Exam 2 Review: Persuasion & Conformity

Exam 2 Review: Persuasion & Conformity

<p> Exam 2 Review – Spring 2013</p><p>Chapter 4 – Attitudes & Behaviors  Definition of attitude – affective, behavioral, cognitive components  Attitude assessment – problems with self-reports? o LaPiere’s research on self-reports versus behavioral observations o Covert measures as alternatives to self-report . Implicit Association Tests (IAT) – how does it work? o Fishbein & Ajzen’s Theory of Planned Behavior: . Principle of Aggregation – how could this improve self-reports? . Level of Specificity – how could this improve self-reports? . Theory of Planned Behavior (see Fig 4.2)  Intention is the best predictor of behavior  Importance of roles in determining our behaviors & influencing attitudes o Stanford Prison Experiment (SPE) as example . What are details of the study – how were participants assigned to roles of ‘guard’ and ‘prisoner’? . How did the role play impact their behavior & attitudes? . How/why did the study end? . What are 3 main lessons from the SPE?  How does behavior affect attitudes? o Foot-in-the door – how does this work? Role of self-perception?  Cognitive Dissonance –another explanation for why behavior affects attitudes o Festinger’s original experiment . People are motivated by consistency (betw beh + attitude) . Tension/anxiety if feel inconsistent . How did he study cog dissonance? (boring task, $1 or $20…) . Results of his study? Whose attitudes changed most?  Self-Perception theory – alternate to cog dissonance theory o If difficult to interpret our feelings or when weak attitude  look to our behavior for clues . Self-Perception & Emotion  Facial feedback – how does this work?  Embodied cognition – what is it and how does it work? . Self-Perception & Motivation  Overjustification effect – what is it? When might motivation be reduced by rewards? o Example of research on kids’ motivation  Comparing Cog Dissonance & Self-Perception theories – o Difference based on whether anxiety/tension is emphasized or not o Which theory better explains attitude change? Attitude formation? Chapter 7 – Persuasion  Persuasion o Central route to persuasion – how does it work? Example? o Peripheral route to persuasion – how does it work? Example? . What determines which route we use? o Source of Persuasion: . Importance of credibility – how does this work? . Importance of likeability – based on similarity and physical attractiveness o Message: . Primacy vs. recency effect for information & persuasion? . Fear-based messages – what kinds are most effective? . Subliminal messages – what are they?  Distinguish between subliminal perception & persuasion  Greenwald experiment – self-help tapes with self-esteem vs. memory focus; what were the results?  Murphy experiment – with Chinese characters – what were the results? o Audience . Do individual differences affect our ‘persuadability’?  Forewarning & resistance – consider counterarguments  Effects of age: what are the lifecycle and generational explanations for persuasion/attitude change? o Is there more support for lifecycle or generational? o Extreme Persuasion: Example of Cults . Jim Jones’ People’s Temple and Jonestown Massacre  1978 mass suicide & Jones’ influence  What explanations focused on Jones?  What are situational explanations for the suicides?  The use of source, message, & audience effects in cults o Resisting Persuasion . Challenge beliefs . Counterarguments – link to inoculation hypothesis  How does it work?  Possibility of reactance effect? . Attitude Inoculation applications –  Kids & anti-smoking role-playing – does it work?  Kids & toy commercials – does it work? Chapter 6 – Conformity & Obedience (note that this material may change slightly based on class coverage, check your notes to determine what was covered in class)  Types of Social Influence – conformity, compliance, & obedience (definitions & how does each differ from the others?)  Effects of mimicking others – automatic process? Social functions of mimicking? (Chartrand’s research on gestures)  Classic Conformity studies (Sherif & Asch) o Sherif’s study – autokinetic effect (pinpoint of light) . How was the study done? Results? o Asch’s study – line judgments . How was the study done? Results? o Differences between Sherif’s and Asch’s studies? o Why do people conform? . Information purposes . Normative purposes . Public vs. private conformity – what is the distinction? o Majority influences on conformity . What is the influence of group size on conformity? . What is the effect of seeing other nonconformists?  Does it matter if the other nonconformists agree or disagree with you? o Minority influences on conformity – . Influence based on style – what works best?  Compliance o Langer’s experiment – Xerox machine & requests to cut in line; results? o Strategies for compliance – . Reciprocity norm – are there immediate or delayed responses? . Door-in-the-face technique – how does it work? Example?  Obedience o Milgram’s research: . Original experiment – what was the procedure? What was found regarding % of participants who obey? . Impact of the situation on obedience: how did each affect obedience?  Location of the experiment  Experimenter characteristics  Closeness to victim  Disobedient others o Reasons for Obedience . Self-justification . The role of culture – individualists vs. collectivists? o Criticisms of Milgram’s experiment . Deception . No true informed consent . Created distress . Did participants know of right to withdraw? . Inflicted insight o Burger’s replication of Milgram – how was the procedure similar to or different from Milgram? . Results of Burger’s replication? o Ethics of Milgram’s research – . What were the concerns here? Milgram’s response?</p>

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    4 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us