<p>Classical Security dilemma: based on the centrality of the state as actor and the nature of anarchy in the international system. It refers to a situation in which a state’s action taken to assure its own security is perceived as threats to the security of other states. Classical Security Dilemma= state + anarchy + military build-up</p><p>New Security Dilemma: The new security dilemma is not centered on the centrality of the sovereign state. Instead globalization + weak or failed states + transsovereign problems=New Security Dilemma. Globalization as a potential holds the recipe for global peace and prosperity, assuming that the negative repercussions of globalization, i.e. the intensification of transsovereign problems, can be eliminated or at least minimized. In order to sustain globalization and focus on the positive aspects of its development, transsovereign problems have to be fought. Dilemma: our actions to fight transsovereign problems may actually deepen rather than alleviate them. How can we curtail transsovereign problems in the age of globalization where peace and prosperity hinges on globalization? How can we combat transsovereign problems, such as the development of weak and failed states (terrorism, global drug trade, disease etc.), without making them more severe?</p>