1 Chapter 1: What do you know about being a Psychopath? “Do I have any stories about what it’s like to conduct a forensic interview with a diagnosable psychopath?” I repeated the question asked by one of my inquisitive students in class. A thoughtful smile played on my face as I remembered my long and intense career of interviewing those referred to me for forensic evaluations. “Well, something like that would take quite a bit of our class time to tell.” I glanced around the room only to be greeted with looks of disappointment. These undergraduate forensic psychology students obviously didn’t care if I wasted an entire class period ranting about a time I interviewed a psychopath. I mean, they were interested and I supposed that that was the main reason most of those students were there in my forensic classes anyway—they wanted to learn about the media popular psychopath. I suppose I was feeling particularly generous and decided, “What harm could it do to indulge the student’s request?” In my mind, the story I was about to tell would weed out the men from the boys, as the old saying goes. Every year I get students coming into my class expecting a fabulous job (as portrayed by the media) when in fact, being a Forensic Psychologist is rather boring most days. On a rare occasion, I’ll get a real wacko. However, on this one particular case, I was assigned to the most monstrous human being I’d ever met in my life—and probably ever will meet. I guess telling the story would deter the weak of heart from Forensic Psychology, which I suppose is a part of my job as a college professor teaching Forensic Psychology. Forensic 2 Psychology is no walk in the park and these kids needed to be warned of the possibility that you could have to confront real intraspecies predators like the psychopath in the story I was about to relay. However, before I began my story, I had to inform the students what it meant to be a clinically diagnosable psychopath—not what the shows they watched on television portrayed a psychopath to be. “Alright then. But you’re going to get a little lesson about what it really means to have Psychopathy first. It is not what the media today portrays it to be. We’ll go into a deeper discussion of it in the actual Psychopathy chapter; but for now, I want to give you a basic understanding, because it is of a such utter importance to know at this very second.” I glanced around the room, looking at the smirking faces staring at me with eagerness, and grinned. “Psychopathy, as we use it today, isn’t a stand-alone diagnosis. It is diagnosed as a very specific form of Antisocial Personality Disorder. ASPD is typically diagnosed in individuals who consistently commit criminal acts, behave irresponsibly and have an overall disregard for authority or the law. Psychopaths take these symptoms to a new level. In 1941, a man by the name of Hervey Cleckley published a book named Mask of Sanity. In this book, he described what he believed to be a true Psychopath. Some of the additional criteria included superficial charm and good intelligence, insincerity, lack of remorse, antisocial tendencies, incapacity for love, and a poor affect. Not only do Psychopaths possess all of these qualities, but they also possess physiological deficits in the brain. They have reduced fear and anxiety activation in the associated brain centers, such as the Amygdala. They also have more activation in the occipital lobes, or the vision centers, as opposed to the frontal lobe. What does this mean? Well, it means that they see information such as facial expressions, the affect, of another person without 3 problems, but that is as far as it goes. They cannot process facial expressions the way that we can. They cannot physiologically comprehend fear or anxiety, among many other emotions you and I easily can comprehend. Their prefrontal cortex, the decision-making center of the brain, is significantly smaller in size than a non-Psychopath’s. All of these abnormalities, plus others I haven’t mentioned, make judging a Psychopath in court very hard. We hear every day that Psychopaths are evil and heartless creatures and that they deserve to be put on death row regardless of what criminal act they have done. While yes, they are typically heartless and cold, the true question is: can they help it? The answer, as I see it, is ‘no’. That is why I find it difficult to view Psychopaths in such a simplistically negative way. Psychopaths have the inability to feel love and empathy just like an anxious person has the inability to see reason and have comfort in day to day life. Psychopathy is characterized by not only cognitive malfunctions, but by physiological ones as well. We would not say to an anxious person, ‘Stop being so anxious. You’re so annoying. What you’re feeling isn’t real.’ No, what they are feeling is real. Their physiological functions are in a state of disorder and they cannot help the way that they feel. They are sick people who need our love and compassion regardless of their illness. Same goes for Psychopaths, in my opinion. They are sick people who truly cannot help the way they behave and deserve sympathy just the same as any other person—even if we think they are ‘evil.’” The entirety of my class looked at me as if I was insane. However, as I stood there in silence, I could see a select few students having a lightbulb moment and was I extraordinarily pleased. “I’ll get off my soap box now.” I laughed. “With all that being said, I think I can begin the retelling of my experience interviewing a real Psychopath.” Ooo’s and ahh’s swept through the crowd sarcastically. 4 “Oh, shut up. You know you’re jealous.” I replied, rolling my eyes and smiling. Chapter 2: Getting Some Information “What’s his name?” I asked the attorney who had contacted me about this particular case. “Peter,” she said. “Peter Vetrov.” “Russian?” “Well, the heritage is there, sure. But he’s a Brooklyn native.” “Alright. Well, what’s the story on this guy?” The attorney laughed. “He’s definitely an interesting character. Has no remorse whatsoever— about anything.” “What did he do?” There was a lull in the conversation after I asked this question. The attorney finally spoke softly. “He brutally tortured then murdered two men and a woman. He desecrated the woman’s corpse by raping her, then taking her brain and frying it up for dinner paired with a fine wine. It was horrible, Dr. Campbell. He’s the real life Hannibal Lecter—only worse in my opinion. He has no capacity for love and understanding. Even Hannibal could do that. I was appointed by the State to counsel him, only I don’t know how good of a job I can do because he proudly admits everything he did and doesn’t feel sorry for a lick of it. My only option at this point is to try for a sentence mitigation on the account of his mental state. That’s why I contacted you. I believe there is actually something wrong with him. Mentally. Healthy people don’t just go around 5 bashing people’s face in with a sledge hammer on a horrific medieval torture device and commit cannibalism and feel nothing emotionally besides, ‘Oh, what a wonder dinner I’ve made!’” I rubbed my temples. “Yes, I realize that, but you know if I don’t classify your client as having a legitimate psychological disorder, I’m obligated to stay true to that in my written report. You can ask a different psychologist to do another evaluation and report afterwards, but you’ll more than likely get the same general consensus that I give you. I’ll give you my professional, unbiased opinion on the matter.” “From what I’ve heard, you are very good at helping win cases like these. The best around, some say. I trust your opinion; but if you can’t help me, this very sick man will fry. He needs to be understood, not killed.” “What have been the court proceedings thus far?” I asked. “Just because of the nature of the crimes, a competency trial was held in the beginning. But of course, he was able to correctly answer the questions we typically ask in this situation. He’s not an ignorant man; he’s exceptionally smart. The trial came and went with hardly any components brought to the attention of the court that could prove his innocence. I mean, come on. He proudly exclaims he did it from the roof tops, his finger prints are all over the crime scene, and there are multiple eye-witnesses that saw him leaving a bar with all three of the victims the night they were killed. He’s obviously guilty. My only conscience problem is the fact that he couldn’t help but do it. It’s just the way he is. Guilt has been determined, so there is nothing I can do to help him there. But, the sentencing trial is going to be coming up soon and I can’t let the prosecution take his life, which I know they are going to try to do. That’s why I ask you to come into this matter—to help me uncover some mitigating mental health factor that may lessen this otherwise 6 inevitable sentencing.