Logical Fallacies

Logical Fallacies

<p>Logical Fallacies: </p><p>Appeal to Authority: Using an expert to back up your opinion when there’s reason to believe we won’t get good information. A – Not Trustworthy 1 – Conflict of interest a – Congressman who pushes a weapons system through because it will be built in his district. B – Experts working outside their field of expertise 1 – Endorsements a – Tiger Woods endorsing Buick b – Ray Charles endorsing Pepsi 2 – Use v. Endorsing a – Brittany Spears endorsing Diet Pepsi but demanding Diet Coke C – Out of date 1 – They may not be current with technology a – a Media Specialist who doesn’t know about the internet D – Unknowable Knowledge 2 – Some things are unknowable a – a doctor who says a patient doesn’t have cancer, when they do – but all available evidence agrees with the doctor E – Failure to take word of authorities when we should 1 – Our own ignorance a – believing that we’re immune to AIDS because “it’s only for homosexuals.”</p><p>Inconsistency: Using or accepting conflicting statements to support a conclusion or conclusions. A – One person at one time and place 1 – Promising conflicting items a – “I won’t eliminate or reduce government programs; I also will give you a tax reduction.” B – One person at two different times and/or places 1 – Saying one thing now and another thing later a – Lyndon B. Johnson --as Texan Senator voted AGAINST civil rights consistently --as President of the USA, he pushed important civil rights Legislation through Congress, including the 1965 Voting Rights Act C – Organizational Consistency 1 – Different individuals in the same organization providing conflicting info a – Trial Balloons -- a member of an organization leaking an idea that is killed by the public, so the leader of the organization can say they weren’t ever thinking about it seriously. D – Inconsistency between words and actions 1 – Doing one thing and saying another a – Gerald Ford saying he “didn’t believe the public would stand for” pardoning Nixon – then doing it when he became president. b – Feminists who argue about equal roles for men and women, but don’t give expensive engagement rings or pay for half the check c – School regents who argued against affirmative action, but used their influence to help get certain students into the university d – Not dealing with Cuba for “human rights violations,” but dealing with other countries (China, Saudi Arabia, Colombia, etc.) Straw Man – Mis-representing an opponent’s position or attacking a weaker opponent while ignoring a stronger one A – Mis-representing an opponent’s position 1 – Post Office portraying Fed Ex as having rickety old planes that falling apart 2 – A hotel chain making it seem like their competitor doesn’t have hotels in all areas 3 – “John Kerry will raise your taxes to pay for his spending programs; he’ll HAVE to” B – Ignoring a strong opponent in favor of a weak one 1 – IBM commercial about copiers that won’t collate and staple that their Competitors make --comparing “apples” and “oranges”</p><p>False Dilemma – Making it seem like there are NO good options as a result of something A – Either people are good or bad; if they’re good, they don’t need laws to deter crime. If they’re bad, laws to deter crime won’t help. Therefore, we shouldn’t have laws to deter crime. 1 – REFUTATION: SOME bad people might be deterred by harsh laws, thus laws can work --Challenge the claims Either/or Dilemma – Saying there are only two options, and ONE is bad, so you MUST choose the other A – “You have to vote for either the Democratic or the Republican Candidate. You shouldn’t vote for the Democrat, so you must vote for the Republican.” 1 – REFUTATION: There are more than two viable options a – Vote Libertarian; vote Green b – Point out other options than just the two stated</p><p>Begging the Question – Assuming the question (or a significant part of the question) without proof; Answering the question by restating it as a statement A – Assuming the question without proof 1 – “It’s always in the interest of the state to have unrestricted freedom of speech, because the state does better when freedom of speech is unrestricted.” a – doesn’t say WHY the state does better; doesn’t offer proof B – Answering the question by restating it as a statement 1 – “Why does Chloroform render people unconscious? Because it is a soporific.” a – Begging the question, because a soporific IS something that induces sleep…this doesn’t tell us how it works the way it does, just that it does what it does. 2 – “Why hasn’t Mr. Palise won a Pulitzer Prize for his photography yet? Because The Pulitzer Prize committee hasn’t determined that his work is deserving of a Pulitzer Prize.” a – Begging the question, because of COURSE they haven’t determined that…otherwise he’d have a Pulitzer Prize</p><p>Questionable premise-Questionable statement – Catch-all category when there’s no real name given to the fallacy, but the statement is still questionable. A – Accepting a less-than-believable premise or statement 1 – Ford Motor Company makes the best cars, therefore you should buy a Ford a – Where’s the proof? 2 – Kobe Bryant is the best basketball player in the NBA a – Where’s the proof? B – A statement that is obviously false 1 – All Arabs are terrorists a – Obviously false, therefore not to be accepted Suppressed or Overlooked Evidence – Failing to bring relevant evidence into an argument A – “Candidate X voted 98 times to raise taxes.” 1 – 16 votes were on a budget bill that didn’t actually raise taxes but did determine how they were spent 2 – 48 of the votes were on the SAME bill that came up time and again B – “Candidate Y never met with the Black Caucus of the US Congress.” 1 – Actually, he DID meet with them, but the other candidate didn’t know about it</p><p>Tokenism – accepting a token gesture as though it is the real thing A – In Il Postino (The Postman), a politician promised to build pipes for the people to have running water. He began construction before the election…and when he was elected, construction stopped B – Hiring one minority as proof that your company has a completely level playing field</p>

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    3 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us