Word Count Text: 3597; Word Count Abstract: 250;

Word Count Text: 3597; Word Count Abstract: 250;

<p>1 1</p><p>2 Word count text: 3597; Word count abstract: 250;</p><p>Number of references: 45;</p><p>1 Tables: 5; Figures: 0; Supplementary Figure: 1; </p><p>2 Supplementary Tables: 2.</p><p>Maternal educational level and blood pressure, aortic stiffness, cardiovascular structure and functioning in childhood: The Generation R Study</p><p>Running title: Maternal education and cardiovascular outcomes</p><p>Selma H. BOUTHOORN MDa,b, Frank J. VAN LENTHE PhDb, Layla L. DE JONGE MDa,c,d,</p><p>Albert HOFMAN MD PhDa,c , Lennie VAN OSCH-GEVERS, MD, PhDd, Vincent WV</p><p>JADDOE MD PhDa,c,d, Hein RAAT MD PhDb</p><p> aThe Generation R Study Group, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands;</p><p> bDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus Medical Centre, the Netherlands;</p><p> cDepartment of Epidemiology, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; </p><p> dDepartment of Pediatrics, Erasmus Medical Centre, the Netherlands.</p><p>Corresponding author</p><p>Selma H. Bouthoorn MD. The Generation R Study Group, Erasmus MC, University Medical </p><p>Centre Rotterdam. P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Telephone: +31 </p><p>(0)10-704 38496; fax: +31 (0)10 704 4645; e-mail: [email protected].</p><p>Conflict of interest: None</p><p>Abstract 3 2</p><p>4 3Background: In adults, low level of education was shown to be associated with higher blood </p><p>4pressure levels and alterations in cardiac structures and function. It is currently unknown </p><p>5whether socioeconomic inequalities in arterial and cardiac alterations originate in childhood. </p><p>6Therefore, we investigated the association of maternal education with blood pressure levels, </p><p>7arterial stiffness and cardiac structures and function at the age of 6 years, and potential </p><p>8underlying factors.</p><p>9Methods: The study included 5843 children participating in a prospective cohort study in the </p><p>10Netherlands. Maternal education was assessed at enrollment. Blood pressure, carotid-femoral </p><p>11pulse wave velocity, left atrial diameter, aortic root diameter, left ventricular mass and </p><p>12fractional shortening were measured at the age of 6 years. </p><p>13Results: Children with low educated (category 1) mothers had higher systolic (2.80 mm Hg, </p><p>1495% CI: 1.62-2.94) and diastolic (1.80 mm Hg, 95% CI: 1.25-2.35) blood pressure levels as </p><p>15compared to children with high educated (category 4) mothers. The main explanatory factors </p><p>16were the child’s BMI, maternal BMI and physical activity. Maternal education was negatively</p><p>17associated with fractional shortening (p for trend 0.008), to which blood pressure and child’s </p><p>18BMI contributed the most. No socioeconomic gradient was observed in other arterial and </p><p>19cardiac measurements.</p><p>20Conclusion: Socioeconomic inequalities in blood pressure are already present in childhood. </p><p>21Higher fractional shortening among children from low socioeconomic families might be a </p><p>22first cardiac adaptation to higher blood pressure and higher BMI. Interventions should be </p><p>23aimed at lowering child BMI and increasing physical activity among children from low </p><p>24socioeconomic families. </p><p>25Keywords: Maternal educational level, blood pressure, cardiac structures, cardiac function, </p><p>26arterial stiffness, childhood 5 3</p><p>6 27</p><p>28</p><p>29</p><p>30</p><p>31</p><p>32</p><p>33</p><p>34</p><p>35</p><p>36</p><p>37</p><p>38</p><p>39</p><p>40</p><p>41</p><p>42</p><p>43</p><p>44Introduction 7 4</p><p>8 45Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death in most western parts of the </p><p>46world. Low socioeconomic position (SEP) has been recognized as a marked risk factor in the </p><p>47occurrence of CVD among adults . A better understanding of the origins and underlying </p><p>48mechanisms of socioeconomic inequalities in CVD is essential to develop effective strategies </p><p>49aimed at preventing or reducing these inequalities. Growing evidence suggest that CVD </p><p>50inequalities arise already in childhood, since several CVD risk factors including, low birth </p><p>51weight, short gestational age, physical inactivity, childhood obesity and familial hypertension,</p><p>52affect children from low socioeconomic families more frequently . These risk factors may </p><p>53cause inequalities in blood pressure levels in childhood, and may track into adulthood . </p><p>54Indeed, a recent study showed socioeconomic inequalities in blood pressure to appear at the </p><p>55age of 5-6 years old already, mediated by known CVD risk factors including birth weight, </p><p>56childhood BMI and maternal BMI . </p><p>57Alterations in arterial and cardiac structures such as aortic stiffness, aortic root size, left atrial </p><p>58and left ventricular enlargement, contribute to the risk of CVD among adults . In adults, it has </p><p>59been shown previously that a low level of education was associated with left ventricular </p><p>60hypertrophy, left ventricular dilatation and cardiac dysfunction . Factors recognized to </p><p>61influence these structures include elevated blood pressure levels and obesity . These factors </p><p>62are more common in children from low SEP families and were also found to cause a higher </p><p>63left ventricular mass in childhood already . However, no previous study examined the </p><p>64socioeconomic gradient in early structural changes of the heart among children. Therefore, to </p><p>65improve the understanding of the origins and underlying mechanisms of CVD inequalities, we</p><p>66investigated in a population-based, prospective cohort study, the association between maternal</p><p>67educational level and blood pressure levels, arterial stiffness and cardiac structures and </p><p>68function at the age of 6 years. Furthermore, we examined whether adiposity measures, </p><p>69lifestyle-related determinants and birth characteristics could explain these associations. 9 5</p><p>10 70</p><p>71</p><p>72</p><p>73</p><p>74</p><p>75</p><p>76</p><p>77</p><p>78</p><p>79</p><p>80</p><p>81</p><p>82</p><p>83</p><p>84</p><p>85</p><p>86Methods</p><p>87Study design 11 6</p><p>12 88This study is embedded within the Generation R Study, a population-based prospective cohort</p><p>89study from early pregnancy onwards described in detail elsewhere . Enrolment was aimed at </p><p>90early pregnancy, but was allowed until the birth of the child. All children were born between </p><p>91April 2002 and January 2006 and form a prenatally enrolled birth-cohort that is currently </p><p>92being followed-up until young adulthood. The study was conducted in accordance with the </p><p>93guidelines proposed in the World Medical Association of Helsinki and has been approved by </p><p>94the Medical Ethical Committee of the Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam. </p><p>95Written consent was obtained from all participating parents . </p><p>96Study group</p><p>97In total, 8305 children still participate in the study from the age of 5 years . The participating </p><p>98children and their mothers were invited to a well-equipped and dedicated research center in </p><p>99the Erasmus Medical Center - Sophia Children’s Hospital between March 2008 and January </p><p>1002012. Measurements were focused on several health outcomes including body composition, </p><p>101obesity, heart and vascular development and behaviour and cognition . In total, 6690 children</p><p>102visited the research center. Mothers of children who didn’t visit the research center had a </p><p>103lower educational level, more frequently smoked during pregnancy (p<0.001) and fewer of </p><p>104them gave breastfeeding (p=0.001) as compared to mothers of children who visited the </p><p>105research center. No differences were found in other characteristics between these groups </p><p>106(Supplementary Table S1). We excluded twins (n=167) and participants who lacked </p><p>107information on maternal educational level (n=594) and on cardiovascular measurements </p><p>108(n=50). Furthermore, children with echocardiographic evidence of congenital heart disease or </p><p>109kidney disease were excluded (n=36), leaving a study population of 5843 children </p><p>110(Supplementary Figure S1). </p><p>111Maternal educational level 13 7</p><p>14 112Our indicator of SEP was educational level of the mother. Level of maternal education was </p><p>113established using questionnaires at enrollment. The Dutch Standard Classification of </p><p>114Education was used to categorize 4 subsequent levels of education: 1. high (university </p><p>115degree), 2. mid-high (higher vocational training, Bachelor’s degree), 3. mid-low (>3 years </p><p>116general secondary school, intermediate vocational training) and 4. low (no education, primary</p><p>117school, lower vocational training, intermediate general school, or 3 years or less general </p><p>118secondary school) .</p><p>119Child cardiovascular structures and function</p><p>120We measured blood pressure with the child in supine position quietly awake. Systolic and </p><p>121diastolic blood pressure (SBP and DBP) was measured at the right brachial artery, four times </p><p>122with one minute intervals, using the validated automatic sphygmanometer Datascope Accutor </p><p>123Plus TM (Paramus, NJ, USA) . A cuff was selected with a cuff width approximately 40% of the</p><p>124arm circumference and long enough to cover 90% of the arm circumference. More than 90% </p><p>125of the children who visited the research center had four successful blood pressure </p><p>126measurements available. SBP and DBP were determined by excluding the first measurement </p><p>127and averaging the other measurements. </p><p>128Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity, the reference method to assess aortic stiffness , was </p><p>129assessed using the automatic Complior device (Complior; Artech Medical, Pantin, France) </p><p>130with participants in supine position. The distance between the recording sites at the carotid </p><p>131(proximal) and femoral (distal) artery was measured over the surface of the body to the </p><p>132nearest centimeter. Through piezoelectric sensors placed on the skin, the device collected </p><p>133signals to assess the time delay between the pressure upstrokes in the carotid artery and the </p><p>134femoral artery. Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity was calculated as the ratio of the distance</p><p>135travelled by the pulse wave and the time delay between the feet of the carotid and femoral 15 8</p><p>16 136pressure waveforms, as expressed in meters per second . To cover a complete respiratory </p><p>137cycle, the mean of at least 10 consecutive pressure waveforms was used in the analyses. </p><p>138Recently, it has been shown that pulse wave velocity can be measured reliably, with good </p><p>139reproducibility in a large pediatric population-based cohort .</p><p>140Two-dimensional M-mode echocardiographic measurements were performed using the ATL-</p><p>141Philips Model HDI 5000 (Seattle, WA, USA) or the Logiq E9 (GE Medical Systems, </p><p>142Wauwatosa, WI, USA) devices. The children were examined in a quiet room with the child </p><p>143awake in supine position. Missing echocardiograms were mainly due to restlessness of the </p><p>144child or unavailability of equipment or sonographer. Left atrial diameter, interventricular end-</p><p>145diastolic septal thickness (IVSTD), left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD), left </p><p>146ventricular end-diastolic posterior wall thickness (LVPWTD), interventricular end-systolic </p><p>147septal thickness, left ventricular end-systolic diameter, left ventricular end-systolic posterior </p><p>148wall thickness, aortic root diameter, and fractional shortening were measured using methods </p><p>149recommended by the American Society of Echocardiography . Left ventricular mass (LV </p><p>150mass) was computed using the formula derived by Devereux et al :LV mass = 0.80 × </p><p>1511.04((IVSTD + LVEDD + LVPWTD)3 − (LVEDD) 3)+ 0.6. To assess reproducibility of </p><p>152ultrasound measurements, the intraobserver and interobserver intraclass correlation </p><p>153coefficients were calculated previously for left atrial diameter, aortic root diameter, IVSTD, </p><p>154LVEDD and LVPWTD in 28 subjects (median age 7.5 years, interquartile range 3.0-11.0) and</p><p>155varied between 0.91 to 0.99 and 0.78 to 0.96, respectively .</p><p>156Explanatory variables </p><p>157The following factors were considered to be potential explanatory factors in the pathway </p><p>158between SEP and blood pressure, cardiovascular structures and function. These were chosen </p><p>159based on previous literature . 17 9</p><p>18 160Maternal characteristics </p><p>161Information on pre-pregnancy weight, pre-pregnancy hypertension (yes, no) and smoking </p><p>162during pregnancy (no, until confirmed pregnancy and continued during pregnancy) and </p><p>163financial difficulties, as indicator of family stress, was obtained by questionnaires. Also, </p><p>164another measurement of family stress was assessed with the family assessment device score at</p><p>165age 5. A higher score reflects more ‘stress’. Information on pregnancy-induced hypertension </p><p>166and preeclampsia was obtained from medical records. Women suspected of pregnancy </p><p>167hypertensive complications, based on these records, were crosschecked with the original </p><p>168hospital charts. Details of these procedures have been described elsewhere . Maternal height </p><p>169was measured during visits at our research center. On the basis of height and pre-pregnancy </p><p>170weight, we calculated pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI) (weight/height2). </p><p>171Birth characteristics</p><p>172Birth weight and gestational age at birth were obtained from midwife and hospital registries. </p><p>173Information on breastfeeding during infancy (ever/never) was obtained by questionnaires.</p><p>174Child characteristics</p><p>175Weight of the child was measured while wearing lightweight clothes and without shoes by </p><p>176using a mechanical personal scale (SECA), and height was measured by a Harpenden </p><p>177stadiometer (Holtain Limited) in standing position, which were both calibrated on a regular </p><p>178basis. BMI was calculated using the formula; weight (kg) / height (m)2. Standard-deviation </p><p>179scores (SDS) adjusted for age and gender were constructed for these growth measurements . </p><p>180Watching television (< 2 hours/day, ≥ 2 hours/day), as indicator of sedentary behaviour, and </p><p>181playing sports (yes/no), as indicator of physical activity, were obtained from questionnaires at</p><p>182the age of 5 years. 19 10</p><p>20 183Confounding variables</p><p>184Gender and date of birth of the child were obtained from midwife and hospital registries. </p><p>185Ethnicity (Dutch, other western, non-western) was obtained from the first questionnaire at </p><p>186enrollment in the study. These factors were considered as potential confounding factors.</p><p>187Statistical analyses</p><p>188First, univariate associations of maternal educational level to all covariates, blood pressure, </p><p>189carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity, cardiac structures and function were explored using Chi-</p><p>190square tests and ANOVAs. Second, we assessed the association of maternal educational level </p><p>191with blood pressure levels, carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity, cardiac structures and </p><p>192function using linear regression models adjusted for the potential confounders (model 1). To </p><p>193evaluate the mediating effects of all potential explanatory factors Baron and Kenny’s causal </p><p>194step approach was used . Only those factors that were significantly associated with the </p><p>195outcome (independent of maternal educational level; data available upon request) and </p><p>196unequally distributed across SEP groups (Table 1) were added separately to model 1 . To </p><p>197assess their mediating effects, the corresponding percentages of attenuation of effect estimates</p><p>198were calculated by comparing differences of model 1 with the adjusted ones (100 x (B model 1 – </p><p>199B model 1 with explanatory factor) / (B model 1 )). Finally, a full model containing maternal educational level </p><p>200and all the explanatory factors assessed the joint effects of the explanatory factors. The </p><p>201explanatory mechanisms were investigated only for outcomes (blood pressure, pulse wave </p><p>202velocity, cardiac structures and function) that differed by maternal educational level after </p><p>203adjustment for confounders (model 1). Interaction terms between maternal educational level </p><p>204and child’s sex on all the outcomes were not significant (p>0.1); therefore analyses were not </p><p>205stratified for sex. Multiple imputation was used to deal with the missing values in the </p><p>206covariates. Five imputed datasets were created and analysed together. A 95% confidence 21 11</p><p>22 207interval (CI) was calculated around the percentage attenuation using a bootstrap method with </p><p>2081000 re-samplings per imputed dataset in the statistical program R . All the other statistical </p><p>209analyses were performed using Statistical Package of Social Science (SPSS) version 20.0 for </p><p>210Windows (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL, USA).</p><p>211</p><p>212</p><p>213</p><p>214</p><p>215</p><p>216</p><p>217</p><p>218</p><p>219</p><p>220</p><p>221Results</p><p>222 223Table 1 shows the characteristics of the study population. Of all participating children 22.4% </p><p>224(n= 1308) had mothers with a low educational level and 25.3% (n=1483) of the mothers were </p><p>225high educated. Compared with mothers with a high education, those with a low education had</p><p>226a higher pre-pregnancy BMI, suffered more frequently from pre-pregnancy hypertension, had </p><p>227more financial difficulties and a higher family assessment device score (p<0.001), indicating 23 12</p><p>24 228more stress within their families, fewer of them gave breastfeeding, and they more frequently </p><p>229smoked during pregnancy (p=0.002). Their children were on average lighter at birth and had </p><p>230a shorter gestational duration (p<0.001). Mothers with a high education were more frequently </p><p>231Dutch, while mothers with a low education had more frequently a non-western ethnic </p><p>232background (p<0.001). Children of low educated mothers less frequently played sports, </p><p>233watched more frequently ≥ 2 hours television per day and were heavier as compared with </p><p>234children of high educated mothers (p<0.001). Mean systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood </p><p>235pressure (DBP) levels (p<0.001) and carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (p=0.02) were </p><p>236negatively associated with level of education. Also, left atrial diameter (p<0.001) and left </p><p>237ventricular mass (p=0.003) differed according to educational level (Table 1).</p><p>238Multivariable linear regression analyses adjusted for the potential confounders showed that </p><p>239the lower the education of the mother, the higher the systolic and diastolic blood pressure of </p><p>240their children (p for trend <0.001) (Table 2). No consistent associations of maternal education </p><p>241were observed with carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity, aortic root diameter, left atrial </p><p>242diameter, and left ventricular mass. Fractional shortening was negatively associated with </p><p>243maternal educational level (p for trend 0.008). There was no interaction between ethnicity and</p><p>244maternal education on these outcomes (p > 0.05).</p><p>245Maternal pre-pregnancy BMI, maternal pre-pregnancy hypertension, gestational age, and the </p><p>246child’s height and BMI were related both to maternal educational level and SBP. The selected</p><p>247explanatory factors for DBP included maternal pre-pregnancy hypertension, birth weight, </p><p>248watching television, playing sports, and the child’s height and BMI. Birth weight, child’s </p><p>249BMI, SBP and DBP were the selected explanatory factors in the association between maternal</p><p>250education and fractional shortening. For each selected factor, an interaction with maternal </p><p>251education was tested for significance, none of them were significant (p > 0.05). 25 13</p><p>26 252Regarding the proportion of explanation by each risk factor (Table 3 and Table 4), the child’s </p><p>253BMI was the most important contributor to the association of maternal education to SBP in </p><p>254the mid-low and low educational subgroup (15% attenuation (95% CI: -29% to -7%) and 29%</p><p>255(95% CI: -42% to -20%) ). Secondly, maternal pre-pregnancy BMI contributed to the </p><p>256association between maternal education and SBP accounting for 11% (95% CI: -22% to -6%) </p><p>257and 12% (95% CI: -18% to -7%) respectively. Overall, 12% (95% CI: -26% to 0.3%) and </p><p>25824% (95% CI: -36% to -14%) of the association of maternal education and SBP was </p><p>259explained for mid-low and low education by including the explanatory factors (Table 3). For </p><p>260DBP, the child’s BMI and playing sports were the most contributing factors in the association </p><p>261between maternal education and DBP, explaining 8% (95% CI: -14% to -3%) and 7% (95% </p><p>262CI: -13% to -3%) in the lowest educational subgroup. The overall explanation was 12% (95% </p><p>263CI: -47% to -3%), 16% (95% CI: -30% to -8%) and 21% (95% CI: -35% to -12%) in the mid-</p><p>264high, mid-low and low educational subgroup respectively (Table 4). For both SBP and DBP </p><p>265the socioeconomic differences remained significant after including all the explanatory factors </p><p>266(Table 3 and Table 4). Complete elimination of the association of mid-low and low education </p><p>267with fractional shortening was observed after individual adjustment for BMI, SBP and DBP. </p><p>268SBP was the most contributing factor, explaining 27% (95% CI: -142% to 25%) and 42% </p><p>269(95% CI: -159% to -12%) respectively (Table 5).</p><p>270</p><p>271</p><p>272</p><p>273</p><p>274 27 14</p><p>28 275</p><p>276</p><p>277</p><p>278</p><p>279</p><p>280</p><p>281</p><p>282</p><p>283</p><p>284</p><p>285</p><p>286</p><p>287Discussion</p><p>288This study shows that socioeconomic inequalities in adult CVD may have their origins in </p><p>289childhood. We found socioeconomic inequalities in systolic and diastolic blood pressure to </p><p>290occur already at the age of 6 years. Furthermore, a positive association was found between </p><p>291maternal education and fractional shortening, which was explained by higher blood pressure </p><p>292levels and a higher BMI among children of lower educated mothers. We did not find evidence</p><p>293for socioeconomic inequalities in carotid- femoral pulse wave velocity, aortic root diameter, </p><p>294left atrial diameter, and left ventricular mass at the age of 6 years. 29 15</p><p>30 295Methodological considerations</p><p>296The strengths of this study are the prospective population-based design and the availability of </p><p>297many important covariates that may explain the association between maternal education, </p><p>298blood pressure levels, and cardiac structures and function. In addition, we had a large sample </p><p>299size of 5843 participants and the availability of several cardiovascular measurements in most </p><p>300of these children. </p><p>301To various extents, our results may have been influenced by the following limitations. We </p><p>302used maternal educational level as indicator of SEP. Maternal education may reflect general </p><p>303and health-related knowledge, health behavior, health literacy and problem-solving skills . </p><p>304Furthermore, it has been shown that education is the strongest and most consistent </p><p>305socioeconomic predictor of cardiovascular risk factors . It is less clear to what extent it </p><p>306captures the material and financial aspects of the household. We therefore repeated the </p><p>307analyses using household income level as determinant, and we found comparable results with </p><p>308the highest SBP and DBP and the highest fractional shortening in the lowest income group </p><p>309(Supplementary Table S2). Information on various covariates in this study was self-reported, </p><p>310which may have resulted in underreporting of certain adverse lifestyle related determinants. In</p><p>311our blood pressure measurements, we were not able to account for circadian rhythm. Yet, </p><p>312while this may have resulted in random error, it seems less likely that bias varied </p><p>313systematically across socioeconomic groups. Although the participation rate in The </p><p>314Generation R Study was relatively high (61%), there was some selection towards a relatively </p><p>315highly educated and more healthy study population . Non-participation would have led to </p><p>316selection bias if the associations of maternal educational level with the outcome differed </p><p>317between participants and non-participants. Previous research showed that this bias is </p><p>318minimal . However, it cannot be ruled out completely. Finally, unmeasured factors related to </p><p>319both SEP and blood pressure, such as salt intake and psychosocial factors, might explain some 31 16</p><p>32 320of the remaining effect of SEP on blood pressure. Sleep patterns may also explain some of the</p><p>321remaining effect, since this has been associated with cardiovascular health in previous </p><p>322studies .</p><p>323Maternal education, blood pressure and cardiac structures and function</p><p>324Previous literature concerning the association between socioeconomic circumstances and </p><p>325blood pressure in childhood is conflicting . This might be due to the use of different study </p><p>326designs and different study populations. In line with previous literature we found BMI to be </p><p>327the factor contributing most to the association between maternal education and blood pressure</p><p>328. Obesity may cause disturbances in autonomic function, insulin resistance and abnormalities </p><p>329in vascular structure and functions, which in turn may cause elevated blood pressure levels . </p><p>330Maternal pre-pregnancy BMI was also an important explanation of the socioeconomic </p><p>331gradient in SBP. Maternal BMI and a child’s BMI are correlated; the effect of maternal BMI </p><p>332may act for an important part through its effect on the child’s BMI. This is supported by our </p><p>333findings which showed that after adjustment for child’s BMI and maternal BMI, only child’s </p><p>334BMI remained significant (data not shown). A novel finding of this study is that indicators of </p><p>335sedentary behavior and physical activity, including watching television and playing sports, </p><p>336mediate the association between maternal education on DBP. Although these effects may pass</p><p>337through the effects of the child’s BMI on DBP, its significant association in the fully adjusted </p><p>338model suggests that there is probably also an independent effect of physical activity on DBP, </p><p>339which explains the socioeconomic inequalities in DBP. This is supported by a recent study of </p><p>340Knowles et al. who found higher physical activity to be associated with lower DBP levels </p><p>341among 5-7 year old children, independent of BMI and other markers of adiposity . These </p><p>342findings suggest that intervention should be aimed at increasing physical activity, especially </p><p>343among children with a lower SEP. 33 17</p><p>34 344Although children from low SEP families had higher BP levels and a higher BMI which is </p><p>345previously shown to be associated with larger left ventricular mass and atrial enlargement , we</p><p>346did not find a socioeconomic gradient in cardiac structures at the age of 6 years. We found, </p><p>347however, left ventricular mass to be lower in the mid-high and the mid-low educational </p><p>348subgroup as compared to the high educational subgroup. The direction of the association was </p><p>349not entirely equal to what was expected. Also, no socioeconomic gradient was observed and </p><p>350therefore commonly used cardiovascular risk factors explaining socioeconomic inequalities </p><p>351are not likely to be an explanation. Future research is necessary to replicate these findings. </p><p>352Another remarkable finding was the higher fractional shortening among children with mid-</p><p>353low and low educated mothers. One explanation might be that these children experience more </p><p>354stress during the echocardiographic assessment due to a lower lack of parental support </p><p>355because they, as well as their parents, are more impressed by the measurement setting, </p><p>356resulting in a higher fractional shortening. However, stress would also have increased their </p><p>357heart rate and adjustment for heart rate would then have explained, at least to some extent, the</p><p>358association between maternal education and fractional shortening. In our study, this </p><p>359explanation is less likely since heart rate, as indicator of stress, was not associated with </p><p>360fractional shortening. Since an increased fractional shortening was explained by higher blood </p><p>361pressure levels and a higher BMI, another explanation might be that it is the first indication of</p><p>362cardiac adaptation to higher blood pressure levels and higher BMI among low SEP children. </p><p>363However, in a later stage higher blood pressure levels and a higher BMI result in alterations </p><p>364of cardiac structures such as left ventricular and left atrial enlargement , which are associated </p><p>365with a lower fractional shortening. Thus our findings that lower education leads to a higher </p><p>366fractional shortening at the age of 6 are not fully understood and a change finding can also not</p><p>367be excluded. Confirmation in future studies is therefore highly recommended and replication </p><p>368would suggest that cardiac structural alterations can be prevented at this age by lowering 35 18</p><p>36 369blood pressure levels and body weight, especially among children from low socioeconomic </p><p>370families. </p><p>371Conclusion</p><p>372Our study adds to the small body of literature concerning socioeconomic differences in blood </p><p>373pressure and shows that inequalities arise in early childhood which were mainly explained by </p><p>374socio-economic inequalities in the child’s BMI and physical activity. No differences in </p><p>375arterial stiffness or cardiac structures were observed per educational subgroup. However, a </p><p>376socioeconomic gradient in fractional shortening was observed, with children from low SEP </p><p>377families having a higher fractional shortening as compared to children from high SEP </p><p>378families. This might be a first cardiac adaptation to a higher blood pressure and a higher BMI.</p><p>379The results require careful interpretation since the associations were relatively small and the </p><p>380clinical importance not yet fully understood. 37 19</p><p>38 Supplementary information is available at http://www.oup.com/ajh.</p><p>381Acknowledgements</p><p>382The Generation R Study is conducted by the Erasmus Medical Centre in close collaboration </p><p>383with the Erasmus University Rotterdam, School of Law and Faculty of Social Sciences, the </p><p>384Municipal Health Service Rotterdam area, Rotterdam, the Rotterdam Homecare Foundation, </p><p>385Rotterdam, and the Stichting Trombosedienst & Artsenlaboratorium Rijnmond (STAR), </p><p>386Rotterdam. We gratefully acknowledge the contribution of general practitioners, hospitals, </p><p>387midwives and pharmacies in Rotterdam. We also thank Wim Helbing for his valuable </p><p>388comments on an earlier draft of this manuscript.</p><p>Funding</p><p>The first phase of the Generation R Study is made possible by financial support from: </p><p>Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Erasmus University Rotterdam and the Netherlands </p><p>Organization for Health Research and Development (ZonMw). </p><p>Conflict of interest</p><p>None</p><p>389</p><p>390</p><p>391</p><p>392</p><p>393 </p><p>394 39 20</p><p>40 395References</p><p>396</p>

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    20 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us