<p>QUESTION ONE (50 POINTS) 1. Identify Basis for Challenge (d.p./e.p)</p><p>2. Standing issue </p><p> own right vs. patient’s </p><p> personal stake/injury in fact/effective relief</p><p> ripeness (no prosecution-yet chill)</p><p>3. Due Process </p><p> explain due process concept/limits on arbitration, Government interference</p><p> fund rights analysis (Doc’s patients? Characterize and describe)</p><p> apply factors effectively (ordered liberty/deeply rooted)</p><p> develop arguments, case analogies</p><p> privacy/Casey/bodily integrity</p><p> place of history etc (Bowers/Cruzan)</p><p> role of judiciary vs. Legislature</p><p> identify and apply appropriate level of scrutiny</p><p> use facts, analyze state’s interests</p><p>4. Tentative E. pro arguments, explain concept</p><p>(classification) fund rights/terminally ill – passive vs. active</p><p> basis for divergent treatment, similarly situated?</p><p>Identify and apply appropriate scrutiny, develop argument</p><p>5. Eq. Pro re: increased punishment for MD</p><p>Identify classification, apply criteria, apply appropriate scrutiny/state justifications</p><p>Question Two (45 Points)</p><p>1. Identify Issue of Executive vs. Congressional Power/Role of cts.</p><p>2. Status & Effect of Executive Agreement vs. Art II Treaty</p><p>Contrast origins/creation/authority</p><p>3. Validity of Executive Agreement (terms of treaty/troops & Assault & recognition)</p><p>Jackson Analysis applied (understanding)</p><p>Identify lowest ebb & why (role of treaty/veto) policy angles for president</p><p>Compare Executive (foreign affairs, C in C, recog.)</p><p> w/ Congressional (declare war, legislature, $, for affairs?)</p><p>4. Political Question Analysis (Basis in Sep. of P, role of cts) > explain concept</p><p>Apply Baker factors/identify critical facts on justicibility questions</p><p>Esp. embarrass, inconsist, commitment, standards/parallel to Goldwater</p><p>5. Ripeness/standing</p><p>Question Three (30 points)</p><p>1. Identify Commerce clause issue > explain dormant cc concepts</p><p>2. Dormant CC > no preemption -- discrim vs. non-discrim. Arguments</p><p>Identify sources, types of discrim., use facts</p><p>Identify legal consequences> apply appropriate level of scrutiny (least restrictive alternative test and balancing test)</p><p>Make Arguments about means & ends using facts</p><p>3. Best counter arguments (esp. noxious materials angle but commerce!)</p><p>4. Econ regulation/Eq. Pro angle</p><p>Question Four (30 points)</p><p>1. Identify challenge (Eq. Pro/Reverse Discrim./Affirm. Action/Gender)</p><p>2. State Action (reason for it/basis) > test/factors/analogies</p><p>Funding promotes challenged actions/furthers injury > facts</p><p>3. Eq. Pro </p><p>Classification issues > gender or race (vs. fund rt- but educ.is not…)</p><p>Apply appropriate level of scrutiny (note reverse discrim argument fails)</p><p>Evaluation of ends & means</p><p>Impermissible Quota (Bakke) vs. gender as factor</p><p>Question Five (20 points)</p><p>1. Identify basis for challenge (Eq. Pro. )</p><p>2. Classification (Gender) identify > Eq. Pro Analysis w focus on intent/purpose</p><p>Facially neutral/disparate impact</p><p> use of facts & tie into intent issue</p><p>Identify & apply appropriate scrutiny</p><p>3. Distinguish Lucy from Paloma > identify state, evaluate means</p><p>Height, weight, test</p><p>Question Six (10 Points)-CC analysis/hording (discrim) / market particip.? / P & I? / Proc. d.P.?</p><p>Question Seven (10 Points)</p><p>P & I / CC Claims > Protected interest / tests / end & means / peculiar source</p><p> intra state (vs. I.C.) > discrim – scrutiny</p><p>Question Eight (10 Points)-- Fed. CC power, intrastate activity, substantial effect, (Educ or safety?) Weak eq pro / d.P. angles</p><p>Question Nine (10 Points) basis for rt (d.P. / Privacy rationale), Casey vs. Roe > scrutiny / test?</p><p> strict scrutiny / undue burden – sub obstacle / purpose or effect</p><p> life of mother issue / viability</p>