Article: Individual and Community Levels of Maternal Autonomy and Child Undernutrition in India

Article: Individual and Community Levels of Maternal Autonomy and Child Undernutrition in India

<p>Article: Individual and Community Levels of Maternal Autonomy and Child Undernutrition in India Journal: International Journal of Public Health Authors: Ramaprasad Rajaram ([email protected], Athena Infonomics ); Jessica M Perkins; William Joe; S.V. Subramanian</p><p>Supplemental Table 1. Mutivariate, multilevel, logistic regression adjusted odds-ratios for stunting, wasting, and underweight, separately, according to a continuous measure of the proportion of maternal autonomy in the community in three domains, separately, for children under five years across 29 states in India (n = 40,686; National Family and Health Survey, India, 2005-06). </p><p>Model 1: adjusted for child age Model 2: adjusted for all variables Model 3: adjusted for all and sex only except individual autonomy variables Continuous proportion of children in community with AOR 95% CI AOR 95% CI AOR 95% CI a mother who has autonomy in… Child Stunting … healthcare 0.64*** (0.57, 0.71) 0.88** (0.79, 0.99) 0.88** (0.78, 0.99) … movement 0.62*** (0.56, 0.69) 0.89** (0.80, 0.99) 0.90 (0.80, 1.01) … money 0.87** (0.77, 0.97) 0.87** (0.77, 0.97) 0.85** (0.75, 0.97) Child Wasting … healthcare 0.95 (0.86, 1.04) 1.10 (0.96, 1.25) 1.13* (0.98, 1.32) … movement 0.93* (0.85 1.02) 1.08 (0.95, 1.23) 1.09 (0.95, 1.26) … money 0.92* (0.84 1.02) 1.04 (0.91, 1.20) 1.10 (0.94, 1.27) Child Underweight … healthcare 0.78*** (0.70, 0.87) 1.04 (0.94, 1.17) 1.06 (0.94, 1.20) … movement 0.74*** (0.66, 0.82) 1.00 (0.90, 1.12) 1.02 (0.90, 1.15) … money 0.77*** (0.69, 0.87) 0.93 (0.83, 1.05) 0.93 (0.82, 1.06) Notes: Model 2 was adjusted for child birth order, maternal characteristics (BMI, height, age, marital status, education, whether currently working, age at first birth, and number of births in the last five years), and household characteristics (paternal education, household wealth quintiles, religion, caste, access to toilet, access to water, and rural vs. urban location). Models accounted for the clustering of observations within </p><p>1 primary sampling units (PSUs also referred to as communities) and states. Model 3 included the variables in Model 2 plus individual maternal autonomy.</p><p>2</p>

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    2 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us