Detection and Study of Blooms of Trichodesmium Erythraeum and Noctiluca Miliaris in NE Arabian Sea S

Detection and Study of Blooms of Trichodesmium Erythraeum and Noctiluca Miliaris in NE Arabian Sea S

Detection and study of blooms of Trichodesmium erythraeum and Noctiluca miliaris in NE Arabian Sea S. G. Prabhu Matondkar 1*, R.M. Dwivedi 2, J. I. Goes 3, H.do.R. Gomes 3, S.G. Parab 1and S.M.Pednekar 1 1National Institute of Oceanography, Dona-Paula 403 004, Goa, INDIA 2Space Application Centre, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, INDIA 3Bigelow Laboratory for Ocean Sciences, West Boothbay Harbor, Maine, 04575, USA Abstract The Arabian Sea is subject to semi-annual wind reversals associated with the monsoon cycle that result in two periods of elevated phytoplankton productivity, one during the northeast (NE) monsoon (November-February) and the other during the southwest (SW) monsoon (June- September). Although the seasonality of phytoplankton biomass in these offshore waters is well known, the abundance and composition of phytoplankton associated with this distinct seasonal cycle is poorly understood. Monthly samples were collected from the NE Arabian Sea (offshore) from November to May. Phytoplankton were studied microscopically up to the species level. Phytoplankton counts are supported by Chl a estimations and chemotaxonomic studies using HPLC. Surface phytoplankton cell counts varied from 0.1912 (Mar) to 15.83 cell x104L-1 (Nov). In Nov Trichodesmium thiebautii was the dominant species. It was replaced by diatom and dinoflagellates in the following month. Increased cell counts during Jan were predominantly due to dinoflagellates Gymnodinium breve , Gonyaulax schilleri and Amphidinium carteare . Large blooms of Noctiluca miliaris were observed in Feb a direct consequence of the large populations of G. schilleri upon which N. miliaris is known to graze. In Mar and April, N. miliaris was replaced by blooms of Trichodesmium erythraeum . This succession of species was distinctly reflected in the phytoplankton pigments measured by HPLC. In Nov high concentrations of zeaxanthin (0.5 mgm-3) and β-carotene (0.52 mgm-3) were mainly due to T. thiebautii while high concentrations of peridinin (0.4 mgm-3) were due to the large populations of dinoflagellates observed in Jan. During the N. miliaris bloom both Chl b (3.76 mgm-3) and prasinoxanthin ( 0.11 mgm-3) were reasonably high. The large amount of organic matter produced by these blooms export organic matter in subeuphotic depths. The monitoring of this export production is done with the help of OCM (IRS-P4I) during present study. Introduction Material and Methods Arabian Sea is well known for its distinct and predictable oscillations in phytoplankton biomass which are strongly linked to monsoonal wind driven Six cruises were undertaken on board the ORV Sagar Kanya and FORV Sagar Sampada . Water samples were collected and analyzed for forcing during NE and SW monsoons. However very little information is available on the variations in phytoplankton composition associated with the phytoplankton taxonomy (Inverted Microscope), chemotaxonomy (HPLC), Chlorophyll a by HPLC and fluorometry as a part of the validation of blooms that appear during the NE and SW monsoons. The launching of the OCEAN-SAT (1) in1999 afforded us an opportunity to identify the the Indian ocean colour sensor, Ocean Colour Monitor (OCM). OCM derived chlorophyll a data was processed during cruises and validated using phytoplankton species associated with the large scale blooms observed in the ocean colour data. The NE winter bloom was sampled periodically from Nov- the ship board data. April and the seasonality of phytoplankton in the Arabian Sea was established by microscopy and chemotaxonomy. Sampling positions INDIA OMAN 20 °N GOA ARABIAN SEA BAY OF BENGAL 10 °N ANDAMANSEA LAKSHADWEEP Monthly variations in surface Chl a (mg m -3) and column Chl a (mg m -2) in the Northeastern Arabian Sea SOMALIA 40 °E 50 °E 60 °E 70 °E 80 °E 90 °E 100 °E SK I52 SK 186 FORV 212 SK 171 SK 214 FORV 222 Months Dominant phytoplankton species Months Phytoplankton cell counts Surface phytoplankton Surface Column group % Nov Trichodesmium Nitzschia Ampphora Chaetoceros Melosira Chaetoceros thiebautii closterium hyalina socilalis moniliformis danicus Surface Column Dia Dinf Cyano Other Dec Gymnodinium Prorocentrum Rhizosolenia Trichodesmium Nitzschia Actinoptychus (nos.x10 4l-1) (nos.x10 6m-2) gracile minimus alata thiebautii longissima senarius Results Jan Gymnodinium Gonyaulax Amphidinium Amphidinium Coscinodiscus Gyrodinium Nov 15.831 180.690 30.39 0.40 69.21 0.00 breve schilleri carteare carteare radiatus spirale Dec 0.4352 19.4238* 75.00 23.44 0.78 0.00 Taxonomy Feb Noctiluca Navicula sp. I Nitzschia Noctiluca Rhizosolenia Coscinodiscus Phytoplankton cell counts ranged from 0.2 to 15.83 x10 4l-1 at the surface and 4.5 to 180.7 x10 6m-2 in the water column. miliaris closterium miliaris shrubsolei occulus Jan 0.2324 4.2638 7.14 89.29 0.00 3.57 March Trichodesmium Noctiluca Hemiaulus Rhizosolenia Pyrophacus Cocconeis Highest surface cell counts were observed in Nov and lowest in Jan and Mar. The month of Feb saw the presence of an intense erythraeum miliaris sinensis shrubsolei horologium scutellum Feb 0.53 4.479 20 20 0.00 60.00 April Trichodesmium Coscinodiscus Peridinium Navicula Trichodesmium Rhizosolenia N. miliaris bloom. erythraeum marginatus elegans delicatula erythraeum stolterfothii March 0.1912 14.553 30.71 23.08 38.96 7.69 In the Nov, cyanobacteria (69%) dominated the phytoplankton populations. May Trichodesmium Trichodesmium Scripsiella Trichodesmium Nitzschia Thalassiothrix April 1.6682 20.2165 3.64 16.63 79.73 0.00 erythraeum thiebautii trochoidea erythraeum accuminata frauenfeldii In the following month, diatoms dominated followed by dinoflagellates and cyanobacteria. May 4.1626 10.1084 1.94 3.94 94.07 0.00 In Jan, diatoms were replaced by dinoflagellates (89%) followed by diatoms and other algae. ( Dia-diatom; Dinf- dinoflagellates; Cyano-cyanobacteria.; Other- Noctiluca ) In the Feb the large bloom of N. miliaris dominated the phytoplankton population (60%) followed by diatoms and *Sub-surface bloom of Trichodesmium was observed dinoflagellates. In March cyanobacteria was the dominant (38%) group followed by diatoms and dinoflagellates. December In the months of April and May cyanobacterial populations increased dramatically to 80-94 %. Surface November Pigments by HPLC Pras β-caro Pras 0.00% Chl a Chemotaxonomy β-caro 0.33% 7.65% 20.54% The pigments zeaxanthin (11.6 %) and β-carotene (13.5%) measured in Nov were primarily due to the T. thiebautii bloom. 13.46% Zea In December dinoflagellates such as Gymnodinium gracile and Prorocentrum minimus contributed substantial amounts of Zea 11.55% Fuco 8.31% peridinin 0.59% (48.8 %) and β-carotene (7.65%) while the zeaxanthin (8.31%) measured was due to T. thiebutii . Chl b Chl c2 7.78% Peridinin dominated the water column in Jan (21-26%) due to the presence dinoflagellates such as Gymnodinium breve and 0.00% Gonyaulax Chl c3 0.00% Chl b Chl a Fuco schilleri . Chl b (13.7%) was from the considerable fraction of green flagellates observed microscopically. 5.40% 68.07% Peri 6.94% The Feb bloom of N. miliaris contributed Chl b (23%), Chl c2 (26.4%) and Prasinoxanthin (6.4%), the latter derived from the 0.59% endosymbiont Pedinomonas noctilucae that the dinoflagellate harbors. N. miliaris blooms were observed in the open ocean Peri 48.78% while on the January January shelf Trichodesmium blooms dominated. Pras β-caro Surface 8.06% 1.33% In Mar, the bloom of T. erythraeum produced the pigments such as zeaxanthin (4.6%) and β-carotene (7.3 %). Pr as C olum n Zea 13.81% The following month, concentrations of zeaxanthin (13.2%) and β-carotene (11.9 %) increased as the bloom of T. erythraeum Chl a 2.87% Zea developed. 29.66% Chl a 2.05% 30.80% In May zeaxanthin (11.77%) and β-carotene (8 %) measured were due to the diazotrophs T. erythraeum and T. thiebautii . Fuco β- c ar o 12.59% 7.02% Chl b Chl b 13.69% 8.81% Peri Per 26.45% 21.24% Chl c2 Chl c3 Chl c2 Fuc o Chl c3 0.36% 5.00% 4.17% 11.76% 0.33% Zea February Trichodesmium erythraeum bloom Pras March 2.92% Zea Pras 6.39% Chl a 4.60% Per 26.76% 5.32% Per 5.59% 3.33% Trichodesmium erythraeum Chl a Fuco Fuco 34.89% 3.45% 2.82% β-caro 2.87% β-caro 7.32% Chl c3 2.71% Chl b Chl c 3 22.98% 0.00% Trichodesmium thiebautii bloom Chl c2 Chl b 26.34% Chl c 2 20.03% 21.69% Zea Peri 11.77% Pras β-caro 0.09% Pras April 2.59% 11.92% Trichodesmium thiebautii 0.15% May Fuco 0.09% Zea 13.23% β-caro 8.00% Peri Chl a Noctiluca bloom 70.56% 6.18% Chl c3 0.06% Fuco Chl a 0.33% 66.64% Chl b Chl b 6.84% 1.55% Noctiluca miliaris Chlorophyll fields derived from the OCM sensor (Ocean Colour Monitor) Conclusions In Nov/Dec, depletion of nutrients that had upwelled from winter convective mixing coincided with development of blooms of T. thiebautii at surface in Nov and at subsurface in Dec. This was confirmed by elevated zeaxanthin and β-carotene measured. Low Chl a concentrations and low phytoplankton counts were seen in Dec, a situation that was mirrored in the ocean colour images. In Jan, blooms comprising of a mixture of several species of dinoflagellates were observed which contributed to the high Chl a seen in the ocean color data and to the high concentrations of peridinin measured by HPLC. This mixed dinoflagellate bloom was followed by an intense N. miliaris bloom in Feb. The elevated levels of Chl b and Chl c were derived from the N. miliaris bloom. High levels of prasinoxanthin were due to the symbiotic prasinophyte Pedinomonas noctilucae that the N.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    1 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us