<p> Group presentation and team evaluation</p><p>Time limit: About 10 minutes and no more than 12 minutes per group.</p><p>Guidelines for the presentation (Follow Munter’s reading on how to build a good presentation). Helpful Hints</p><p> Remember a good presentation tells as story. It should not be too long and hard to follow (we do not want to be dazzle by your presentation skills but learn/her your story). It should be long enough and include enough detail for the audience to feel like the learn something. A good rule of thumb regarding how long it should be is to have 1 slide per minute.</p><p> Keep your audience in mind. Your audience is the board of directors (Me and peers from the other industry). </p><p> The design of the slides is important. Slides need to have good titles that convey information and tables and or graphics that help the viewer plow/understand/visualize over complex information.</p><p> I am expecting for the presentation to include “details” (numbers, data, relevant qualitative information) </p><p>Deliverables:  The power point slides in paper version to be given prior to the presentation.  The group evaluation grids included at the end of the grading rubric.</p><p>Grading: I will follow the rubric included on the next page. I will grade your presentation based on the content of it although I will provide you feedback on your oral presentation skills. This means that although I do not require that all members of the team speak I highly encourage you to do so. Grading Rubric for Power Point Presentation</p><p>Points 3 2 1 0 Appropriately focused topic with a Focused topic with partially Somewhat focused topic or a vague A lack of focus or confused purpose, clearly communicated demonstrated understanding of the sense of the purpose for the which result in confusion on the part Topic understanding of the purpose for purpose for the presentation presentation, which require the of the audience the presentation audience to make assumptions</p><p>Clear and convincing command of Clear use of facts and information Partially clear use of facts and Confusing or incomplete facts with Research facts and information with with partially developed information with limited or little and/or confusing explanations Analysis insightful explanations that help to explanations in support of the incomplete explanations to support as to how the facts support the illustrate the speaker’s ideas and speaker’s ideas or arguments the speaker’s ideas or arguments speakers ideas or arguments arguments Clearly and logically organized Clear attempt at organization with a Some inconsistencies in organization A lack of organization makes it with an engaging introduction, a beginning, middle, and end and an and/or a lack of sustained focus difficult to follow the speaker’s Organization logically sequenced body with attempt to use transitions throughout the presentation with ideas; presentation may be too appropriate transitions, and a clear inconsistently use transitions conversational and may ramble and convincing conclusion without a clear beginning, middle, or end Uses sophisticated and varied Uses appropriate language and word Use words that may be unsuited to Inappropriate use of language language that is suited to the topic choice, but with less sophistication, the topic, audience or purpose of the distracts the audience because it is Language and audience; word choice is expressiveness and/or originality presentation; word choice lacks too informal or too imprecise given concise, original, and effectively originality and fails to convey an the topic and purpose of the speech conveys the appropriate tone given appropriate tone for the speech the purpose of the speech The layout is visually pleasing and The layout uses horizontal and The layout shows some structure, but The layout is cluttered, confusing, contributes to the overall message vertical white space appropriately. appears cluttered and busy or and does not use spacing, headings Power point with appropriate use of headings, The presentations includes distracting with large gaps of white and subheadings to enhance the slides subheadings and white space. quantitative data and qualitative space or uses a distracting readability. The presentations includes detail background. quantitative data and qualitative The presentations does not include detail (*) presented through graphs The presentations includes some any quantitative data or qualitative or tables that are easy to read/ quantitative data and qualitative detail understand detail Group Evaluation Name ______Date of Evaluation: ______Part I: Evaluate the group as a unit with this section of the evaluation tool. Write the score in the score box. Beginning Developing Accomplished Exemplary Category 1 2 3 4 Score Group Cooperation We did most of the work by We worked together most of We worked together so that Everyone worked together ourselves, we talked a little the time, sharing information everyone contributed to the using his or her abilities and among our group members regularly final project knowledge to make the project come together Distribution of Some group members did Everyone had a job to do but We divided up and Work was shared fairly Group Tasks not complete any of the work some jobs were incomplete completed the work equally according to the abilities and interests of the members Group Leadership We had no leader so we just No one person was a leader One or more persons took a We had a leader who helped us did our own thing so we usually helped each leadership role and gave organize and stay on task until other get the job done good directions that kept us the job was complete going Communication We only talked when we We talked about what we We usually asked each We talked all the time and among group thought we needed to, but were doing other for help and showed shared our work for group members received little feedback our work to each other feedback Individual A few people tried very hard, Each person did some work We all seemed to find our Everyone did a great job, I Participation but most didn’t do much and tried to do a fair share place and do what was would work with these people needed again Listening to other We usually listened to what We usually listened to each We listened while others Everyone listened to each other points of view others were saying but some other and tried to use what talked, we learned about a lot, and used what we heard either did not share ideas or they said in the project different viewpoints, and to improve our work and the argued used some of that whole project information in the project Showing respect No one was courteous and Some were courteous and Most were courteous and All were courteous and valued opinions were not valued some opinions were valued most opinions were valued each other’s opinions</p><p>Group Total Score</p><p>Part II: Evaluate your experience of this group project Rate your I would rather work alone I learned that group work can I liked learning this way It was a valuable and realistic experience of this sometimes be helpful and would probably try it way to learn. My group was group project again great. Part III. Use the following section to evaluate the other members of your group (fill one per person). Your evaluation should be honest. Group Member Name: ______Beginning Developing Accomplished Exemplary Category 1 2 3 4 Score Source of Conflict Participated in regular Was the source of conflict Was minimally involved in Worked to minimize conflict conflict that interfered with within the group. The group either starting or solving and was effective at solving group progress. The conflict sought assistance in conflicts. personal issues within the was discussed outside of the resolution from the instructor. group. group. Assistance Contributions were Contributed some toward the Contributed significantly Completed an equal share of insignificant or nonexistent project but other members clearly work and strived to maintain contributed more equity throughout the project Effectiveness Work performed was Work performed was Work performed was Work performed was very ineffective and mostly incomplete and contributions useful and contributed to useful and contributed useless toward the final were less than expected the final project significantly to the final project project Attitude Rarely had a positive attitude Usually had a positive Often had a positive Always had a positive attitude toward the group and project attitude toward the group and attitude toward the group toward the group and the project and the project project Attendance & Rarely attended group Sometimes attended group Almost always attended Always attended group Readiness meetings, rarely brought meetings, sometimes brought group meetings, almost meetings, always brought needed materials, and was needed materials, and was always brought needed needed materials, and was rarely ready to work sometimes ready to work materials, and was almost always ready to work always ready to work Focus on the task Rarely focused on the task Focused on the task and what Focused on the task and Consistently stayed focused on and what needed to be done. needed to be done some of what needed to be done the task and what needed to be Let others do the work. the time. Other group most of the time. Other done. Other group members members sometimes had to group members could count could count on this person all nag, prod, and remind to keep on this person most of the of the time. this member on task. time.</p><p>Group Member Total Score</p>