Family Law | University College London

Family Law | University College London

09/25/21 LAWS3010: Family Law | University College London LAWS3010: Family Law View Online [1] A Diduck 2014. Autonomy and Vulnerability in family law: the missing link. Vulnerabilities, care and family law. J.A. Wallbank and J. Herring, eds. Routledge. [2] Alison Diduck 1995. The Unmodified Family: The Child Support Act and the Construction of Legal Subjects. Journal of Law and Society. 22, 4 (1995), 527–548. [3] Altman, S. 2003. A Theory of Child Support. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family. 17, 2 (Aug. 2003), 173–210. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/lawfam/17.2.173. [4] Anitha, S. and Gill, A. 2009. Coercion, Consent and the Forced Marriage Debate in the UK. Feminist Legal Studies. 17, 2 (Aug. 2009), 165–184. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10691-009-9119-4. [5] Archard, D. 2003. Children, family, and the state. Ashgate. [6] Archard, D. 2004. Children: Rights and Childhood. Taylor and Francis. 1/59 09/25/21 LAWS3010: Family Law | University College London [7] Auchmuty, R. 2008. What’s so special about marriage? The Impact of Wilkinson v Kitzinger. Child and family law quarterly. 20, 4 (2008). [8] Bainham, A. 2003. Children and their families: contact, rights and welfare. Hart. [9] Bamforth, N. 2007. The benefits of marriage in all but name? Same sex couples and the Civil Partnership Act 2004. Child and family law quarterly. 19, 2 (2007). [10] Barker, N. 2012. Not the marrying kind: a feminist critique of same-sex marriage. Palgrave Macmillan. [11] Barlow, A. 2005. Cohabitation, marriage and the law: social change and legal reform in the 21st century. Hart. [12] Barlow, A. 2005. Cohabitation, marriage and the law: social change and legal reform in the 21st century. Hart. [13] Barlow, A. and James, G. 2004. *Regulating Marriage and Cohabitation in 21st Century Britain. Modern Law Review. 67, 2 (Mar. 2004), 143–176. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.2004.00482.x. [14] 2/59 09/25/21 LAWS3010: Family Law | University College London Bernstein, A. 2006. Marriage proposals: questioning a legal status. New York University Press. [15] Bevan, C. 2013. The role of intention in non-marriage cases post Hudson v Leigh. Child and family law quarterly. 25, 1 (2013). [16] Bowcott, O. 2014. Stalking prosecutions rise by 20% under new law on harassment | Law | The Guardian. The guardian. (Sep. 2014). [17] Bradley, D. 1996. Family law and political culture: (Scandinavian laws in comparative perspective). Sweet & Maxwell. [18] Bridgeman, J. et al. 2011. Regulating family responsibilities. Ashgate. [19] Bridgeman, J. et al. 2008. Responsibility, law and the family. Ashgate. [20] Bridgeman, J. et al. 2008. Responsibility, law and the family. Ashgate. [21] Bryson, C. et al. 2013. Child Maintenance: How Much Should the State Require Fathers to Pay When Families Separate? [22] 3/59 09/25/21 LAWS3010: Family Law | University College London Burton, M. 2009. Civil law remedies for domestic violence: why are applications for non-molestation orders declining? Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law. 31, 2 (Jun. 2009), 109–120. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/09649060903043497. [23] Burton, M. 2009. Failing to Protect: Victims’ Rights and Police Liability. Modern Law Review. 72, 2 (Mar. 2009), 283–295. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.2009.00744.x. [24] Burton, M. 2008. Legal responses to domestic violence. Routledge-Cavendish. [25] Carling, A.H. et al. 2002. Analysing families: morality and rationality in policy and practice. Routledge. [26] Carling, A.H. et al. 2002. Analysing families: morality and rationality in policy and practice. Routledge. [27] Children’s Legal Centre (London, England) 1983. Childright. (1983). [28] Choudhry, S. and Herring, J. 2010. Chapter 9. European human rights and family law. Hart. [29] Choudhry, S. and Herring, J. 2010. European human rights and family law. Hart. 4/59 09/25/21 LAWS3010: Family Law | University College London [30] Cobb, S. 2013. Legal aid reform: its impact on family law. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law. 35, 1 (Mar. 2013), 3–19. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/09649069.2013.774607. [31] Collier, R. 1994. The Campaign Against the Child Support Act: ‘Errant Fathers and Family Men’. Family law. 24, (1994), 384–387. [32] Collier, R. 1999. The Dashing of a ‘Liberal Dream’? - The Information Meeting, The ‘New Family’ and the Limits of Law. Child and family law quarterly. 11, 3 (1999). [33] Collier, R. and Sheldon, S. 2008. Fragmenting fatherhood: a socio-legal study. Hart. [34] Cretney, S. 1996. Divorce Reform in England: Humbug and Hypocrisy or a Smooth Transition? Divorce: where next?. Dartmouth Pub. Co. [35] Cretney, S. 2005. Family Law in the Twentieth Century. Oxford University Press. [36] Cretney, S. 2003. The Family and the Law – Status or Contract? Child and family law quarterly. 15, 4 (2003). [37] Crompton, L. 2004. The Civil Partnerships Bill 2004: The Illusion of Equality. Family law. 34, 12 (2004). 5/59 09/25/21 LAWS3010: Family Law | University College London [38] Deech, R. 2010. Cohabitant. Family law. 40, 1 (2010). [39] Deech, R. 2009. *Divorce – A Disaster? Family law. 39, 11 (2009). [40] Deech, R. 1980. The Case Against the Legal Recognition of Cohabitation. Marriage and cohabitation in contemporary societies: areas of legal, social and ethical change. Butterworths. [41] Deech, R. 2009. What’s a Woman Worth? Family law. 39, 12 (2009). [42] Dempsey, M.M. 2009. Prosecuting domestic violence: a philosophical analysis. Oxford University Press. [43] Dewar, J. 2000. Family law and its discontents. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family. 14, 1 (Apr. 2000), 59–85. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/lawfam/14.1.59. [44] Dewar, J. 1998. The Normal Chaos of Family Law. Modern Law Review. 61, 4 (Jul. 1998), 467–485. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.00157. [45] Dewar, J. 1998. *The Normal Chaos of Family Law. Modern Law Review. 61, 4 (Jul. 1998), 6/59 09/25/21 LAWS3010: Family Law | University College London 467–485. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.00157. [46] Diduck, A. 2011. *Ancillary Relief: Complicating the Search for Principle. Journal of Law and Society. 38, 2 (Jun. 2011), 272–300. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6478.2011.00543.x. [47] Diduck, A. 2003. Chapter 2. Law’s families. LexisNexis. [48] Diduck, A. 2003. *Chapter 3. Law’s families. LexisNexis. [49] Diduck, A. 2003. Chapter 6. Law’s families. LexisNexis. [50] Diduck, A. 2003. Chapter 7. Law’s families. LexisNexis. [51] Diduck, A. 2001. Fairness and Justice for All? The House of Lords in White v. White [2000] 2 F.L.R. 981. Feminist Legal Studies. 9, 2 (2001), 173–183. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016744705288. [52] Diduck, A. 2003. Law’s families. LexisNexis. [53] 7/59 09/25/21 LAWS3010: Family Law | University College London Diduck, A. 2008. Marriage and cohabitation. Ashgate. [54] Diduck, A. 2005. Shifting Familiarity. Current Legal Problems. 58, 1 (Jan. 2005), 235–254. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/clp/58.1.235. [55] Diduck, A. 2011. *What is Family Law For? Current Legal Problems. 64, 1 (Jan. 2011), 287–314. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/clp/cur010. [56] Diduck, A. and Kaganas, F. 2012. *Chapter 1. Family law, gender and the state. Hart. [57] Diduck, A. and Kaganas, F. 2012. Chapter 2. Family law, gender and the state. Hart. [58] Diduck, A. and Kaganas, F. 2012. Chapter 3. Family law, gender and the state. Hart. [59] Diduck, A. and Kaganas, F. 2012. *Chapter 5. Family law, gender and the state. Hart. [60] Diduck, A. and Kaganas, F. 2012. Chapter 7. Family law, gender and the state. Hart. [61] Diduck, A. and Kaganas, F. 2012. Chapter 7. Family law, gender and the state. Hart. 8/59 09/25/21 LAWS3010: Family Law | University College London [62] Diduck, A. and Kaganas, F. 2012. Chapter 12. Family law, gender and the state. Hart. [63] Diduck, A. and Kaganas, F. 2012. Family law, gender and the state. Hart. [64] Diduck, A. and O’Donovan, K. 2006. Feminist perspectives on family law. Routledge-Cavendish. [65] Diduck, A. and Orton, H. 1994. Equality and Support for Spouses. The Modern Law Review. 57, 5 (Sep. 1994), 681–702. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.1994.tb01969.x. [66] Dobash, R.E. and Cavanagh, K. 2000. Changing violent men. Sage Publications. [67] Dobash, R.E. and Dobash, R.P. 2000. The Politics and Policies of Responding to Violence Against Women. Home truths about domestic violence: feminist influences on policy and practice : a reader. Routledge. [68] Dobash, R.P. 2004. Women’s Violence to Men in Intimate Relationships: Working on a Puzzle. British Journal of Criminology. 44, 3 (Apr. 2004), 324–349. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azh026. [69] 9/59 09/25/21 LAWS3010: Family Law | University College London Donzelot, J. and Hurley, R. The policing of families. Hutchinson. [70] Douglas et al, G. 2013. Accommodating Religious Divorce in the Secular State: A Case-Study Analysis. Families: Deviance, Diversity and the Law. Hart Publishing. 185–201. [71] Douglas et al., G. 2011. Contact is not a Commodity to be Bartered for Money. Family law. 41, 5 (2011). [72] Douglas et al., G. 1996. Supporting Children when Parents Separate - A Neglected Family Justice or Mental Health Issue? Child and family law quarterly. 8, 2 (1996). [73] Douglas et al., G. 2012. The Role of Religious Tribunals in Regulating Marriage and Divorce. Child and family law quarterly. 24, 2 (2012), 139–157. [74] Douglas, G. et al. 2009. Cohabitants, Property and the Law: A Study of Injustice. Modern Law Review.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    59 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us