<p>GEOGRAPHY DISSERTATION EXAMINER’S REPORT</p><p>The examiner may complete either side of this form.</p><p>Student I.D. number: Dissertation Topic/Title:</p><p>Examiner’s name: Were you this student’s advisor? Yes / No</p><p>Is this a single-module (GEG-30008) or double-module (GEG-30006) dissertation? Single / Double</p><p>Are the length, student effort and intellectual achievement appropriate? Yes / No</p><p>Topic: (Well defined, appropriate to geography and geographical modes of enquiry, and potentially achievable?)</p><p>Aims / Objectives: (Clearly expressed, appropriate to topic and running coherently through the work?)</p><p>Incorporation of existing knowledge: (Critical review, assimilation and use of existing knowledge? Full and appropriate citation and listing of references and sources?)</p><p>Implementation of techniques: (Appropriate techniques / methodologies implemented and justified in collection, analysis and presentation of material? Adequate data? Good use of statistical, graphical and cartographic techniques?)</p><p>Results, Analysis and Discussion: (Results consistent with work undertaken, clearly presented and knowledgeably analysed, interpreted and discussed? Is the student aware of limitations?)</p><p>Conclusion (Consistent with objectives; handled perceptively, critically and with sound judgement?)</p><p>Presentation (Clear and correct writing, appropriate layout, structure, diagrams,/maps/ photographs, binding? Inclusion of an Abstract, Contents list, and appropriate sections?)</p><p>Other comments / overall impression</p><p>The mark should be decided with reference to the Geography Dissertation Markers’ Guide in the Overall Dissertation Handbook and the University’s approved marking guidelines on the DAA Web page: Mark http://www.keele.ac.uk/depts/aa/newacadregpages/marking%20criteria.htm %</p><p>GEOGRAPHY DISSERTATION EXAMINER’S REPORT</p><p>The examiner may complete either side of this form.</p><p>Student I.D. number: Dissertation Topic/Title:</p><p>Examiner’s name: Were you this student’s advisor? Yes / No</p><p>Is this a single-module (GEG-30008) or double-module (GEG-30006) dissertation? Single / Double</p><p>Are the length, student effort and intellectual achievement appropriate? Yes / No</p><p>The examiner should consider the following issues, but may focus the report on those that most directly influence the mark awarded: </p><p>Topic: (Well defined, appropriate to geography and geographical modes of enquiry, and potentially achievable?) Aims / Objectives: (Clearly expressed, appropriate to topic and running coherently through the work?) Incorporation of existing knowledge: (Critical review, assimilation and use of existing knowledge? Full and appropriate citation and listing of references and sources?) Implementation of techniques: (Appropriate techniques / methodologies implemented and justified in collection, analysis and presentation of material? Adequate data? Good use of statistical, graphical and cartographic techniques?) Results, Analysis and Discussion: (Results consistent with work undertaken, clearly presented and knowledgeably analysed, interpreted and discussed? Is the student aware of limitations?) Conclusion (Consistent with objectives; handled perceptively, critically and with sound judgement?) Presentation (Clear and correct writing, appropriate layout, structure, diagrams,/maps/ photographs, binding? Inclusion of an Abstract, Contents list, and appropriate sections?)</p><p>Examiner’s comments:</p><p>Any additional pages of comments should be securely attached to this form</p><p>The mark should be decided with reference to the Geography Dissertation Markers’ Guide in the Overall Dissertation Handbook and the University’s approved marking guidelines on the DAA Web page: Mark http://www.keele.ac.uk/depts/aa/newacadregpages/marking%20criteria.htm %</p>