Folic Acid Supplementation

Folic Acid Supplementation

<p>FOLIC ACID SUPPLEMENTATION</p><p>Study Design No. of Patient Interventions Outcomes Subgroup Analyses of Notes Patients Population Clinical Endpoints in Women</p><p>Liem RCT N overall: Secondary 1) Open-label folic Primary study outcome(s): None reported 2003 593 prevention acid 0.5 mg QD (n Composite of vascular = 300) events (death, MI, stroke, N women: Pts had “stable revascularization, vascular 72 treated, CAD” defined 2) Standard of care surgery) 59 control as at least one (n = 293) of following: Clinical endpoints of interest: Mean age: MI, lesions ≥ 1) Composite outcome(s): 64.9 treated, 60% on Folic acid: 37 (12.3%) 65.5 control angiography, events PCI, CABG Control: 33 (11.2%) events Age range: SD 9.9 Mean follow up 2) Heart attack/MI: treated, SD 24 months Folic acid: 3 9.7 control Control: 4 </p><p>% Diabetics: 3) Stroke (hemorrhagic, 7% treated, non-hemorrhagic, TIA): 11% control Folic acid: 4 Control: 3 % Caucasian: 4) Revascularization NR procedure (PCI, bypass): Folic acid: 10 Control: 6 </p><p>5) Death/mortality: Folic acid: 12 Control: 14 </p><p>6) CHF: NR</p><p>Schnyder RCT N overall: Secondary 1) Folate 1 mg, Primary study outcome(s): None reported Primary 2001 205 patients prevention Vitamin B12 400 Presence or absence of endpoint of mcg, pyridoxine 10 restenosis by follow up restenosis N women: Status post mg tab QD (n = angiography reached in 18/92</p><p>Page 1 of 4 Study Design No. of Patient Interventions Outcomes Subgroup Analyses of Notes Patients Population Clinical Endpoints in Women 46 PTCA 105) treated pts Clinical endpoints of interest: (19.6%) vs. 32 Mean age: 2) Placebo (n = 1) Composite outcome(s): of 85 placebo 61 100) Treatment: 13 pts (37.6%), P = Placebo: 23 0.01 Age range: Followed for 6 SD 11.3 months 2) Heart attack/MI: Treatment: 5 % Diabetics: Placebo: 7 27 3) Stroke (hemorrhagic, % non-hemorrhagic, TIA): Caucasian: NR NR 4) Revascularization procedure (PCI, bypass): Treatment: 11 Placebo: 21</p><p>5) Death/mortality: Treatment: 1 Placebo: 2 </p><p>6) CHF: NR</p><p>Schnyder RCT N overall: Secondary 1) Folic acid 1 mg Primary study outcome(s): 1) Composite outcome(s): 2002 553 prevention QD, Vitamin B12 Composite outcome of Data presented in figure, no 400 mcg QD, death, nonfatal MI, need for absolute numbers given, N women: Status post pyridoxine 10 mg repeat revascularization at 6 95% CI approx 0.45-1.3 108 PTCA QD (n = 272) months and 1 year 2) Heart attack/MI: NR Mean age: 2) Placebo QD (n = Clinical endpoints of interest: 63.4 treated, 281) 1) Composite outcome(s): 3) Stroke (hemorrhagic, 61.8 placebo 6 months: 11.4% treatment, non-hemorrhagic, TIA): NR For 6 months 18.9% placebo; RR, 0.60; Age range: 95%CI 0.40-0.91, P = 0.02 4) Revascularization SD 10.6 procedure (PCI, bypass): treated, 11.0 12 months: n = 42, 15.4% NR placebo treatment, n = 64, 22.8% placebo; RR, 0.68, 95% CI 5) Death/mortality: NR % Diabetics: 0.48-0.96, P = 0.03</p><p>Page 2 of 4 Study Design No. of Patient Interventions Outcomes Subgroup Analyses of Notes Patients Population Clinical Endpoints in Women 27-28 6) CHF: NR 2) Heart attack/MI: % 12 months: Caucasian: 7 treatment, 12 placebo, NR unadjusted p = .27, HR 0.60 (95%CI .24-1.51), adjusted p = .17, HR .57 (.27-1.42)</p><p>3) Stroke (hemorrhagic, non-hemorrhagic, TIA): NR</p><p>4) Revascularization procedure (PCI, bypass): Target lesion revascularization: Treatment n = 27, placebo n = 45, unadjusted p = 0.03, HR 0.62 (0.40-0.97), adjusted p = .02, HR 0.61 (0.41-0.95) Any revascularization: Treatment n = 38, placebo n = 56, unadjusted p = .06, HR 0.70 (0.49-1.01), adjusted p = .04, HR 0.69 (0.51-0.98)</p><p>5) Death/mortality: Cardiac death: Treatment n = 3, placebo = 6, unadjusted p = .34, HR 0.52 (0.13-2.04), adjusted p = .23, HR 0.51(0.15-2.00)</p><p>Any death: Treatment n = 4, placebo n = 8, unadjusted p = .27, HR 0.54(0.16-1.70), adjusted p = .17, HR 0.52 (0.21-1.56)</p><p>6) CHF: NR</p><p>Page 3 of 4 REFERENCES:</p><p>1. Liem A, Reynierse-Buitenwerf GH, Zwinderman AH, et al. Secondary prevention with folic acid: effects on clinical outcomes. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2003;41(12):2105-13.</p><p>2. Schnyder G, Roffi M, Pin R, et al. Decreased rate of coronary restenosis after lowering of plasma homocysteine levels. New England Journal of Medicine 2001;345(22):1593-600.</p><p>3. Schnyder G, Roffi M, Flammer Y, et al. Effect of homocysteine-lowering therapy with folic acid, vitamin B(12), and vitamin B(6) on clinical outcome after percutaneous coronary intervention: the Swiss Heart study: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2002;288(8):973-9.</p><p>Page 4 of 4</p>

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    4 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us