Is Toxoplasma Gondii a Threat to the Conservation of Free-Ranging Australian Marsupial Populations?

Is Toxoplasma Gondii a Threat to the Conservation of Free-Ranging Australian Marsupial Populations?

International Journal for Parasitology: Parasites and Wildlife 5 (2016) 17e27 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect International Journal for Parasitology: Parasites and Wildlife journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ijppaw Review Is Toxoplasma gondii a threat to the conservation of free-ranging Australian marsupial populations? * Alison E. Hillman , Alan J. Lymbery, R.C. Andrew Thompson Murdoch University, 90 South St, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia article info abstract Article history: It has often been asserted that Australian marsupial species are particularly susceptible to Toxoplasma Received 4 June 2015 gondii infection and to clinical toxoplasmosis following infection. This implicates T. gondii as a potential Received in revised form threat to marsupial population viability, and contrasts to what is known of T. gondii in populations of 7 December 2015 several other host species. We reviewed the literature, and found a lack of scientifically robust evidence Accepted 11 December 2015 addressing the occurrence of T. gondii infection in free-ranging populations of Australian marsupial species, and the impacts of the infection on population health. Key limitations included a lack of studies Keywords: in free-ranging marsupial populations, study findings susceptible to substantial chance influences, and Toxoplasma gondii fi fi Toxoplasmosis selection, misclassi cation and confounding biases. The lack of scienti cally robust data available on this Marsupials topic indicates that assertions that free-ranging populations of Australian marsupials are particularly Conservation susceptible to T. gondii infection and to toxoplasmosis are premature. The threat of T. gondii to the Epidemiology viability of free-ranging marsupial populations should therefore be regarded, at this stage, as a hypothesis. © 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of Australian Society for Parasitology. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). Contents 1. Introduction . ................................................. 18 1.1. T. gondii infection and toxoplasmosis . ........................18 2. The frequency of T. gondii infection in free-ranging populations of Australian marsupial species . ..................... 18 2.1. T. gondii infection surveys undertaken in free-ranging populations of Australian marsupials . ..................18 2.2. T. gondii exposure in free-ranging populations of Australian marsupials . ........................20 2.3. Prevalence data as a measure of infection frequency . ........................23 3. Frequency of disease (toxoplasmosis) following infection with T. gondii in free-ranging populations of Australian marsupial species . ..... 23 3.1. Longitudinal studies of the population effects of T. gondii in free-ranging populations of Australian marsupials . .............23 3.2. Using morbidity and mortality linked to toxoplasmosis in captive populations of Australian marsupials as an indicator of outcomes of T. gondii infection in free-ranging populations . ........................24 3.3. Using morbidity and mortality in experimental T. gondii infection of Australian marsupial species under laboratory conditions as an indicator of outcomes of T. gondii infection in free-ranging populations . .. ........................24 4. Other possible effects of T. gondii infection that may impact population viability of free-ranging Australian marsupials . .......... 25 4.1. Possible influences of T. gondii on behaviour . .. ........................25 4.2. Possible effects of T. gondii infection on marsupial reproductive success . ........................25 5. Conclusions . ................................................. 26 Acknowledgements . ........................26 Supplementary data . ................................................. 26 References................................................................. ................................ ........................26 * Corresponding author. E-mail address: [email protected] (A.E. Hillman). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijppaw.2015.12.002 2213-2244/© 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of Australian Society for Parasitology. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). 18 A.E. Hillman et al. / International Journal for Parasitology: Parasites and Wildlife 5 (2016) 17e27 1. Introduction Leisenfeld, 2004; Dubey, 2010). Clinical toxoplasmosis may follow recent infection with T. gondii, or result from a recrudescent Australia is home to a vast array of endemic marsupial species infection. Recrudescence may be prompted by concurrent illness or (superorder Australidelphia). Of an estimated 162 marsupial spe- immunosuppression (Ruskin and Remington, 1976; Lappin et al., cies present at the time of European settlement in 1788, twelve 1991; Nicoll et al., 1997). species have since become extinct, and many others have suffered major contraction of distribution and substantial to severe popu- 2. The frequency of T. gondii infection in free-ranging lation declines (Burbidge et al., 2009; Woinarski, 2015). The pri- populations of Australian marsupial species mary drivers of these population declines are believed to be: anthropogenic habitat loss; habitat destruction associated with No published studies have investigated the incidence of T. gondii climate change, altered fire regimes and the introduction of infection in free-ranging populations of Australian marsupials. competing feral herbivores and exotic weeds; and predation by Surveys have provided estimates infection prevalence and sero- introduced feral species, particularly foxes and cats (Dickman, prevalence; these are summarised in Tables 1 and 2. 1996; Fisher et al., 2003; McKenzie et al., 2007; Burbidge et al., 2009; Saunders et al., 2010). 2.1. T. gondii infection surveys undertaken in free-ranging There has also been speculation as to the role of introduced populations of Australian marsupials infectious disease as a contributing factor to population declines of Australian marsupials (e.g., Freeland, 1994; Abbott, 2006; Evidence of T. gondii infection has been found in free-ranging Thompson et al., 2010). populations of red kangaroos (Macropus rufus), western grey kan- Toxoplasma gondii is arguably the most broadly implicated garoos (Macropus fuliginosus), common wallaroos (Marcopus infection, prompted by reports of cases and outbreaks of severe robustus) and woylies (Bettongia penicillata)(Table 1). Findings clinical toxoplasmosis in captive populations of Australian marsu- suggestive of T. gondii infection (histopathological evidence pial species. From the published literature, there appears to be a without confirmatory testing) have also been obtained from long perception that marsupials are particularly susceptible to infection nosed bandicoots (Perameles nasuta), eastern barred bandicoots with T. gondii and to toxoplasmosis. For example: “Toxoplasmosis is (Perameles gunnii), southern brown bandicoots/quenda (Isoodon a significant disease of Australian marsupials commonly causing obesulus), quokka (Setonix brachyurus), brushtail possums (Tricho- mortality in captive and free-ranging populations…” (Obendorf surus vulpecula), brush-tailed phascogales (Phascogale tapoatafa) et al., 1996); “Marsupials and new world monkeys are among the and kowari (Dasyuroides byrnie)(Table 1). most susceptible animals for developing the clinical disease toxo- Prevalence estimates are all limited by uncertain external val- plasmosis…” (Skerratt et al., 1997); “Australasian marsupials, idity, due to the use of non-proportionate sampling methods: especially wallabies, are highly susceptible to acute toxoplasmosis” reliance on culled animals, road kill or trapping for study subjects (Dubey and Crutchley, 2008); “Australian marsupials are among the may entail selection bias. Surveys involving small sample sizes have most susceptible hosts for T. gondii…” (Parameswaran et al., low power to detect the presence of infection, and marked 2009a); “T. gondii is of concern for Australian native marsupials, imprecision in prevalence estimates (Table 1). Commonly, the use which appear to be particularly susceptible to acute infection…” of diagnostic methodology that is known to be of poor sensitivity (Hollings et al., 2013). and/or specificity in other species leaves apparent prevalence es- In this paper, we examine the evidence for these assertions. We timates subject to misclassification bias. review estimates of the frequency of T. gondii infection in free- In marsupial surveys, the most commonly used diagnostic test ranging Australian marsupial populations, and then review the has been the mouse bioassay, which lacks sensitivity (Piergili extent to which the infections are associated with acute toxoplas- Fioretti, 2004). None of the surveys of Australian marsupials us- mosis or with other effects (such as behavioural changes and ing this technique also used immunohistochemistry or PCR to reduced reproductive success) that may threaten population confirm identification of T. gondii bradyzoites. Thus, the specificity viability. of the mouse bioassay may be compromised, as T. gondii brady- zoites can appear very similar to those of Neospora caninum under 1.1. T. gondii infection and toxoplasmosis light microscopy (Dubey et al., 2009). As with the mouse bioassay, sample inoculation into cell culture (in this case 13-day old chick T. gondii is a protozoan parasite, which can infect a

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    11 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us