Aron, L. (2009). Alternative Schooling in the USA. in Kitty Te Riele (Eds.), Making Schools

Aron, L. (2009). Alternative Schooling in the USA. in Kitty Te Riele (Eds.), Making Schools

<p> Annotated Bibliography</p><p>Aron, L. (2009). Alternative schooling in the USA. In Kitty te Riele (Eds.), Making schools </p><p> different. (pp.10-19). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Incorporated.</p><p>This book chapter provides an overview of the need for alternative schooling in the </p><p>United States. The author conducts studies for U.S. and federal agencies and provides</p><p> an ongoing report to the nation on public mental health service systems. This chapter </p><p> also explains the term alternative schools and reviews the typologies of those schools. </p><p>Characteristics of high quality programs were addressed. The outcomes of alternative </p><p> schooling was discussed. This author pointed out that many students who qualify for</p><p> alternative schooling may be being pushed out of schools because they do not perform</p><p> well on high stakes tests. It is a “quiet crisis” our schools are facing. The alternatives</p><p> for these students is largely of unknown quality and too few in numbers and types of </p><p> facilities. This book chapter will be valuable to my research by addressing some basic </p><p> terminology and reviewing the basic types of alternative schools. This will add to my </p><p> discussion of the literature in my literature review section. </p><p>Booker, K., & Mitchell, A. (2011). Patterns in recidivism and discretionary placement in disciplinary alternative education: The impact of gender, ethnicity, age, and special</p><p> education status. Education & Treatment of Children (ETC), 34(2), 193-208. doi:10.</p><p>1353/etc.2011.0016</p><p>This study examined the probability of being placed in an alternative education setting</p><p> for disciplinary reasons and the possibility of returning within one year. The authors are</p><p> researchers at Texas Women’s University. They revealed that minority students and </p><p> high school students had a higher chance of returning within one year than non-minority</p><p> students and middle school students. Boys were also rated to have a higher rate of </p><p> return than girls. Students with special education services were noted to have about the</p><p> same return rate as non-special education students. Cultural and developmental </p><p> implications due to the findings of this study were discussed. This study provides clear</p><p> quantitative data on the impact of gender, race, and special education status on the</p><p> return rate of students to alternative school settings and will add dimension to my </p><p> research. Several suggestions for future practice and further research were outlined </p><p> which has given me ideas on where I may want to go with my own research. </p><p>Christle, C. A., Jolivette, K., & Nelson, C. (2005). Breaking the school to prison pipeline: </p><p>Identifying school risk and protective factors for youth delinquency. Exceptionality,</p><p>13(2), 69-88. doi:10.1207/s15327035ex1302_2 The authors of this study discussed key elements that are present and identified for </p><p> students who are on a school to prison track. The authors are professors at the </p><p>University of South Carolina, Georgia State University, and the University of </p><p>Kentucky. The key elements that were found are academic failure, exclusionary </p><p> discipline practice, and dropout. Three multi-method studies were conducted that </p><p> examined these key elements. The article points out that much research has been </p><p> conducted on the risks of delinquency but not on the variables to offset these risks. </p><p>This study specifically pointed out school characteristics and policies that can help to </p><p> minimize the risk factors or can intensify risk factors for delinquent students. This </p><p> article will be beneficial to my research because it points out key elements that have</p><p> been identified as risk factors for students who attend alternative schools. It will be </p><p> interesting to see if I find the same key elements in my own research. </p><p>D'Angelo, F., & Zemanick, R. (2009). The Twilight Academy: An alternative education program</p><p> that works. Preventing School Failure, 53(4), 211-218. doi:10.3200/PSFL.53.4.211-218</p><p>The authors of this article point out that youth today are more diverse than ever before.</p><p>Frank D’Angelo is an assistant professor at Bloomsburg University in Pennsylvania. </p><p>Robert Zemanick is an assistant principal at the Nazareth Area Middle School in </p><p>Pennsylvania. Schools need to address this diversity in their school population and create alternative education settings that meet the needs of the students that have </p><p> difficulty succeeding in a traditional classroom setting. The authors point out that </p><p> characteristics of successful alternative programs as well as the philosophy of </p><p> alternative education need to be clearly defined. Challenges to alternative schooling</p><p> also need to be well described and stated. This article is beneficial because it confirms</p><p> that alternative schools can be highly effective in providing an education to students </p><p> who have not been successful in traditional educational settings. This will add to my </p><p> literature review because it aids me in the triangulation of resources in support of </p><p> alternative schools.</p><p>Dixon, P. (2010). The forgotten room: Inside a public alternative school for at-risk youth.</p><p>Childhood Education, 87(1), 65. </p><p>The forgotten room is an ethnographic study of an alternative school in Georgia, and </p><p> gives a true candid look at an alternative school. The author, Patrick Dixon, is a </p><p>Principal of Bellflower Adult School in Bellflower Unified School District in </p><p>California. This is an eye-opening account that should be read by the people </p><p> determining policies, making decisions, or running support programs for alternative education. These individuals are often far removed from what actually goes on in </p><p> these </p><p> schools. This article will add to my research because it is different from other </p><p> ethnographic studies. This is due to the fact that the observer, Mary Hollowell, has</p><p> varied roles as, volunteer, substitute paraprofessional, observer, and teacher. This </p><p> allowed for a unique observatory perspective which weaves several alternative </p><p> education topics into one remarkable story. This article will help me to stay grounded</p><p> to the fact that what I am researching has real implications with real people not just</p><p> research subjects. </p><p>Houchins, D. E., Puckett-Patterson, D., Crosby, S., Shippen, M. E., & Jolivette, K. (2009).</p><p>Barriers and facilitators to providing incarcerated youth with a quality education.</p><p>Preventing School Failure, 53(3), 159-166. doi:10.3200/PSFL.53.3.159-166</p><p>The authors of this article collected a list of barriers and catalysts to providing a </p><p> quality education to youth that are incarcerated. The authors are professors at </p><p>Georgia State University and Auburn University. They provided a list which offered </p><p> several themes for starting point to discussing how to improve the educational </p><p> process and its quality for youth that are incarcerated. The following nine themes are </p><p> the foundation for discussions: discipline, student concerns, academics, personnel concerns, materials and supplies, parent involvement, funding, communication, and </p><p> facilities. The authors used the constant comparative method to analyze their data. The</p><p> article then focused as to what teachers and administrators can do specifically to </p><p> improve the educational process for incarcerated youth. This article will be useful to me</p><p> because the themes will help me to focus on specific areas that I may want to include in </p><p> my questionnaires. The constant comparative method is also something I am </p><p> considering for my own research method.</p><p>Rios, L. (1996). Me...teach criminals? The true adventures of a prison teacher. New York, </p><p>NY: Vantage Press Incorporated.</p><p>This book is a true account personal account of teaching criminals for eight years in a </p><p>Texas jail system. The author, Lorna Rios, taught Texas prisoners in two jails and a </p><p> prison for eight years. She has also taught probationers and GED classes for Austin</p><p>Community College. She is currently a certified public school teacher in Idaho and is </p><p> a professional presenter and conference speaker. The author discovers that </p><p> approximately 80% of the prisoners she teaches are high school dropouts. She explores </p><p> the question of why this is so, and what makes these prisoners different from other </p><p> uneducated adults. This narrative explores prejudices toward minority groups and the notion that incarcerating people for longer terms does not work. This actually makes it </p><p> harder for prisoners to rehabilitate and transition back into a free society. This book </p><p> will assist me in my research by giving me a first-hand account of what it is like to work</p><p> in an alternative setting.</p><p>Tissington, L.D. (2006). History: Our hope for the future. Preventing School Failure, 51(1), </p><p>19-25. http://courses.unt.edu/bullock/readings/PreventingSchool51%281%29.pdf#page=</p><p>18</p><p>The author of this article looks at how public education has changed throughout history. </p><p>Laura Tissington is an assistant professor and Associate Chair of the College of </p><p>Professional Studies at the University of West Florida in Pensacola, Florida. She points</p><p> out that these changes have led to the formation of alternative education settings which </p><p> are now fast growing due to the need of these settings. Quality alternative education </p><p> settings must contain essential components in order to comply with federal mandates </p><p> that require all public schools hold all students to the same standard. Tissington </p><p> declares that administrators and teachers are cautious about counting low test scores</p><p> on state tests or low school averages. This article is valuable because it provides me</p><p> with the history of public education. This will help to give readers a better </p><p> understanding of the role of education and how it relates to the growing field of alternative education. </p><p>Turton, A. M., Umbreit, J., & Mathur, S. R. (2011). Systematic function-based intervention for </p><p> adolescents with emotional and behavioral disorders in an alternative setting: </p><p>Broadening the context. Behavioral Disorders, 36(2), 117-128. Retrieved from </p><p>EBSCOhost.</p><p>This article examines the efficacy of function-based interventions in an alternative </p><p> setting. The authors are researchers from the University of Alaska at Anchorage, </p><p>University of Arizona, and Arizona State University respectively. Their interventions</p><p> were designed to support students with emotional and behavioral disorders. It was </p><p> decided that implementing these interventions would continue even after the study </p><p> ended in an effort to control behavior and to facilitate transition back into the </p><p> mainstream classroom. This article pointed out a major problem in how we are </p><p> educating a whole group of children. This information is important because it adds to </p><p> the literature supporting the efficacy function-based interventions and the social validity </p><p> of those interventions. This will be invaluable to my research in many ways. I hope to add some component where I look at how students transition back to their home </p><p> schools. This article gives me ideas on how to make that transition more successful and</p><p> hopefully reduce the return rate of students back to alternative schools.</p><p>Vacca, J. S. (2004). Educated prisoners are less likely to return to prison. Journal of </p><p>Correctional Education, 55(4), 297-305. Retrieved from EBSCOhost. </p><p>This study supports earlier research that prisoners who attend some type of educational</p><p> programs during the time they are incarcerated are less likely to return to prison once </p><p> they are released. The author, James Vacca, is the Chair of Special Education and </p><p>Literacy at C.W. Post College in Long Island, New York. He has taught reading and</p><p> writing to inmates at a maximum security prison in Comstock, New York. He was also</p><p> a school teacher and administrator in New York Public Schools and residential </p><p> treatment centers for more than thirty years. Educational programs in prisons account</p><p> for less violence by inmates involved in the program. They also help to create a more</p><p> positive prison climate. This is confirmed by several studies in several states. In </p><p> addition, these educational programs advocate vocational training for prisoners. This</p><p> is especially important when prisoners transition from prison back to society. This </p><p> article gives me strong support in favor of alternative schooling.</p>

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    9 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us