<p> Hyperreading References and Recommended Readings </p><p>2012-2013 Strategic Plan. (n.d.). LaGuardia Community College. Retrieved February 15, 2013, from https://web.laguardia.edu/president/content/</p><p>Abedi, J. (2009). Computer Testing as a Form of Accommodation for English Language Learners. Educational Assessment, 14(3/4), 195-211. doi:10.1080/10627190903448851</p><p>Afflerbach, P. & Cho, B.Y. (2009). Determining and describing reading strategies: Internet and traditional forms of reading. In H.S. Waters& W. Schneider (Eds.), Metacognition, strategy use, and instruction (p. 201-225). New York: Guilford Press.</p><p>Agosto, D. E. (2002). A model of young people’s decision-making in using the web. Library and Information Science Research, 24, 311-341. </p><p>Angus, K. B., and J. Greenbaum. "Position statement on rights of adult readers and learners." Teaching study strategies in developmental education. . Boston, MA: Bedford/St. Martin's, 2012. 80-88. Print.</p><p>Anstey, M., & Bull, G. (2006). Teaching and learning multiliteracies: Changing times, changing literacies. Newark: DE: International Reading Association and Australian Literacy Educators’ Association. approaches. (3rd Edition.) San Francisco: Sage Publications Inc.</p><p>Bailey, T., & Cho, S. (2010). Issue brief: Developmental education in community colleges prepared for: The White House Summit on Community College. Community College Research Center, September, 1-5.</p><p>Bakar, N., Noor, N., Azman, H., Nor, N., & Hamat, A. (2011). Students' Evaluation of an Intelligent English Language Literacy System (I-ELLS). International Journal of Educational & Psychological Assessment, 6(2), 63-82. Retrieved from EBSCOhost.</p><p>Barab, S. A., Bowdish, B. E., & Lawless, K. A. (1997). Hypermedia navigation: Profiles of hypermedia users. Education Technology Research and Development, 45(3), 23-42.</p><p>Berg, S. A., Hoffman, K. & Dawson, D. (2010). Not on the same page: Undergraduates’ information retrieval in electronic and print books. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 36 (6), 518-525.</p><p>Bilal, D. (2001). Children’s use of the Yahooligans! Web search engine: II. Cognitive and physical behaviors on research tasks. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(2), 188-136.</p><p>Blanchard, J. S. & Farstrup, A.E. (2011). Technologies, digital media, and reading instruction. In S. J. Samuels & A. E. Farstrup (Eds.) What research has to say about reading instruction (fourth edition) pp. 286-314. Boud, D., Cohen, R., & Walker, D. (1993). Introduction: Understanding Learning from Experience. In D. Boud, R. Cohen, & D Walker, (Eds.) Using Experience for Learning, (pp. 1-18), Michigan, The Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press. </p><p>Brookfield, S. (1986). Understanding and facilitating adult learning: A comprehensive analysis of principles and effective practices. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.</p><p>Burbules, N. C. (1998). Rhetorics of the web: hyperreading and critical literacy. In Snyder, I. (ed.) Page to screen: Taking literacy into the electronic era (1998):102-122.</p><p>Burbules, N. C., & Callister, T. A. (2000). Watch IT. The risks and promises of information technologies for education. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.</p><p>Burton, V., & Chadwick, S. (2000). Investigating the practices of student researchers: Patterns of use and criteria for use of internet and library source. Computers and Computation, 17(3), 309-328.</p><p>Cammack, D. (2005a). By any means necessary: Understanding the literacy and technology practices of using multimedia in a college history course (Doctoral dissertation, Teachers College. Columbia University, 2005). Dissertation Abstracts International, 66, 229.</p><p>Carmel, E., Crawford, S., & Chen, H. (1992). Browsing in hypertext: A cognitive study. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 22, 865-884.</p><p>Caverly, D. C., Peterson, C. L., Delaney, C. J., & Starks-Martin, G. A. (2009). Technology integration. In R. F. Flippo & D. C. Caverly (Eds.) Handbook of college reading and study strategy research. 314-350.</p><p>Chen, C., & Ford, N. (1998). Modeling user navigation behaviors in a hypermedia-based learning system: An individual difference approach. International Journal of Knowledge Organization, 25, 67-78.</p><p>Chen, S. Y., Fan, J. –P., & Macredie, R. D. (2006). Navigation in hypermedia learning systems: Experts versus novices. Computers in Human Behavior, 22, 251-266. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2004.06.004</p><p>Chi, M. T., & Ceci, S. J. (1987). Content knowledge: Its role, representation, and restructuring in memory development. In H. W. Reese (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior (Vol. 20, pp. 91-142). San Diego Academic.</p><p>Coiro, J. (2012). Understanding dispositions toward reading on the Internet. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 55 (7), (April), 645-648. Coiro, J., & Dobler, E. (2004). Investigating how less-skilled and skilled readers use cognitive reading strategies while reading on the Internet. Paper presented at the 54th annual meeting of the National Reading Conference, San Antonio, Texas. </p><p>Common Core State Standard Initiative. (2012). English Language Arts Standards. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/ELA-Literacy</p><p>Cromley, J., & Azevedo, R. (2009). Locating information within extended hypermedia. Educational Technology Research & Development, 57(3), 287-313. doi:10.1007/s11423- 008-9106-5</p><p>Curry, M. (2004). UCLA Community College Review: Academic Literacy for English Language Learners. Community College Review, 32(2), 51-68. Retrieved from EBSCOhost.</p><p>Dalton, B. & Proctor, P. (2008). The changing landscape of text and comprehension in the age of new literacies. In J. Coiro, M. Knobel, C. Lankshear, & D. J. Leu, (Eds.), Handbook of Research on New Literacies (pp. 297-324) Mahwah, NJ Erlbaum.</p><p>Dalton, B., & Proctor, P. (2007). Reading as thinking: Integrating strategy instruction in a universally designed digital literacy environment. In D. S. McNamara (Ed.), Reading comprehension strategies: Theories, interventions, and technologies. (pp. 423-442).</p><p>Dee-Lucas, D. (1999). Information location in instructional hypertext: Effects of content domain expertise. Proceedings of the World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia, and Telecommunications, 242-247.</p><p>Eagleton, M. b., Guinee, K., & Langlais, K. (2003). Teaching Internet literacy strategies The hero inquiry project. Voices from the Middle, 10(3), 28-35.</p><p>Ellis, M., & Pillai, A. (2009). Addressing Digital Literacy in the English Language Class. TESL Reporter, 42(1), 66-71. Retrieved from EBSCOhost.</p><p>Eschet-Alkalai, Y. & Amichai-Hamburger, Y. (2004). Experiments in digital literacy. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 7(4), 421-429.</p><p>Eshet-Alkalai, Y. (2004) Digital Literacy: A Conceptual Framework for Survival Skills in the Digital Era. Journal of Educational Multimedia & Hypermedia. 13 (1), 93-106.</p><p>Evans, E., & Po, J. (2007). A break in the transaction: Examining students' responses to digital texts. Computers and Composition, 24, 56-73.</p><p>Eveland, W., and Dunwoody, S. (1998). Users and navigation patterns of a science World Wide Web site for the public. Public Understand. Sci., 7, 285-311. Fabos, B. (2008). The price of information: Critical literacy, education, and today’s Internet. In J. Coiro, M. Knobel, C. Lankshear, & D. J. Leu, (Eds.), Handbook of Research on New Literacies (pp. 839-870) Mahwah, NJ Erlbaum.</p><p>Fidel, R., Davies, R. K., Douglass, M. H., Holder, J. K., Hopkins, C. J., Kushner, E. J., et al. (1999). A visit to the information mall: Web searching behavior of high school students. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(1), 24-37.</p><p>Gerdes, H. (1997). Learn with text and hypermedia. Berlin: Pabst Lengerich.</p><p>Gerhart, S. L. (2004), January). Do Web search engines suppress controversy? First Monday, 9 (1). Retrieved August 16, 3013, from http://firstmonday.org/issues/issue9_1gerhart/index.html.</p><p>Gulli, A., & Signorini, A. (2005). The indexable Web is more than 11.5 billion pages. Poster proceedings of the 14th international conference on World Wide Web, pages 902-903, Chiba, Japan: ACM Press.</p><p>Harada, V. H. (2001). From instruction to construction: Learning in the information age. Paper presented at the Ninth Treasure Mountain Research Retreat for School Library Media Programs, Brown County, Indiana.</p><p>Hartman, D.K., Morsink, P.M., & Zheng, J. (2010). From print to pixels: The evolution of cognitive conceptions of reading comprehension. In E.A. Baker (Ed.). The new literacies: Multiple perspectives on research and practice. The Guilford Press. New York.</p><p>Hawisher, G. E., & Selfe, C. L. (2004). Becoming literate in the information age: Cultural ecologies and the literacies of technology. College Composition and Communication, 55(4), 642-692).</p><p>Hayles, N. K. (2010). How we read: close, hyper, machine. ADE Bulletin. 150.</p><p>Henry, L. (2006). Exploring new literacies pedagogy and online reading comprehension among adolescents and their teachers: Issues of social equity or social exclusion? Dissertation proposal, University of Connecticut, Storrs. </p><p>Henry, L. A. (2006). SEARCHing for an answer: The critical role of new literacies while reading on the Internet. Reading Teacher, 59(7), 614-627. doi:10.1598/RT.59.7.1</p><p>Hsieh, P., & Dwyer, F. (2009). The instructional effect of online reading strategies and learning styles on student academic achievement. Educational Technology and Society, 12 (2), 36- 50.</p><p>Jones, S. (2003). Let the games begin: Gaming technology and entertainment among college students. Retrieved August 4, 2013, from http://www.pewinternet.org/reports/toc.asp? Reports=93 Kaufmann, D. F., Zhao, R. & Yang, Y-S. (2011). Effects of online note taking formats and self- monitoring prompts on learning from online text: Using technology to enhance self- regulating learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology. </p><p>Kozma, R. B. (1991). Learning with media. Review of Educational Research, 6, 179-211.</p><p>Kuiper, E. & Volman, M. (2008). The web as a source of information for K-12 education. In J. Coiro, M. Knobel, C. Lankshear, & D. J. Leu, (Eds.), Handbook of Research on New Literacies (pp. 267-296) Mahwah, NJ Erlbaum.</p><p>Kuiper, E., Volman, M., & Terwel, J. (2005). The web as an information resource in K-12 education: Strategies for supporting students in searching and processing information. Review of Educational Research, 75, 285-328.</p><p>Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2003). New Literacies: Changing knowledge and classroom learning. Philadelphia: Open University Press.</p><p>Larson, L. C. (2008). Electronic Reading Workshop: Beyond Books With New Literacies and Instructional Technologies. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 52(2), 121-131. Retrieved from EBSCOhost.</p><p>Laurillard, D. (1998). Multimedia and the learner’s experience of narrative. Computers & Education, 31, 229-242.</p><p>Lawless, K. A. & Schrader, P. G. (2008). Where do we go now? Understanding research on navigation in complex digital environments. In J. Coiro, M. Knobel, C. Lankshear, & D. J. Leu, (Eds.), Handbook of Research on New Literacies (pp. 267-296) Mahwah, NJ Erlbaum.</p><p>Lawless, K. A., & Kulikowich, J. M. (1996). Understanding hypertext navigation through cluster analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 14(4) 385-399.</p><p>Le Bigot, L. & Rouet, J-F. (2007). The impact of presentation format, task assignment, and prior knowledge on students’ comprehension of multiple online documents. Journal of Literacy Research, 39(4), 445-470.</p><p>Leu, D. J. & Kinzer, C. K. (2000). The convergence of literacy instruction with networked technologies for information and communication. Reading Research Quarterly, 35 (1). 108-127.</p><p>Leu, D. J., Kinzer, C.K., Coiro, J. & Cammack, D. (2004). Toward a theory of new literacies emerging from the Internet and other Information and Communication Technologies. In R. B. Ruddell & N. Unrau (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (5th ed., pp 1570-1613). DE: International Reading Association. Leu, D., & Zawilinski, L. (2007). The new literacies of online reading comprehension. New England Reading Association Journal, 43 (1), 1-7.</p><p>Lorenzen, M. (2001). The land of confusion? High school students and their use of the World Wide Web for research. Research Strategies, 18, 151-163.</p><p>Loveless, A., Devoogd, G. L., & Bohlin, R. M. (2001). Something old, something new…Is pedagogy affected by ICT? In A. Loveless & V. Ellis (Eds.), ICT. Pedagogy and the curriculum: Subject to change (pp. 63-83). London: Routledge/Falmer.</p><p>Lui, Z. (2005). Reading behavior in the digital environment: Changes in reading behavior over the last ten years. Journal of Documentation, 61(6), 700-713.</p><p>MacGregor, S. K. (1999). Hypermedia navigation profiles: Cognitive characteristics and information processing strategies. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 20(2), 189-206.</p><p>Manuel, Kate. (2008). Teaching information literacy to Generation Y. Journal of Library Administration, 36, 195-217.</p><p>Meyer, A., & Rose, D. H. (2005). The future is in the margins: The role of technology and disability in educational reform. In D. H. Rose, A. Meyer, & C. Hitchcock (Eds.), The universally designed classroom: Accessible curriculum and digital technologies (pp. 13- 35). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.</p><p>Mokhtari, K. (2008). Assessing the new literacies of online reading comprehension: An informative interview with W. Ian O'Byrne, Lisa Zawilinski, J. Greg McVerry, and Donald J. Leu at the University of Connecticut. The Reading Teacher, 62 (4), 354-357.</p><p>Murphy, C. A. (1988). Assessment of computer self-efficacy: Instrument development and validation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, San Francisco, CA.</p><p>National Association for Developmental Education. (1995). Definition and goals statement. Carol Stream, IL: Author.</p><p>Navarro-Pieto, R., Scaife, M., & Rogers, Y. (1999). Cognitive strategies in web searching. In A. Spink & G. J. Jenson (Eds.). Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Human Factors & the Web, (pp. 19-34), Eindhoven, The Netherlands: Springer-Verlag.</p><p>Ophir, E., Nass, C., & Wagner, A. (2009). Cognitive control in media multitaskers. Proceedings of the National Academies of Science of the United States of America, published ahead of print August 24, 2009, doi:10.1073/pnas.0903620106.</p><p>Patterson, N. (2000). Hypertext and the changing roles of readers. English Journal, 90(2), 75-90. Prichard, C. (2008). Evaluating L2 readers' vocabulary strategies and dictionary use. Reading in a Foreign Language, 20(2), 216-231. Retrieved from EBSCOhost.</p><p>Proctor, C., Dalton, B., & Grisham, D. L. (2007). Scaffolding English Language Learners and Struggling Readers in a Universal Literacy Environment With Embedded Strategy Instruction and Vocabulary Support. Journal of Literacy Research, 39(1), 71-93. doi:10.1080/10862960701326530</p><p>Rager, K. B. (2006). Self-directed learning and the organizing circumstance: Opportunities and challenges posed by the Internet and the web. International Journal of Self-Directed Learning, 3 (1), 52-60.</p><p>RAND Reading Study Group. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward an R & D program in reading comprehension. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.</p><p>Rosenblatt, L. M. (1978). The reader, the text, the poem: the transactional theory of the literary work. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.</p><p>Rosenblatt, L. M. (2005). Making meaning with texts: selected essays. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.</p><p>Salmeron, L. (2005). Reading strategies and hypertext comprehension. Discourse Processes, 40, 171-191.</p><p>Sandberg, K. (2011). College student academic reading: A review of the current literature. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 42 (1)(Fall), 89-98.</p><p>Sandberg, K. (2013). Hypertext: Its nature and challenges for college students. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 44(1). p. 51-71.</p><p>Schmar-Dobler, E. (2003). Reading on the Internet: The link between literacy and technology. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 47(1), 80-85. Retrieved from EBSCOhost.</p><p>Schwartz, N. H., Andersen, C., Hong, N., Howard, B., & McGee, S. (2004). The influence of metacognitive skills on learners’ memory of information in a hypermedia environment. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 31, 77-93.</p><p>Shapiro, A., & Niederhauser, D. (2004). Learning from hypertext: Research issues and findings. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp. 605-620). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.</p><p>Shenton, A. K., & Dixon, P. (2003). A comparison of youngsters’ use of CD-ROM and the Internet as information resources. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(11), 1029-1049. Smythe, S., & Neufeld, P. (2010). "Podcast Time": Negotiating Digital Literacies and Communities of Learning in a Middle Years ELL Classroom. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 53(6), 488-496. Retrieved from EBSCOhost.</p><p>Snow, C. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward a research and development program in reading comprehension. Pittsburg, PA: Office of Educational Research and Improvement.</p><p>Snyder, I., & Bulfin, S. (2008). Using new media in the secondary English classroom. for K-12 education. In J. Coiro, M. Knobel, C. Lankshear, & D. J. Leu, (Eds.), Handbook of Research on New Literacies (pp. 805-838) Mahwah, NJ Erlbaum.</p><p>Sox, A., & Rubinstein-Ávila, E. (2009). WebQuests for English-Language Learners: Essential Elements for Design. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 53(1), 38-48. Retrieved from EBSCOhost.</p><p>Spiro, R. J., Vispoel, W., Schmitz, J., Samarapungavan, A., & Boerger, A. (1987). Knowledge acquisition for application: Cognitive flexibility and transfer in complex content domains. In B. C. Britton (Ed.), Executive control processes (pp. 177-200). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.</p><p>Sutherland-Smith, W. (2002). Weaving the literacy Web: Changes in reading from page to screen. The Reading Teacher, 55, 662-669.</p><p>Tapscott, R., (1998). Growing up digital: The rise of the Net generation. New York: McGraw- Hill.</p><p>Tsai, M. & Tsai, C. (2003). Information searching strategies in web-based science learning: The role of Internet self-efficacy. Innovation in Education and Teaching International, 40(1), 43-50.</p><p>Van Meter, P. N., & Firetto, C. (2008). Intertextuality and the study of new literacies: Research critique and recommendations. In J. Coiro, M. Knobel, C. Lankshear, & D. J. Leu, (Eds.), Handbook of Research on New Literacies (pp. 1079-1092) Mahwah, NJ Erlbaum.</p><p>Verezub, E., Grossi, V., Howard, K., & Watkins, P. (2008). Building e-based literacy for vocational education and training students. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24(3), 326-338. Retrieved from EBSCOhost.</p><p>Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.</p><p>Whitaker, L. A. (1998). Human navigation. In C. Forsythe, E. Grose, & J. Ratner (Eds.), Human factors and Web development. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.</p><p>Wilber, D. J. (2008). College students and new literacy practices. In J. Coiro, M. Knobel, C. Lankshear, & D. J. Leu, (Eds.), Handbook of Research on New Literacies (pp. 553-582) Mahwah, NJ Erlbaum. Wittgenstien, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations. New York: Macmillan.</p><p>Yang, Y. C., & Chou, H. (2008). Beyond critical thinking skills: Investigating the relationship between critical thinking skills and dispositions through different online instructional strategies. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(4), 666-684. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00767.x</p><p>Zhang, H., & Salvendy, G. (2001). The implications of visualization ability and structure preview design for Web information search tasks. International Journal of Human Computer Interaction, 13(1), 75-95.</p><p>Zhang, S. & Duke, N. K. (2008). Strategies for Internet reading with different reading purposes: A descriptive study of twelve good internet readers. Journal of Literacy Research, 40, 128-162.</p>
Details
-
File Typepdf
-
Upload Time-
-
Content LanguagesEnglish
-
Upload UserAnonymous/Not logged-in
-
File Pages9 Page
-
File Size-