![Arxiv:1902.03413V3 [Math.FA]](https://data.docslib.org/img/3a60ab92a6e30910dab9bd827208bcff-1.webp)
<p>DECAY AND SMOOTHNESS FOR EIGENFUNCTIONS OF <br>LOCALIZATION OPERATORS </p><p>FEDERICO BASTIANONI, ELENA CORDERO, AND FABIO NICOLA <br>Abstract. We study decay and smoothness properties for eigenfunctions of com- </p><p>ϕ<sub style="top: 0.08em;">1</sub>,ϕ<sub style="top: 0.08em;">2 </sub></p><p></p><ul style="display: flex;"><li style="flex:1">pact localization operators A<sup style="top: -0.3em;">ϕ</sup><sub style="top: 0.2em;">a </sub><sup style="top: -0.3em;">,ϕ </sup>. Operators A<sub style="top: 0.2em;">a </sub></li><li style="flex:1">with symbols a in the wide </li></ul><p></p><p></p><ul style="display: flex;"><li style="flex:1">1</li><li style="flex:1">2</li></ul><p></p><p>modulation space M<sup style="top: -0.3em;">p,∞ </sup>(containing the Lebesgue space L<sup style="top: -0.3em;">p</sup>), p < ∞, and windows ϕ<sub style="top: 0.12em;">1</sub>, ϕ<sub style="top: 0.12em;">2 </sub>in the Schwartz class S are known to be compact. We show that their L<sup style="top: -0.3em;">2</sup>-eigenfuctions with non-zero eigenvalues are indeed highly compressed onto a few Gabor atoms. Similarly, for symbols a in the weighted modulation spaces M<sub style="top: 0.21em;">v</sub><sup style="top: -0.3em;">∞</sup><sub style="top: 0.21em;">⊗1</sub>(R<sup style="top: -0.3em;">2d</sup>), s > 0 (subspaces of M<sup style="top: -0.3em;">p,∞</sup>(R<sup style="top: -0.3em;">2d</sup>), p > 2d/s) the L<sup style="top: -0.3em;">2</sup>-eigenfunctions of </p><p>s</p><p>A<sup style="top: -0.31em;">ϕ</sup><sub style="top: 0.2em;">a </sub><sup style="top: -0.31em;">,ϕ </sup>are actually Schwartz functions. </p><p></p><ul style="display: flex;"><li style="flex:1">1</li><li style="flex:1">2</li></ul><p></p><p>An important role is played by quasi-Banach Wiener amalgam and modulation spaces. As a tool, new convolution relations for modulation spaces and multiplication relations for Wiener amalgam spaces in the quasi-Banach setting are exhibited. </p><p>1. Introduction </p><p>The study of localization operators has a long-standing tradition. They have become popular with the papers by I. Daubechies [11, 12] and from then widely investigated by several authors in different fields of mathematics: from signal analysis to pseudodifferential calculus, see, for instance [1, 2, 4, 7, 8, 10, 31, 32, 43, 44, 45, 50]. In quantum mechanics they were already known as Anty-Wick operators, cf. [41] and the references therein. <br>Localization operators can be introduced via the time-frequency representation known as short-time Fourier transform (STFT). Let us though introduce the STFT. Recall first the modulation M<sub style="top: 0.15em;">ω </sub>and translation T<sub style="top: 0.15em;">x </sub>operators of a function f on R<sup style="top: -0.36em;">d</sup>: </p><p>M<sub style="top: 0.15em;">ω</sub>f (t) = e<sup style="top: -0.41em;">2πitω</sup>f (t) , <br>T<sub style="top: 0.15em;">x</sub>f (t) = f (t − x) , ω, x ∈ R<sup style="top: -0.41em;">d</sup>. </p><p>For z = (z<sub style="top: 0.15em;">1</sub>, z<sub style="top: 0.15em;">2</sub>) ∈ R<sup style="top: -0.36em;">2d</sup>, we define the time-frequency shift π(z) = M<sub style="top: 0.15em;">z </sub>T<sub style="top: 0.15em;">z </sub>. Fix ϕ ∈ </p><p></p><ul style="display: flex;"><li style="flex:1">2</li><li style="flex:1">1</li></ul><p></p><p>S(R<sup style="top: -0.36em;">d</sup>) \ {0}. We define the short-time Fourier transform of a tempered distribution f ∈ S<sup style="top: -0.37em;">′</sup>(R<sup style="top: -0.37em;">d</sup>) as </p><p>Z</p><p>(1) V<sub style="top: 0.15em;">ϕ</sub>f(x, ω) = hf, π(x, ω)ϕi = F(fT<sub style="top: 0.15em;">x</sub>ϕ)(ω) = </p><p>f(y) ϕ(y − x) e<sup style="top: -0.41em;">−2πiyω </sup>dy. </p><p>R<sup style="top: -0.19em;">d </sup></p><p>2010 Mathematics Subject Classification. 47G30; 35S05; 46E35; 47B10. </p><p>Key words and phrases. Time-frequency analysis, localization operators, short-time Fourier transform, quasi-Banach spaces, modulation spaces, Wiener amalgam spaces. </p><p>1</p><ul style="display: flex;"><li style="flex:1">2</li><li style="flex:1">FEDERICO BASTIANONI, ELENA CORDERO, AND FABIO NICOLA </li></ul><p></p><p>The localization operator A<sub style="top: 0.25em;">a</sub><sup style="top: -0.36em;">ϕ ,ϕ </sup>with symbol a and windows ϕ<sub style="top: 0.15em;">1</sub>, ϕ<sub style="top: 0.15em;">2 </sub>is formally </p><p></p><ul style="display: flex;"><li style="flex:1">1</li><li style="flex:1">2</li></ul><p></p><p>defined to be </p><p>Z</p><p>A<sup style="top: -0.41em;">ϕ</sup><sub style="top: 0.24em;">a </sub><sup style="top: -0.41em;">,ϕ </sup>f(t) = </p><p>a(x, ω)V<sub style="top: 0.15em;">ϕ </sub>f(x, ω)M<sub style="top: 0.15em;">ω</sub>T<sub style="top: 0.15em;">x</sub>ϕ<sub style="top: 0.15em;">2</sub>(t) dxdω. </p><p></p><ul style="display: flex;"><li style="flex:1">1</li><li style="flex:1">2</li></ul><p></p><p>(2) </p><p>1</p><p>R<sup style="top: -0.19em;">2d </sup></p><p>2</p><p>If ϕ<sub style="top: 0.15em;">1</sub>(t) = ϕ<sub style="top: 0.15em;">2</sub>(t) = e<sup style="top: -0.36em;">−πt </sup>, then A<sub style="top: 0.15em;">a </sub>= A<sub style="top: 0.25em;">a</sub><sup style="top: -0.36em;">ϕ ,ϕ </sup>is the classical Anti-Wick operator and </p><p></p><ul style="display: flex;"><li style="flex:1">1</li><li style="flex:1">2</li></ul><p></p><p>the mapping a → A<sup style="top: -0.36em;">ϕ</sup><sub style="top: 0.25em;">a </sub><sup style="top: -0.36em;">,ϕ </sup>is a quantization rule in quantum mechanics [5, 13, 41, 50]. <br>If one considers a symbol a in the Lebesgue space L<sup style="top: -0.36em;">q</sup>(R<sup style="top: -0.36em;">2d</sup>) (1 ≤ q < ∞) and window functions ϕ<sub style="top: 0.15em;">1</sub>, ϕ<sub style="top: 0.15em;">2 </sub>in the Feichtinger’s algebra M<sup style="top: -0.36em;">1</sup>(R<sup style="top: -0.36em;">d</sup>) (see below for its defi- </p><p></p><ul style="display: flex;"><li style="flex:1">1</li><li style="flex:1">2</li></ul><p></p><p>nition) then the localization operator A<sup style="top: -0.36em;">ϕ</sup><sub style="top: 0.25em;">a </sub><sup style="top: -0.36em;">,ϕ </sup>is in the Schatten class S<sub style="top: 0.15em;">q </sub>(see [7]). This </p><p></p><ul style="display: flex;"><li style="flex:1">1</li><li style="flex:1">2</li></ul><p></p><p>implies, in particular, that A<sub style="top: 0.24em;">a</sub><sup style="top: -0.37em;">ϕ ,ϕ </sup>is a bounded and compact operator on L<sup style="top: -0.37em;">2</sup>(R<sup style="top: -0.37em;">d</sup>). <br>Sharp results for localization operators on modulation spaces (Banach case) were obtained in [9], thus concluding the open issues related to this problem. <br>The focus of this paper is the properties of eigenfunctions of compact localization operators. </p><p></p><ul style="display: flex;"><li style="flex:1">1</li><li style="flex:1">2</li></ul><p></p><p>The study of eigenvalues and eigenfunctions of a restrict class of compact and self-adjoint localization operators, namely of the type A<sup style="top: -0.36em;">ϕ</sup><sub style="top: 0.25em;">χ</sub><sup style="top: -0.36em;">,ϕ</sup>, where Ω is a compact </p><p>Ω</p><p>domain of the time-frequency plane and the window ϕ is in L<sup style="top: -0.36em;">2</sup>(R<sup style="top: -0.36em;">d</sup>), was pursued in [1, 2, 3]. The focus of the previous papers, as well as new recent contributions [37, 38], extending the previous results, is the asymptotic behavior of the eigenvalues, depending on the domain Ω. <br>Our perspective is different: properties of eigenfunctions of a compact localization operator having a general symbol a, without any requirement on the geometry of the function a. In particular, the symbol a does not need to have a compact support. Besides, the related localization operator A<sup style="top: -0.36em;">ϕ</sup><sub style="top: 0.24em;">a </sub><sup style="top: -0.36em;">,ϕ </sup>is not necessarily a self-adjoint op- </p><p></p><ul style="display: flex;"><li style="flex:1">1</li><li style="flex:1">2</li></ul><p></p><p>erator (but A<sup style="top: -0.36em;">ϕ</sup><sub style="top: 0.25em;">a </sub><sup style="top: -0.36em;">,ϕ </sup>is compact). It is easy to check that the adjoint of a localization </p><p></p><ul style="display: flex;"><li style="flex:1">1</li><li style="flex:1">2</li></ul><p></p><p>operator is given by </p><p>ϕ<sub style="top: 0.09em;">2</sub>,ϕ<sub style="top: 0.09em;">1 </sub></p><p>∗</p><p></p><ul style="display: flex;"><li style="flex:1">(A<sup style="top: -0.41em;">ϕ</sup><sub style="top: 0.25em;">a </sub><sup style="top: -0.41em;">,ϕ </sup>) = A<sub style="top: 0.2em;">a¯ </sub></li><li style="flex:1">;</li></ul><p></p><p></p><ul style="display: flex;"><li style="flex:1">1</li><li style="flex:1">2</li></ul><p></p><p>hence the self-adjointness property forces the choice ϕ<sub style="top: 0.15em;">1 </sub>= ϕ<sub style="top: 0.15em;">2 </sub>and the symbol a real valued, as for the case A<sup style="top: -0.36em;">ϕ</sup><sub style="top: 0.24em;">χ</sub><sup style="top: -0.36em;">,ϕ </sup>mentioned above. Our framework can allow the use of </p><p>Ω</p><p>two different windows ϕ<sub style="top: 0.15em;">1 </sub>and ϕ<sub style="top: 0.15em;">2 </sub>to analyze and synthesize the signal f, respectively. Moreover, the symbol a can be a complex-valued function. <br>For a linear bounded operator T on L<sup style="top: -0.37em;">2</sup>(R<sup style="top: -0.37em;">d</sup>) we denote by σ(T) the spectrum of <br>T, that is the set {λ ∈ C : T − λI is not invertible}; in particular, the set σ<sub style="top: 0.15em;">P </sub>(T) denotes the point spectrum of T, that is </p><p>σ<sub style="top: 0.15em;">P </sub>(T) = {λ ∈ C : ∃ a non-zero f ∈ L<sup style="top: -0.41em;">2</sup>(R<sup style="top: -0.41em;">d</sup>) such that Tf = λf}. <br>Under our assumptions, the operator A<sup style="top: -0.37em;">ϕ</sup><sub style="top: 0.24em;">a </sub><sup style="top: -0.37em;">,ϕ </sup>is a compact mapping on L<sup style="top: -0.37em;">2</sup>(R<sup style="top: -0.37em;">d</sup>). </p><p></p><ul style="display: flex;"><li style="flex:1">1</li><li style="flex:1">2</li></ul><p></p><p>Hence, the spectral theory for compact operators yields </p><p>ϕ<sub style="top: 0.09em;">1</sub>,ϕ<sub style="top: 0.09em;">2 </sub></p><p>σ(A<sup style="top: -0.41em;">ϕ</sup><sub style="top: 0.25em;">a </sub><sup style="top: -0.41em;">,ϕ </sup>) \ {0} = σ<sub style="top: 0.15em;">P </sub>(A<sub style="top: 0.25em;">a </sub>) \ {0}. </p><p></p><ul style="display: flex;"><li style="flex:1">1</li><li style="flex:1">2</li></ul><p></p><p></p><ul style="display: flex;"><li style="flex:1">DECAY AND SMOOTHNESS FOR EIGENFUNCTIONS OF LOCALIZATION OPERATORS </li><li style="flex:1">3</li></ul><p></p><p>For sake of completeness, we recall that for compact operators on L<sup style="top: -0.36em;">2</sup>(R<sup style="top: -0.36em;">d</sup>) the number </p><p>ϕ<sub style="top: 0.09em;">1</sub>,ϕ<sub style="top: 0.09em;">2 </sub></p><p>zero is always in the spectrum σ(A<sup style="top: -0.36em;">ϕ</sup><sub style="top: 0.25em;">a </sub><sup style="top: -0.36em;">,ϕ </sup>) and that the point spectrum σ<sub style="top: 0.15em;">P </sub>(A<sub style="top: 0.25em;">a </sub>)\{0} </p><p></p><ul style="display: flex;"><li style="flex:1">1</li><li style="flex:1">2</li></ul><p></p><p>(possibly empty) is at most countably infinite. <br>A function f ∈ L<sup style="top: -0.36em;">2</sup>(R<sup style="top: -0.36em;">d</sup>) is called an eigenfunction of the operator A<sup style="top: -0.36em;">ϕ</sup><sub style="top: 0.24em;">a </sub><sup style="top: -0.36em;">,ϕ </sup>if there </p><p></p><ul style="display: flex;"><li style="flex:1">1</li><li style="flex:1">2</li></ul><p></p><p>exists λ ∈ C such that </p><p>A<sup style="top: -0.41em;">ϕ</sup><sub style="top: 0.25em;">a </sub><sup style="top: -0.41em;">,ϕ </sup>f = λf. </p><p></p><ul style="display: flex;"><li style="flex:1">1</li><li style="flex:1">2</li></ul><p></p><p>We are interested in the properties of eigenfuctions of A<sup style="top: -0.36em;">ϕ</sup><sub style="top: 0.24em;">a </sub><sup style="top: -0.36em;">,ϕ </sup>related to eigenvalues </p><p></p><ul style="display: flex;"><li style="flex:1">1</li><li style="flex:1">2</li></ul><p></p><p>ϕ<sub style="top: 0.09em;">1</sub>,ϕ<sub style="top: 0.09em;">2 </sub></p><p>λ ∈ σ<sub style="top: 0.15em;">P </sub>(A<sup style="top: -0.36em;">ϕ</sup><sub style="top: 0.25em;">a </sub><sup style="top: -0.36em;">,ϕ </sup>) \ {0}, whenever σ<sub style="top: 0.15em;">P </sub>(A<sub style="top: 0.25em;">a </sub>) \ {0} = ∅. </p><p></p><ul style="display: flex;"><li style="flex:1">1</li><li style="flex:1">2</li></ul><p></p><p>To chase our goal, the new idea is to use properties of quasi-Banach modulation and Wiener amalgam spaces. Some of these issues are investigated for the first time in this paper. <br>To give a flavour of these results, we recall the definition of modulation spaces <br>(un-weighted case: for the more general cases see below). <br>Fix a non-zero window function g ∈ S(R<sup style="top: -0.36em;">d</sup>) and p, q ∈ (0, ∞). The modulation space M<sup style="top: -0.36em;">p,q</sup>(R<sup style="top: -0.36em;">d</sup>) consists of all tempered distributions f ∈ S<sup style="top: -0.36em;">′</sup>(R<sup style="top: -0.36em;">d</sup>) such that </p><p>1</p><p>q</p><p></p><ul style="display: flex;"><li style="flex:1"> </li><li style="flex:1">!</li></ul><p></p><p>qp</p><p>ꢀZ<br>ꢁ<br>Z</p><p>p,q </p><p>kfk<sub style="top: 0.15em;">M </sub>:= kV<sub style="top: 0.15em;">g</sub>fk<sub style="top: 0.15em;">L </sub></p><p>p,q </p><p>=</p><p></p><ul style="display: flex;"><li style="flex:1">|V<sub style="top: 0.15em;">g</sub>f(x, ω)|<sup style="top: -0.42em;">p</sup>dx dω </li><li style="flex:1">< ∞ </li></ul><p></p><p></p><ul style="display: flex;"><li style="flex:1">R<sup style="top: -0.18em;">d </sup></li><li style="flex:1">R<sup style="top: -0.18em;">d </sup></li></ul><p></p><p>p,q </p><p>(with natural modifications when p = ∞ or q = ∞). For p, q ≥ 1 the function k·k<sub style="top: 0.15em;">M </sub>is a norm, and different window functions g ∈ S(R<sup style="top: -0.37em;">d</sup>) yield equivalent norms, thus the same space. Modulation spaces M<sup style="top: -0.36em;">p,q</sup>(R<sup style="top: -0.36em;">d</sup>), p, q ≥ 1, are Banach spaces, invented by H. Feichtinger in [19], where many of their properties were already investigated. <br>We remark that a localization operator A<sup style="top: -0.36em;">ϕ</sup><sub style="top: 0.25em;">a </sub><sup style="top: -0.36em;">,ϕ </sup>with symbol a ∈ M<sup style="top: -0.36em;">p,∞</sup>, 1 ≤ p < ∞, and windows ϕ<sub style="top: 0.15em;">1</sub>, ϕ<sub style="top: 0.15em;">2 </sub>∈ M<sup style="top: -0.37em;">1</sup>, belongs to the Schatten class S<sub style="top: 0.15em;">p </sub>and, in particular, it is a compact operator on L<sup style="top: -0.36em;">2</sup>(R<sup style="top: -0.36em;">d</sup>) (cf. [8, Theorem 1]). </p><p></p><ul style="display: flex;"><li style="flex:1">1</li><li style="flex:1">2</li></ul><p></p><p>The (quasi-)Banach space M<sup style="top: -0.36em;">p,q</sup>, p, q > 0, were first introduced and studied by Y.V. <br>Galperin and S. Samarah in [27], see the next section for more details. Roughly speaking, the mapping f is in M<sup style="top: -0.36em;">p,q</sup>(R<sup style="top: -0.36em;">d</sup>) if it locally behaves like a function in FL<sup style="top: -0.36em;">q</sup>(R<sup style="top: -0.36em;">d</sup>) and “decays” as a function in L<sup style="top: -0.36em;">p</sup>(R<sup style="top: -0.36em;">d</sup>) at infinity. <br>In this paper we extend convolution relations for Banach modulation spaces exhibited in [7, 47] to the quasi-Banach ones, see Proposition 3.1 below. This result seems remarkable by itself. <br>Such convolution relations will be crucial for our main result, that can be simplified as follows (cf. Theorem 3.7). </p><p>Theorem 1.1. Consider a symbol a ∈ M<sup style="top: -0.36em;">p,∞</sup>(R<sup style="top: -0.36em;">2d</sup>), 0 < p < ∞, non-zero windows </p><p>ϕ<sub style="top: 0.09em;">1</sub>,ϕ<sub style="top: 0.09em;">2 </sub></p><p>ϕ<sub style="top: 0.15em;">1</sub>, ϕ<sub style="top: 0.15em;">2 </sub>∈ S(R<sup style="top: -0.36em;">d</sup>) and assume that σ<sub style="top: 0.15em;">P </sub>(A<sub style="top: 0.24em;">a</sub><sup style="top: -0.36em;">ϕ ,ϕ </sup>) \ {0} = ∅. If λ ∈ σ<sub style="top: 0.15em;">P </sub>(A<sub style="top: 0.24em;">a </sub>) \ {0}, any </p><p></p><ul style="display: flex;"><li style="flex:1">1</li><li style="flex:1">2</li></ul><p></p><p>T</p><p>eigenfunction f ∈ L<sup style="top: -0.36em;">2</sup>(R<sup style="top: -0.36em;">d</sup>) with eigenvalue λ satisfies f ∈ <sub style="top: 0.29em;">γ>0 </sub>M<sup style="top: -0.36em;">γ</sup>(R<sup style="top: -0.36em;">d</sup>). </p><p>Roughly speaking, this means that L<sup style="top: -0.36em;">2 </sup>eigenfunctions of such compact localization operators reveal to be extremely well-localized. To make this statement more precise, </p><p></p><ul style="display: flex;"><li style="flex:1">4</li><li style="flex:1">FEDERICO BASTIANONI, ELENA CORDERO, AND FABIO NICOLA </li></ul><p></p><p>we use Gabor frames. Let Λ = αZ<sup style="top: -0.36em;">d </sup>× βZ<sup style="top: -0.36em;">d </sup>be a lattice of the time-frequency plane. The set of time-frequency shifts G(g, Λ) = {π(λ)g : λ ∈ Λ}, for a non-zero g ∈ L<sup style="top: -0.37em;">2</sup>(R<sup style="top: -0.37em;">d</sup>), is called a Gabor system. The set G(g, Λ) is a Gabor frame if there exist constants A, B > 0 such that </p><p>X</p><p>(3) </p><p>Akfk<sup style="top: -0.41em;">2</sup><sub style="top: 0.25em;">2 </sub>≤ </p><p></p><ul style="display: flex;"><li style="flex:1">|hf, π(λ)gi|<sup style="top: -0.41em;">2 </sup>≤ Bkfk<sub style="top: 0.25em;">2</sub><sup style="top: -0.41em;">2</sup>, </li><li style="flex:1">∀f ∈ L<sup style="top: -0.41em;">2</sup>(R<sup style="top: -0.41em;">d</sup>). </li></ul><p></p><p>λ∈Λ </p><p>If A = B = 1 we call G(g, Λ) a Parseval Gabor frame. In this case (3) reduces to </p><p>X</p><p>(4) </p><p>kfk<sup style="top: -0.41em;">2</sup><sub style="top: 0.25em;">2 </sub>= </p><p>|hf, π(λ)gi|<sup style="top: -0.41em;">2</sup>, ∀f ∈ L<sup style="top: -0.41em;">2</sup>(R<sup style="top: -0.41em;">d</sup>). </p><p>λ∈Λ </p><p>From now on we restrict to Parseval Gabor frames. If the eigenfunction f above </p><p>T</p><p>satisfies f ∈ <sub style="top: 0.29em;">γ>0 </sub>M<sup style="top: -0.36em;">γ</sup>(R<sup style="top: -0.36em;">d</sup>), then f is highly compressed onto a few Gabor atoms π(λ)g. Indeed, for N ∈ N<sub style="top: 0.15em;">+</sub>, its N-term approximation error σ<sub style="top: 0.15em;">N </sub>(f) presents superpolynomial decay. We define </p><p>X</p><p></p><ul style="display: flex;"><li style="flex:1">(5) </li><li style="flex:1">Σ<sub style="top: 0.15em;">N </sub>= {p = </li></ul><p></p><p>c<sub style="top: 0.15em;">k,n</sub>π(αk, βn)g : c<sub style="top: 0.15em;">k,n </sub>∈ C, F ⊂ Z<sup style="top: -0.42em;">d </sup>× Z<sup style="top: -0.42em;">d</sup>, card F ≤ N} </p><p>k,n∈F </p><p>(the set of all linear combinations of Gabor atoms consisting of at most N terms). Note that Σ<sub style="top: 0.15em;">N </sub>is not a linear subspace since Σ<sub style="top: 0.15em;">N </sub>+ Σ<sub style="top: 0.15em;">N </sub>= Σ<sub style="top: 0.15em;">2N </sub>. That is why the approximation of a signal f by elements of Σ<sub style="top: 0.15em;">N </sub>is often referred to as non-linear approximation. Given a function f ∈ L<sup style="top: -0.36em;">2</sup>(R<sup style="top: -0.36em;">d</sup>), the N-term approximation error in L<sup style="top: -0.36em;">2</sup>(R<sup style="top: -0.36em;">d</sup>) is </p><p></p><ul style="display: flex;"><li style="flex:1">(6) </li><li style="flex:1">σ<sub style="top: 0.15em;">N </sub>(f) = inf kf − pk<sub style="top: 0.15em;">2</sub>. </li></ul><p></p><p>p∈Σ<sub style="top: 0.11em;">N </sub></p><p>That is, σ<sub style="top: 0.15em;">N </sub>(f) is the error produced when f is approximated optimally by a linear combination of N Gabor atoms. </p><p>T</p><p>We shall show in Corollary 3.9 that, if f ∈ <sub style="top: 0.29em;">γ>0 </sub>M<sup style="top: -0.36em;">γ</sup>(R<sup style="top: -0.36em;">d</sup>), then, for every r > 0 there exists a positive constant C = C(r, f) such that </p><p>σ<sub style="top: 0.15em;">N </sub>(f) ≤ CN<sup style="top: -0.41em;">−r</sup>. </p><p>Since σ<sub style="top: 0.15em;">N </sub>(f) is the error produced when f is approximated optimally by a linear combination of N Gabor atoms, the decay above shows the high compression of the eigenfunction onto such atoms, cf. [28, Subsection 12.4]. <br>Another main result (Theorem 3.10) states, in the same spirit, that for symbols in the weighted modulation space M<sub style="top: 0.25em;">v</sub><sup style="top: -0.36em;">∞</sup><sub style="top: 0.25em;">⊗1</sub>(R<sup style="top: -0.36em;">2d</sup>), s > 0 (see Definition 2.4 below), the cor- </p><p>s</p><p>d</p><p>responding L<sup style="top: -0.37em;">2 </sup>eigenfunctions of A<sup style="top: -0.37em;">ϕ</sup><sub style="top: 0.24em;">a </sub><sup style="top: -0.37em;">,ϕ </sup>, with eigenvalues λ = 0, are actually in S(R ). </p><p></p><ul style="display: flex;"><li style="flex:1">1</li><li style="flex:1">2</li></ul><p></p><p>Also in this case A<sub style="top: 0.24em;">a</sub><sup style="top: -0.36em;">ϕ ,ϕ </sup>is a compact operator, since M<sub style="top: 0.24em;">v ⊗1</sub>(R<sup style="top: -0.36em;">2d</sup>) ⊂ M<sup style="top: -0.36em;">p,∞</sup>(R<sup style="top: -0.36em;">2d</sup>), when- </p><p>∞</p><p>s</p><p></p><ul style="display: flex;"><li style="flex:1">1</li><li style="flex:1">2</li></ul><p></p><p>ever p > 2d/s, cf. the subsequent Remark 2.7. These symbol classes include certain measures and the result applies, in particular, to Gabor multipliers (see e.g., [21]). We leave the precise statement to the interested reader. </p><p></p><ul style="display: flex;"><li style="flex:1">DECAY AND SMOOTHNESS FOR EIGENFUNCTIONS OF LOCALIZATION OPERATORS </li><li style="flex:1">5</li></ul><p></p><p>In short, the paper is organized as follows. Section 2 is devoted to the function spaces involved in our study. In particular, we show new multiplication relations for Wiener amalgam spaces in the quasi-Banach setting and we prove convolution relations for quasi-Banach modulation spaces. Section 3 represents the core of the paper. We first exhibit continuity results for Weyl operators on modulation spaces (involving the quasi-Banach setting), cf. Theorem 3.3. Then we study the eigenfunctions’ properties for Weyl operators (Propositions 3.5 and 3.6 below). Next we show our main result on the eigenfunctions’ regularity and smoothness of localization operators: Theorem 3.7 and related consequences in terms of the N-term approximation (Proposition 3.8 and Corollary 3.9). The last Section 4 is devoted to the study of eigenfunctions of localization operators with symbols in the weighted Lebesgue spaces L<sup style="top: -0.37em;">q</sup><sub style="top: 0.24em;">m</sub>(R<sup style="top: -0.37em;">d</sup>), 1 ≤ q < ∞. This section suggests a wider study of the topic for localization operators on groups [50]. We shall pursue this issue in a subsequent paper. Let us conclude this introduction with another open problem, that can be worth investigating. Namely, in this paper we work with compact localization operators having symbols a in M<sub style="top: 0.24em;">v</sub><sup style="top: -0.37em;">∞</sup><sub style="top: 0.24em;">⊗1</sub>(R<sup style="top: -0.37em;">2d</sup>), for s > 0, or in the larger space M<sup style="top: -0.37em;">p,∞</sup>(R<sup style="top: -0.37em;">2d</sup>), </p>
Details
-
File Typepdf
-
Upload Time-
-
Content LanguagesEnglish
-
Upload UserAnonymous/Not logged-in
-
File Pages22 Page
-
File Size-