THE REVELATION to ST. JOHN by Roland Kleger Copyright © Roland Kleger, Doctor of Theology, CH-8280 Kreuzlingen (Switzerland) The Revelation to St. John “Behold, he is coming with the clouds, and every eye will see him, and those who pierced him; and all tribes of the earth will wail on account of him. Yes, Amen! I am the Alpha and the Omega, the beginning and the end, says the Lord, the one who is and who was and who is coming, the Almighty.” Rev 1:7-8 by Roland Kleger Kreuzlingen (Switzerland), December 2018 Copyright © Roland Kleger, Doctor of Theology, CH-8280 Kreuzlingen (Switzerland) Revelation.engl.12.2018 © Roland Kleger 3 I. Introductory Questions A. Date of Writing and Author of Revelation 1. General The title of the last book of the Bible is "Revelation of Jesus Christ" (VApoka,luyij VIhsou/ 5 Cristou/). It is a revelation (literally: unveiling), which God the Father gave to his Son to show to his servants (1:1). The title of the book "Revelation by John" is a traditional term used since early times and it served not least to distinguish the book from various other (extracanonical) apocalyptic writings. In the 4th century the word Saint was added to the name of the author: Revelation by Saint John. 10 2. Authorship and time of writing of Revelation In the course of church-history commentators have come up with various hypotheses as to the date of writing as well as to its authorship. a.) Revelation – written by the apostle John during the reign of Nero This would mean between 68 and 70 AD. Based on a statement of Papias (ca. 70-155) 15 commentators of the 19th century (e.g. Westcott and Lightfoot) thought that Nero or his successor Vespasian was responsible for the imprisonment of the apostle John on the isle of Patmos. In this case Revelation would have been written shortly before the destruction of Jerusalem (by Titus in the year 70). This date is also suggested by the well-known early church fathers: Clemens of Alexandria, Origen and Jerome (Hieronymus). They saw in the term "beast" (e.g. chapter 17) an 20 allusion to the emperor Nero. b.) Revelation – written towards the end of the 1st century by a bishop (or elder) with the name of John Certain exegetes doubt that John the apostle was still alive by the end of the 1st century. Denis of Alexandria (disciple of Origen, middle of 3rd century) for instance denied the authorship of 25 Revelation by John the apostle, because he did not believe in a literal millennium.1 He attributed Revelation to another John, who is supposed to be buried in Ephesus next to the apostle John. Eusebius (270-340) and other theologians of the Eastern Church followed this line and spoke of "John the Elder – bishop of Ephesus". 1 Millennium in our context refers to the so-called reign of 1000 years (Rev 20:1ff). Compare: chiliasm – derived from the Greek ci,,lioi (chilioi) = 1000. Revelation.engl.12.2018 © Roland Kleger 4 c.) Revelation – written by the apostle John towards the end of the 1st century Most exegetes of the early church attributed Revelation to the apostle John. Irenaeus (of Lyon) and Justin Martyr relate that the apostle John returned after his imprisonment on the isle of Patmos to 5 Ephesus and that he lived until the reign of Trajan (i.e. until 98). So the writing of Revelation should be placed around 95 AD. Starting at that time there was a fierce persecution of Christians under Domitian (who was therefore called a second Nero). Domitian was a cruel despot. It is told that he had arrested and convicted John to forced labour on the isle of Patmos to intimidate the Christians. During his time in exile John received this last revelation of Christ. The church fathers 10 Tertullian and Hippolytus are regarded as important witnesses to the authorship of Revelation by the apostle John. B. The Canonicity of Revelation Justin Martyr (ca. 160) and Irenaeus of Lyon (ca. 180) confirm the authorship of the book of Revelation by the apostle John quoting repeatedly from the book. Also Clemens of Alexandria (ca. 15 220), Tertullian of Carthage (ca. 210), Hyppolitus (ca. 240) and Origen (ca. 250) attribute Revelation to John the apostle. The Muratori-Canon2 confirms that the church by the end of the 2nd century recognised Revelation to be canonical. In the course of the history of the church the book of Revelation was again and again a cause of contention and a stumbling block for commentators. 20 The protestant reformers also speak of their difficulty with the book of Revelation. Erasmus of Rotterdam, Luther and Zwingli attributed Revelation to post-apostolic times. Joseph Salinger, a critic of the 16th century, congratulated John Calvin that he had written a commentary to every book of the Bible – except Revelation. Liberal Theologians of the 19th century who question the authority of Scripture in the first place, of course criticise Revelation. 25 In the 20th century the book was discredited rather because it is supposed to be swamped with symbols. All this does not change the fact that Revelation is definitely included in the scripture- canon and regarded as belonging to the Holy Scripture by the early Church Fathers. C. Different methods of exposition 30 Distinguishing basically between four methods or approaches of interpretation, it needs to be said that there are further nuances within the different schools of expositors. There are also commentators who advise a combination of approaches. Following is a short summary of the four approaches or methods: 1. The allegorical approach 35 Supporters of this method understand Revelation by John as a kind of allegory, in which the powers of good and evil confront each other. Everything has a spiritual meaning (method of spiritualising). This method is based on a mystic-allegorical understanding of most of the book – everything is 2 This fragment was found in the year 1740 in the library Ambrosiana in Milan by an Italian named Muratori – hence the name Muratori. Revelation.engl.12.2018 © Roland Kleger 5 supposed to have a symbolic meaning. This method was mainly represented by the ‘Alexandrians’ Clemens of Alexandria and Origen as well as Augustine and Hieronymus. Especially since the time of Augustine, followers of this interpretation-method understand the events in the book of Revelation as conflict and fight between the church and evil during the age of the church. The book 5 should encourage believers, who are suffering, to walk faithfully despite temptation and persecution. By this method the strong prophetic character of the book is not recognised. In our opinion this method does not do justice to the centrality of the return of Christ and the events which follow his return. 2. The preterit approach 10 Preterit is derived from the Latin word praeter and means:3 past, bygone. Representatives of this method regard that the events recorded in this book were fulfilled before the time of Emperor Constantine IV.4 This means that these chapters are understood to refer to the conflict between the Christian Church and the Roman Empire. Followers of this ‘historic’ method of interpretation fell again and again into the mistake of identifying the apocalyptic persons and events with rulers and 15 happenings of their times. The eschatological character of the book – sometimes with exception of chapters 21–22 – was totally neglected. For supporters of this method the book of Revelation has, for readers of later centuries, only didactical value. 3. The present or historic continuous approach Representatives of this method of interpretation think that Revelation encompasses the whole span 20 of church-history from the time of John the Baptist until the end of the world. The method was applied by Wycliffe, Luther and Bengel. They refer many passages (e.g. concerning the great prostitute of Babylon) to Rome and the papacy. The same objections against the two previous positions apply also against this method. With this method events and persons of Revelation are not brought into relation with the rest of biblical prophecy, which results in the fact that details of many 25 passages are not sufficiently explained. 4. The futuristic approach Most representatives of this method regard the words of Rev 1:19 as the “key of interpretation” and envision the events of chapters 4–22 as still lying in the future. They cite passages from the Old (e.g. Isa 2; 4; 24−27; 35; 60−62; Eze 37−48; Zec 14 etc.) and the New (Mat 24; Mar 13; Luk 21; 30 Rom 11:25-27; 2Th 2 etc.) Testament. Using the hermeneutic principle of literal interpretation with this book one reaches the conclusion that the events related in chapters 4–22 are still in the future. The followers of this method agree that chapters 4–22 refer to the end times, whereas in relation to understanding and exegesis of the seven churches in chapters 2–3, three positions need to be differentiated.5 35 1. The seven letters describe only the condition of the seven listed 1st century local churches of the time of John the apostle. 3 In grammar the so-called Preterit refers to the past tense. 4 The first Christian emperor; one speaks of the Christian or constantinian change or turning at 312 AD, when the church became more and more a state-church. 5 We do not deny that in the book of Revelation many words and pictures have a symbolic meaning: e.g. the seven horns symbolise omnipotence, the seven eyes symbolise omniscience, the lamb symbolises Christ, whereas in contrast the beast symbolises the Antichrist.