State of California s115

State of California s115

<p>STATE OF CALIFORNIA CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD SAN FRANCISCO BAY REGION</p><p>STAFF SUMMARY REPORT (Tobi Tyler) MEETING DATE: August 15, 2001 ITEM: 8</p><p>SUBJECT: CITY OF BENICIA, BENICIA, SOLANO COUNTY - Reissuance of NPDES Permit</p><p>CHRONOLOGY: December, 1974 - NPDES Permit adopted. May, 1977; April, 1982; January, 1988; & August 1994 - Permit reissued. </p><p>DISCUSSION: The attached Tentative Order reissues the NPDES permit for the City of Benicia (City). The City owns and operates a secondary level treatment plant that treats wastewater from residential, industrial and commercial sources within the City of Benicia. The City's service area has a population of about 28,000. The plant has a dry weather design treatment capacity of 4.5 million gallons per day and currently treats an annual average flow of 3.2 mgd. Treated effluent is discharged into the waters of Carquinez Strait, through a submerged deepwater outfall.</p><p>This Tentative Order (Appendix A) is similar to the NPDES permits that were adopted on June 20, 2001. Based on the City’s Infeasibility Analysis (IA), the City cannot comply with final limits for mercury, copper, and selenium calculated according to procedures in the SIP. Staff believe that, through their IA and future commitments to pollution prevention, the City has shown that they qualify for interim limits with compliance schedules for these pollutants, as specified under the SIP and the Basin Plan. </p><p>Although staff have resolved many of the issues, unresolved concerns from the City and USEPA remain. The City’s concerns are with the interim mass limits for mercury, effluent limitations for 4,4-DDE and Dieldrin, joint special study requirements, and fecal coliform receiving water study. USEPA’s main concern is the lack of concrete commitments, by way of deliverables and milestones, tied to development of TMDLs or compliance with the final calculated limits, WQBELs. Board staff’s responses to these comments and concerns are in Appendix E.</p><p>RECOMMENDATION: Adoption of the Tentative Order. APPENDICES: A. Tentative Order B. Fact Sheet C. Infeasibility Analysis D. Comments Received E. Response to Comments</p><p>File Number: 2129.2001 </p>

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    1 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us