Types of Pronouns; Their Formal and Semantic Properties; Their Syntactic Functions

Types of Pronouns; Their Formal and Semantic Properties; Their Syntactic Functions

<p> (15) Pronouns (Types of Pronouns; Their Formal and Semantic Properties; Their Syntactic Functions) </p><p>(15.1) Characteristics of Pronouns</p><p>(15.1.1) Pronouns versus Nouns - pronouns = replace nouns / noun phrases => lack a lexical meaning of their own - PRO in contrast to N (a) semantics - a closed class system (b) morphology - case contrast for subject x object case - person distinction - gender contrast (c) syntax - determiners - nominals - functions of ADJ - functions of ADV</p><p>(15.1.2) Grammatical Categories - case, gender, number, person (1) case - N: common case x morphologically marked possessive case - PRO: marked subject case x object case x possessive case (possessive PRO) - x you and it not marked for case - formal: PRO following the verb be, i.e. not followed by the finite V form > subject case - x colloquial: ... > object case: it’s all right, it’s only me (2) gender - manifested in 3rd person SG personal / reflexive / possessive PRO - relative / interrogative PRO: personal (who) x non-personal gender (which) (3) number - manifested in special lexical entry: I > we; he / she / it > they - x exceptional regular PL formation by the –(e)s ending: yourself > yourselves; other > others; one > ones - demonstrative PRO: SG this > PL these; SG that > PL those (4) person - manifested in personal / reflexive / possessive PRO - 1st person = the speaker - 2nd person = the addressee - 3rd person = ‘the rest’ - colloquial: you / they = also with the meaning of a general human agent (you change three times / where do they sell it?) - formal: we / one = ... (one doesn’t like to have one’s word doubted)</p><p>(15.1.3) Reference - a linguistic context > anaphors = bound within the minimal domain by subject, need a co- referential antecedent - a pragmatic c. > pronouns = free within the minimal domain x bound by clause-external context - anaphoric reference = reference to an antecedent already mentioned in the clause before - cataphoric r. = reference to an antecedent to be mentioned in the clause (absent in CZ)</p><p>(15.2) Classification of Pronouns</p><p>Dušková Quirk / Greenbaum (I) specific (1) central (1) central (a) personal: me, we, ... (a) personal (b) reflexive: myself, ourselves, ... (b) reflexive (c) possessive (c) possessive (a’) determinative (pre-nominal): your, its, ... (b’) independent (post-nominal): mine, hers, its?, ... (2) reciprocal: each other, one another (d) reciprocal (2) non-central (3) relative: the wh- series, that (e) relative (4) interrogative: the wh-series (f) interrogative (5) demonstrative: this/that, these/those (g) demonstrative (6) indefinite (II) indefinite (a) positive (a’) universal: all/both, each/every (h) universal (b’) assertive: some-, one, half, several, enough, other, another (i) partitive (c’) non-assertive: any-, either (j) quantifying (b) negative: no-, neither Central PRO: different syntactic functions x the same morphological features</p><p>(15.2.1) Personal Pronouns - functions of 3rd per. SG it (a) can replace a N with both definite and indefinite determination - x ... N with an indefinite determination only with a co-referential antecedent: I’ve bought a new hat but my husband doesn’t like it - ... not a co-referential antecedent > the pro-form one: I’ve bought a new hat and Jane has bought one too (b) a ‘place holder’ = a formal substitute in the position of the subject: it’s raining / snowing / warm - CZ: one-member subjectless clauses x not possible in E</p><p>(15.2.2) Reflexive Pronouns - SG -self or PL -selves + 1st and 2nd pers. PRO in possessive case - ... + 3rd per. PRO in object case (1) non-emphatic use - PRO co-referential with the subject = the action expressed by the verb passes from the subject back again to the subject - typically takes the position of the object - functions (a) a direct object: he shaves himself (b) an indirect object: she bought herself a new hat (c) a part of the predicate: ah, that’s better, you’re yourself again (d) used as an adjective: she wants a little time to herself (e) used as an adverb: speak for yourself (f) with reflexive verbs: absent oneself from, pride oneself on, behave yourself, introduce oneself, excuse oneself, underestimate oneself (2) emphatic use - PRO not necessarily co-referential with the subject - typically takes the position of apposition > after the emphasised sentence member: the gift will be presented by the head-mistress herself - pronounced with an emphatic stress</p><p>(15.2.3) Possessive Pronouns (a) determinative = an attributive function (pre-nominal) (b) independent = nominal function (post-nominal) - E: possessives also used to refer to parts of the body (he broke his leg) x CZ: absent - determinative possessives in complementary distribution with articles - special structures (a) the structure N + of + POSS when need to use another determiner besides the possessive: a friend of mine (implies one out of many) (b) POSS in the function of subject: ours was not an intimate acquaintance </p><p>(15.2.4) Reciprocal Pronouns - each other = implies only two - one another = implies more than two - x CZ: reciprocal pronouns identical with reflexive pronouns</p><p>(15.2.5) Relative Pronouns - who (whom, whose), which, that - compound relative pronouns: whichever, whatever, whoever - distinction of person (who / that) x non-person (which / that) - distinction of restrictive (who / which / that / 0) x non-restrictive (who / which) - who: personal antecedent x whose: also non-persons (NOT the interrogative whose!) - which: non-personal antecedent / sentence antecedent - that: restrictive relative clause (they live in a house that was build in 1600) - who / which: can be preceded by a PREP x that: the PREP postponed to the sentence end (here is the car about which I told you x here is the car that I told you about)</p><p>(15.2.6) Interrogative Pronouns - who, which, what - used to form questions - functions: determiners (whose idea was it?) / nominals (whom did she marry?) - distinction of person (who / which / what) x non-person (which / what) - which (= which of): implies a choice from a restricted set of possibilities - what (= what kind of): asks for characteristics or description - what related to persons can refer only to the nominal part of the predicate (what is he [what’s his profession]? what is he like? x who is he [what’s his name]?) - what: usually with a postponed PREP (what are you hinting at?)</p><p>(15.2.7) Demonstrative Pronouns - SG this / that > PL these / those - functions: both determiners (pass me that box please) / nominals (what is this?) - this, these = ‘near’ reference x that, those = ‘distant’ reference - this: both anaphoric (The story is greatly exaggerated. At least that’s what he told me.) and cataphoric reference (I know this much, that his story is greatly exaggerated.) - that: anaphoric reference only </p><p>(15.2.8) Universal Pronouns - all, every, every- (-one, -body, -thing), each, both (1) all - semantics: unity or collectivness - co-occurrence: SG / PL; count / non-count; person / non-person - function: determiner (all the money is spent) / nominal (all is lost) (2) every - semantics: individual items in a collective > with 3+ items - co-occurence: SG; count; person / non-person - function: determiner (the explosion broke every window in the street) (3) each - semantics: individuals items in a collective taken one by one > with 2+ items - co-occurence: SG; count; person / non-person - function: determiner (each person signed the paper) / nominal (each must do his best) (4) both - semantics > with 2 items - co-occurence: PL; count; person / non-person - function: determiner (both the men were found guilty) / nominal (both were found guilty)</p><p>(15.2.9) Partitive Pronouns (Quirk) / Existential and Negative Quantifiers (Dušková) - some and its compounds (-body, -one, -thing) - any and its compounds (...) - no and its compounds (nobody, no one, nothing, none) - other (the other, another, others, the others) - either and neither (1) some - semantics: an indefinite quantity or number (PL or non-count: I spilt some milk on the table) / a particular but unidentified person or thing (SG count: some fool has overran my cat) - co-occurrence: SG / PL; count / non-count; person / non-person - function: determiner (he wants some money) / nominal (if you have no money, I lend you some) - use: affirmatives, interrogatives when expecting affirmation (2) any - semantics: no matter what (emphatic use: come any day you like) / an indefinite quantity or number (non-emphatic use: is there any coffee left?) - co-occurrence: SG / PL; count / non-count; person / non-person - function: determiner / nominal - use: negative sentences, interrogatives, conditionals (3) no - co-occurrence: SG / PL; count / non-count; person / non-person - function: determiner (there is no coffee left) (4) nobody, no one, nothing, none - co-occurence: SG - function: nominal (nothing happened) (5) other - form: a countable pronoun with inflectional morphology - = the second of two: the other + SG verb / the other + SG noun (one of my brothers is named X, the other Y / give me the other book) - = the remaining ones: the others + PL verb / the other + PL noun - = different or additional ones: others + PL verb / other + PL noun (some like milk chocolate, others prefer plain chocolate / there are other ways of doing this) (6) either / neither - co-occurence: SG; countable; person / non-person - function: determiner / nominal - either = one or the other of two (either method can be used); both (I haven’t seen either of them) - neither = not this and not the other (neither of the two statements is correct)</p><p>(15.2.10) Quantifying Pronouns - many / few; much / little; several, enough, one (1) many (more, most) / few - co-occurence: PL; count - function: determiner (have you many books?) / nominal (no, I have few) (2) much (more, most) / little - co-occurrence: SG; count / non-count - function: determiner (we have not much time) / nominal (much has been said, and little done) (3) several - co-occurence: PL; countable - function: determiner (I have seen several of them) / nominal (he made several mistakes) (4) enough - co-occurence: PL; countable / non-countable - function: determiner (have you got enough food?) / nominal (yes, we have enough) (5) one - = a numerical stressed variant of the indefinite article: one boy disappeared yesterday - = a substitute for a SG or PL countable noun: I thought you prefer large ones - = a substitute for a general human agent: one can never be careful enough</p>

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    5 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us