<p>RUBRIC FOR PhD STUDENT TEACHING PORTFOLIO</p><p>Attribute Does not meet expectations Meets expectations Exceeds expectations Syllabus □ Poorly organized □ Acceptable organization □ Excellent organized □ Course objectives are unclear □ Course objectives are reasonably □ Course objectives are extremely □ Grading methods are not clearly clear clear explained or are unreasonable □ Grading methods are explained □ Grading methods are clearly □ Readings and reference list and reasonable explained and appropriate inadequate or inappropriate □ Readings and reference list □ Readings and reference list appropriate thorough and closely linked to course topics</p><p>Topic □ Poor knowledge of topic area □ Adequate knowledge of topic area □ Excellent knowledge of topic area knowledge and □ Incorrect information □ Information is correct □ Information is excellent lectures □ Focus is on less-important □ Focus is acceptable □ Focus is on most important information □ Good organization information □ Poor organization □ Good use of graphics □ Excellent organization □ Poor use of graphics □ Slides are clear □ Excellent use of graphics □ Slides are unclear □ Good documentation □ Slides have excellent clarity □ Poor documentation □ Presentation is mostly at the level □ Excellent documentation □ Wrong level of detail for this appropriate for this type of course □ Excellent choice of level of detail type of class Other material □ Course website is unclear or □ Course website is clear and □ Course website is well organized poorly organized organized and of excellent quality □ Other material (if provided) are □ Other materials (if provided) are □ Other material (if provided) are unclear or poorly designed clear excellent</p><p>Overall □ Does not meet expectations □ Meets expectations □ Exceeds expectations assessment Constructive comments for student:</p>