Running Head: RORSCHACH and PSYCHOPATHY

Rorschach and Psychopathy, Supplementary Material 1Appendix 1: Characteristics of Studies Included in Meta-Analysis.Participants ______Report No. Age % % w/ ASPD Included Perpetrator ID Authors Type Male or CD Dx Psychotic? Status ______1a. Ballard (2006) D 100 Adol. 100% 98% No FE 1b. Loving (1998) D 48 Adol. 100% 100% No FE___ 1c. Loving & Russell (2000) A 66 Adol. 100% 100% No FE 2a. Cunliffe (2002) D 45 Adult 0% 100% No I____ 2b. Cunliffe & Gacono (2005) A 45 Adult 0% 100% No I 3. Darcangelo (1997) D 40 Adult 100% ? ? I, R_ 4. Egozi-Profeta (1999) D 44 Adult 100% 100% No I, Dr 5a. Gacono & Meloy (1991) A 42 Adult 100% 100% No I____ 5b. Gacono & Meloy (1994) B 82 Adult 100% 100% No I 5c. Gacono, Meloy, & Berg (1992) A 43 Adult 100% 100% No I____ 5d. Gacono, Meloy, & Heaven(1990) A 42 Adult 100% 100% No I 5e. Heaven (1989) D 31 Adult 100% 100% No I____ 5f. Meloy & Gacono (1992) A 43 Adult 100% 100% No I 6. Hartmann et al. (2006) A 40 Adult 100% 100% No I, V_ 7. Muntz (1999) D 48 Adult 0% 30% No I 8. Ponder (1999) D 50 Adol. 86% ? No V____ 9a. Siemsen (1999) D 71 Adult 100% ? Yes I, MI 9b. Young et al. (2000) C 118 Adult 100% 69% Yes I, MI 10a. Smith (1995) D 60 Adol. 100% 100% No FE 10b. Smith et al. (1997) A 45 Adol. 100% 100% No FE___ 11a. Nassen (2008) D 97 Adult 100% ? No I, HV 11b. Welsh (1999) D 153 Adult 100% 37% Yes I, HV(continued on next page)Note: Studies with the same number in the ID (e.g., 1a. and 1b.) used the same or overlapping samples of participants. Abbreviations: For Study Type, A = Journal Article, D= Dissertation; B = Book, C = Book Chapter; % ASPD or CD Dx = Percentage of sample diagnosed with Antisocial Personality Disorder or Conduct Disorder; For Perpetrator Status, FE = Referred for forensic evaluation, I = Incarcerated, V = Violent, R = Rapists, Dr = Drug Offenders, HV = Highly Violent, MI = Mentally Ill; ? = insufficient information to determine. Rorschach and Psychopathy, Supplementary Material 2Appendix 1: Characteristics of Studies Included in Meta-Analysis (continued).Hare Psychopathy Checklist (PCL) ______PCL Groups (High/Medium/Low, High/Medium, or High/Low) ______Version Range of PCL No. participants ID Authors of PCL scores in each group in each group ______1a. Ballard (2006) PCL:YV H:> 30; M:20-29; L:< 19 H:13; M:44; L:43 1b. Loving (1998) PCL:YV H:> 30; M:20-29; L:< 19 H:11; M:17; L:20 1c. Loving & Russell (2000) PCL:YV H:> 30; M:20-29; L:< 19 H:13; M:26; L:27 2a. Cunliffe (2002) PCL-R H:> 30; M:< 24 H:27; M:18______2b. Cunliffe & Gacono (2005) PCL-R H:> 30; M:< 24 H:27; M:18 3. Darcangelo (1997) PCL-R H:> 30; M:< 29 H:11; M:29______4. Egozi-Profeta (1999) PCL-R H:> 30; M:< 29 H:17; M:27 5a. Gacono & Meloy (1991) original PCL H:> 30; M:< 29 H:21; M:21______5b. Gacono & Meloy (1994) PCL-R H:> 30; M:< 29 H:33; M:49 5c. Gacono, Meloy, & Berg (1992) PCL-R H:> 30; M:< 29 H:22; M:21______5d. Gacono, Meloy, & Heaven (1990) original PCL H:> 30; M:< 29 H:21; M:21 5e. Heaven (1989) original PCL H:> 30; M:< 29 H:14; M:17______5f. Meloy & Gacono (1992) original PCL H:> 30; M:< 29 H:22; M:21 6. Hartmann et al. (2006) PCL:SV H:> 19; M:< 18 H:16; M:24______7. Muntz (1999) PCL-R H:> 30; M:20-29; L:< 19 H: 9; M:22; L:17 8. Ponder (1999) PCL:YV Not divided into groups______9a. Siemsen (1999) PCL-R H:> 28; M:< 27 H:23; M:48 9b. Young et al. (2000) PCL-R H:> 30; M:< 29 H:32; M:86______10a. Smith (1995) PCL-R* H:> 30; M:20-29; L:< 19 H:20; M:20; L:20 10b. Smith et al. (1997) PCL-R* H:> 29; L:< 17 H:24; M:21______11a. Nassen (2008) PCL-R H:> 30; M:< 27 H:55; M:42 11b. Welsh (1999) PCL-R H:> 30; M:20-29; L:< 19 H:65; M:63; L:25 (continued on next page)Abbreviations: PCL = Refers to all versions of Hare Psychopathy Checklist; original PCL = Hare Psychopathy Checklist as published by Hare (1980); PCL-R = Hare Psychopathy Checklist, Revised; PCL-YV = Hare Psychopathy Checklist, Youth Version; PCL-SV = Hare Psychopathy Checklist, Screening Version; PCL-R* = version of PCL-R modified for use with adolescents. H = High psychopathy; M = Medium Psychopathy; L = Low Psychopathy. Rorschach and Psychopathy, Supplementary Material 3Appendix 1: Characteristics of Studies Included in Meta-Analysis (continued).Interrater Reliability ______Rorschach Scores PCL ______ID Authors Statistic Range Median Statistic Reliability ______1a. Ballard (2006) Kappa .69-.91 .85 Spearman .94 1b. Loving (1998) Pct. Agreement .92-1.00 .94_____Spearman______.94______1c. Loving & Russell (2000) Pct. Agreement .92-1.00 .94 Spearman .94 2a. Cunliffe (2002) Pct. Agreement .79-1.00 .86 Spearman .98______2b. Cunliffe & Gacono (2005) Pct. Agreement .79-1.00 .86 Spearman .98 3. Darcangelo (1997) ICC______.80-1.00 .95______ICC______.90______4. Egozi-Profeta (1999) ? ? ? ? ? 5a. Gacono & Meloy (1991) ?______?______?______Spearman______.89______5b. Gacono & Meloy (1994) ? ? ? ? ? I 5c. Gacono, Meloy, & Berg (1992) ?______?______?______Spearman______.94______5d. Gacono, Meloy, & Heaven(1990) ? ? ? Spearman .89 5e. Heaven (1989) ? ?______?______Spearman______.89______5f. Meloy & Gacono (1992) Pct. Agreement .92-1.00 .96 Spearman .89 6. Hartmann et al. (2006) ICC______.68-.93___.86______?______?______7. Muntz (1999) Pct. Agreement .81-.95 .89 Pearson .97 8. Ponder (1999) Pct. Agreement__.85-1.00__.95______ICC______.96______9a. Siemsen (1999) Kappa .66-1.00 .91 ? ? 9b. Young et al. (2000) _?______?______?______?______?______10a. Smith (1995) Pct. Agreement >.80 ? ICC .80 10b. Smith et al. (1997) Pct. Agreement __ ?___ .94_____Spearman______.96______11a. Nassen (2008) ICC .14-1.00 .84 ? ? 11b. Welsh (1999) ? ? ? ? ?(continued on next page)Abbreviations: Pct. Agreement = Percentage Agreement; Spearman = Spearman’s rho; Pearson = Pearson’s r; ICC = Intraclass Correlation Coefficient. Rorschach and Psychopathy, Supplementary Material 4Appendix 1: Characteristics of Studies Included in Meta-Analysis (continued).PCL Scorers ______ID Authors Professional Qualifications Training in PCL ______1a. Ballard (2006) Forensic psychologists ? 1b. Loving (1998) __Forensic psychologists, doctoral students______?______1c. Loving & Russell (2000) Forensic psychologists, doctoral students ? 2a. Cunliffe (2002) __Doctoral students______Trained in scoring & administration 2b. Cunliffe & Gacono (2005) Doctoral students Trained in scoring & administration 3. Darcangelo (1997) __Doctoral student______?______4. Egozi-Profeta (1999) Doctoral student ? 5a. Gacono & Meloy (1991) __Doctoral students______?______5b. Gacono & Meloy (1994) Doctoral students ? 5c. Gacono, Meloy, & Berg (1992)__Doctoral students______?______5d. Gacono, Meloy, & Heaven(1990) Doctoral students ? 5e. Heaven (1989) Doctoral students ______?______5f. Meloy & Gacono (1992) Doctoral students ? 6. Hartmann et al. (2006) Doctoral student and “assistant”______Attended professional workshop_____ 7. Muntz (1999) Doctoral student ? 8. Ponder (1999) __Doctoral student ______Attended professional workshop_____ 9a. Siemsen (1999) Forensic psychologists ? 9b. Young et al. (2000) Forensic psychologists ______?______10a. Smith (1995) Forensic psychologist ? 10b. Smith et al. (1997) Doctoral student ______?______11a. Nassen (2008) Forensic psychologists Formally trained in scoring & administration 11b. Welsh (1999) Forensic psychologists Formally trained in scoring & administration Rorschach and Psychopathy, Supplementary Material 5Appendix 2: Validity coefficients of non-dichotomous Rorschach variables, by study.Study Number (from Appendix 1) and validity coefficients Rorschach ------Variable Study r Study r Study r Study r Study r Study r Study r ------AgPast 1a. 0.347 3. 0.170 5b. -0.200 6. 0.689 7. 0.080AgPotential 1a. 0.353 3. 0.140 5b. -0.028 6. 0.587 7. 0.058M- 5b. 0.038 6. 0.497 11a. 0.000Sum T 1c. 0.412 2b. -0.155 3. 0.500 4. 0.190 5b. 0.212 7. 0.019 9a. 0.16210b. -0.030 11b. 0.062Personals 2a. 0.070 3. 0.540 4. 0.170 5b. 0.016 7. -0.047 8. 0.060 9a. 0.22710a. -0.048 11b. 0.097EGOI 1c. 0.076 3. 0.250 5b. 0.139 7. 0.059 8. 0.130 9a. 0.200 10a. 0.08911b. 0.000AgContent 1a. 0.063 3. -0.090 5b. -0.165 6. 0.554 7. 0.067Sum V 1c. 0.101 2a. 0.143 4. -0.020 5b. 0.094 7. 0.011 9a. 0.113FC 5b. 0.189 7. 0.019 11b. 0.031COP 2b. -0.090 5b. 0.009 7. 0.267 8. -0.050 9a. 0.189 CF 5b. -0.046 7. 0.218(Table continues on next page) Rorschach and Psychopathy, Supplementary Material 6Appendix 2: Validity coefficients of non-dichotomous Rorschach variables, by study. (continued)Study Number (from Appendix 1) and validity coefficients Rorschach ------Variable Study r Study r Study r Study r Study r Study r Study r ------Reflections 1c. 0.426 2b. -0.155 3. 0.110 4. -.270 5b. 0.133 7. 0.053 9a. 0.15710a. 0.165 11b. -0.096Sum Y 1c. -0.002 3. 0.230 4. -0.150 5b. 0.201 7. 0.195 10b. 0.076 11b. -0.013Afr 2a. 0.024 5b. 0.161 7. -0.102 11b. 0.025 Pure H 1c. -0.020 5b. -0.058 8. 0.20 11b. 0.044Pure C 5b. 0.084 7. -0.072Space 1c. 0.173 5b. -0.014 7. -0.071 11b. -0.091 FD 1c. 0.107 5b. -0.069 7. -0.122 11b. -0.065AG 1a. -0.147 3. -0.060 5b. 0.115 6. -0.080 7. 0.126 8. -0.020 9a. -0.135 10b. -0.274 Rorschach and Psychopathy, Supplementary Material 7Appendix 3: Validity coefficients of dichotomous Rorschach signs, by study.Study Number (from Appendix 1) and validity coefficients ------Rorschach Sign Study phi Study phi Study phi Study phi Study phi Study phi Study phi ------COP = 0 5b. 0.005 7. 0.171 9b. 0.216Sum Y = 0 1c. 0.071 3. 0.421 5b. 0.129 7. 0.279 10b. 0.141 11b. -0.085Afr < .50 2a. 0.236 7. 0.008 Sum T = 0 1c. 0.376 2b. -0.227 3. 0.527 5b. 0.236 7. -0.073 8. -0.060 9b. 0.14010b. -0.085 11b. 0.099M- > 0 5b. 0.115AgPast > 0 1a. 0.282 5b. -0.108AgPotential > 0 1a. 0.254 5b. -0.078Reflections > 0 1c. 0.329 2a. -0.096 5b. 0.173 7. -0.115 8. 0.140 9b. 0.148 10a. 0.05311b. -0.013AG = 0 1a. -0.090 5b. 0.065 7. 0.072 9b. -0.122 10b. -0.269 Personals > 0 2b. -0.012 3. 0.450 5b. 0.160 7. -0.189 10a. -0.024 FD > 0 1c. 0.274 2b. 0.159 5b. -0.038 7. -0.101 11b. -0.067 Pure C > 0 2a. -0.109 5b. 0.035 7. 0.007 9b. 0.018 (Table continues on next page) Rorschach and Psychopathy, Supplementary Material 8Appendix 3: Validity coefficients of dichotomous Rorschach signs, by study. (continued)Study Number (from Appendix 1) and validity coefficients ------Rorschach Sign Study phi Study phi Study phi Study phi Study phi Study phi Study phi ------Sum V > 0 1c. 0.117 2b. -0.255 5b. 0.004 7. 0.081 S > 2 1b. 0.195 5e. -0.009 7. -0.061 9b. 0.065 11b. -0.102EGOI > .44 7. -0.133 9b. 0.013 10a. 0.000 11b. -0.040 AgContent > 0 1a. -0.048 5b. -0.065(CF+C)>FC+1 7. 0.027 11b. -0.092 Pure H < 2 1c. -0.328 11b. 0.093

Running Head: RORSCHACH and PSYCHOPATHY

Details

Download

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

Support