<p>1 1</p><p>2 Word count text: 3597; Word count abstract: 250;</p><p>Number of references: 45;</p><p>1 Tables: 5; Figures: 0; Supplementary Figure: 1; </p><p>2 Supplementary Tables: 2.</p><p>Maternal educational level and blood pressure, aortic stiffness, cardiovascular structure and functioning in childhood: The Generation R Study</p><p>Running title: Maternal education and cardiovascular outcomes</p><p>Selma H. BOUTHOORN MDa,b, Frank J. VAN LENTHE PhDb, Layla L. DE JONGE MDa,c,d,</p><p>Albert HOFMAN MD PhDa,c , Lennie VAN OSCH-GEVERS, MD, PhDd, Vincent WV</p><p>JADDOE MD PhDa,c,d, Hein RAAT MD PhDb</p><p> aThe Generation R Study Group, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands;</p><p> bDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus Medical Centre, the Netherlands;</p><p> cDepartment of Epidemiology, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; </p><p> dDepartment of Pediatrics, Erasmus Medical Centre, the Netherlands.</p><p>Corresponding author</p><p>Selma H. Bouthoorn MD. The Generation R Study Group, Erasmus MC, University Medical </p><p>Centre Rotterdam. P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Telephone: +31 </p><p>(0)10-704 38496; fax: +31 (0)10 704 4645; e-mail: [email protected].</p><p>Conflict of interest: None</p><p>Abstract 3 2</p><p>4 3Background: In adults, low level of education was shown to be associated with higher blood </p><p>4pressure levels and alterations in cardiac structures and function. It is currently unknown </p><p>5whether socioeconomic inequalities in arterial and cardiac alterations originate in childhood. </p><p>6Therefore, we investigated the association of maternal education with blood pressure levels, </p><p>7arterial stiffness and cardiac structures and function at the age of 6 years, and potential </p><p>8underlying factors.</p><p>9Methods: The study included 5843 children participating in a prospective cohort study in the </p><p>10Netherlands. Maternal education was assessed at enrollment. Blood pressure, carotid-femoral </p><p>11pulse wave velocity, left atrial diameter, aortic root diameter, left ventricular mass and </p><p>12fractional shortening were measured at the age of 6 years. </p><p>13Results: Children with low educated (category 1) mothers had higher systolic (2.80 mm Hg, </p><p>1495% CI: 1.62-2.94) and diastolic (1.80 mm Hg, 95% CI: 1.25-2.35) blood pressure levels as </p><p>15compared to children with high educated (category 4) mothers. The main explanatory factors </p><p>16were the child’s BMI, maternal BMI and physical activity. Maternal education was negatively</p><p>17associated with fractional shortening (p for trend 0.008), to which blood pressure and child’s </p><p>18BMI contributed the most. No socioeconomic gradient was observed in other arterial and </p><p>19cardiac measurements.</p><p>20Conclusion: Socioeconomic inequalities in blood pressure are already present in childhood. </p><p>21Higher fractional shortening among children from low socioeconomic families might be a </p><p>22first cardiac adaptation to higher blood pressure and higher BMI. Interventions should be </p><p>23aimed at lowering child BMI and increasing physical activity among children from low </p><p>24socioeconomic families. </p><p>25Keywords: Maternal educational level, blood pressure, cardiac structures, cardiac function, </p><p>26arterial stiffness, childhood 5 3</p><p>6 27</p><p>28</p><p>29</p><p>30</p><p>31</p><p>32</p><p>33</p><p>34</p><p>35</p><p>36</p><p>37</p><p>38</p><p>39</p><p>40</p><p>41</p><p>42</p><p>43</p><p>44Introduction 7 4</p><p>8 45Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death in most western parts of the </p><p>46world. Low socioeconomic position (SEP) has been recognized as a marked risk factor in the </p><p>47occurrence of CVD among adults . A better understanding of the origins and underlying </p><p>48mechanisms of socioeconomic inequalities in CVD is essential to develop effective strategies </p><p>49aimed at preventing or reducing these inequalities. Growing evidence suggest that CVD </p><p>50inequalities arise already in childhood, since several CVD risk factors including, low birth </p><p>51weight, short gestational age, physical inactivity, childhood obesity and familial hypertension,</p><p>52affect children from low socioeconomic families more frequently . These risk factors may </p><p>53cause inequalities in blood pressure levels in childhood, and may track into adulthood . </p><p>54Indeed, a recent study showed socioeconomic inequalities in blood pressure to appear at the </p><p>55age of 5-6 years old already, mediated by known CVD risk factors including birth weight, </p><p>56childhood BMI and maternal BMI . </p><p>57Alterations in arterial and cardiac structures such as aortic stiffness, aortic root size, left atrial </p><p>58and left ventricular enlargement, contribute to the risk of CVD among adults . In adults, it has </p><p>59been shown previously that a low level of education was associated with left ventricular </p><p>60hypertrophy, left ventricular dilatation and cardiac dysfunction . Factors recognized to </p><p>61influence these structures include elevated blood pressure levels and obesity . These factors </p><p>62are more common in children from low SEP families and were also found to cause a higher </p><p>63left ventricular mass in childhood already . However, no previous study examined the </p><p>64socioeconomic gradient in early structural changes of the heart among children. Therefore, to </p><p>65improve the understanding of the origins and underlying mechanisms of CVD inequalities, we</p><p>66investigated in a population-based, prospective cohort study, the association between maternal</p><p>67educational level and blood pressure levels, arterial stiffness and cardiac structures and </p><p>68function at the age of 6 years. Furthermore, we examined whether adiposity measures, </p><p>69lifestyle-related determinants and birth characteristics could explain these associations. 9 5</p><p>10 70</p><p>71</p><p>72</p><p>73</p><p>74</p><p>75</p><p>76</p><p>77</p><p>78</p><p>79</p><p>80</p><p>81</p><p>82</p><p>83</p><p>84</p><p>85</p><p>86Methods</p><p>87Study design 11 6</p><p>12 88This study is embedded within the Generation R Study, a population-based prospective cohort</p><p>89study from early pregnancy onwards described in detail elsewhere . Enrolment was aimed at </p><p>90early pregnancy, but was allowed until the birth of the child. All children were born between </p><p>91April 2002 and January 2006 and form a prenatally enrolled birth-cohort that is currently </p><p>92being followed-up until young adulthood. The study was conducted in accordance with the </p><p>93guidelines proposed in the World Medical Association of Helsinki and has been approved by </p><p>94the Medical Ethical Committee of the Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam. </p><p>95Written consent was obtained from all participating parents . </p><p>96Study group</p><p>97In total, 8305 children still participate in the study from the age of 5 years . The participating </p><p>98children and their mothers were invited to a well-equipped and dedicated research center in </p><p>99the Erasmus Medical Center - Sophia Children’s Hospital between March 2008 and January </p><p>1002012. Measurements were focused on several health outcomes including body composition, </p><p>101obesity, heart and vascular development and behaviour and cognition . In total, 6690 children</p><p>102visited the research center. Mothers of children who didn’t visit the research center had a </p><p>103lower educational level, more frequently smoked during pregnancy (p<0.001) and fewer of </p><p>104them gave breastfeeding (p=0.001) as compared to mothers of children who visited the </p><p>105research center. No differences were found in other characteristics between these groups </p><p>106(Supplementary Table S1). We excluded twins (n=167) and participants who lacked </p><p>107information on maternal educational level (n=594) and on cardiovascular measurements </p><p>108(n=50). Furthermore, children with echocardiographic evidence of congenital heart disease or </p><p>109kidney disease were excluded (n=36), leaving a study population of 5843 children </p><p>110(Supplementary Figure S1). </p><p>111Maternal educational level 13 7</p><p>14 112Our indicator of SEP was educational level of the mother. Level of maternal education was </p><p>113established using questionnaires at enrollment. The Dutch Standard Classification of </p><p>114Education was used to categorize 4 subsequent levels of education: 1. high (university </p><p>115degree), 2. mid-high (higher vocational training, Bachelor’s degree), 3. mid-low (>3 years </p><p>116general secondary school, intermediate vocational training) and 4. low (no education, primary</p><p>117school, lower vocational training, intermediate general school, or 3 years or less general </p><p>118secondary school) .</p><p>119Child cardiovascular structures and function</p><p>120We measured blood pressure with the child in supine position quietly awake. Systolic and </p><p>121diastolic blood pressure (SBP and DBP) was measured at the right brachial artery, four times </p><p>122with one minute intervals, using the validated automatic sphygmanometer Datascope Accutor </p><p>123Plus TM (Paramus, NJ, USA) . A cuff was selected with a cuff width approximately 40% of the</p><p>124arm circumference and long enough to cover 90% of the arm circumference. More than 90% </p><p>125of the children who visited the research center had four successful blood pressure </p><p>126measurements available. SBP and DBP were determined by excluding the first measurement </p><p>127and averaging the other measurements. </p><p>128Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity, the reference method to assess aortic stiffness , was </p><p>129assessed using the automatic Complior device (Complior; Artech Medical, Pantin, France) </p><p>130with participants in supine position. The distance between the recording sites at the carotid </p><p>131(proximal) and femoral (distal) artery was measured over the surface of the body to the </p><p>132nearest centimeter. Through piezoelectric sensors placed on the skin, the device collected </p><p>133signals to assess the time delay between the pressure upstrokes in the carotid artery and the </p><p>134femoral artery. Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity was calculated as the ratio of the distance</p><p>135travelled by the pulse wave and the time delay between the feet of the carotid and femoral 15 8</p><p>16 136pressure waveforms, as expressed in meters per second . To cover a complete respiratory </p><p>137cycle, the mean of at least 10 consecutive pressure waveforms was used in the analyses. </p><p>138Recently, it has been shown that pulse wave velocity can be measured reliably, with good </p><p>139reproducibility in a large pediatric population-based cohort .</p><p>140Two-dimensional M-mode echocardiographic measurements were performed using the ATL-</p><p>141Philips Model HDI 5000 (Seattle, WA, USA) or the Logiq E9 (GE Medical Systems, </p><p>142Wauwatosa, WI, USA) devices. The children were examined in a quiet room with the child </p><p>143awake in supine position. Missing echocardiograms were mainly due to restlessness of the </p><p>144child or unavailability of equipment or sonographer. Left atrial diameter, interventricular end-</p><p>145diastolic septal thickness (IVSTD), left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD), left </p><p>146ventricular end-diastolic posterior wall thickness (LVPWTD), interventricular end-systolic </p><p>147septal thickness, left ventricular end-systolic diameter, left ventricular end-systolic posterior </p><p>148wall thickness, aortic root diameter, and fractional shortening were measured using methods </p><p>149recommended by the American Society of Echocardiography . Left ventricular mass (LV </p><p>150mass) was computed using the formula derived by Devereux et al :LV mass = 0.80 × </p><p>1511.04((IVSTD + LVEDD + LVPWTD)3 − (LVEDD) 3)+ 0.6. To assess reproducibility of </p><p>152ultrasound measurements, the intraobserver and interobserver intraclass correlation </p><p>153coefficients were calculated previously for left atrial diameter, aortic root diameter, IVSTD, </p><p>154LVEDD and LVPWTD in 28 subjects (median age 7.5 years, interquartile range 3.0-11.0) and</p><p>155varied between 0.91 to 0.99 and 0.78 to 0.96, respectively .</p><p>156Explanatory variables </p><p>157The following factors were considered to be potential explanatory factors in the pathway </p><p>158between SEP and blood pressure, cardiovascular structures and function. These were chosen </p><p>159based on previous literature . 17 9</p><p>18 160Maternal characteristics </p><p>161Information on pre-pregnancy weight, pre-pregnancy hypertension (yes, no) and smoking </p><p>162during pregnancy (no, until confirmed pregnancy and continued during pregnancy) and </p><p>163financial difficulties, as indicator of family stress, was obtained by questionnaires. Also, </p><p>164another measurement of family stress was assessed with the family assessment device score at</p><p>165age 5. A higher score reflects more ‘stress’. Information on pregnancy-induced hypertension </p><p>166and preeclampsia was obtained from medical records. Women suspected of pregnancy </p><p>167hypertensive complications, based on these records, were crosschecked with the original </p><p>168hospital charts. Details of these procedures have been described elsewhere . Maternal height </p><p>169was measured during visits at our research center. On the basis of height and pre-pregnancy </p><p>170weight, we calculated pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI) (weight/height2). </p><p>171Birth characteristics</p><p>172Birth weight and gestational age at birth were obtained from midwife and hospital registries. </p><p>173Information on breastfeeding during infancy (ever/never) was obtained by questionnaires.</p><p>174Child characteristics</p><p>175Weight of the child was measured while wearing lightweight clothes and without shoes by </p><p>176using a mechanical personal scale (SECA), and height was measured by a Harpenden </p><p>177stadiometer (Holtain Limited) in standing position, which were both calibrated on a regular </p><p>178basis. BMI was calculated using the formula; weight (kg) / height (m)2. Standard-deviation </p><p>179scores (SDS) adjusted for age and gender were constructed for these growth measurements . </p><p>180Watching television (< 2 hours/day, ≥ 2 hours/day), as indicator of sedentary behaviour, and </p><p>181playing sports (yes/no), as indicator of physical activity, were obtained from questionnaires at</p><p>182the age of 5 years. 19 10</p><p>20 183Confounding variables</p><p>184Gender and date of birth of the child were obtained from midwife and hospital registries. </p><p>185Ethnicity (Dutch, other western, non-western) was obtained from the first questionnaire at </p><p>186enrollment in the study. These factors were considered as potential confounding factors.</p><p>187Statistical analyses</p><p>188First, univariate associations of maternal educational level to all covariates, blood pressure, </p><p>189carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity, cardiac structures and function were explored using Chi-</p><p>190square tests and ANOVAs. Second, we assessed the association of maternal educational level </p><p>191with blood pressure levels, carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity, cardiac structures and </p><p>192function using linear regression models adjusted for the potential confounders (model 1). To </p><p>193evaluate the mediating effects of all potential explanatory factors Baron and Kenny’s causal </p><p>194step approach was used . Only those factors that were significantly associated with the </p><p>195outcome (independent of maternal educational level; data available upon request) and </p><p>196unequally distributed across SEP groups (Table 1) were added separately to model 1 . To </p><p>197assess their mediating effects, the corresponding percentages of attenuation of effect estimates</p><p>198were calculated by comparing differences of model 1 with the adjusted ones (100 x (B model 1 – </p><p>199B model 1 with explanatory factor) / (B model 1 )). Finally, a full model containing maternal educational level </p><p>200and all the explanatory factors assessed the joint effects of the explanatory factors. The </p><p>201explanatory mechanisms were investigated only for outcomes (blood pressure, pulse wave </p><p>202velocity, cardiac structures and function) that differed by maternal educational level after </p><p>203adjustment for confounders (model 1). Interaction terms between maternal educational level </p><p>204and child’s sex on all the outcomes were not significant (p>0.1); therefore analyses were not </p><p>205stratified for sex. Multiple imputation was used to deal with the missing values in the </p><p>206covariates. Five imputed datasets were created and analysed together. A 95% confidence 21 11</p><p>22 207interval (CI) was calculated around the percentage attenuation using a bootstrap method with </p><p>2081000 re-samplings per imputed dataset in the statistical program R . All the other statistical </p><p>209analyses were performed using Statistical Package of Social Science (SPSS) version 20.0 for </p><p>210Windows (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL, USA).</p><p>211</p><p>212</p><p>213</p><p>214</p><p>215</p><p>216</p><p>217</p><p>218</p><p>219</p><p>220</p><p>221Results</p><p>222 223Table 1 shows the characteristics of the study population. Of all participating children 22.4% </p><p>224(n= 1308) had mothers with a low educational level and 25.3% (n=1483) of the mothers were </p><p>225high educated. Compared with mothers with a high education, those with a low education had</p><p>226a higher pre-pregnancy BMI, suffered more frequently from pre-pregnancy hypertension, had </p><p>227more financial difficulties and a higher family assessment device score (p<0.001), indicating 23 12</p><p>24 228more stress within their families, fewer of them gave breastfeeding, and they more frequently </p><p>229smoked during pregnancy (p=0.002). Their children were on average lighter at birth and had </p><p>230a shorter gestational duration (p<0.001). Mothers with a high education were more frequently </p><p>231Dutch, while mothers with a low education had more frequently a non-western ethnic </p><p>232background (p<0.001). Children of low educated mothers less frequently played sports, </p><p>233watched more frequently ≥ 2 hours television per day and were heavier as compared with </p><p>234children of high educated mothers (p<0.001). Mean systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood </p><p>235pressure (DBP) levels (p<0.001) and carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (p=0.02) were </p><p>236negatively associated with level of education. Also, left atrial diameter (p<0.001) and left </p><p>237ventricular mass (p=0.003) differed according to educational level (Table 1).</p><p>238Multivariable linear regression analyses adjusted for the potential confounders showed that </p><p>239the lower the education of the mother, the higher the systolic and diastolic blood pressure of </p><p>240their children (p for trend <0.001) (Table 2). No consistent associations of maternal education </p><p>241were observed with carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity, aortic root diameter, left atrial </p><p>242diameter, and left ventricular mass. Fractional shortening was negatively associated with </p><p>243maternal educational level (p for trend 0.008). There was no interaction between ethnicity and</p><p>244maternal education on these outcomes (p > 0.05).</p><p>245Maternal pre-pregnancy BMI, maternal pre-pregnancy hypertension, gestational age, and the </p><p>246child’s height and BMI were related both to maternal educational level and SBP. The selected</p><p>247explanatory factors for DBP included maternal pre-pregnancy hypertension, birth weight, </p><p>248watching television, playing sports, and the child’s height and BMI. Birth weight, child’s </p><p>249BMI, SBP and DBP were the selected explanatory factors in the association between maternal</p><p>250education and fractional shortening. For each selected factor, an interaction with maternal </p><p>251education was tested for significance, none of them were significant (p > 0.05). 25 13</p><p>26 252Regarding the proportion of explanation by each risk factor (Table 3 and Table 4), the child’s </p><p>253BMI was the most important contributor to the association of maternal education to SBP in </p><p>254the mid-low and low educational subgroup (15% attenuation (95% CI: -29% to -7%) and 29%</p><p>255(95% CI: -42% to -20%) ). Secondly, maternal pre-pregnancy BMI contributed to the </p><p>256association between maternal education and SBP accounting for 11% (95% CI: -22% to -6%) </p><p>257and 12% (95% CI: -18% to -7%) respectively. Overall, 12% (95% CI: -26% to 0.3%) and </p><p>25824% (95% CI: -36% to -14%) of the association of maternal education and SBP was </p><p>259explained for mid-low and low education by including the explanatory factors (Table 3). For </p><p>260DBP, the child’s BMI and playing sports were the most contributing factors in the association </p><p>261between maternal education and DBP, explaining 8% (95% CI: -14% to -3%) and 7% (95% </p><p>262CI: -13% to -3%) in the lowest educational subgroup. The overall explanation was 12% (95% </p><p>263CI: -47% to -3%), 16% (95% CI: -30% to -8%) and 21% (95% CI: -35% to -12%) in the mid-</p><p>264high, mid-low and low educational subgroup respectively (Table 4). For both SBP and DBP </p><p>265the socioeconomic differences remained significant after including all the explanatory factors </p><p>266(Table 3 and Table 4). Complete elimination of the association of mid-low and low education </p><p>267with fractional shortening was observed after individual adjustment for BMI, SBP and DBP. </p><p>268SBP was the most contributing factor, explaining 27% (95% CI: -142% to 25%) and 42% </p><p>269(95% CI: -159% to -12%) respectively (Table 5).</p><p>270</p><p>271</p><p>272</p><p>273</p><p>274 27 14</p><p>28 275</p><p>276</p><p>277</p><p>278</p><p>279</p><p>280</p><p>281</p><p>282</p><p>283</p><p>284</p><p>285</p><p>286</p><p>287Discussion</p><p>288This study shows that socioeconomic inequalities in adult CVD may have their origins in </p><p>289childhood. We found socioeconomic inequalities in systolic and diastolic blood pressure to </p><p>290occur already at the age of 6 years. Furthermore, a positive association was found between </p><p>291maternal education and fractional shortening, which was explained by higher blood pressure </p><p>292levels and a higher BMI among children of lower educated mothers. We did not find evidence</p><p>293for socioeconomic inequalities in carotid- femoral pulse wave velocity, aortic root diameter, </p><p>294left atrial diameter, and left ventricular mass at the age of 6 years. 29 15</p><p>30 295Methodological considerations</p><p>296The strengths of this study are the prospective population-based design and the availability of </p><p>297many important covariates that may explain the association between maternal education, </p><p>298blood pressure levels, and cardiac structures and function. In addition, we had a large sample </p><p>299size of 5843 participants and the availability of several cardiovascular measurements in most </p><p>300of these children. </p><p>301To various extents, our results may have been influenced by the following limitations. We </p><p>302used maternal educational level as indicator of SEP. Maternal education may reflect general </p><p>303and health-related knowledge, health behavior, health literacy and problem-solving skills . </p><p>304Furthermore, it has been shown that education is the strongest and most consistent </p><p>305socioeconomic predictor of cardiovascular risk factors . It is less clear to what extent it </p><p>306captures the material and financial aspects of the household. We therefore repeated the </p><p>307analyses using household income level as determinant, and we found comparable results with </p><p>308the highest SBP and DBP and the highest fractional shortening in the lowest income group </p><p>309(Supplementary Table S2). Information on various covariates in this study was self-reported, </p><p>310which may have resulted in underreporting of certain adverse lifestyle related determinants. In</p><p>311our blood pressure measurements, we were not able to account for circadian rhythm. Yet, </p><p>312while this may have resulted in random error, it seems less likely that bias varied </p><p>313systematically across socioeconomic groups. Although the participation rate in The </p><p>314Generation R Study was relatively high (61%), there was some selection towards a relatively </p><p>315highly educated and more healthy study population . Non-participation would have led to </p><p>316selection bias if the associations of maternal educational level with the outcome differed </p><p>317between participants and non-participants. Previous research showed that this bias is </p><p>318minimal . However, it cannot be ruled out completely. Finally, unmeasured factors related to </p><p>319both SEP and blood pressure, such as salt intake and psychosocial factors, might explain some 31 16</p><p>32 320of the remaining effect of SEP on blood pressure. Sleep patterns may also explain some of the</p><p>321remaining effect, since this has been associated with cardiovascular health in previous </p><p>322studies .</p><p>323Maternal education, blood pressure and cardiac structures and function</p><p>324Previous literature concerning the association between socioeconomic circumstances and </p><p>325blood pressure in childhood is conflicting . This might be due to the use of different study </p><p>326designs and different study populations. In line with previous literature we found BMI to be </p><p>327the factor contributing most to the association between maternal education and blood pressure</p><p>328. Obesity may cause disturbances in autonomic function, insulin resistance and abnormalities </p><p>329in vascular structure and functions, which in turn may cause elevated blood pressure levels . </p><p>330Maternal pre-pregnancy BMI was also an important explanation of the socioeconomic </p><p>331gradient in SBP. Maternal BMI and a child’s BMI are correlated; the effect of maternal BMI </p><p>332may act for an important part through its effect on the child’s BMI. This is supported by our </p><p>333findings which showed that after adjustment for child’s BMI and maternal BMI, only child’s </p><p>334BMI remained significant (data not shown). A novel finding of this study is that indicators of </p><p>335sedentary behavior and physical activity, including watching television and playing sports, </p><p>336mediate the association between maternal education on DBP. Although these effects may pass</p><p>337through the effects of the child’s BMI on DBP, its significant association in the fully adjusted </p><p>338model suggests that there is probably also an independent effect of physical activity on DBP, </p><p>339which explains the socioeconomic inequalities in DBP. This is supported by a recent study of </p><p>340Knowles et al. who found higher physical activity to be associated with lower DBP levels </p><p>341among 5-7 year old children, independent of BMI and other markers of adiposity . These </p><p>342findings suggest that intervention should be aimed at increasing physical activity, especially </p><p>343among children with a lower SEP. 33 17</p><p>34 344Although children from low SEP families had higher BP levels and a higher BMI which is </p><p>345previously shown to be associated with larger left ventricular mass and atrial enlargement , we</p><p>346did not find a socioeconomic gradient in cardiac structures at the age of 6 years. We found, </p><p>347however, left ventricular mass to be lower in the mid-high and the mid-low educational </p><p>348subgroup as compared to the high educational subgroup. The direction of the association was </p><p>349not entirely equal to what was expected. Also, no socioeconomic gradient was observed and </p><p>350therefore commonly used cardiovascular risk factors explaining socioeconomic inequalities </p><p>351are not likely to be an explanation. Future research is necessary to replicate these findings. </p><p>352Another remarkable finding was the higher fractional shortening among children with mid-</p><p>353low and low educated mothers. One explanation might be that these children experience more </p><p>354stress during the echocardiographic assessment due to a lower lack of parental support </p><p>355because they, as well as their parents, are more impressed by the measurement setting, </p><p>356resulting in a higher fractional shortening. However, stress would also have increased their </p><p>357heart rate and adjustment for heart rate would then have explained, at least to some extent, the</p><p>358association between maternal education and fractional shortening. In our study, this </p><p>359explanation is less likely since heart rate, as indicator of stress, was not associated with </p><p>360fractional shortening. Since an increased fractional shortening was explained by higher blood </p><p>361pressure levels and a higher BMI, another explanation might be that it is the first indication of</p><p>362cardiac adaptation to higher blood pressure levels and higher BMI among low SEP children. </p><p>363However, in a later stage higher blood pressure levels and a higher BMI result in alterations </p><p>364of cardiac structures such as left ventricular and left atrial enlargement , which are associated </p><p>365with a lower fractional shortening. Thus our findings that lower education leads to a higher </p><p>366fractional shortening at the age of 6 are not fully understood and a change finding can also not</p><p>367be excluded. Confirmation in future studies is therefore highly recommended and replication </p><p>368would suggest that cardiac structural alterations can be prevented at this age by lowering 35 18</p><p>36 369blood pressure levels and body weight, especially among children from low socioeconomic </p><p>370families. </p><p>371Conclusion</p><p>372Our study adds to the small body of literature concerning socioeconomic differences in blood </p><p>373pressure and shows that inequalities arise in early childhood which were mainly explained by </p><p>374socio-economic inequalities in the child’s BMI and physical activity. No differences in </p><p>375arterial stiffness or cardiac structures were observed per educational subgroup. However, a </p><p>376socioeconomic gradient in fractional shortening was observed, with children from low SEP </p><p>377families having a higher fractional shortening as compared to children from high SEP </p><p>378families. This might be a first cardiac adaptation to a higher blood pressure and a higher BMI.</p><p>379The results require careful interpretation since the associations were relatively small and the </p><p>380clinical importance not yet fully understood. 37 19</p><p>38 Supplementary information is available at http://www.oup.com/ajh.</p><p>381Acknowledgements</p><p>382The Generation R Study is conducted by the Erasmus Medical Centre in close collaboration </p><p>383with the Erasmus University Rotterdam, School of Law and Faculty of Social Sciences, the </p><p>384Municipal Health Service Rotterdam area, Rotterdam, the Rotterdam Homecare Foundation, </p><p>385Rotterdam, and the Stichting Trombosedienst & Artsenlaboratorium Rijnmond (STAR), </p><p>386Rotterdam. We gratefully acknowledge the contribution of general practitioners, hospitals, </p><p>387midwives and pharmacies in Rotterdam. We also thank Wim Helbing for his valuable </p><p>388comments on an earlier draft of this manuscript.</p><p>Funding</p><p>The first phase of the Generation R Study is made possible by financial support from: </p><p>Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Erasmus University Rotterdam and the Netherlands </p><p>Organization for Health Research and Development (ZonMw). </p><p>Conflict of interest</p><p>None</p><p>389</p><p>390</p><p>391</p><p>392</p><p>393 </p><p>394 39 20</p><p>40 395References</p><p>396</p>
Details
-
File Typepdf
-
Upload Time-
-
Content LanguagesEnglish
-
Upload UserAnonymous/Not logged-in
-
File Pages20 Page
-
File Size-