Value of Imaging After Urinary Tract Infections. Arch Dis Child: First Published As 10.1136/Adc.72.5.393 on 1 May 1995

Value of Imaging After Urinary Tract Infections. Arch Dis Child: First Published As 10.1136/Adc.72.5.393 on 1 May 1995

Archives ofDisease in Childhood 1995; 72: 393-396 393 Long term follow up to determine the prognostic value of imaging after urinary tract infections. Arch Dis Child: first published as 10.1136/adc.72.5.393 on 1 May 1995. Downloaded from Part 2: scarring Malcolm V Merrick, Alp Notghi, Nicholas Chalmers, A Graham Wilkinson, William S Uttley Abstract under 1 year or in children of any age Long term follow up of children with with bladder control. No case can be urinary tract infections, in whom imag- made for any abbreviated schedule of ing investigations were performed at pre- investigation. These risk factors should sentation, has been used to identify be taken into account when designing fol- features that distinguish those at greatest low up protocols. risk of progressive renal damage. No (Arch Dis Child 1995; 72: 393-396) single investigation at presentation was Keywords: vesicoureteric reflux, urinary tract able to predict subsequent deterioration infection, reflux nephropathy. but, by employing a combination of imaging investigations, it was possible to separate groups with high or low proba- bility of progressive damage. In the low Imaging investigations are generally con- risk group the incidence of progressive sidered essential in the work-up of children damage was 02% (95% confidence with a urinary tract infection.' Much attention interval (CI) 0 to 1.3%). The combination has been paid to the importance of identifying of both scarring and reflux at vesicoureteric reflux before the development of presentation, or one only of these but overt reflux nephropathy, although the limita- accompanied by subsequent documented tions of the tests that detect reflux have been urinary tract infection, was associated largely overlooked.2 The prognostic impor- with a 17-fold (95% CI 2*5 to 118) increase tance of focal scarring is widely recognised; in the relative risk of progressive renal that of diffuse scarring is less well docu- damage compared with children without mented.3 However, most series with follow up these features. have employed intravenous urography, even The recommended combination of though scintigraphy (with technetium (99mTc) investigations at presentation for girls of labelled dimercaptosuccinic acid (99mTc- http://adc.bmj.com/ any age and boys over 1 year is ultra- DMSA) in particular) has been shown to sound and dimercaptosuccinic acid detect cortical loss in substantially more (DMSA) scintigraphy in all, to detect kidneys than does excretion urography.48 The both scarring and significant structural value of ultrasound is more contentious.9 10 abnormalities, renography in children There are surprisingly few data on the clinical Department ofNuclear with dilatation of any part of the urinary consequences of the abnormalities found Medicine, Western General Hospitals tract on ultrasound, to distinguish dilata- either by scintigraphy or ultrasound and their on October 1, 2021 by guest. Protected copyright. NHS Trust, Edinburgh tion from obstruction, and an isotope ability to predict long term deterioration while, EH4 2XU voiding study in all who have acquired in the absence of any control group, the effec- M V Merrick A Notghi bladder control. This gives the best tiveness of treatment in preventing progressive N Chalmers separation between those at high and damage is unproved." A recent small retro- A G Wilkinson those at low risk of progressive damage spective study (which placed more reliance on Department of Child with least radiation dose and lowest rate intravenous urography than scintigraphy) did Life and Health, Royal of instrumentation. Micturating cysto- find an association between the severity of Hospital for Sick urethrography (MCU) should be scarring and the duration of the delay before Children, Edinburgh Sick Children's NHS restricted to girls who have not acquired initiating appropriate treatment, although it is Trust bladder control, unless there is reason to not clear whether this referred to scarring at W S Uttley suspect a significant structural abnor- presentation or on follow up.12 It is thus not Correspondence to: mality such as urethral valves. A single surprising that a survey of paediatricians in the Dr Merrick. non-febrile urinary tract infection that UK showed 'an alarming conflict of practice' Accepted 23 January 1995 responds promptly to treatment is not a concluding 'the management of urinary tract justification for performing MCU in boys infection is in disarray' and 'any investigative protocol should be realistic and suitable for Table 1 Correlation between ultrasound and DMSA in individual kidneys; examinations implementation by all paediatricians'.'3 We performed within one month ofeach other report here follow up of children referred to a single centre (providing a regional service) for Initial ultrasound Cortical loss on imaging after a urinary tract infection, in order normal initial ultrasound Total to determine whether the identification of scar- Initial DMSA normal 1570 48 1618 at in Cortical loss on initial DMSA 162 286 448 ring presentation either isolation, when Total considered in association with reflux or with 1732 334 2066 subsequent episodes of urinary infection, can 394 Merrick, Notghi, Chalmers, Wilkinson, Uttley Table 2 Associations between the presence or absence ofscarring at presentation and the subsequent appearance or progression ofscarring Girls Boys < I year - I year < I year - I year Arch Dis Child: first published as 10.1136/adc.72.5.393 on 1 May 1995. Downloaded from No of kidneys in which no scarring was observed at presentation 372 5492 510 1973 No (%) in which scars developed 13 (3 5) 56 (0-98) 6 (1-2) 19 (0 96) No of kidneys with scarring at presentation 56 697 63 247 No (%) in which scarring progressed 8 (14-3) 59 (8 5) 10 (15 9) 16 (6 5) Difference in % (95% CI) 10-8 (1-4 to 20-1) 7-5 (5 4 to 9 6) 14-7 (5-6 to 23 8) 5-5 (2-4 to 8 6) Table 3 Associations between urinary tract infections (UTIsJ after the index event and appearance or progression of scaring Girls Boys < I year 3 I year < I year 3 I year No having no further UTIs 93 1790 107 607 No (%) with progressive scarring 2 (2 2) 42 (2 4) 3 (2 8) 14 (2 3) No having further UTIs 59 607 91 204 No (%) with progressive scarring 8 (13-6) 38 (6 3) 5 (5-5) 8 (3-9) Difference in % (95% CI) 11-4 (2-2 to 20 6) 3-9 (1-9 to 6 0) 2-7 (-2-9 to 8 3) 1-6 (- 1-3 to 4 5) stratify the risk of progressive renal damage. loss in 162 of 448 kidneys in which a scinti- The role of vesicoureteric reflux in the same graphic abnormality was reported (36-2%) population is analysed in more detail in the while scintigraphy was considered normal in companion paper.2 48 (14.3%) of those with ultrasound reports of cortical thinning or loss. Abnormalities other than cortical loss, most commonly a dilated Patients and methods renal pelvis, were detected by ultrasound in The population studied has been described 176 children (209 kidneys, 7.3% ofthe kidneys previously.2 The reports of imaging and examined by ultrasound). Significant dilation other investigations were obtained from case of the renal pelvis was also identified in all by notes, which were also the source of data on renography, which was in any case necessary to urine cultures, surgical procedures, other differentiate between physiological dilatation, investigations, and follow up. The depart- obstruction, and reflux. Progressive renal mental records contained duplicate contem- damage occurred more commonly in children poraneous hard copies of all nuclear medicine who had cortical loss at presentation (table 2), reports and examinations, which were and in girls in whom further urinary tract infec- reviewed. Renal scintigraphy (99mTc-DMSA, tions were confirmed (table 3) but not boys. 1 MBq/kg, four projections 1-5 to 3 hours The number of older children in each year is after injection) was performed as described small and it was not possible to identify a cut http://adc.bmj.com/ previously, not earlier than 24 hours after off beyond which there was no risk of damage labelled diethylenetriaminepenta-acetic acid to previously normal kidneys. Only one boy (99mTc-DTPA) renography or three hours and four girls who presented over the age of after labelled mercaptoacetyl triglycine 8 years with unscarred kidneys subsequently (99mTc-MAG3, 0-2 MBq/kg) renography and developed cortical loss, but these were when children were in remission.4 14 A scattered throughout the range. Multiple scoring system was used to assess the extent recurrences of infection were frequent in both on October 1, 2021 by guest. Protected copyright. of scarring and the magnitude of any sexes. There was a tendency for a greater changes.15 Ultrasound was performed by one number of subsequent infections to be associ- of three experienced paediatric radiologists or ated with progression of scarring in girls under trainees under their supervision. Statistical 1 year, but no such association was evident in analysis was performed using the confidence older girls or in boys. interval analysis (CIA) package.16 Any single abnormal feature occurred in only about a half of the children who suffered progressive renal damage (table 4). Consider- Results ing each test separately, the probability of There was concordance between ultrasound progressive damage was highest in girls under and scintigraphy for the presence or absence 1 year with vesicoureteric reflux (odds ratio of scarring in 89-8% of the 2066 children 14-5) and in boys under 1 with scarring at in whom the results of both were available presentation (odds ratio 13-5) (table 5). The (table 1). Ultrasound failed to detect cortical documentation of either reflux or further urinary tract infection did not confer a signifi- Table 4 Associations with subsequent deterioration cantly increased risk of progressive damage in under nor did No No (%) Relative risk boys 1, further urinary tract in group detenorating (95% CI) infection in boys over 1 year.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    4 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us