<p> Iredell-Statesville Schools School Improvement Plan A Continuous Improvement Strategic Plan</p><p>School Name: Lakeshore Year: 2013-2014 Current NCLB Status: Met AYP Current ABC Status: School of Excellence Elementary</p><p>P PLAN: Identify the gap and the approach Overall SMART Goal (Two year projection): By 2014-2015 Lakeshore Elementary students in grades 3-5 will go from 93.59% proficient to 100% proficient as measured by NC Mathematics End of Grade Test. By 2014-2015, Lakeshore Elementary will decrease the number of students identified in Tier 2 by 50% as determined by AIMSWeb. 100% of subgroups in all grade levels will show growth as measured by CA 1- CA4.</p><p>Data Analysis. Answer the question below using any data and/or information you have about your performance. In order to meet your Overall Goal, what is the most important area that needs improving and why? We will use an RtI Diamond model approach to increase student engagement during core instruction and provide intervention/enrichment aligned to student needs to increase academic growth for all subgroups.</p><p>Page 1 Updated 061011 Iredell-Statesville Schools School Improvement Plan A Continuous Improvement Strategic Plan</p><p>First Grade Missing Number 2013-2013 First Grade Oral Counting 2012-2013</p><p>First Grade Number ID 2012-2013 First Grade Quantity Discrimination 2012-2013</p><p>Second Grade MCAP 2012-2013 Third Grade MCAP 2012-2013</p><p>Page 2 Updated 061011 Iredell-Statesville Schools School Improvement Plan A Continuous Improvement Strategic Plan</p><p>Fourth Grade MCAP 2012-2013 Fifth Grade MCAP 2012-2013</p><p>2012-2013 SUBGROUP DATA</p><p>Page 3 Updated 061011 Iredell-Statesville Schools School Improvement Plan A Continuous Improvement Strategic Plan</p><p>Page 4 Updated 061011 Iredell-Statesville Schools School Improvement Plan A Continuous Improvement Strategic Plan</p><p>Page 5 Updated 061011 Iredell-Statesville Schools School Improvement Plan A Continuous Improvement Strategic Plan % of Individual Students Showing CA Growth CA1-4 2012-2013 Grades K-5 2011- K First Second Third Fourth Fifth Grades K-5 2012 2012-2013 Overall C2 C3 C4 C2 C3 C4 C2 C3 C4 C2 C3 C4 C2 C3 C4 C2 C3 C4 Overall Growth CA1-CA4 98.83% 79 91 92 100 100 100 69 89 93 70 75 87 65 69 98 78 96 99 94.8</p><p>2012-2013 EOG Results Unavailable Until October 2013</p><p>Page 6 Updated 061011 Iredell-Statesville Schools School Improvement Plan A Continuous Improvement Strategic Plan</p><p>LES EOG Math Proficiency 100.00% t n 80.00% e i c i f 60.00% o r P</p><p> t 40.00% n e c r 20.00% e P 0.00% 2006- 2007- 2008- 2009- 2010- 2011- 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Series1 80.80% 93.40% 93.40% 89.50% 89.70% 93.59% Year</p><p>2012-2013 Fidelity Data</p><p>Page 7 Updated 061011 Iredell-Statesville Schools School Improvement Plan A Continuous Improvement Strategic Plan</p><p>Cycle 1:Math Pirate Fidelity Walks</p><p>12 0 1</p><p>10 f o</p><p> t 8 u o</p><p>6 t n</p><p> e 4 s e</p><p> r 2 P 0 l l h s c k d d d e h s t / i t t a a s c i f f v c e e y e r o d s t i n i i f n l u t l r t a f l c t g u w c e n 6 e i i a e h a a c . t b s t s p a d e e e k d r s d g n e s i < c e s i d t a e g s j e p d l e u v s v g m n h e c i i t s b c n b u c u t e e t s s e n o e o r f d r s e o a p c D</p><p>Cycle 2 Fidelity walks 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 Yes 1 0 No</p><p>Page 8 Updated 061011 Iredell-Statesville Schools School Improvement Plan A Continuous Improvement Strategic Plan Fidelity Walks Cycle 3 12 10 8 6 4 Yes 2 0 No</p><p>Cycle 4 Pirate Fidelity Walks 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 yes 1 0 no</p><p>Page 9 Updated 061011 Iredell-Statesville Schools School Improvement Plan A Continuous Improvement Strategic Plan Cycle 5 Fidelity Data 4.5</p><p>4 4 f</p><p> o 3.5 t 3 u o</p><p>2.5 t</p><p> n 2 e s 1.5 e r 1 yes P 0.5 0 no</p><p>Cycle 2 Vmath Fidelity Walks</p><p>N/A Unknown 1 rarely 2 sometimes 3 often 4 always</p><p>Page 10 Updated 061011 Iredell-Statesville Schools School Improvement Plan A Continuous Improvement Strategic Plan Cycle 3 Vmath Fidelity Walks</p><p>N/A Unknown 1 rarely 2 sometimes 3 often 4 always</p><p>Vmath Fidelity Data Cycle 2 % Cycle 3 % Possible Look Fors 360 210 N/A 30 8.3 10 2.7 Unknown 34 9.4 6 2.8 1 rarely 2 0.5 8 3.8 2 sometimes 8 2.2 3 0.6 3 often 59 16.3 16 7.61 4 always 227 63 145 78.6 Data Analysis. Answer the data analysis questions. 1. What is contributing to your success in this 2. What opportunities for improvement do you 3. What seems to be the root cause of the area and how do you know? notice? problem and how do you know? Fourth Grade Math 80% green Spring, First grade missing OFI’S- Fifth grade Math and Third Grade Math below 80% Increase engagement of students in core instruction number, quantity discrimination, number ID all at 90% or spring to reduce students needing intervention. higher for spring AIMS will continue to be used in all grades except From CA 1-CA4 kinder. Add Moving with Math as available resource From CA1-CA4 K- Asian decreased for math intervention and core instruction-will need K- all subgroups showed growth except Asian 1- Male maintained to be monitored for fidelity. Monitor interventions 2- Asian maintained and SWD decreased with fidelity through frequent progress monitoring… 1st All subgroup but male showed growth 3- AIG decreased, female and ED maintained if not working must move to something new. Be </p><p>Page 11 Updated 061011 Iredell-Statesville Schools School Improvement Plan A Continuous Improvement Strategic Plan 4- Asian and LEP showed least amount of growth creative with scheduling so that students are able to 2nd All subgroups showed growth except Asian and SWD 5- Black decreased and mixed maintained receive interventions that they need. Use AIMS data to support enrichment as well for students needing 3rd Asian and white subgroup increased more than 10 Fidelity data shows conceptual vs. procedural still has some to move beyond. Provide more training on points confusion. conceptual vs. procedural. </p><p>4th all subgroups showed growth </p><p>5th All subgroup showed growth except for black and mixed</p><p>Fidelity data is strong with most walks at 100%, VMATH intervention fidelity data showed improvement over time. </p><p>Target SMART Goal (One year projection): By 2013-2014 Lakeshore Elementary Students in grades 3-5 will go from 93.59% proficient to 96.8 % proficient as measured by the NC Mathematics End of Grade Test. By 2013-2014, the percent of students showing growth in grades K-5 will increase from 94.8% to 100% as measured by CA. By 2013-2014, 100% of students identified above grade level in AimsWeb will show growth. By 2013-2014 100% of subgroups will show a minimum of 5 point growth from CA 1- CA 4.</p><p>What will you do during cycle 1 to address the root cause identified in #3(Identify key approach or strategy you will implement during cycle 1 to move toward achieving your target goal.)? Implement RtI Diamond Model –with clearly defined core focused on increased student engagement and is supported by 8 mathematical practices with a clearly defined tier II that incorporates a targeted intervention block and enrichment block. </p><p>D DO: Develop and Implement Deployment Plan Step # Cycle 1 List the specific steps your team will Person(s) responsible for Measure/Indicator Start Date End Date complete during the first cycle. completion of the step. (How will you know if the step is completed correctly?)</p><p>Page 12 Updated 061011 Iredell-Statesville Schools School Improvement Plan A Continuous Improvement Strategic Plan 1 Maintain a Core Team for RtI pilot training. Hinson Goal team mtg. 6/4/13 6/4/13 2 Continue training of Common Core, 8 Hinson/Semanko LES Core Chart 8/26/13 6/10/14 mathematical practices and math foundations, Cain workshop 3 Continue to implement 8 mathematical Hinson/Semanko PLC’s 8/26/13 6/10/14 practices and conceptual thinking during core instruction 4 Ongoing RtI coaching from core team (RtI pilot) RtI trainers Staff Meeting 8/26/13 6/10/14 5 Identify students needing tier 2 intervention and RtI Coordinator Tracking Sheet 8/26/13 10/1/13 begin/continue tier 2 paperwork, implement Pirate Time 5 Continue to Train, and implement Hinson Training agenda 6/12/13 6/10/14 intervention/enrichment programs for math Pirate Time. VMath and Extensions Moving with Math 6 Schedule 4 data days for the year, 1 each Hinson Data Day Agendas 6/13/13 9/30/13 quarter to review data and determine next steps. 7 Continue implementation of core instruction Semanko Lesson Plans 8/25/13 6/10/14 that incorporates 8 mathematical practices and conceptual thinking</p><p>8 Purchase Total Participation Technique Book for Hinson Purchase Invoice 8/25/13 all teachers (TPT) 9 Continue training on TPT strategies to Hinson/Semanko/Beane, Lesson plans 8/26/13 6/7/14 incorporate TPT strategies in core Compass Team 10 Ongoing support through PLC’s and ERD for the Semanko Agenda/Minutes 8/25/13 6/10/14 implementation of RtI. 11 Teachers review Tiered Paperwork monthly RtI Coordinator Revised Tiered Paperwork 8/24/13 8/24/14 summary sheets 12 District differentiation specialist and Hinson, Shipley, Beane Completed schedule 8/26/13 6/10/14</p><p>Page 13 Updated 061011 Iredell-Statesville Schools School Improvement Plan A Continuous Improvement Strategic Plan intervention specialist works with enrichment block teachers through ERD support. 13 Update and Implement fidelity tool for Hinson Fidelity Data 9/30/13 6/10/14 intervention and enrichment block. 14 Utilize Vmath coach for training on fidelity tool. Vmath coach Meeting agenda 9/1/13 6/10/14 15 Progress Monitor Tiered Paperwork students Classroom teacher Assessment results 10/17/13 6/10/14 16 Administer/Analyze AIMS WEB Screening Hinson AIMS WEB results/report 8/26/13 6/10/14 beginning-year, mid-year, end-year 17 Administer CA according to school testing Teachers Marathon Data 8/26/13 6/10/14 schedule (4 times a year) 18 Analyze CA data to determine strength of core Teachers % of students at each tier 8/26/13 6/10/14 and students identified in each tier beginning, data middle, and end of year. 19 Analyze fidelity data and subgroup data after King/Jones/ Goal Team SIP plan 8/26/13 6/10/14 each CA Implementation Plan Quality Check: What resources/budget needs do you have for the first cycle?  $800 for Cain workshop  Intervention program/enrichment program training, consumable workbooks for intervention groups, (ie Vmath)  RtI tier II strategy resources available within the school and people to lead groups  Cardstock for games  Black and color ink for printers  Envelopes for games  Glues sticks, brads for games  TPT book for each teacher</p><p>If you identified budget needs, what budget code will you use to meet the budget needs for this cycle?  Instructional Money  I3 Grant Money</p><p>If funding is not available, identify the steps from the implementation plan that will address the funding gap.</p><p>Page 14 Updated 061011 Iredell-Statesville Schools School Improvement Plan A Continuous Improvement Strategic Plan See if funds can be provided by PTO</p><p>What professional development, if any, will be offered in cycle 1 to support the staff in implementing the approach?  RtI Pilot-District Support  Support Training for Common Core and the 8 mathematical practices  CAIN workshop for all staff conceptual vs. procedural  TPT training for all staff (including assistants)</p><p>Determine the measures/data that will be used to determine the effectiveness of the first cycle approach by answering the following questions: A. List the information or measures the team B. List the information or measures the team will use to C. List the information or measures the will use to determine if the approach was determine if the approach wasn’t implemented team will use to determine what worked implemented/completed? (Completion correctly? (Fidelity of implementation data.) and what didn’t work? (Impact data) Data) Fidelity tool for intervention/enrichment block CA, EOG Data, AIMS web Data, CA Progress Monitoring Data subgroup data</p><p>Tiered Paperwork summary sheets</p><p>S Study – Analysis of data after implementing an approach At the end of cycle 1, answer the following questions based on the data collected from the identified measures in boxes A, B, and C above: 1. What worked and how do you 2. What didn’t work and how do you know? 3. Do you need any additional assistance as you look at your know? results and start planning for Cycle 2? ___Yes ___No</p><p>Reflect on the answers in box 1 and 2 above for cycle 1 and check which option best describes what you will do in your plan for cycle 2 (double click the box and select “check” to check the box)? Target goal has been met and is changed to a new target goal. Target goal not met so we will continue current plan. We will make improvements to Target goal not met but current plan is effective so we will the plan based on what didn’t work as identified in #2 above. continue current plan and repeat it for the next cycle. Target goal not met and information indicates that we need to abandon the current plan and identify a new approach. Page 15 Updated 061011 Iredell-Statesville Schools School Improvement Plan A Continuous Improvement Strategic Plan A Act – Revise or continue with implementation plan based on data analysis. 4. What is your focus for cycle 2 (Identify key approach or strategy)? If you are continuing with the approach from cycle 1, restate it here. If you are changing your approach for cycle 2, state it here. Step # Cycle 2 List the specific steps your team will Person(s) responsible for Measure/Indicator Start Date End Date complete during the second cycle. completion of the step. (How will you know if the step is completed correctly?)</p><p>Implementation Plan Quality Check: What resources/budget needs do you have for cycle 2? </p><p>If you identified budget needs, what budget code will you use to meet the budget needs for this cycle? </p><p>If funding is not available, list the steps from the implementation plan that will address the funding gap.</p><p>What professional development, if any, will be offered in cycle 2 to support the staff in implementing the approach?</p><p>Page 16 Updated 061011 Iredell-Statesville Schools School Improvement Plan A Continuous Improvement Strategic Plan</p><p>Determine the measures/data that will be used to determine the effectiveness of the Cycle 2 approach by answering the following questions A. List the information or measures the team will B. List the information or measures the team will use C. List the information or measures the use to determine if the approach was to determine if the approach wasn’t implemented team will use to determine what worked implemented/completed? (Completion Data) correctly? (Fidelity of implementation.) and what didn’t work? (Impact Data)</p><p>S Study – Analysis of data after implementing an approach At the end of cycle 2, answer the following questions based on the data collected from the identified measures in boxes A, B, and C above: 1. What worked and how do you know? 2. What didn’t work and how do you know? 3. Do you need any additional assistance as you look at your results and start planning for Cycle 2? ___Yes ___No From whom do you need assistance? Reflect on the data analysis for the year so far and check the option below that best describes your direction for the 2012-13 SIP. A Act – Continue with the Target Goal or revise the Target Goal for next year. Overall goal has been met and School Improvement Plan focus will change for next year. Or… Target goal has been met and is changed to a new target goal. Target goal not met but current plan is effective so we will continue current plan and repeat it for the 2014-2015 SIP to take our work to sustaining.. .Target goal not met, so we will continue current plan for 2014-2015. We will make improvements to the plan based on what didn’t work through this year.</p><p>Page 17 Updated 061011</p>