Continuous Assessment Plan - Master of Arts in Secondary School Education

Continuous Assessment Plan - Master of Arts in Secondary School Education

<p> Continuous Assessment Plan</p><p>Program: Gifted Education Endorsement Level: Graduate CIP Code: none College of Education Assessment Year: 2006-2007; Student Data: 2005-2006 Mission and Goal Data Collection Instruments Evaluation Assessment Results Program Improvement Statement Criteria Unit Wide Assessment - Student Data from Post- Action Items: MSU Mission: Murray State Continuing Professional Practicum Survey: 1. Incorporate CEC/NAGC University serves as a Identified areas of need Standards into Syllabi. residential, regional university Preparation (below 4.3 on 5 pt. scale) 2. Address areas of need as per offering core programs in the Survey Data liberal arts, humanities, sciences  Standard 3.E Standard 3.E: and selected high quality Admission Data  Post examples of lessons professional programs. Murray  Standard 5.C with differentiation for State shall offer a limited  Standard 5.D Depth of Knowledge on number of master’s degrees as  Standard 6.C Blackboard support well as the specialist program in  Standard 6.D platforms. (EDU 692) education.  Standard 6.E  Post important models MSU Goal: To produce of thinking. (EDU 692) graduates who exhibit the GPA 2.5 or 3.0 Standard 5.C: following characteristics:  Create assignment in 8. Demonstrate master of their which teacher screen chosen field of study in for twice preparation for a successful, exceptionalities in the productive life. classroom. (EDU 691) Required Degree Verified Standard 5.D:  Provide examples of activities that allow students to take other perspectives (e.g., simulations). (EDU 692 & 695)  Create assignment that allow teachers to process strategies that help students to develop coping skills. (EDU 691)  Teach “wrap-around” model and its counseling applications to gifted education. (EDU 691) Certification Verified Standard 6.C:  Create a website with examples of different assessment options. (EDU 691)  Moderate online discussion of comparisons of nationally-normed testing and KCCT tests, implications of NCLB for G/T, Qualitative Assessment Method. (EDU 691) Admission to Candidacy 3.0 Standard 6.D:  New Lesson Plan template for all courses includes Differetiated Objectives and Differentiate Assessment sections. Practicum EDU 694 Standard 6.E:  Program Assessment now in place for EDU 693.  Add a Curriculum Assessment Rubric for PD Packet Assignments in EDU 691, 655.  New text to be adopted for EDU 692 includes Curriculum Assessment as part of Parallel Curriculum Model assignment.</p><p>Summative Assessment Program Decision Made: 11/08/06 Thesis Pass/Fail Decision-Making Committee: G/T Endorsement Advisory Comprehensive Exam Pass/Fail Committee Members: Verification of GPA 3.0 or higher Dr. Chuck Hulick COE Ms. Tatiana Adams Elementary G/T Coordinator Marshall County Verification of Program of Coursework Ms. Lou Carter Principal Studies completed Murray Middle School Overall program/student Ms. Deborah Smith G/T Coordinator assessment Graves County Ms. Deanna Miller G/T Coordinator Four Rivers Consortium</p>

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    3 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us