CXCL10, CXCL11, HLA-A, and IL-1B Are Induced in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells From

12 CXCL10, CXCL11, HLA-A, and IL-1 are induced in peripheral blood3 mononuclear cells from women with Chlamydia trachomatis related infertility456 Shruti Menon1, Kimberly Alexander1, Peter Timms2, John A Allan3,4, and Wilhelmina7 M. Huston1,389 1 Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of10 Technology, Brisbane, Australia11 2Faculty of Science, Health, Education and Engineering, University of the Sunshine12 Coast, Australia13 3Wesley and St Andrews Research Institute, The Wesley Hospital, Auchenflower,14 QLD, 4066, Australia. 15 4UC Health Clinical School, The Wesley Hospital, Auchenflower, QLD, 4066.161718192021221 23 ABSTRACT24 Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) infections can result in the development of serious25 sequelae such as pelvic inflammatory disease and tubal infertility. In this study,26 peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) from women who were undergoing or27 had recently undergone IVF treatment were cultured ex vivo with C. trachomatis to28 identify the immune responses associated with women who had serological evidence29 of a history of Chlamydia infection. Cytokines secreted into the supernatant from the30 cultures were measured using ELISA, and the level of IL-1 was found to be31 significantly higher in Chlamydia positive women than Chlamydia negative women.32 qRT-PCR analysis of expression of 88 immune related genes showed trends towards33 an upregulation of CXCL10, CXCL11, and HLA-A in Chlamydia positive women34 compared to Chlamydia negative women. These findings support that some women35 launch a more marked pro-inflammatory response upon infection with C. trachomatis36 and this may be associated with why C. trachomatis induces infertility in some37 infected women. 383940414243444546472 48 INTRODUCTION49 Chlamydia (C.) trachomatis is one of the most common sexually transmitted bacteria50 in the world (reviewed (1)). The infection can result in serious complications in51 women including, pelvic inflammatory disease (PID), ectopic pregnancy and tubal52 infertility (2). C. trachomatis pathogenesis and the mechanism resulting in female53 infertility have been investigated using various in vitro techniques; including infection54 of HeLA cells with C. trachomatis where the expression of genes that regulate innate55 immunity (3) and IL-8 (4) has been detected. Specific chlamydial antigens have also56 been proposed to mediate much of the inflammation, in one example, Zhou et al. (5)57 showed that expression of the C. trachomatis pORF5 protein in HeLa cells induced58 the expression of TNF-, IL-1, and IL-8. Additionally ex vivo studies using infection59 with C. trachomatis serovar D on primary cells isolated from human fallopian tube60 showed that IFN- effector functions in hypoxic conditions facilitated the61 development of chronic infections (6). Ex-vivo stimulation with C. trachomatis on62 PBMC and endometrial tissue of women showed an accumulation of IL-4 (7) and a63 polarization towards Type 2 immunity (8). Murine models have shown that infection64 with C. trachomatis alters CD8+ T cell responses in eliciting protection against the65 pathogen (9), and ex vivo studies on mouse macrophages and fibroblasts showed an66 MyD88 dependent induction of IFN- and IP-10 (10). Additionally, when challenged67 with C. trachomatis MoPn biovar in the ovarian bursa of C3H and C57BL/6 mice,68 they developed hydrosalpinx that subsequently resulted in infertility (11). These69 studies indicate that a pro-inflammatory response from the local tissue is likely a70 major contributor to the pathological outcome, however the paradox is that a pro-71 inflammatory or cellular response is essential to clear the intracellular chlamydial72 infection.3 7374 Several studies have identified immune factors expressed from peripheral blood75 mononuclear cells from Chlamydia infected or infertile participants. The stimulation76 of PBMC from infertile women with chlamydia 60kDa heat shock protein (HSP60)77 yielded higher production of IFN-, IL-10 and IL-12 cytokines (12). In vitro78 lymphocyte proliferation of PBMC from women with salpingitis with C. trachomatis79 57-kDa Hsp showed a production of cell-mediated responses to the infection,80 indicating its possible role in tubal pathology (13). Pro-inflammatory or regulatory81 cytokines such as IL-17(14), IFN- (15), IL-6 (16), and IL-22 (14) have been82 previously shown to be secreted from C. trachomatis stimulated PBMC of patients83 with acute infections, or chlamydial infertility. 848586 Diagnosis of women with chlamydial infertility is typically conducted using surgical87 or sonographic investigation for fallopian tubal blockage (17). However, even in the88 absence of apparent tubal occlusion women who are sero-positive for CT are 50% less89 likely to conceive other than by IVF treatment (18). Approximately 45% of tubal90 infertility is due to C. trachomatis (19). However, in spite of the prevalence of this91 condition we still only have limited understanding of the disease mechanism that92 results in infertility in some women.9394 Here PBMC from infertile female participants who are undergoing or had recently95 undergone IVF treatment were isolated and cultured ex vivo in the presence of C.96 trachomatis. The gene expression of 88 innate and adaptive genes and 10 secreted97 cytokines were measured from the cultures to detect differences in the responses from4 98 women who had serological evidence of chlamydial infertility compared to those with99 other causes of infertility. 100101 MATERIALS AND METHODS102 Whole blood and sera was collected from fully consented voluntary participants. 31103 women with infertility (greater than 1 year of attempting to conceive and requiring104 IVF treatment) who were attending an IVF clinic or who were pregnant having105 recently conceived from treatment at the IVF clinic participated in the study. The106 study was reviewed and approved by the Queensland University of Technology and107 UC Health Human Research Ethics Committees: UC Health Ethics approval 1314,108 QUT Human Research Ethics approval 1300000505. Chlamydia109 Microimmunofluorescence (MIF) IgG (Focus Diagnostics, USA) assay was110 conducted on the participant sera to determine the C. trachomatis infection history111 status. 112113 C. trachomatis D (ATCC VR-885) and F strain (ATCC VR-346) were cultured in114 McCoy cells. Confluent cells were infected with the strains and incubated at 37C for115 44 hours. Following infection, the strains were semi-purified. To prepare a mixture of116 C. trachomatis D and F strains, the cultures were mixed together (equal ratio of EBs)117 and purified using density gradient centrifugation (29% v/v urografin Ultravist®118 (Sigma-Aldrich)), and stored in sucrose phosphate buffer at -80C.1195 120 Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were isolated from participant whole blood.121 PBMC were isolated using Ficoll-PlaqueTM Premium reagent (GE Healthcare) as122 previously described in Cunningham et al. (16). PBMC (1 x 106cells/well) and they123 were stimulated at an MOI of 5 with purified C. trachomatis serovar D (ATCC: VR-124 885), purified C. trachomatis serovar F (ATCC VR-346), purified C. trachomatis D125 and F mix (50:50 elementary bodies (EBs)), phorbol myristate acetate (PMA)126 (positive control) and media (negative control). The cells were incubated for 15 hours127 at 37C. After incubation, the cells were centrifuged at 800 × g, and the supernatant128 was collected. The cells were resuspended in RNA cell protect® (Qiagen, Victoria,129 Australia) for gene expression analysis. The levels of IFN-, IL-12, IL-1B, IL-2, IL-4,130 IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-17 and TNF- were measured from the supernatants using131 ELISA kits (Elisakit.com, Melbourne, Australia) as per manufacturer’s instructions. 132 Total RNA was extracted and purified using Qiagen RNeasy Micro Kit (Victoria,133 Australia), and reverse transcribed into cDNA using Qiagen RT2 First strand kit and134 expression of innate and adaptive immune genes were determined using Qiagen RT2135 Profiler PCR arrays. The expression levels of all genes were normalized to 5136 housekeeping genes (ACTB, B2M, GAPDH, RPLP0 and HPRT1) for each participant137 sample as per manufacturer’s instructions. The fold change between CT positive138 infertile women and CT negative infertile women were determined using 2-Ct139 method(20). 140141 RESULTS 142 Participants were classified as serologically positive for C. trachomatis using143 Chlamydia trachomatis MIF IgG assay (four out of 31 were MIF positive and144 considered Chlamydia infertile). All participants were women undergoing or recently6 145 had undergone IVF treatment. The participants who were sero-negative to C.146 trachomatis infection were characterized as CT negative (n=27). The immune147 responses were then compared to media as a control C. trachomatis D and F strain148 treatments in the same groups using cytokine ELISAs and qRT-PCR analysis. Figure149 1 shows the level of secreted cytokines from the supernatants of both Chlamydia150 positive and Chlamydia negative infertile women after culture in the presence of C.151 trachomatis D and F strains. In response to the culture in the presence of the C.152 trachomatis D and F EBs, IL-8 (617.5pg/mL versus 602.5pg/mL) and TNF- (111153 pg/mL versus 71.73pg/mL) were produced in both cohorts; however, only IL-1154 (96.42pg/mL versus 41.42pg/mL) production in Chlamydia positive women was155 significantly higher than Chlamydia negative women (p<0.05). Compared to the156 negative control (unstimulated, media only control) for Chlamydia positive infertile157 women, the levels of IL-8 (617.5pg/mL and 515pg/mL), TNF- (111pg/mL and158 7.557pg/mL) and IL-1 (96.42 pg/mL vs 7.76pg/mL) were significantly higher in the159 PBMC stimulated with C. trachomatis D and F strains (Figure 2). Therefore, this is a160 reflection of the Chlamydia response of the PBMCs from these participants rather161 than a general response of the PBMCs to culture. 162163 Expression of a selection of 88 innate and adaptive immune genes from PBMC164 cultured with C. trachomatis D and F was analysed using a RT-PCR array. The gene165 expression was normalized to housekeeping genes for each participants’ culture and166 the fold change in gene expression between C. trachomatis infertile women and167 women with infertility for other reasons tested (ct). Three genes showed a trend168 towards higher expression levels in CT positive infertile women (n=4) compared to169 CT negative infertile women (n=27) (Table 2). The chemokines CXCL10 (5.48-fold)7 170 and CXCL11 (2.31-fold), and human leukocyte antigen HLA-A (2.22-fold) showed171 the most notable differences between the two participant groups (although these were172 not significantly different, possibly due to the low sample size of CT positive infertile173 women).174175176177 DISCUSSION178179 The cytokines secreted and immune gene expression in peripheral blood mononuclear180 cells was tested to provide information into the immune pathways that are activated181 from women who have C. trachomatis infertility. Within 15 hours of co-culture with182 C. trachomatis, three immune genes were expressed at greater than 2 fold higher183 levels in Chlamydia positive infertile women compared to Chlamydia negative184 infertile women (not significant). A mix of two well characterized and common C.185 trachomatis strains were used in the co-culture model, rather than a single strain,186 although these may not have been the same as the strain that originally infected the187 participants to cause the infertility. These two strains will not cover all of the relevant188 diversity of C. trachomatis, but were used to provide more diversity in the simulating189 antigen mix than a single strain. Infection by C. trachomatis is likely to trigger a190 range of immune responses as a result of antigen binding human leukocyte antigens191 (HLA) molecules. Previous studies have elucidated the role of HLA class I and class192 II molecules and their genotypes in increasing the susceptibility to tubal pathology193 and infertility caused by C. trachomatis in women (21-25). In this study, the HLA-194 class I molecule, HLA-A gene was upregulated in CT positive infertile women (not8 195 significant). Kimani et al., (21) reported that HLA-A31 allele was a significant risk196 factor for C. trachomatis PID in a longitudinal study of urban female sex worker in197 Kenya (n=23 PID cases). Additionally, HLA-A2 was reported to elicit cytotoxic T198 lymphocyte responses to C. trachomatis MOMP in peripheral blood of Chlamydia199 infected patients (26). 200201 Our study showed an increased expression of two chemokines CXCL10 (IP-10) and202 CXCL11 in women with Chlamydia infertility compared to the women with infertility203 for other reasons. Chemokines are small pro-inflammatory molecules that induce204 migration of leucocytes (27). The role of CXCL10 in protective immunity against205 chlamydial infections has been implicated in murine model infected with C.206 muridarum (28). In polarized polA2EN epithelial cells, a reduction of CXCL10 was207 observed on infection with C. trachomatis (29); whereas in A2497 epithelial cells, an208 upregulation of CXCL10 was observed (30). CXCL10 recruits CXCR3 and CCR5209 positive leukocytes such as T cells and natural killer cells to the site of infection (29).210 Previous studies on mouse models have shown that these chemokines are211 predominantly expressed in upper genital tract infection and mediate protection212 through Th1 or pro-inflammatory immunity (28, 31, 32). Wan et al. (33) showed that213 CXCL11 (IFN-inducible T cell -chemoattractant or i-TAC) gene expression,214 stimulated by the interferons (34), were higher in secretory phase cells on infection215 with C. trachomatis.216217 Whilst a trend towards an increase in mRNA levels were observed for IL-1 and218 TNF- (not significant), ELISAs detection of the secreted protein showed that219 secreted IL-1 was significantly higher in Chlamydia positive infertile women than9 220 Chlamydia negative infertile women (p<0.05). Supporting the previous findings of221 Hvid et al. (35), this study also shows that IL-1 is an important proinflammatory222 cytokine induced by C. trachomatis infection, and therefore likely an important223 contributor to pathology from C. trachomatis infection. Here the IL-1 was detected224 from primary ex vivo culture of PBMC rather than reproductive tract epithelia (as in225 Hvid et al., (35)), suggesting that both the innate epithelial response and innate226 mononuclear response from some women in response to C. trachomatis infection is227 pro-inflammatory and involves IL-1. Both IL-1 and TNF- are potent inducers of228 IL-8, hence high levels of the cytokine were observed in the supernatants of229 Chlamydia positive and Chlamydia infertile women (36). 230231 The limitations of our study include a small sample size that might account for the232 lack of significance between the cohorts for many factors. The observed differences in233 responses here for women with Chlamydia infertility compared to women with other234 causes of infertility supports the model that some women launch a more marked pro-235 inflammatory response to the infection and thus develop the serious pathology and236 disease sequelae and these responses may reflect the original response to the infection237 in the local tissue. 238239 FUNDING240 This work was partially funded by a Queensland Government Smart State NIRAP241 project. 242243 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS24410 245 The authors would like to thank the voluntary participants involved in this study. The246 authors acknowledge the involvement of Ms Helen Woodhouse in participant247 recruitment. The Wesley Research Institute Tissue Bank was involved in sample248 collection. 249250 CONFLICT OF INTEREST251 The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.252253254 REFERENCES255256 1. Paavonen J, Eggert-Kruse W; Chlamydia trachomatis: impact on human 257 reproduction. Human Reproduction Update 1999;5(5):433-447. doi: 258 10.1093/humupd/5.5.433.259 2. Agrawal T, Vats V, Salhan S, et al.; The mucosal immune response to 260 Chlamydia trachomatis infection of the reproductive tract in women. Journal of 261 Reproductive Immunology 2009;83(1–2):173-178. doi: 262 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jri.2009.07.013.263 3. Hess S, Peters J, Bartling G, et al.; More than just innate immunity: 264 comparative analysis of Chlamydophila pneumoniae and Chlamydia trachomatis 265 effects on host-cell gene regulation. Cell Microbiol 2003;5(11):785-95.266 4. Buchholz KR, Stephens RS; Activation of the host cell proinflammatory 267 interleukin-8 response by Chlamydia trachomatis. Cell Microbiol 2006;8(11):1768-268 79. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2006.00747.x.11 269 5. Zhou H, Huang Q, Li Z, et al.; PORF5 plasmid protein of Chlamydia 270 trachomatis induces MAPK-mediated pro-inflammatory cytokines via TLR2 271 activation in THP-1 cells. Sci China Life Sci 2013;56(5):460-6. doi: 10.1007/s11427-272 013-4470-8.273 6. Roth A, Konig P, van Zandbergen G, et al.; Hypoxia abrogates antichlamydial 274 properties of IFN-gamma in human fallopian tube cells in vitro and ex vivo. Proc Natl275 Acad Sci U S A 2010;107(45):19502-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1008178107.276 7. Vicetti Miguel RD, Maryak SA, Cherpes TL; Brefeldin A, but not monensin, 277 enables flow cytometric detection of interleukin-4 within peripheral T cells 278 responding to ex vivo stimulation with Chlamydia trachomatis. J Immunol Methods 279 2012;384(1-2):191-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2012.07.018.280 8. Vicetti Miguel RD, Harvey SA, LaFramboise WA, et al.; Human female 281 genital tract infection by the obligate intracellular bacterium Chlamydia trachomatis 282 elicits robust Type 2 immunity. PLoS One 2013;8(3):e58565. doi: 283 10.1371/journal.pone.0058565.284 9. Loomis WP, Starnbach MN; Chlamydia trachomatis infection alters the 285 development of memory CD8+ T cells. J Immunol 2006;177(6):4021-7.286 10. Nagarajan UM, Ojcius DM, Stahl L, et al.; Chlamydia trachomatis induces 287 expression of IFN-gamma-inducible protein 10 and IFN-beta independent of TLR2 288 and TLR4, but largely dependent on MyD88. J Immunol 2005;175(1):450-60.289 11. Khamesipour A, Pal S, Peterson EM, et al.; Induction of infertility by the 290 Chlamydia trachomatis mouse pneumonitis biovar in strains of mice that differ in 291 their response to the 60 kDa heat shock protein. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility292 1994;101(2):287-294. doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.1010287.12 293 12. Kinnunen A, Surcel HM, Halttunen M, et al.; Chlamydia trachomatis heat 294 shock protein-60 induced interferon-gamma and interleukin-10 production in infertile 295 women. Clin Exp Immunol 2003;131(2):299-303.296 13. Witkin SS, Jeremias J, Toth M, et al.; Cell-mediated immune response to the 297 recombinant 57-kDa heat-shock protein of Chlamydia trachomatis in women with 298 salpingitis. J Infect Dis 1993;167(6):1379-83.299 14. Jha R, Srivastava P, Salhan S, et al.; Spontaneous secretion of interleukin-17 300 and -22 by human cervical cells in Chlamydia trachomatis infection. Microbes Infect 301 2011;13(2):167-78. doi: 10.1016/j.micinf.2010.10.012.302 15. Debattista J, Timms P, Allan J, et al.; Reduced levels of gamma-interferon 303 secretion in response to chlamydial 60 kDa heat shock protein amongst women with 304 pelvic inflammatory disease and a history of repeated Chlamydia trachomatis 305 infections. Immunol Lett 2002;81(3):205-10.306 16. Cunningham K, Stansfield SH, Patel P, et al.; The IL-6 response to Chlamydia307 from primary reproductive epithelial cells is highly variable and may be involved in 308 differential susceptibility to the immunopathological consequences of chlamydial 309 infection. BMC Immunol 2013;14:50. doi: 10.1186/1471-2172-14-50.310 17. Paavonen J, Teisala K, Heinonen PK, et al.; Microbiological and 311 histopathological findings in acute pelvic inflammatory disease. Br J Obstet Gynaecol312 1987;94(5):454-60.313 18. Keltz MD, Sauerbrun-Cutler MT, Durante MS, et al.; Positive Chlamydia 314 trachomatis serology result in women seeking care for infertility is a negative 315 prognosticator for intrauterine pregnancy. Sex Transm Dis 2013;40(11):842-5. doi: 316 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000035.13 317 19. Price MJ, Ades AE, Welton NJ, et al.; How much tubal factor infertility is 318 caused by Chlamydia? Estimates based on serological evidence corrected for 319 sensitivity and specificity. Sex Transm Dis 2012;39(8):608-13. doi: 320 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e3182572475.321 20. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD; Analysis of relative gene expression data using 322 real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods 323 2001;25(4):402-8. doi: 10.1006/meth.2001.1262.324 21. Kimani J, Maclean IW, Bwayo JJ, et al.; Risk factors for Chlamydia 325 trachomatis pelvic inflammatory disease among sex workers in Nairobi, Kenya. J 326 Infect Dis 1996;173(6):1437-44.327 22. Cohen CR, Gichui J, Rukaria R, et al.; Immunogenetic correlates for 328 Chlamydia trachomatis-associated tubal infertility. Obstet Gynecol 2003;101(3):438-329 44.330 23. Cohen CR, Sinei SS, Bukusi EA, et al.; Human leukocyte antigen class II DQ 331 alleles associated with Chlamydia trachomatis tubal infertility. Obstet Gynecol 332 2000;95(1):72-7.333 24. Kinnunen AH, Surcel HM, Lehtinen M, et al.; HLA DQ alleles and 334 interleukin-10 polymorphism associated with Chlamydia trachomatis-related tubal 335 factor infertility: a case-control study. Hum Reprod 2002;17(8):2073-8.336 25. Ness RB, Brunham RC, Shen C, et al.; Associations among human leukocyte 337 antigen (HLA) class II DQ variants, bacterial sexually transmitted diseases, 338 endometritis, and fertility among women with clinical pelvic inflammatory disease. 339 Sex Transm Dis 2004;31(5):301-4.14 340 26. Kim SK, Devine L, Angevine M, et al.; Direct detection and magnetic 341 isolation of Chlamydia trachomatis major outer membrane protein-specific CD8+ 342 CTLs with HLA class I tetramers. J Immunol 2000;165(12):7285-92.343 27. Costantini S, Raucci R, De Vero T, et al.; Common structural interactions 344 between the receptors CXCR3, CXCR4 and CXCR7 complexed with their natural 345 ligands, CXCL11 and CXCL12, by a modeling approach. Cytokine 2013;64(1):316-346 21. doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2013.05.024.347 28. Belay T, Eko FO, Ananaba GA, et al.; Chemokine and chemokine receptor 348 dynamics during genital chlamydial infection. Infect Immun 2002;70(2):844-50.349 29. Buckner LR, Lewis ME, Greene SJ, et al.; Chlamydia trachomatis infection 350 results in a modest pro-inflammatory cytokine response and a decrease in T cell 351 chemokine secretion in human polarized endocervical epithelial cells. Cytokine 352 2013;63(2):151-65. doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2013.04.022.353 30. Porcella SF, Carlson JH, Sturdevant DE, et al.; Transcriptional profiling of 354 human epithelial cells infected with plasmid-bearing and plasmid-deficient 355 Chlamydia trachomatis. 2015;83(2):534-43. doi: 10.1128/iai.02764-14.356 31. Maxion HK, Kelly KA; Chemokine expression patterns differ within 357 anatomically distinct regions of the genital tract during Chlamydia trachomatis 358 infection. Infect Immun 2002;70(3):1538-46.359 32. Sakthivel SK, Singh UP, Singh S, et al.; CCL5 regulation of mucosal 360 chlamydial immunity and infection. BMC Microbiol 2008;8:136. doi: 10.1186/1471-361 2180-8-136.362 33. Wan C, Latter JL, Amirshahi A, et al.; Progesterone activates multiple innate 363 immune pathways in Chlamydia trachomatis-infected endocervical cells. Am J 364 Reprod Immunol 2014;71(2):165-77. doi: 10.1111/aji.12168.15 365 34. Sánchez-Martín L, Sánchez-Mateos P, Cabañas C; CXCR7 impact on 366 CXCL12 biology and disease. Trends in Molecular Medicine 2013;19(1):12-22. doi: 367 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molmed.2012.10.004.368 35. Hvid M, Baczynska A, Deleuran B, et al.; Interleukin-1 is the initiator of 369 Fallopian tube destruction during Chlamydia trachomatis infection. Cell Microbiol 370 2007;9(12):2795-803. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2007.00996.x.371 36. Osawa Y, Nagaki M, Banno Y, et al.; Tumor necrosis factor alpha-induced 372 interleukin-8 production via NF-kappaB and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt 373 pathways inhibits cell apoptosis in human hepatocytes. Infect Immun 374 2002;70(11):6294-301.375376 377 378 Figure 1: The graph shows the concentration of cytokines detected in the379 supernatants of the ex vivo PBMC cultures in the presence of C. trachomatis D380 and F. Chlamydia positive infertile women (n=4) and Chlamydia negative infertile381 women (n=27) (* indicates p<0.05). 382 383 Figure 2: The graph shows the concentration of cytokines detected in the384 supernatants of the ex vivo PBMC cultures of Chlamydia positive infertile women385 in the presence of C. trachomatis D and F and control cultures (no Chlamydia386 added) (* indicates p<0.05). 387 388 389 39016 391 392 Table 1: Participant fertility data CT Mean Type of infertility IVF outcome Gravidas past Gravidas at serology Age *ectopic (n=) *success(n=) *nulliparous(n=) the time of status by (years) *tubal(n=) *failure (n=) *multiparous (n=) collectionMIF (n=)CT 39.5 *Tubal (n=3); PID Success (n=2) Nulliparous (n=3) n=0 positive (n=1); salpingitis Failure (n=2) Multiparous (n=1) infertile (n=1); tubal adhesion women (n=2)](n=4) *Unknown etiology(n=1)CT 37.4 *Tubal (n=4); ovary Success (n=11) Nulliparous (n=13) n=1 negative removal (n=2); PID Failure (n=8) Multiparous (n=6) infertile (n=1); salpingitis women (n=1); tubal(n=19) obstruction (n=1); ovarian cystecty(n=1); Sterile (n=1);*Ectopic pregnancy(n=1)*Polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS)(n=4)17 *Endometritis (n=4)+ [PID=(n=2)]*Unknown etiology(n=6);393 39418 395396 Table 2: Gene expression of various immune related genes from PBMC cultures397 with C. trachomatis from Chlamydia positive infertile women 398Gene Gene function (37) Fold change (CT positive infertile vs CT negative infertile)* (2-CT) CXCL10 CXC motif ligand 10 5.480 CXCL11 chemotactic for T cells 2.319 HLA-A Human leucocyte antigen 2.224 MX1 guanosine triphosphate metabolizing protein 2.044 TNF Tumour necrosis factor. 1.689 HLA-E Human leucocyte antigen 1.317 C3 Complement component 3 1.190 NFKBIA Nuclear factor of Kappa light polypeptide gene 1.105 IRF3 Interferon regulatory transcription factor 0.185 IL1B Interleukin 1 cytokine 1.08 CCL5 Chemokine, chemoattractant 1.055 STAT3 Transcription factor 1.010 IL8 Chemoattractant, 0.995 FASLG tumor necrosis factor superfamily FAS/FASLG 0.988 signaling pathway DDX58 DEAD box proteins, putative RNA helicases 0.962 STAT1 Signal transducer and activator of transcription 0.926 MYD88 Cytosolic adapter protein 0.913 IFNAR1 Receptor for interferons alpha and beta 0.912 CD14 Surface antigen 0.875 IL1A Interleukin 1 cytokine family 0.854 STAT4 Signal transducer and activator of transcription 0.831 CSF2 Colony stimulating factor 2 0.818 IL23A Subunit of cytokine interleukin 23 0.782 NFKB1 Transcription regulator 0.744 ICAM1 Intercellular adhesion molecule 1 cell surface 0.710 glycoprotein CD40 TNF-receptor superfamily; receptor on antigen- 0.689 presenting cells CXCR3 G protein-coupled receptor 0.629 IL6 Interleukin 6 0.622 TBX21 transcription factor 0.591 CASP1 caspase 0.58019 CD80 Membrane receptor 0.578 IRF7 interferon regulatory factor 7 0.546 STAT6 Signal transduction and transcription 0.532 IFNG Type II interferon family 0.519 IFNGR1 gamma interferon receptor 0.515 MAPK1 MAP kinases 0.448 ITGAM integrin alpha M chain 0.441 IFNA1 Interferon alpha 0.4068 CD8A cell surface glycoprotein 0.403 IFNB1 Interferon beta 0.394 TRAF6 TNF receptor associated factor 0.392 NOD1 nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain 0.374 CXCR5 CXC chemokine receptor family 0.359 CD4 Membrane glycoprotein 0.340 CD86 cell surface ligand 0.323 MAPK8 MAP kinases 0.310 CCL2 Chemokine 0.294 IL10 Cytokine 0.292 TICAM1 Adaptor protein containing (TIR) 0.271 JAK2 Janus kinase 2 0.257 LYZ Lysozyme 0.257 TLR3 Toll-like receptor 0.2541 IL2 Interleukin 2 0.225 CCR6 Beta chemokine receptor 0.211 TLR7 Toll-like receptor 0.204 IRAK1 Interleukin-1 receptor-associated kinase 0.198 CD40LG Surface of T cells 0.191 SLC11A1 Solute carrier family 11 0.183 FOXP3 transcriptional regulator 0.162 NLRP3 Upstream activator of NF-kappaB 0.159 TLR2 Toll-like receptor 0.143 CCR5 Beta chemokine receptor family, 0.142 IL18 Proinflammatory cytokine 0.138 IL1R1 Cytokine receptor interleukin-1 alpha, 0.117 TLR1 Toll-like receptor 0.098 TLR4 Toll-like receptor 0.098 LY96 associates with toll-like receptor 4 0.089 NOD2 Nod1/Apaf-1 family 0.088 TLR8 Toll-like receptor 0.086 TLR6 Toll-like receptor 0.081 RAG1 Involved in activation of immunoglobulin V-D- 0.081 J recombination IL5 Interleukin 5 cytokine 0.080 GATA3 transcription factors 0.08020 IL17A Proinflammatory cytokine 0.078 TLR5 Receptor mobilizes the nuclear factor NF- 0.076 kappaB CXCL13 Chemokine 0.075 IL4 Interleukin 4 0.073 MBL2 Soluble mannose-binding lectin 0.073 APCS Glycoprotein 0.072 TLR9 Toll-like receptor 0.072 CRP Host defence related functions 0.071 IL22 Interleukin-22 0.045 IL13 immunoregulatory cytokine; B-cell maturation 0.041 MPO Myeloperoxidase 0.037 CCR4 G-protein-coupled receptor family; receptor for 0.036 the CC chemokine TYK2 tyrosine kinase Janus kinases (JAKs) 0.034 CCR8 beta chemokine receptor family 0.015 RORC DNA-binding transcription factor 0.081399 *CT was obtained by normalizing the level of expression of gene of interest to the GOI AVG HKG 400 expression level of housekeeping genes (HKG) (CT= CT - CT ). Fold change 401 in gene expression (2-CT) was determined by dividing the normalized expression of 402 gene of interest of the experimental sample by the normalized expression of the same 403 gene of interest in the control sample; where CT= CT (CT positive infertile 404 sample)- CT (CT negative infertile sample). 405406 40721 408 409 Fig 1 410 411 412 413 414415 416 Fig 222

CXCL10, CXCL11, HLA-A, and IL-1B Are Induced in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells From

Details

Download

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

Support