<p>Evaluator Name______</p><p>Oral Presentation Grading Rubric</p><p>Team:______Date:______</p><p>Please use the criteria in the following tables to rate the quality of I - engineering content, II - individual presentations, and III - overall presentation.</p><p>I. Engineering Content Excellent Good Fair Poor  Excellent statement of  Good statement of  Statement of problem  Inaccurate statement of design problem or need design problem or need or need is confusing or problem or need  Excellent discussion of  Adequate discussion of incomplete  All alternatives are design alternatives design alternatives  At least one alternative seriously flawed  Feasibility/merit  Feasibility/merit seems contrived  Feasibility/merit criteria well developed criteria well developed  Feasibility/merit criteria poorly and applied partially applied criteria developed and developed an not  Engineering analysis  Engineering analysis applied inappropriately applied techniques predict or techniques predict or  Engineering analysis  Engineering analysis verify accuracy of verify accuracy of techniques poorly techniques omitted for design certain aspects of predict or verify verifying accuracy of  Complete and accurate design accuracy of design design set of engineering  Incomplete but  Incomplete and  Engineering drawings drawings accurate set of inaccurate set of omitted  All required resources engineering drawings engineering drawings  No resources identified identifed  Some required  Minimal resources  No budget developed  Complete budget resources identified identified estimated and presented  Budget estimated and  Incomplete budget presented estimated and presented</p><p>The BREADTH of engineering content of this oral presentation was (circle one): Note: Breadth is defined as the appropriate variety of an applied engineering discipline.</p><p>Excellent Good Fair Poor</p><p>Comments:</p><p>The DEPTH of engineering content of this oral presentation was (circle one): Note: Depth is defined as sufficient technical content of an applied engineering discipline.</p><p>Excellent Good Fair Poor</p><p>Comments: II. Individual Presentations Excellent Good Fair Poor  Excellent use of  Good use of language  Simplistic use of  Significant language without with few grammatical language; many grammatical errors grammatical errors errors grammatical errors  Volume too low or  Volume and rate vary  Volume not too soft or  Volume too low or loud; rate too fast or to add emphasis loud; rate not too fast loud; rate too fast or slow; monotone  Clear articulation or slow slow  Significant articulation  Excellent eye contact  Majority of articulation  Poor articulation problems and presence adequate  Poor eye contact and  No eye contact or  No verbal static (um,  Good eye contact and presence presence ah) presence  Lots of verbal static  Excessive verbal static  Excellent, substantive  Minimal verbal static  Poor responses to  Answered no questions responses to questions  Good responses to questions most questions</p><p>The quality of each individual presentation was (circle one):</p><p>Name of Speaker: ______Excellent Good Fair Poor</p><p>Name of Speaker: ______Excellent Good Fair Poor</p><p>Name of Speaker: ______Excellent Good Fair Poor</p><p>Name of Speaker: ______Excellent Good Fair Poor</p><p>III. Overall Presentation</p><p>Excellent Good Fair Poor  Clear organization  Some elements of  Organization lacking  No apparent pattern organization present  Inadequate transition organization  Excellent transition  Appropriate transition between topics  No transition between between topics between topics  Inadequate transition topics  Excellent transition  Adequate transition between speakers  No transition between between speakers between speakers  Visuals poorly speakers  Visuals well designed  Visuals adequately designed  Visuals inadequate to support topics designed  Visuals contain many  Visuals contain  Visuals contain no  Visual contain minimal errors significant errors errors errors  Well over/ under time  Significantly over/  Appropriate length  Over/under time limit limit under time</p><p>The overall quality of this oral presentation was (circle one): Excellent Good Fair Poor</p>