<p>1989 CTA - Search 2</p><p>DCT : di((“free! speech” “equal protection” “due process” discriminat! “title vii”) and religio! pray! church bible god jew! judai! moslem muslim islam! krisha jesus christ!) ______</p><p>1. Toledo v. Nobel-Sysco, Inc., 892 F.2d 1481, 58 USLW 2398, 51 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 1146, 52 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 39,544 (10th Cir.(N.M.), Dec 29, 1989) (NO. 86- 1853, 86-1871) (427-NA)</p><p>2. U.S. v. Clemmons, 892 F.2d 1153 (3rd Cir.(Pa.), Dec 28, 1989) (NO. 88-3656) (428-NA)</p><p>3. U.S. v. Greene, 892 F.2d 453 (6th Cir.(Tenn.), Dec 19, 1989) (NO. 89-5589) (Already included, see 196-FE)</p><p>4. Coats v. Pierre, 890 F.2d 728, 15 Fed.R.Serv.3d 583, 57 Ed. Law Rep. 389 (5th Cir.(Tex.), Dec 18, 1989) (NO. 88-2308) (429-NA)</p><p>5. Thomas v. United Parcel Service, Inc., 890 F.2d 909, 58 USLW 2391, 132 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3052, 113 Lab.Cas. P 11,697 (7th Cir.(Ill.), Nov 20, 1989) (NO. 88-2184) (430- NA)</p><p>6. Clarke v. U.S., 886 F.2d 404, 58 USLW 2192, 280 U.S.App.D.C. 387, 56 Ed. Law Rep. 731 (D.C.Cir., Sep 26, 1989) (NO. 88-5439) (431-NA)</p><p>7. Holloway v. Pigman, 884 F.2d 365 (8th Cir.(Ark.), Aug 31, 1989) (NO. 88-1685) (211- FE)</p><p>8. U.S. v. Lane, 883 F.2d 1484, 51 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 39,269 (10th Cir.(Colo.), Aug 25, 1989) (NO. 87-2774, 87-2805) (432-NA)</p><p>9. Marks v. City of Chesapeake, Va., 883 F.2d 308 (4th Cir.(Va.), Aug 24, 1989) (NO. 88- 1732) (446-NA)</p><p>10. Arnold v. Board of Educ. of Escambia County Ala., 880 F.2d 305, 55 Ed. Law Rep. 68 (11th Cir.(Ala.), Aug 10, 1989) (NO. 87-7617) (Already included, see 201-FE)</p><p>11. E.E.O.C. v. Hacienda Hotel, 881 F.2d 1504, 58 USLW 2163, 50 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 877, 51 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 39,250 (9th Cir.(Cal.), Aug 10, 1989) (NO. 88-5563) (433-NA)</p><p>12. Dunn v. White, 880 F.2d 1188, 58 USLW 2127 (10th Cir.(Okla.), Aug 01, 1989) (NO. 88- 2194) (212-FE)</p><p>13. U.S. v. Gelb, 881 F.2d 1155 (2nd Cir.(N.Y.), Aug 01, 1989) (NO. 1229, 89-1038) (434- NA)</p><p>14. International Soc. for Krishna Consciousness of New Orleans, Inc. v. City of Baton Rouge, 876 F.2d 494, 58 USLW 2059 (5th Cir.(La.), Jul 05, 1989) (NO. 88-3381) (213-FE)</p><p>15. Austin v. Berryman, 878 F.2d 786, 58 USLW 2036, 50 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 323, Unempl.Ins.Rep. (CCH) P 21,919 (4th Cir.(Va.), Jun 28, 1989) (NO. 88-3948) (Already included, see 202-FE)</p><p>16. Tanner v. Heise, 879 F.2d 572 (9th Cir.(Idaho), Jun 27, 1989) (NO. 87-4392) (214-FE)</p><p>17. U.S. v. Sanchez-Lopez, 879 F.2d 541 (9th Cir.(Idaho), Jun 22, 1989) (NO. 88-3102, 88- 3104, 88-3105) (435-NA)</p><p>18. U.S. v. Schoolcraft, 879 F.2d 64 (3rd Cir.(Pa.), Jun 22, 1989) (NO. 88-5757) (436-NA)</p><p>19. Medlin v. Palmer, 874 F.2d 1085 (5th Cir.(Tex.), Jun 13, 1989) (NO. 88-1060, 88-1118, 88-1646) (Already included, see 204-FE)</p><p>20. Oxborrow v. Eikenberry, 877 F.2d 1395 (9th Cir.(Wash.), Jun 12, 1989) (NO. CIV A 87- 4440, CIV A 88-3522) (437-NA)</p><p>21. Jenkins v. State of La., Through Dept. of Corrections, 874 F.2d 992, 51 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 248, 50 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 39,076 (5th Cir.(La.), Jun 07, 1989) (NO. 88-3507) (215-FE)</p><p>22. Lubavitch of Iowa, Inc. v. Walters, 873 F.2d 1161 (8th Cir.(Iowa), May 08, 1989) (NO. 88-1733) (216-FE)</p><p>23. Arnaud v. Odom, 870 F.2d 304 (5th Cir.(La.), Apr 19, 1989) (NO. 88-4053, 88-4099) (217-FE)</p><p>24. Carter v. City of Miami, 870 F.2d 578, 49 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 1014, 49 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 38,904 (11th Cir.(Fla.), Apr 19, 1989) (NO. 87-5665) (438-NA)</p><p>25. U.S. v. Aguilar, 871 F.2d 1436 (9th Cir.(Ariz.), Mar 30, 1989) (NO. 86-1208, 86-1215, 86- 1209, 86-1213, 86-1214, 86-1210, 86-1211, 86-1212) (Already included, see 206-FE)</p><p>26. U.S. v. Aguilar, 883 F.2d 662 (9th Cir.(Ariz.), Mar 30, 1989) (NO. 86-1208, 86-1211, 86- 1214, 86-1209, 86-1212, 86-1215, 86-1210, 86-1213) (Already included, see 206-FE)</p><p>27. U.S. v. Kidder, 869 F.2d 1328 (9th Cir.(Wash.), Mar 15, 1989) (NO. 87-3172) (439-NA)</p><p>28. Benzel v. Grammer, 869 F.2d 1105 (8th Cir.(Neb.), Mar 13, 1989) (NO. 88-1827, 88- 1828) (440-NA) 29. Zombro v. Baltimore City Police Dept., 868 F.2d 1364, 57 USLW 2512, 49 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 297, 49 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 38,785 (4th Cir.(Md.), Mar 03, 1989) (NO. 86-2659) (441-NA)</p><p>30. Shamley v. ITT Corp., 869 F.2d 167 (2nd Cir.(N.Y.), Mar 01, 1989) (NO. 238, 88-7427) (460-NA)</p><p>31. Ripplinger v. Collins, 868 F.2d 1043 (9th Cir.(Ariz.), Feb 24, 1989) (NO. 87-2501) (442- NA)</p><p>32. Jackson v. Cain, 864 F.2d 1235 (5th Cir.(La.), Feb 09, 1989) (NO. 87-3110) (443-NA)</p><p>33. Cordero v. De Jesus-Mendez, 867 F.2d 1 (1st Cir.(Puerto Rico), Jan 24, 1989) (NO. 87- 1011, 87-1532, 88-1005, 87-1012, 87-1530, 88-1006, 88-1126, 87-1531) (444-NA)</p><p>34. Young v. Coughlin, 866 F.2d 567 (2nd Cir.(N.Y.), Jan 24, 1989) (NO. 333, 88-2315) (Already included, see 209-FE)</p><p>35. E.E.O.C. v. General Lines, Inc., 865 F.2d 1555, 51 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 971, 48 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 38,623, 110 Lab.Cas. P 35,171 (10th Cir.(Wyo.), Jan 20, 1989) (NO. 87-1253) (445-NA)</p><p>36. Garnett By and Through Smith v. Renton School Dist. No. 403, 874 F.2d 608, 53 Ed. Law Rep. 476 (9th Cir.(Wash.), Jan 17, 1989) (NO. 88-3552) (Already included, see 210-FE)</p>