Updates in Stress-Ulcer Prophylaxis

Updates in Stress-Ulcer Prophylaxis

Updatesinstressulcerprophylaxis:Is pharmacologicalprophylaxisstill indicated? RubenDVillanueva,PharmD,BCCCP,BCPS Assistantprofessor OUHSCCollegeofPharmacy TraumaCriticalCare OUMedicalCenter 1 Objectives • Describethepathophysiologyofstressulcersinthe criticallyill • Compareandcontrastcurrentstressulcerprophylaxis guidelines • Summarizerecentstressulcerprophylaxisliterature • Determineacriticallyillpatient’scontinuedneedfor stressulcerprophylaxis 2 PreͲAssessment Whichofthefollowingistheunderlying pathophysiologicprocessforthedevelopmentof stressulcersintheICU? A) GIhypoperfusion B) Anemia C) Infection D) Hypersecretorystate 3 PreͲAssessment Whichofthefollowinghavebeenidentifiedas independentriskfactorsforclinicallysignificantGI bleedingincriticallyillpatients? A) Sepsis B) Organtransplant C) Vasoactivemedications D) Renalreplacementtherapy 4 PreͲAssessment Enteralnutritionwouldlikelybesufficientforstress ulcerprophylaxisinwhichofthefollowingscenarios? A) Mechanicallyventilatedpatientreceivingcontinuous renalreplacementtherapywithanINRof2 B) MechanicallyventilatedTBIpatientwithout intracranialhypertension C) Mechanicallyventilatedpatientwithchronicliverand kidneydisease,COPD,andreceivingcorticosteroids D) Mechanicallyventilatedpatientwithoutsignificant PMH,anINRof1.9andonnorepinephrine 5 UpdatesinStressUlcerProphylaxis BACKGROUND& PATHOPHYSIOLOGY 6 Background Stressrelatedmucosaldisease/damage • Representsacontinuum – Asymptomaticsuperficiallesionstoclinically significantGIbleeding(GIB) • Twotypes – Stressrelatedinjury – Stressulcers • EXCLUDES varicealbleeding StressͲrelatedmucosalbleeding Occult Guaiac+stoolorgastricaspirate Overt(OB) Hematemesis,hematochezia,melena Overt PLUS ш1:hemodynamicchanges, Clinically important(CIB) needfortransfusion,orљHgb >2g/dL Plummer,M.P.,Blaser,A.R.,&Deane,A.M.(2014).Stressulceration:prevalence,pathology,andassociationwithadverseoutcomes.CriticalCare,18(213),1Ͳ 7. 7 Fennerty,M.B.(2002).Pathophysiologyoftheuppergastrointestinaltractinthecriticallyillpatient:Rationaleforthetherapeutic benefitsofacidsuppression.Crit CareMed,30,S351Ͳ S355. Background • Asymptomaticerosions(± occultbleeding) – Presentin74– 100%ofcriticallyillpatientswithin 72hrofadmissiontotheICUbasedonendoscopy • Ratesofovertandclinicallysignificantbleeding depend onhowtheyaredefined – 2001reviewsuggestedovertbleedingmayoccurin ч25%ofICUpatientswithout pharmacologicSUP – OverallincidenceofclinicallysignificantGIbleeding inpatientswithout pharmacologicSUPreportedat3 –4%(0.6–5%) Mutlu,G.M.,Mutlu,E.A.,&Factor,P.(2001).GIComplicationsinPatientsReceivingMechanicalVentilation.CHEST,119,1222Ͳ 1241. Bardou,M.,Quenot,J.ͲP.,&Barkun,A.(2015).StressͲrelatedmucosaldiseaseinthecriticallyillpatient.NatRevGastroenterolHepatol,12,98Ͳ 107. 8 Plummer,M.P.,Blaser,A.R.,&Deane,A.M.(2014).Stressulceration:prevalence,pathology,andassociationwithadverseoutcomes.CriticalCare,18(213),1Ͳ 7. Background • Mortalityvariesbypopulation – Combineddatafrom2largestudies(N=1666)of mechanicallyventilated(MV)patients • Attributablemortalityofclinicallyimportantbleeding – Absoluterisk:20– 30% – Relativerisk(vsnoCIB):1–4 – Recentdatareported55.6%90dmortalityw/CIB Cook,D.J.,Griffith,L.,Walter,S.D.,Guyatt,G.,O'Meade,M.,Heyland,D.,...Tryba,M.(2001).Theattributablemortalityandlengthof intesive careunitstayofclinicallyimportantgastrointestinalbleedingincriticallyillpatients.CriticalCare,5(6),368Ͳ 375. Krag,M.,Perner,A.,Wetterslev,J.,Wise,M.P.,Borthwick,M.,Bendel,S.,...Moller,M.H.(2015).Prevalenceandoutcomeof 9 gastrointestinalbleedinganduseofacidsuppressantsina cutelyilladultintensivecarepatients.IntensiveCareMed,41,833Ͳ 845. CriticalIllness јCatecholamines Shockorhypotension Hypovolemia Proinflammatory јVasoconstricƟon љCardiacoutput cytokinerelease Splanchnicandmucosal hypoperfusion љHCO3Ͳ љMucosal љProtecƟve AcidbackͲ љGIMoƟlity secretion bloodflow factors,i.e HSP,TFF diffusion Mucosalvulnerability GastricAcid AcuteStressulcer 10 Bardou,M.,Quenot,J.ͲP.,&Barkun,A.(2015).StressͲrelatedmucosaldiseaseinthecriticallyillpatient.NatRevGastroenterolHepatol,12,98Ͳ 107. Buendgens,L.,Koch,A.,&Tacke,F.(2016).PreventionofstressͲulcerbleedingattheintensivescareunit:Risksandbenefitsofstressulcerprophylaxis.WorldJCrit CareMed,5(1),57Ͳ 64. UpdatesinStressUlcerProphylaxis RISKFACTORS 11 Cooketal.,1994†RiskFactors Simonsetal.,1995‡ Cooketal.,1999† Design MCPro Obs (N=2252) Retro. (N=33,637) MCPro. RCT (N =1077) 60±15 years PolyͲtrauma Age~60years 17.4% onMV No breakdownof 100%onMV Patients 48.5%CVsurgery patientcharacteristics ~60%medical TBI <2.5% *EXCLUDEDburns* ~22% emerg.surgery Encouraged withholding SUP Ranitidine:50mg IVq8hr Intervent. EXCEPT certainpopulations N/A 30%onSUP Sucral:1gmPTq6hr CIB†:OBplusш1within24hrofonsetofbleeding(absentothercauses):љSBPby GIB 20mmHg,љSBPby10mmHgorјHRby20bpmonsiƫngup;љHgb >2mg/dL plus Definitions tx;tx afterwhichtheHgb didnotrisebynumberunitstx’d minus2mg/dL Severestressulcer/CIB‡:perforationorbleedingrequiring>2unitstx’d Mortality (%)9vs.48.5 Mortalityw/GIB(%)25 ICUmort.(%)19vs. 36.7 GIB:14±12dafteradmit GIB: 51%ч14dpinjury GIB:median3d(2–6d) Outcomes OB:4.4% o 40%onH2RA OB:4.7%(3.4–6) o 95%CI3.6–5.6% o 25%diet/gastricEN CIB:2.6%(1.6–3.6) CIB:1.5% OB:0.17% o 95%CI1–2.1% CIB:0.05% MC=multicenter,Pro=prospective,Obs = observational,Retro=restrospecitve,RCT=randomizedcontrolledtrial MV=mechanicalventliation,CV=cardiovascular,TBI=traumaticbraininjury GIB=gastrointestinalbleeding,OB=overtbleedingCIB=clinicallyimportantbleeding,tx =transfusion *Certainpopulations=TBI,burnsw/BSA>30%,pepticulcerdisease/gastritis,recentGIB,organtransplant 12 Cooketal.,1994* Simonsetal.,1995** Cooketal.,1999* Risk Univariate (OR) Univariate (RR) Univariate (RR) Factor HOTN: 25.5 TS<13:2.8 Plt <50k2.58(1.19– 5.57) CIB* Sepsis:7.3 AISheadш3:4.8 MaxScr 1.19(1.06– 1.35) GIB** Liverfx:6.5 >2Organfxs:49.4 MaxMOD1.11(1.01– 1.21) Renalfx:4.6 ARDS:30.1 RenalMOD1.46(1.14– 1.87) Steroids:3.7 RenalFx:45.5 Hep MOD1.37(1.04– 1.77) Organtxp:3.6 Liverfx:51 EN0.35(0.16– 0.76) Anticoagulationtx:3.3 Coagulopathy:26.3 H2RA0.4(0.18– 0.89) EN 3.8 Pneumonia20.4 Otherinfx:23.3 Independent (OR) Independent (OR) Independent (RR) MV>48hr:15.6 SCI:2 MaxScr 1.16(1.02– 1.32) Coagulopathy:4.3 ISSш16:12.6 EN0.3(0.13– 0.67) Age>55:2.5 H2RA0.39(0.17– 0.83) ***31/33CIBshadMV orcoagulopathy*** ***ALLCIBhadeitherSCI ***22/33CIBsw/BOTH orISSш16*** MVand coagulopathy*** ***2/1405CIBswith neither MVor coagulopathy*** OR=oddsratio,RR=relativerisk,txp =transplant,ACanticoagulant, tx =treatment,TS=truama score,AIS=abbreviatedinjuryseverity score,fx =failure,SCI=spinalcord,ISS=injuryseverityscore,MOD=multiͲorgandysfunctionscore,EN=enteralnutrition 13 RiskFactors:2000s All(N=1034) ͲCIB(N=1007) +CIB(N=27) P Age, median(IQR) 63(48– 74) 64(48– 75) 58(51– 70) 0.324 SOFA,median(IQR) 6(4–8)6(4Ͳ 8) 10(7– 14) <0.001 Coagulop.atadmission, % 12.4 11.7 37 <0.001 Comorbidities, % 0 48.5 4.9 18.5 0.002 1 30.8 30.6 37 0.474 2 14.8 14.6 22.2 0.271 3 4.4 4.1 18.5 0.005 >3 1.5 1.5 3.7 0.347 Mechanical vent.atadmit, % 52.6 52.3 63 0.275 Circ.supportatadmit, % 45.4 44.7 70.3 0.009 RRTatadmit,% 6.8 6.1 33.3 <0.001 90dMortality, % 26.2 25.4 55.6 ͲͲ CIB=clinicallyimportantbleedingSOFA=sequential organfailureassessment,Coagulop =coagulopathy,Circ support= circulatorysupport(i.e.vasoactiveinfusions),RRT=renalreplacementtherapy Krag,M.,Perner,A.,Wetterslev,J.,Wise,M.P.,Borthwick,M.,Bendel,S.,...Moller,M.H.(2015).Prevalenceandoutcomeofgastrointestinalbleedingand 14 useofacidsuppressantsina cutelyilladultintensivecarepatients.IntensiveCareMed,41,833Ͳ 845. RiskFactors:2000s GI bleedingdefinitionsandoutcomes Overtbleeding(OB) ш1ofthefollowing:hematemesis,coffeeground emesis,melena,hematochezia,bloodyNGaspirate Clinicallyimportant bleeding(CIB) OBplusш1ofthefollowingwithin24hrofOBinthe absenceofothercauses:љBPш20mmHg,start of/increaseofvasopressorш20%,љHgb ш2g/dl,tx ш2unitsRBCsduringbleedingepisode Acid suppressiontherapy atadmit, % 37.4 PPI,%55 H2RA,%17 MediantimetoGIB,days(IQR) 3 (2–6) 21/27ч7dofICUstay OB(49/1034),%(95%CI) 4.7 (3.4Ͳ6) CIB(27/1034),%(95%CI) 2.6(1.6 – 3.6) ***27/27 receivingSUPattimeofbleed*** 90dMortality andCIB,% 55.6 OR 3.72(1.72 – 8.04) aOR 1.70 (0.68– 4.28) 15 Krag,M.,Perner,A.,Wetterslev,J.,Wise,M.P.,Borthwick,M.,Bendel,S.,...Moller,M.H.(2015).Prevalenceandoutcomeofgastrointestinalbleedinganduseofacidsuppressantsina cutelyilladultintensivecarepatients.IntensiveCareMed,41,833Ͳ 845. RiskFactors:2000s Risk Factor OvertGIBleeding(aOR) CIB(aOR) SOFAscore 1.25(1.14–1.38) 1.37(1.22–1.55) Chronicliverdisease* 4.51(2.30–8.86) 7.64(3.32–17.57) Coagulopathy* 2.64(1.29–5.42) 4.22(1.74–10.23) Comorbidities 1 2.51(1.15–5.46) 3.03(1.00–9.25) 2 2.80(1.17–6.67) 3.22(0.94–11.06) 3 4.24(1.31–13.72) 9.29(2.34–36.94) >3 6.66(1.22–36.42) 8.88(2.74–28.80) Circulatorysupport atadmit 2.39(1.28–4.46) 2.31(0.99–5.40) RRTatadmit* 7.35(3.47–15.56) 6.89(2.72–17.48) Coagulopathy. atadmit* 4.06(2.16–7.63) 5.21(2.29–11.83) Anticoagulation at admit 2.25(1.04–4.87) 1.77(0.61–5.16) Acidsuppressivetx atadmit 2.95(1.44–6.06) 3.61(1.28–10.20 *Previously identifiedriskfactorsforCIB 16 Krag,M.,Perner,A.,Wetterslev,J.,Wise,M.P.,Borthwick,M.,Bendel,S.,...Moller,M.H.(2015).Prevalenceandoutcomeofgastrointestinalbleedinganduseofacid suppressantsina cutelyilladultintensivecarepatients.IntensiveCareMed,41,833Ͳ 845. RiskFactors:EnteralNutrition • ProtectiveeffectsofEN – Increasedsplanchnicbloodflow – ENformulationsaretypicallyalkaline • IndependentpredictoroflowerratesofCIBin MVpatientsonSUP:0.3(0.13– 0.67) Cook,D.,Heyland,D.,Griffith,L.,Cook,R.,Marshall,J.C.,&Pagliarello,J.(1999).Rikfactorsforclinicallyimportantuppergastrointestinalbleedinginpatients

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    26 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us