<p>Deception Course-- Psychology 323—Spring 2016 J. Peter Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Professor Department of Psychology Institute for Neuroscience Northwestern University Evanston, Il. 60208 Phone 847-491-3629 Fax 847-491-7859 [email protected] http://www.psych.nwu.edu/psych/people/faculty/rosenfeld/</p><p>This is an introduction to the topic of deception. For the first 5 weeks, we will cover the demographics, language, determinants, styles, and examples of deceit. We will also cover behavioral analyses of deception. In the remaining 5 weeks, we will study the physiological detection of deception. You may expect to read about 50 pages per week in: </p><p>Aldert Vrij (2008) Detecting Lies and Deceit : Pitfalls and Opportunities, second edition (Wiley Series in Psychology of Crime, Policing and Law) (Paperback available)</p><p>The Vrij book is available on line from Amazon, etc. In the beginning, we will stick close to the Vrij book, using and discussing it to get a sense of the psychosocial determinants of deception. This book has its limitations and is no bible. It is pretty simple to zip through.</p><p>When we deal with the detection of deception, since that is my major research area, I will do some lecturing, and the Vrij text augmented with readings in the primary literature, will be background. Required reading in black font. Purple color below is optional reading. I will discuss the new brain wave deception tests, which I helped develop.</p><p>There are 2, non-cumulative, multiple choice exams, the average of which influence your grade 67%, if your class participation allows me to take it in to consideration I will consider it up to an influence value of 33%. If you are the strong silent type, then your exam average will determine your grade entirely.</p><p>OUTLINE</p><p>WEEK READING TOPICS (underlined) Weeks 1-2 Vrij Ch 1,2,3(to p.50) Demographics, definitions of deception “ “ 3(50-90), 4 Verbal & Non-Verbal Behaviors “ “ 8 Statement Validity Assessment Web Page”Project Implicit” Implicit Association Test Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464-1480. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464</p><p>Week 3 Vrij Ch 9,10 Reality Monitoring, SCAN Boogards et al (2016) </p><p>. </p><p>4 Vrij Ch 11, The “Control Question” test (CQT) </p><p>5 Vrij Ch 12, The “Guilty Knowledge” test(GKT); Lykken,D. (1959) The GSR in the detection of guilt, Journal of Applied Psychology,43, 385-388.</p><p>6-8 Vrij Ch 13, Brain-based GKTs,CQTs CQ NRC/NASA report. The Polygraph and Lie Detection(2003) Nat. Acad. Sc. </p><p>9 to end Limitations of older brain-based tests, a New “CTP” Protocol ; Rosenfeld, J.P. Soskins,M., Bosh, G., & Ryan, A. (2004) Simple effective countermeasures to P300-based tests of detection of concealed information. Psychophysiology, 41, 205-219. </p><p>Rosenfeld, J.P. “Brain Fingerprinting,” A Critical Analysis. (2005) Sc. Rev. Ment. Health Practice, 4,20-37. WEB SITE/ PUBLICATIONS/RECENT PAPERS</p><p>Rosenfeld, J.P. et al., (2008) The Complex Trial Protocol (CTP): A new, countermeasure- resistant, accurate P300-based method for detection of concealed information (2008) Psychophysiology, 45, 906-919.WEB SITE/ PUBLICATIONS/RECENT PAPERS</p><p>J. P. Rosenfeld (2011) P300 in Detecting Concealed Information. In B. Verschuere, G. Ben Shakhar, & E. Meijer, (Eds.) Memory Detection: Theory and application of the concealed information test . (69 pages) Cambridge University Press. WEB SITE/CLASSES/312-2/Book Chapters, # 5. United States General Accounting Office (2001) Report to Hon. Charles E. Grassley, U.S. Senate Investigative Techniques: Federal Agency Views on the Potential of "Brain Fingerprinting." USGAO: GAO-02-2</p>