Electronic Supplementary Material s46

Electronic Supplementary Material s46

<p> 1 Electronic Supplementary Material</p><p>2</p><p>3 Magnetic metal-organic frameworks for the extraction of trace amounts of heavy metal ions</p><p>4 prior to their determination by ICP-AES </p><p>5 Meysam Safari, Yadollah Yamini1, Mohammad Yaser Masoomi, Ali Morsali, Ahmad Mani-</p><p>6 Varnosfaderani </p><p>7 Department of Chemistry, Tarbiat Modares University, P.O. Box 14115-175, Tehran, Iran</p><p>8</p><p>9</p><p>10 Characterization of the sorbents</p><p>11 To gain a better understanding of the morphology Fe3O4@TMU-8, the samples were also </p><p>12 characterized using SEM and TEM (Fig. S2A). The SEM images show that micro flower like </p><p>13 morphologies have been obtained which are comprised of magnetic nanoparticles, and TEM image </p><p>14 revealed that the finally formed Fe3O4@TMU-8 are composed of a Fe3O4 core and a TMU-8 shell. </p><p>15 Based on the SEM images, the average diameter of the Fe3O4@TMU-8 studied here is about 40 nm.</p><p>16 The comparison between the TGA curves of TMU-8 and Fe3O4@TMU-8 showed the same thermal </p><p>17 stability for both of MOFs (Fig. S2B).</p><p>18 The magnetic hysteresis loops of the Fe3O4@TMU-8 samples were obtained from VSM </p><p>19 measurement at room temperature. Fe3O4, Fe3O4@TMU-8, 5-cycles, 10-cycles, 15-cycles and 20-</p><p>20 cycles showed a characteristic superparamagnetic feature with negligible hysteresis at room </p><p>21 temperature. Fig. 2SC shows the magnetic properties of Fe3O4 NPs and Fe3O4@TMU-8 at room </p><p>22 temperature obtained by VSM within the field range of −10 to 10 KOe. The MOF shell results in the</p><p>23 decrease of the magnetic strength of the nanoparticles due to the weight contribution from the </p><p>24 nonmagnetic MOF. The large saturation magnetization of Fe3O4, Fe3O4@TMU-8 5-cycles, 10-</p><p>-1 25 cycles, 15-cycles and 20-cycles were 65, 53, 41, 25, and 17 emug , respectively. After dispersing 20</p><p>26 cycles in water, the Fe3O4@TMU-8 was collected within 15 s using a magnet. This indicates that </p><p>27 the magnetic microspheres can be used for magnetic separation.</p><p>28 Optimization of extraction conditions</p><p>1 1Corresponding author. Phone: +98-21-82883449, Fax: +98-21-82883460, E-mail address: </p><p>2 [email protected] (Y. Yamini). 29 The effect of the number of layers on the composite plays a significant role in the adsorption of</p><p>30 target metal ions onto Fe3O4@TMU-8. Therefore, the effect of the number of layers on the</p><p>31 composite for the extraction of heavy metal ions was investigated. The extraction of the heavy</p><p>32 metals increased rapidly when the layers on the composite increased from 3 to 15 and changed</p><p>33 slightly when the layers on the composite increased from 15 to 20, which indicated the extraction of</p><p>34 heavy metal ions was inadequate when the layers on the composite was smaller than 15. Heavy</p><p>35 metal ions were adequately adsorbed on the sorbent when 15 layers was used on the composite and</p><p>36 thus the extraction of heavy metal ions changed slightly with a further increase of layers on the</p><p>37 composite. To ensure sufficient extraction, 15 layers on the composite were selected for synthesized</p><p>38 Fe3O4@TMU-8.</p><p>39 The solution pH plays a critical role on the extraction of the analytes. The solution pH not only</p><p>40 affects the molecular status of analytes but also influences the charge species and charge density on</p><p>41 the surface of the sorbent. The effect of the solution pH on the extraction of heavy metal ions was</p><p>42 investigated in a pH range of 4.0 to 11.0. The extraction efficiency increased dramatically as the pH</p><p>43 was increased from 4 to 10 and then decreased. This effect can be related to the protonation of the</p><p>44 sorbent donor atoms at low pH values and the formation and precipitation of hydroxide species of</p><p>45 the target metal ions at high pH values (pH > 10), leading to a decrease in the adsorption of metal</p><p>46 ions. According to these results, the pH of the sample solution was adjusted at pH 10 for subsequent</p><p>47 experiments.</p><p>48 The type of desorption solvent is vital for the desorption efficiency. Thus, the choice of</p><p>49 desorption solvent should be carefully taken into account. The effect of the concentration of HNO3</p><p>50 solution on the efficiency of desorption of the metal ions was studied in the range of 0.025–1 M.</p><p>51 The best desorption of the metal ions is attained by application of 0.5 M HNO3 as the elution</p><p>52 solvent. </p><p>53 In this approach, the central composite design strategy was used for designing the experiments, and</p><p>54 then the BRANN technique was used for nonlinear mapping of the data. Despite other ANN</p><p>55 training algorithms, BRANN is more reproducible and predictive. The main advantages of this</p><p>56 approach are its reproducibility, the ability to model multiple responses, modeling the nonlinear</p><p>57 interactions and unraveling hidden dependencies in data. By using the ED-BRANN strategy, it is</p><p>58 possible to investigate the effect of the factors and their interactions on the extraction efficiency of</p><p>59 each analyte separately. This advantage was not achievable using a usual polynomial equation</p><p>60 commonly used in ED approaches. Moreover, BRANN models are automatically regulated by using</p><p>61 the Bayes theorem, which prevents the occurrence of overfitting. Therefore, the generated models</p><p>62 are predictive and reliable. In this work a BRANN model with a 4-5-7 architecture has been used</p><p>63 for modeling the data obtained after running the CCD experiments 64 As previously mentioned, the effects of the sorbent, extraction time, eluent and sample volume</p><p>65 have been investigated using ED-BRANN approach. In this method, the coded levels of the factors</p><p>66 for 21 experiments (i.e. data in Table S1) were used as independent variables. Moreover, the peak</p><p>67 areas (PAs) values for all 7 analytes have been used as dependent variables. A 4-5-7 network was</p><p>68 developed and trained with Bayesian regularization algorithm. The transfer function for the hidden</p><p>69 layer and the output layer were sigmoidal and linear, respectively. The statistical parameters for this</p><p>70 model are summarized in Table S2. As can be seen in this Table, the model explains more than 90%</p><p>71 of the variance of the responses for each analyte. High values of the coefficient of determination</p><p>72 together with low values of root mean square error (RMSE) imply that the developed BRANN</p><p>73 model has a high potential to describe the experiments. The relative importance of the main effects</p><p>74 and their interactions have been investigated using a sensitivity analysis approach [26]. The relative</p><p>75 contribution of the sorbent, extraction time, sample volume, eluent and their interactions on the</p><p>76 average PAs values of the analytes are illustrated in Fig. 2SB. As can be seen in this figure, the</p><p>77 amount of the sorbent, the extraction time, and their interaction are the more contributing factors in</p><p>78 this model. All analytes represent the same pattern of responses. The effects of the interaction of the</p><p>79 sorbent and extraction time on the PAs values of all seven analytes are illustrated in Fig. 3SA. As</p><p>80 can be seen in this figure, there is a positive synergism effect between the extraction time and the</p><p>81 amount of sorbent. With increasing the extraction time and the amount of the sorbent, the PAs for</p><p>82 all seven analytes increases. By developing the nonlinear ANN model, the pattern search strategy</p><p>83 [27] was used to find the best values of the factors in order to get the maximum PAs values for each</p><p>84 analyte. A constrained multivariate optimization strategy (Fig. 3SB) has been used to optimize the</p><p>85 objective function (inverse of the summation of PAs) under the constraint which the relative</p><p>86 standard deviations of the PAs were less than a small threshold. This criterion guarantees that the</p><p>87 experiment is optimized in a way which the PA of all analytes are maximized, simultaneously.</p><p>88 After the optimization procedure, best values of the parameters were 10 mg for the sorbent, 185 mL</p><p>89 of sample volume, 566 µL of eluent and 11 min of extraction time.</p><p>90</p><p>91</p><p>92 Table S1 Experimental factors, levels and matrix of the face-centered central composite design </p><p>93 (FCCCD) for determination of heavy metal ions by MSPE.</p><p>No Time (min) Eluent (µL) Sample Sorbent (mg) volume (mL)</p><p>1 3.00 200.00 180.00 4.00 2 6.00 350.00 135.00 7.00</p><p>3 6.00 602.27 135.00 7.00</p><p>4 6.00 350.00 210.68 7.00</p><p>5 3.00 200.00 90.00 4.00</p><p>6 9.00 200.00 180.00 10.00</p><p>7 6.00 97.73 135.00 7.00</p><p>8 9.00 500.00 90.00 4.00</p><p>9 6.00 350.00 59.32 7.00</p><p>10 11.05 350.00 135.00 7.00</p><p>11 6.00 350.00 135.00 12.05</p><p>12 0.95 350.00 135.00 7.00</p><p>13 6.00 350.00 135.00 7.00</p><p>14 3.00 500.00 90.00 10.00</p><p>15 6.00 350.00 135.00 7.00</p><p>16 3.00 500.00 180.00 10.00</p><p>17 6.00 350.00 135.00 7.00</p><p>18 6.00 350.00 135.00 1.95</p><p>19 9.00 200.00 90.00 10.00</p><p>20 6.00 350.00 135.00 7.00</p><p>21 9.00 500.00 180.00 4.00</p><p>94</p><p>95 96 Table S2 The statistical parameters of the developed 4-3-7 BRANN model, for nonlinear </p><p>97 modeling of central composite design experiments. </p><p>2 2 1 2 3 Analyte R training R MC-CV RMSE training RMSE MC-CV </p><p>Co 0.904 0.890 0.474 0.494</p><p>Cu 0.971 0.939 0.192 0.218</p><p>Pb 0.943 0.922 0.456 0.482</p><p>Cd 0.962 0.930 0.151 0.180</p><p>Ni 0.916 0.925 0.238 0.263</p><p>Cr 0.918 0.902 0.218 0.227</p><p>Mn 0.941 0.913 0.097 0.135</p><p>98 MC-CV: Monte Carlo-Cross Validation, 2- RMSE: Root mean square error, 3- The results for MC-</p><p>99 CV are the average values for 100 times repetition of the algorithm. </p><p>100</p><p>101</p><p>102</p><p>Table S3 Determination of heavy metal ions and recoveries for tap, river and minerals water samples. </p><p>Tap Water River Water</p><p>Element Added(μg L-1) Found ± SD (μg L-1) Recovery (%) Added (μg L-1) Found ± SD (μg L-1) Recovery (%) Added(μg L</p><p>0.0 <LOD - 0.0 4.4 ± 0.11 -</p><p>Zn</p><p>10.0 10.03 ± 0.45 100.3 10.0 14.3 ± 0.43 99.0</p><p>0.0 <LOD - 0.0 <LOD - Co 10.0 9.77 ± 0.48 97.7 10.0 9.71 ± 0.32 97.1</p><p>0.0 <LOD - 0.0 <LOD - Cr 10.0 9.93 ± 0.63 99.3 10.0 9.86 ± 0.45 98.6</p><p>0.0 2.9 ± 0.12 - 0.0 4.9 ± 0.31 - Cu 10.0 12.8 ± 0.34 99.0 10.0 14.6 ± 0.42 97.0</p><p>Mn 0.0 3.4 ± 0.13 - 0.0 <LOD 10.0 13.1 ± 0.43 97.0 10.0 10.02 ± 0.61 100.2</p><p>0.0 <LOD - 0.0 2.1 ± 0.13 - Ni 10.0 10.5 ± 0.63 108.0 10.0 12.0 ± 0.68 99.0</p><p>0.0 <LOD - 0.0 <LOD - Pb 10.0 9.8 ± 0.61 98.0 10.0 9.4 ± 0.52 94.0</p><p>103</p><p>104</p><p>105</p><p>106</p><p>107</p><p>108</p><p>109</p><p>110</p><p>111</p><p>112</p><p>113</p><p>114</p><p>115</p><p>116</p><p>117</p><p>118 Table S3 (continue) Determination of heavy metal ions and recoveries for fruits and tea</p><p>Element C u Pb</p><p>Ad Found R Added Found R.R Added Found R.R de . d ±SD (μg L-1) ±SD (%) (μg L-1) ±SD (%)</p><p>(μg (μg L-1) (μg L-1) (μg L-1) L- 1)</p><p>Tomato 0 - _ 0.0 - _ 0.0 - _ .0</p><p>1 10.1 ± 0.8 1 10.0 9.0 ± 90.0 10.0 9.6 96.0 0.0 0 0.5 ±0.3</p><p>Tea 0 - - 0.0 - _ 0.0 2.9 ± - .0 0.5</p><p>1 9.7 ± 0.3 9 10.0 8.8 ± 88.0 10.0 12.8 ± 99.0 0.0 7 0.4 0.8 </p><p>Watermelon 0 - _ 0.0 - - 0.0 - - .0</p><p>1 9.7 ± 0.4 9 10.0 9.1 ± 91.0 10.0 9.6 ± 96.0 0.0 7 0.6 0.4</p><p>Cucmber 0 - - 0.0 - - 0.0 - - .0</p><p>1 9.5 ± 0.3 9 10.0 9.2 ± 92.0 10.0 10.2 ± 102.0 0.0 5 0.3 0.7</p><p>0 2.4 ± 0.2 - 0.0 - - 0.0 1.4 ± - onion .0 0.2</p><p>1 12.4 ± 0.7 9 10.0 9.4 ± 94.0 10.0 11.3 ± 99.0 0.0 9 0.7 0.7</p><p>0 1.8 ± 0.3 _ 0.0 - _ 0.0 - _ .0 Carrot 1 11.9 ± 0.6 1 10.0 10.0 ± 100.0 10.0 9.5 ± 95.0 0.0 0 0.3 0.4</p><p>Apple 0 2.1± 0.4 - 0.0 - - 0.0 - _ .0</p><p>1 12.0 ± 0.6 9 10.0 9.0 ± 90.0 10.0 9.6 ± 96.0 0.0 9 0.3 0.5</p><p>119</p><p>120</p><p>121 122</p><p>123</p><p>124 Fig. S1. Comparison of XRD patterns for TMU-8, Fe3O4@TMU-8 core-shell and</p><p>125 Fe3O4/TMU-8 composite. </p><p>126</p><p>127</p><p>128</p><p>129</p><p>130</p><p>131</p><p>132</p><p>133</p><p>134</p><p>135</p><p>136</p><p>137 Fig. S2. FT-IR spectra of TMU-8, Fe3O4/TMU-8 and Fe3O4@TMU-8</p><p>138 139 A)</p><p>140 B) </p><p>141</p><p>142</p><p>143</p><p>144</p><p>145</p><p>146 C)</p><p>147</p><p>148</p><p>149</p><p>150</p><p>151</p><p>152 Fig. S3. A) SEM images of Fe3O4@TMU-8 NPs and TEM image of Fe3O4@ TMU-8 NPs.</p><p>153 B) TGA thermograms of Fe3O4@TMU-8 and TMU-8. C) VSM curves of Fe3O4; 5, 10,15 and</p><p>154 20 cycels of Fe3O4@TMU-8 155 A)</p><p>156 B) </p><p>157</p><p>158</p><p>159</p><p>160</p><p>161</p><p>162</p><p>163</p><p>164 Fig. S4. A) The interaction patterns of the amount of the sorbent and extraction time on the 165 area under peak values of the analytes. a) Cr, b) Co, c) Mn, d) Ni, e) Cu, f) Cd and g) Pb. B) 166 The plot of the values of fitness function against the number of generations for the 167 optimization procedure using constrained genetic algorithm (GA) and BRANN technique. 168 The fitness function equals to (1/) and is minimized using GA.</p>

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    10 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us