Legal, Judicial and Interpretive Trends in Pakistan

Legal, Judicial and Interpretive Trends in Pakistan

Development of Khul‘ Law: Legal, Judicial and Interpretive Trends in Pakistan Muhammad Ahmad Munir Institute of Islamic Studies McGill University, Montreal January 2020 A thesis submitted to McGill University in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy © Muhammad Ahmad Munir, 2020 Table of Contents Abstract ................................................................................................................................................. 5 Résumé .................................................................................................................................................. 5 Acknowledgements .............................................................................................................................. 6 A Note on Transliteration .................................................................................................................... 8 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 9 The Question of Ijtihād: What is Ijtihād? ........................................................................................... 13 The ‘Ulamā’ in Modern Pakistan......................................................................................................... 19 Literature Review ................................................................................................................................. 26 Chapter Outline .................................................................................................................................... 30 Chapter 1 ............................................................................................................................................. 34 Khulʻ in Sunni Classical Islamic Law .................................................................................................. 34 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 34 The Meaning and Usage of Khul‘ as a Technical Juristic Term ...................................................... 37 An Overview of Divorce in Islamic Law ............................................................................................ 39 On the legal differences between a khulʿ and ṭalāq ʿalā al-mal (divorce with payment) ............ 41 Is the Khulʻ a Divorce (ṭalāq) or an Annulment (faskh)? .................................................................. 43 The Khulʻ as Annulment (Faskh): Legal Interpretations of the Qur’ān and Ḥadīth ...................... 45 The Khulʻ as Divorce: The Majority (Jumhūr) Juristic Opinion ....................................................... 47 Consent of the Husband in Khulʻ in Pre-Modern Islamic Law ....................................................... 49 Prophetic Treatment of Khulʻ: The Case of Thābit b. Qays ............................................................ 54 Did the Prophet Himself Pronounce Khul‘ to Ḥabība on Behalf of Thābit? ................................. 59 Khulʻ in the Four Sunni Schools of Law ............................................................................................. 61 Khulʻ in Shāfi‘ī Jurisprudence ............................................................................................................. 64 The Ḥanbalī School and Khulʻ ............................................................................................................. 66 Resumption of the Conjugal Relationship during the Waiting Period from Khulʻ ..................... 68 Khulʻ in the Mālikī School ................................................................................................................... 69 Conclusion ............................................................................................................................................. 74 Chapter 2 ............................................................................................................................................. 76 Background and History of Khul‘ Law in Anglo-Muhammadan Law including and up to the Dissolution of Muslim Marriages Act, 1939 ...................................................................................... 76 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 76 Judicial Affirmation of Ḥanafī Principles in the Nineteenth Century – Khul‘ Case of 1861 ...... 78 Implementation of Sharī‘a by Way of English Lawyers .................................................................. 79 Situating Apostasy in Muslim Personal Law Reforms in the Twentieth-Century India ........... 87 2 Admitting the Muslim right to implement sharī‘a in personal matters: Muslim Personal Law (Shari‘at) Application Act, 1937 .......................................................................................................... 99 Recognition of Fault-Based Divorce: The Dissolution of Muslim Marriages Act of 1939 ........ 101 Conclusions ......................................................................................................................................... 105 Chapter 3 ........................................................................................................................................... 107 The Pakistani Judicial System and Legislative Intervention in Khul‘ ........................................... 107 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................ 107 Post-Partition Pakistani Family Law Courts .................................................................................. 109 Dissolution of Marriage Procedure ................................................................................................. 115 Bringing Khul‘ Into the Law: The Family Law Amendments of 2002 .......................................... 123 The Law Commission, the Executive, and the Dilemma of 2002 ................................................. 125 Unraveling the Dilemma and Cementing Another: The Amendments of 2015 ........................ 127 Conclusion ........................................................................................................................................... 131 Chapter 4 ........................................................................................................................................... 134 Development of Khul‘ Law in Pakistan – Analytical Study of Case Law on Khul‘ Adjudicated by the Superior Judiciary between 1956 and 2001 – Judicial Ijtihād, Interpretive Approach, and Self-Claimed Juristic Authority of the Courts ................................................................................ 134 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................ 134 No Divorce on Grounds of “Incompatibility of Temperaments:” 1945 and 1952 ..................... 135 Mst. Sayeeda Khanam v. Muhammad Sami, Lahore (1952) .................................................................. 136 Khul‘ for “Not Being Able to Observe the Limits of God:” 1959 ................................................... 143 A Full Departure from Ḥanafī Discourse: 1967 .............................................................................. 152 Musst. Khurshid Bibi v. Babu Muhammad Amin (1967) – Khanpur (Rahim Yar Khan) ....................... 154 Conclusion: The Role and Authority of Judicial Ijtihād................................................................. 159 Chapter 5 ........................................................................................................................................... 163 Question of Legitimacy and Moral Dilemma – ‘Ulamā’’s Refusal to Accept Khul‘ Legislation - Fatāwā Nullifying Court Issued Khul‘ Decrees ................................................................................ 163 Mufti Muhammad Taqi Usmani ....................................................................................................... 165 Usmani’s Critique of the Judiciary: The Reality of Khul‘ in Islam ................................................ 166 Qur’ān ................................................................................................................................................... 169 Ḥadīth and the Precedent of the Rightly-Guided Caliphs ............................................................ 176 Juristic Discourse (fiqh) ..................................................................................................................... 177 Usmani’s Intervention ...................................................................................................................... 181 The Moral Dilemma and the Role of the ‘Ulamā’: Critiquing Usmani ......................................... 183 Charting Another Path: The Opinion of the Ahl-i Ḥadīth .............................................................. 187 3 Early Opinions .................................................................................................................................... 188 Contemporary Opinions .................................................................................................................... 190 Middle Voices within the Ḥanafī Tradition ..................................................................................

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    225 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us