<p> Supplemental Materials Absence of Malice: A Meta-Analysis of Nonresponse Bias in Counterproductive Work Behavior Research by L. M. Greco et al., 2014, Journal of Applied Psychology http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0037495</p><p>Appendix A Meta-Analysis Reporting Standards (MARS) Data Transparency Table D C J O J</p><p>Author Year N RR C R M S rxx A CS N J FJ J SJ PJ P OI OO C OS TI S Abad 2010 99 .39 C S 0.25 0D .82 G . − . 1 −.1 Akremi et al. 2010 602 .70 C S 0.17 0 .80 4 −.38 −.30 7 −.17 . − . 1 −.0 S 0.20 0 .77 0 −.21 −.16 9 −.13 Alexander 2011 25 .25 C O 0.07 0. .71 . . 0 Alias et al. 2012 160 .80 C S 0.39 0 .84 −.15 1 . . 0 S 0.46 0 .82 −.17 8 . − . 2 Alias et al. 2013 429 .86 C S 0.08 0 .89 - -.13 0 . . − . 2 C S 0.09 0 .86 - -.38 7 . . − . Andreoli & 3 Lefkowitz 2009 145 C S 0.19 0 .76 5 Aquino et al. 2003 384 .67 A S 0.11 0. .88 . . 1 Aquino et al. 2004 192 .54 C S 0.08 0 .76 0 . . 2 S 0.08 0 .74 4 . − − . . Aquino, 1 2 −.1 Lewis, et al. 1999 245 .52 C S 0.11 0 .73 8 4 6 . − − . . 1 2 −.0 S 0.08 0 .76 0 0 9 . − . 3 Ashforth et al. 2013 251 .58 C S 0.20 0 .76 −.24 .15 1 Aujla 2010 327 .59 I S 0.19 0. .79 −.36 . − . 3 −.4 Babamiri et al. 2013 121 .11 C S 0.11 0 .90 − −.33 3 −.46 −.33 2 . . − . 3 −.4 S 0.11 0 .87 − −.38 3 −.47 −.27 2 Baillien et al. 2011 680 .37 B S 0.08 0. .66 . . − . 2 Banks et al. 2012 111 .74 C S 0.12 0 .87 4 . − . 2 S 0.13 0 .91 5 . Bardes Mawritz et al. 2012 288 .75 C O 0.20 0 .93 Bauer 2011 103 .43 C O 0.07 0. .84 . − 0 −.1 Bechtoldt et al. 2007 558 .31 C S 0.17 0 .76 3 4 . . 0 −.1 S 0.20 0 .76 1 7 . − − . . Bennett & 1 3 −.3 Robinson 2000 133 .43 C S 0.14 0 .78 2 5 3 . − − . . 0 3 −.3 S 0.11 0 .81 8 3 2 . − . Bernerth & 1 Walker 2012 214 .43 C S 0.11 0 .86 −.35 −.21 9 .15 Beuguré 1996 232 .44 C S 0.08 0. .83 . Blau & Andersson 2005 211 .39 I S 0.09 0 .80 . Bodankin & Tziner 2009 88 C O 0.45 0 .79 − −.21 .24 O 0.48 0. .90 −. −.32 .08 Bordia et al. 2008 187 .82 C O 0.31 0. .90 . O 0.14 0. .87 . Bowling & Eschleman 2010 722 .18 C S 0.14 0 .90 − −.33 S 0.14 0. .92 −. −.38 . . − − . . 0 1 Bowling et al. 2010 227 .28 C S 0.13 0 .70 −.35 9 0 T. Brown 2008 204 C S 0.23 0. .84 − S 0.22 0. .82 −. . . M. E. Brown & Trevino 2006 150 .38 C O 0.12 0 .89 . − . 2 Bruk-Lee 2006 213 .54 C S 0.24 0 .82 .37 8 . Bruk-Lee & Spector 2006 133 .15 C S 0.04 0 .84 . − . 1 Bunk 2006 552 .11 C S 0.20 0 .79 .17 7 . − . 0 S 0.16 0 .83 .24 7 Bunk & 2013 288 .13 C S 0.44 0. .79 − Magley . . 0 8 − . 1 S 0.41 0 .83 5 Bunk et al. 2011 191 .57 C S 0.51 0. .88 . − . 2 Bayram et al. 2009 766 C S 0.07 0 .86 9 . − . 2 S 0.06 0 .86 5 . − . 3 Chandler 2008 54 .03 C S 0.17 0 .90 7 . − . 4 S 0.15 0 .91 1 . Christian & Ellis 2011 171 .90 C S 0.09 0 .86 Clark 2010 114 .61 C S 0.11 0. .80 Cobussen 2011 149 .57 C S 0.17 0. .76 . Colquitt & Long ip 143 C O 0.06 0 .93 Crede et al. 2007 959 .64 C S 0.16 0. .88 Cruz 2011 245 .66 C S 0.08 0. .89 . − . 0 Darrat et al. 2010 488 .16 C S 0.12 0 .80 8 . − . 1 S 0.15 0 .72 1 . De Cuyper et al. 2009 671 .38 B S 0.08 0 .64 de Jonge et al. 2009 66 .54 C O 0.07 0. .84 73 .59 C S 0.10 0. .35 . − . de-Lara & 2 Brito 2010 147 .19 C S 0.26 0 .80 2 . de-Lara & Ding 2008 270 .18 C S 0.25 0 .86 −.07 . −.1 de-Lara et al. 2007 270 .18 C S 0.25 0 .86 0 . de-Lara & Suárez-Acosta 2013 204 C S 0.20 0 .74 −.32 DeCelles et al. 2012 160 .19 C S 0.18 0. .82 . − − − . . . Devonish & 1 2 −.2 3 Greenidge 2010 211 C S 0.39 0 .17 9 8 6 4 . − − − . . . 2 1 −.2 3 2010 211 C S 0.42 0 .17 6 9 8 7 . − . −.0 3 Donovan 1999 112 .53 R S 0.05 0 .38 3 .28 0 . − − . . 1 −.1 0 Duffy et al. 2006 238 .47 A O 0.11 0 .80 6 5 9 Duffy et al. 2012 247 .60 A S 0.05 0. .95 .01 . − . 3 Dunlop & Lee 2004 364 .18 C S 0.22 0 .86 2 . − . 4 S 0.20 0 .82 6 Dupré 2004 45 .60 W S 0.18 0. .84 − −.59 . . 3 1 196 .30 W S 0.03 0 .84 . Dupré & Barling 2006 196 .30 W S 0.00 0 −.33 Dupré et al. 2006 119 .91 W S 0.05 0. −.28 . Erkutlu & Chafra 2013 848 .83 C O 0.34 0 .86 . − . 2 Evans et al. 2011 188 .84 C S 0.13 0 .74 2 . Fagbohungbe et al. 2012 301 .62 C S 0.12 0 .84 S 0.28 0. .82 395 .62 C S 0.17 0. .84 S 0.33 0. .84 . Ferguson & Barry 2011 198 .51 C S 0.15 0 .81 . − . Ferris & 2 Brown 2010 171 C O 0.12 0 .78 −.16 6 Ferris et al. 2009 237 C S 0.10 0. .68 − −.25 .08 . . − . -. 1 2 Ferris et al. 2008 161 C S 0.12 0 .87 8 8 . − − . . 2 4 S 0.17 0 .88 5 3 . − . 2 −.2 Ferris et al. 2011 152 .86 C O 0.20 0 .87 6 −.10 8 . − . 2 −.3 O 0.17 0 .87 6 −.12 6 . − . 1 Fox & Spector 1999 185 .48 C S .84 4 − . 4 S .82 5 − . 1 Fox et al. 2007 136 .19 C S 0.04 0 .78 0 . − . 1 O 0.04 0 .96 8 . − . 3 S 0.09 0 .79 4 . − . 2 O 0.09 0 .92 7 Gahyun 2011 516 .95 C S 0.22 0. .94 Gill et al. 2009 120 .55 C O 0.18 0. .96 . − . 0 Glomb & Liao 2003 149 .95 W S 0.07 0 .80 2 Goh 2006 147 C O 0.06 0. .82 −.17 −.20 S 0.07 0. .79 −.18 −.27 O 0.06 0. .82 .13 −.17 S 0.09 0. .79 −.17 −.18 . Golparvar et al. 2012 275 .92 C S 0.24 0 .92 . − . Greenberg et 1 −.2 al. 1999 136 .25 W S 0.10 0 .78 5 1 . − − − . . . 0 3 0 Greene 2012 113 .17 C O 0.06 0 .74 .08 4 0 6 . Gruys & Sackett 2003 318 .33 C S 0.08 0 .82 S 0.11 0. .74 . − . 3 Halldorsson 2007 455 C O 0.11 0 .82 7 .07 .11 . − . 6 −.2 C O 0.16 0 .82 4 −.23 6 . − − . . 1 1 Hammond 2008 296 C S 0.19 0 .87 1 7 . − − . . 2 2 C S 0.19 0 .86 4 7 . − − . . 1 2 −.0 Henle 2001 151 .56 C S 0.21 0 .85 7 −.18 3 8 . − − . . 1 2 −.1 S 0.25 0 .78 9 −.18 0 6 . − . 2 Henle 2005 151 .78 C S 0.23 0 .86 0 . Hepworth & Towler 2004 213 .35 W S 0.20 0 .80 . Hershcovis et al. 2011 299 .69 W S 0.15 0 .92 . −.0 Hitlan & Noel 2009 105 .72 C S 0.12 0 .74 − −.41 3 S 0.08 0. .76 −. −.40 .31 . . Holtz & Harold 2010 318 .08 C S 0.12 0 .81 −.35 122 .74 C O 0.17 0. .91 −.42 318 .08 C S 0.16 0. .84 −.30 122 .74 C O 0.15 0. .91 −.41 . − . Holtz & 1 −.1 Harold 2013 289 .88 C O 0.26 0 .95 1 −.14 −.21 4 Hung u.p. 98 .65 C S 0.18 0. .86 98 .65 C S 0.15 0. .89 Hung et al. 2009 184 .61 C O 0.11 0. .87 184 .61 C S 0.10 0. .92 . − . 5 Inness et al. 2005 105 .58 W S 0.02 0 .84 2 Inness et al. 2008 308 .26 W S 0.07 0. .84 Jacobson 2007 164 .67 C S 0.06 0. .79 James et al. 2005 360 .36 C S 0.11 0. .84 . − . Jarunratanakul 0 −.0 , 2013 480 .63 C S 0.13 0 .98 − −.21 4 −.23 −.28 8 . . − . 0 −.0 S 0.17 0 .96 − −.18 4 −.18 −.23 3 . . − . 0 −.0 624 0.68 C S 0.03 0 0.86 − −.18 8 −.09 −.10 8 . . − . 1 −.0 S 0.09 0 .96 − −.24 0 −.11 −.12 7 . . − . 1 −.3 Jelinek et al. 2006 160 .55 C S 0.28 0 .90 6 5 S 0.36 0. .88 − −.2 . . 8 1 6 Jelinek & Ahearne 2010 190 .55 C S 0.14 0 .84 160 .55 C S 0.27 0. .82 . − . 1 −.2 Jones 2009 424 C S 0.10 0 .76 1 −.37 −.45 2 . − . 0 −.2 S 0.37 0 .84 3 −.16 −.13 2 Judge et al. 2006 131 .96 C O 0.06 0. .82 131 .96 C S 0.15 0. .91 . − . 2 Kalinowski 2011 213 C S 0.25 0 .93 − −.54 .33 9 . . − . 4 C S 0.25 0 .95 − −.61 .39 0 Kaptein 2008 310 .31 C S 0.16 0. .88 . . − . 4 Kelloway et al. 2002 475 .37 C S 0.11 0 .72 0 . − . 3 Kisamore et al. 2010 213 .93 C S 0.06 0 .86 0 Kluemper et . al. 2013 220 .24 C O 0.05 0 .73 .13 . −.1 O 0.07 0 .74 0 . − . 1 −.1 Kwak 2006 341 .34 C S 0.08 0 .73 3 −.14 −.08 5 S 0.08 0. .72 − −.16 −.08 −.1 . . 1 0 8 Laczo 2002 128 .13 C S 0.21 0 .73 −.04 −.10 S 0.18 0. .48 −.21 −.01 . − . Langkamp- 0 Jacobson 2009 311 .73 C S 0.56 0 .79 −.26 .13 1 Le et al. 2014 296 C S 0.11 0. .85 − −.16 .03 S 0.10 0. .84 −. −.16 .06 Lee & Allen 2002 152 .22 C S 0.10 0. .82 . . −.0 Lee et al. 2005 267 .76 C S 0.21 0 .87 − −.21 3 . . −.0 S 0.17 0 .92 − −.24 2 Lee et al. 2007 173 .53 B S 0.06 0. .82 . . − − . . 1 2 Leiter et al. 2011 907 .29 I S 0.08 0 .80 7 .18 0 Leiter et al. 2010 729 .46 I S 0.09 0. .74 .17 Levine et al. 2011 345 .72 C S 0.19 0. .84 105 .88 C S 0.18 0. .75 108 1.0 C S 0.43 0. .75 345 .72 C S 0.19 0. .87 105 .88 C S 0.11 0. .77 108 1.0 C S 0.29 0. .77 Lian et al. 2012 269 .47 C S 0.13 0. .88 −.23 Lian et al. 2011 171 .67 C O 0.12 0. .84 −.20 . −.2 260 .60 C S 0.15 0 .90 −.23 0 Liang & Hsieh 2007 303 .21 C S 0.10 0. .71 . − − . . 3 3 Liao et al. 2004 286 .47 C S 0.16 0 .83 − −.38 .17 4 6 S 0.13 0. .74 −. −.38 .20 − − . . . . 2 2 4 3 Lindsay 2008 418 .59 C S 0.24 0 .93 . − . 1 Liu & Ding 2012 460 .92 C S 0.24 0 .84 2 −.16 . − . 1 S 0.29 0 .82 0 −.17 . . 0 Mackey et al. 2012 125 C S 0.07 0 .75 2 . − − . . 0 0 Marrs 1999 439 .54 C S 0.24 0 .77 4 .02 5 . − − . . 2 2 S 0.23 0 .69 3 .22 9 . . . 0 1 McCardle 2007 528 .73 C S 0.17 0 .92 5 3 .13 . . . 1 1 S 0.19 0 .87 3 2 .17 McFarlin et al. 2001 300 .41 W S 0.22 0. .84 . − − . . 1 −.1 1 −.5 Mehta 2004 392 C S 0.25 0 .81 6 3 9 −.03 2 . − − . . 1 −.2 3 −.2 C S 0.27 0 .81 6 2 0 −.02 2 . Meier & Semmer 2013 197 .44 I S 0.09 0 .78 . − − . . 2 −.2 1 Ménard et al. 2011 284 W S 0.54 0 .76 − −.09 .09 1 4 2 . . Michel & Bowling 2013 357 .69 C S 0.13 0 .98 Millard 2011 122 .48 C S 0.17 0. .76 . Mitchell & Ambrose 2007 427 .31 C S 0.13 0 .82 S 0.11 0. .79 Mol 2011 43 .51 C S 0.16 0. .91 Molitor 1998 313 .52 C S 0.19 0. .81 Monnastes 2010 325 C S 0.15 0. .81 − −.24 .03 C S 0.17 0. .77 −. −.44 Moore et al. 2012 129 .51 C O 0.10 0. .93 . .18 . − . 0 Morrell 2008 322 .39 C S 0.07 0 .76 − −.22 .21 .18 .06 6 . . − . −.0 1 S 0.13 0 .73 − −.40 .15 .06 3 3 . . − . 4 Mount et al. 2006 141 C O 0.14 0 .86 − −.16 .18 1 . . − . 4 C S 0.16 0 .74 − −.16 .24 1 . . − . 4 C O 0.11 0 .84 − −.44 .47 3 . . − . 2 C S 0.12 0 .72 − −.22 .21 0 . . − . . 1 1 Mulki et al. 2006 208 .42 C S 0.10 0 .74 9 9 . − . 2 Munson 2006 364 .36 R S 0.12 0 .57 −.23 .30 4 . − . 1 453 .48 R S 0.12 0 .57 −.35 .36 7 Newton 2007 188 .96 C S 0.06 0. .75 Newton 2011 55 .14 C S 0.18 0. .84 S 0.18 0. .82 . − . 5 Ng & Feldman 2009 162 .93 C O 0.19 0 .94 1 O’Boyle 2011 154 .64 C O 0.09 0. .96 . −.3 O’Brien 2008 212 .30 C O 0.13 0 .96 −.26 2 . − . 4 −.2 277 .40 C O 0.15 0 .92 2 −.10 6 . − . 3 −.2 424 .61 C O 0.16 0 .91 0 −.11 9 . −.3 212 .30 C O 0.12 0 .98 −.27 4 . − . 3 −.3 277 .40 C O 0.15 0 .95 8 −.15 4 . − . 2 −.3 424 .61 C O 0.15 0 .94 9 −.12 2 . − . O’Brien & −.4 0 Allen 2007 209 .66 C O 0.13 0 .83 −.14 −.41 5 .00 5 334 .66 C S 0.27 0. .82 −.13 −.10 −.1 −.11 − . 4 . 1 3 − . −.5 1 209 .66 C O 0.10 0 .87 −.15 −.46 4 −.10 3 . − . −.0 2 334 .66 C S 0.26 0 .81 −.27 −.07 6 −.27 7 . − . 1 −.1 −.2 Ogunfowora 2009 297 .44 C O 0.09 0 .84 5 −.29 −.16 2 −.32 1 . − . 1 −.1 −.2 O 0.15 0 .77 9 −.28 −.15 8 −.36 9 Oh et al. 2014 144 C S 0.11 0. .84 − .03 .18 C O 0.16 0. .82 −. .03 .19 C S 0.16 0. .77 −. −.24 .14 C O 0.19 0. .79 −. −.24 .04 . . − . 0 Ottinot 2008 99 .40 C O 0.13 0 .96 6 . − . 2 184 .77 C S 0.07 0 .85 9 222 . Ottinot 2010 2 .38 C S 0.02 0 .72 Pantaleo 2011 144 .10 C S 0.10 0. .84 C S 0.09 0. .82 Peng 2012 366 .71 C S 0.17 0. .94 . − . Penney & 2 Spector 2005 155 .52 C O 0.06 0 .95 2 O 0.09 0. .94 − . . 2 5 Penney et al. 2011 239 .24 C S 0.06 0 .87 Poncheri 2006 124 .31 C S 0.08 0. .76 O 0.09 0. .88 Probst et al. 2007 144 .60 C S 0.16 0. .79 . − − . . 2 1 Puffer 1987 141 .90 C S 0.28 0 .79 3 6 . − . 0 −.0 −.0 Raver 2004 648 W S 0.16 0 .78 .19 5 −.16 7 .01 9 . − . 1 −.1 −.1 W S 0.12 0 .71 .20 5 −.18 4 −.03 9 . − . 2 Reio & Ghosh 2009 402 I S 0.13 0 .88 0 . − . 3 I S 0.18 0 .89 5 . − − . . Ritter & 1 2 −.0 Venkatraman 2008 495 .76 C S 0.39 0 .88 1 2 9 . Robinson & O’Leary-Kelly 1998 187 .67 C S 0.11 0 .68 . − . 6 Rodell 2013 172 .89 C O 0.05 0 .89 7 Rodell & . Judge 2009 100 .80 C S 0.12 0 .83 Rodopman 2006 178 C O 0.03 0. .83 − −.2 −.03 −.1 − . . 2 1 . 0 2 5 1 − − . . 1 −.2 −.2 3 Rodopman 2009 178 C O 0.13 0 .80 0 2 −.12 4 3 Ronald 2013 116 .76 C S 0.17 0. .72 Sackett et al. 2006 900 .21 C S 0.17 0. .71 − −.22 .29 S 0.22 0. .74 −. −.42 .26 Saidon et al. 2012 669 .22 C S 0.25 0. .83 . . . . 0 −.1 0 Salas 2009 375 .26 C S 0.02 0 .76 6 0 −.02 4 . . . 0 0 S 0.04 0 .78 2 .08 −.03 6 . − . 2 −.3 Sayers et al. 2011 975 I S 0.22 0 .84 9 2 . − − . . 1 1 −.2 Schroeder 2009 203 .08 C S 0.14 0 .88 0 3 0 . − − . . 0 1 −.1 S 0.11 0 .81 6 8 5 . − . 3 −.2 Scott 2007 148 I O 0.06 0 .90 − 3 −.29 −.31 8 Semmer et al. 2012 205 .70 C S 0.11 0. .71 −. −.25 S 0.20 0. .77 −. −.42 . . Shamsudin et al. 2011 372 .93 C S 0.31 0 .89 . − . 0 Shao et al. 2011 490 .13 C O 0.13 0 .85 6 . Skarlicki & Folger 1997 167 .70 R S 0.12 0 .82 . − − . . 4 4 Skarlicki et al. 1999 131 .55 R O 0.12 0 .97 − 0 9 . . − − . . 2 −.2 1 Skarlicki et al. 2008 276 .38 M S 0.10 0 .76 2 −.15 −.17 3 9 Spector & . Zhou 2013 915 C S 0.07 0 .96 − −.28 .15 S 0.14 0. .93 −. −.37 .22 Sprung 2011 208 .43 C S 0.17 0. .99 . S 0.21 0. .98 Sterling 2013 105 .74 C S 0.12 0. .90 Stewart et al. 2009 319 .22 C O 0.07 0. .84 O 0.09 0. .84 O 0.06 0. .82 O 0.07 0. .82 . Storms & Spector 1987 160 .48 W S 0.06 0 .89 M S 0.05 0. .89 Sudha & Khan 2013 60 C S 0.08 0. .86 − −.06 .13 S 0.14 0. .86 . .00 .50 . 0 − . 1 Tate 2009 522 C S 0.11 0 .81 3 . − . 3 C S 0.15 0 .86 1 . − − . . . 3 −.4 0 1 Taylor 2010 74 .11 C O 0.04 0 .81 9 −.40 7 8 2 Taylor et al. 2012 404 .59 W O 0.04 0. .76 − −.12 .11 W O 0.01 0. .88 −. −.17 .05 Tepper et al. 2009 356 .38 R S 0.12 0. .94 . − .34 − . . . 1 1 0 7 − − . . 2 3 797 .77 R S 0.09 0 .79 4 .29 1 . − − . . 2 2 356 .38 R S 0.21 0 .84 1 .33 1 . − − . . 3 4 797 .77 R S 0.13 0 .87 6 .37 0 . − . 3 Tepper et al. 2008 243 .14 C S 0.06 0 .69 1 Tepper et al. 2001 388 .39 C S 0.11 0. .89 − −.26 .12 . . − − . . 1 2 Thau et al. 2007 129 .44 C O 0.03 0 .89 9 7 .02 Thau et al. 2007 103 .41 C O 0.05 0. .80 Thau et al. 2008 373 .34 C S 0.16 0. .76 C S 0.16 0. .68 . − . Thau & 1 −.1 Mitchell 2010 216 .32 C S 0.08 0 .80 1 3 . . 0 −.0 S 0.10 0 .79 1 5 . Townsend et al. 2000 150 .70 C O 0.12 0 .93 . van Jaarsveld et al. 2010 307 .32 I S 0.27 0 .83 Vecchio et al. 2010 179 .17 M S 0.11 0. .83 − − . . . 2 3 7 7 − − . . 2 2 Wasti 1999 848 .77 M S 0.03 0 .88 −.17 8 0 Wu et al. 2014 233 .55 C S 0.37 0. .86 . − . 0 Yang 2008 293 .61 C O 0.21 0 .90 1 . − . 0 O 0.18 0 .91 5 . Yang & Diefendorff 2009 231 C S 0.00 0 .93 − −.17 .12 Yang et al. 2009 81 .16 C S 0.01 0. .71 . 77 .16 S 0.30 0. .63 Yang et al. 2013 361 .90 C S 0.04 0. .74 .24 S 0.03 0. .66 .23 . −.2 −.3 Yen & Teng 2013 318 C S 0.23 0 .90 8 −.31 6 . −.2 −.3 S 0.21 0 .92 5 −.37 2 Yu-ching et al. 2012 341 .70 C S 0.17 0. .93 . − − . . 2 3 −.3 Yüksel 2012 171 .78 C S 0.08 0 .54 2 7 4 . − − . . 0 1 −.2 S 0.09 0 .80 8 9 7 Zettler & . Hilbig 2010 148 .59 C S 0.12 0 .79 Note. N = sample size; RR = response rate; C = Construct, CWB (C),. Workplace Aggression (W), Bullying (B), Antisocial Behavior (A), Incivility (I), Retaliation (R), Other (M); I/O = CWB type, Interpersonal (I), Organizational (O), or Overall (V); Rater = Self (S) or Other (O); M = Scaled Mean CWB construct; SD = scaled standard deviation of CWB construct; rxx = reliability of CWB measure; AG = Agreeableness; CS = Conscientiousness; N = Neuroticism; DJ = distributive justice; FJ = informational justice; CJ = interactional justice; SJ = interpersonal justice; PJ = procedural justice; IR = in-role behavior; OI = OCBI; OO = OCBO; OC = organizational commitment; OS = organizational support; TI = turnover intentions; JS = job satisfaction.</p>