<p> Topic 4 – Production and the Choice of Inputs</p><p>Outline:</p><p>I) Motivation II) Relevant Concepts III) Optimal Combination of Inputs A) In the short-run B) In the long-run IV) Applications</p><p>I) Motivation / Introduction</p><p>Two Goals:</p><p>- Understand optimal use of inputs in production process</p><p>- Provide a foundation for understanding pricing and output decisions of managers / firms II) Relevant Concepts (most of this should be review)</p><p>- Need a mathematical description of the available production technology</p><p>Production Function – An engineering relation that defines the maximum output that can be produced with a given set of inputs.</p><p>Simplifying Assumption – Two inputs: Labor and Capital</p><p>Example: Q F(K,L)</p><p>The maximum amount of output Q that can be produced with K units of capital and L units of labor.</p><p>- Manager’s job is to use the production technology efficiently, i.e. to determine how much of each input to use to produce a given level of output Two Relevant Time Horizons</p><p>Short Run: Defined as the time period during which some inputs are fixed (e.g. assembly line at Ford)</p><p>Long Run: All inputs are variable (i.e. can be adjusted)</p><p>Usually, we assume that capital is fixed in the short- run, while labor is variable</p><p>Three Measures of Productivity</p><p>A) Total Product – The maximum level of output that can be produced with a given amount of inputs.</p><p>Example: Cobb-Douglas Production Function</p><p>Q F(K,L) K.5L.5</p><p>Suppose K is fixed at 16 units.</p><p>Short-Run production function is:</p><p>Q (16).5L.5 4L.5 Q: What is the total product when 100 units of labor are used?</p><p>Q 4(100).5 40 units</p><p>B) Average Product – A measure of the output produced per unit of input (average productivity of the input).</p><p>Q Q AP , AP L L K K</p><p>C) Marginal Product – The change in total output arising from a 1-unit change in one of the inputs, holding the quantity of the other input constant.</p><p>Q Q MP , MP L L K K Stages of Production</p><p>- Most inputs exhibit three stages of production, characterized by the value of their marginal product (holding constant the quantities of all other inputs). a) Increasing marginal returns – Initially, as the usage of an input increases, marginal product rises. b) Decreasing / Diminishing marginal returns – As more of the input is used, the marginal product typically begins to fall. c) Negative marginal returns – As greater quantities of the input is used, eventually the marginal product will become negative.</p><p>Example: Assembly line workers Stages of Production</p><p>Q Increasing Diminishing Negative Marginal Marginal Marginal Returns Returns Returns</p><p>Q=F(K,L) =TP</p><p>AQ: ng-run input demand curves are downward sloping.bstitution effectP MP L Relationship between marginal and average product</p><p>Notice that:</p><p>When MP > AP, AP is rising</p><p>When MP < AP, AP is falling</p><p>When MP = AP, AP is at its maximum</p><p>Example: GPAs and test scores</p><p>Law of Diminishing (Marginal) Returns – Beyond some point, output grows at a diminishing rate with increases in the variable input.</p><p>It has been said that, “if it weren’t for the law of diminishing returns, the whole world could be fed out of a flowerpot.” Returns to Scale Q: In the long-run (when all inputs are variable), what happens to output when all inputs are increased by exactly the same proportion?</p><p>Increasing Returns to Scale – A proportional increase in all inputs yields a more than proportional increase in output (aka “Economies of Scale”).</p><p>Constant Returns to Scale – A proportional increase in all inputs yields an equal proportional increase in output.</p><p>Decreasing Returns to Scale – A proportional increase in all inputs yields a less than proportional increase in output (aka “Diseconomies of Scale”).</p><p>Note: A production function can exhibit different degree of returns to scale over different levels of output. Common pattern: - Increasing returns to scale at low levels of output - Constant returns to scale at medium levels of output - Decreasing returns to scale at high levels of output Caveat: Decreasing returns to scale and the law of diminishing returns are completely unrelated!</p><p>- “ Decreasing returns to scale” is a long-run concept based on simultaneously varying all inputs.</p><p>- “Diminishing returns” is short-run concept based on varying one input while all others are held fixed.</p><p>III) Optimal Combination of Inputs</p><p>A) In the Short-Run (capital fixed)</p><p>With capital fixed, this reduces to asking how much labor should be hired?</p><p>First, define a new concept… Value Marginal Product (VMP) – The value of the output produced by the last unit of an input.</p><p>VMP P*MP L L VMP P*MP K K where P is the price the firm gets for it’s product.</p><p>Note: Also sometimes referred to as the “marginal revenue product.”</p><p>Profit-Maximizing Input Usage Rule: When the cost of each additional unit of labor is w, continue to hire labor up until the point where</p><p>VMP w L</p><p>(in the range of diminishing marginal product).</p><p>This is just a form of the marginal benefit = marginal cost rule we saw earlier in the semester.</p><p>VMP Where L is the marginal benefit of hiring an additional unit of labor and w is the marginal cost of hiring an additional unit of labor. Example 1: </p><p>Quantity Price Wage Of Of MPL VMPL Rate Labor Output (weekly) 0 $3 - - - 1 3 76 $228 $400 2 3 172 516 400 3 3 244 732 400 4 3 292 876 400 5 3 316 948 400 6 3 316 948 400 7 3 292 876 400 8 3 244 732 400 9 3 172 516 400 10 3 76 228 400 11 3 -44 -132 400</p><p>Initially, w > VMPL , but this is in the region where MPL is increasing</p><p> th Then, VMPL > w up through the 9 worker hired. Example 2:</p><p>Price of output = $10</p><p>Q F(K,L) K1/2L1/2</p><p>Q: If capital is fixed at 1 unit in the short run, how much labor should the firm hire if the wage rate is $2 and the marginal product of labor is as shown below?</p><p>K1/2 MP L 2L1/2</p><p>VMP w Rule is: L in region where MPL is declining.</p><p>Notice that MPL is everywhere declining in L.</p><p>1 MP With K = 1, L 2L1/2 5 VMP L L1/2</p><p>VMP w Then L</p><p>5 2 L1/2</p><p>25 L 6.25 4</p><p>Note: The downward-sloping portion of the VMPL is the firm’s labor demand curve. </p><p>The fact that it is downward sloping follows from the property of diminishing marginal product.</p><p>Thus, in the firm’s short-run labor demand curve will always be downward-sloping (in contrast to consumer demand curves). B) In the Long-Run (both inputs variable)</p><p>Motivation 1) To maximize profits, the firm must produce its output in the least cost manner. </p><p>2) Cost-minimization is more fundamental than profit-maximization; applies to behavior of nonprofit organizations as well.</p><p>We will study the manager’s cost minimization problem.</p><p>Goal of the manager is to find the cost-minimizing combination of inputs to produce a given level of output.</p><p>Manager’s cost-minimization problem is analogous to the consumer’s utility maximization problem that we saw earlier. Two familiar concepts: i) Isoquants (similar to indifference curves) ii) Isocost Line (similar to the budget line)</p><p>“Iso” = “same” “Isoquant” = “same quantity” “Isocost” = “same cost”</p><p>Isoquants </p><p>- Defines the quantities of inputs (K,L) that yield the same level of output (Q).</p><p>- Isoquants farther from the origin are associated wit higher levels of output.</p><p>Marginal Rate of Technical Substitution (MRTS) – The rate at which a producer can substitute between two inputs and maintain the same level of output.</p><p>- Given by the slope of the isoquant. - Equal to the ratio of the marginal products.</p><p>MP MRTS L KL MP K Law of Diminishing Marginal Rate of Technical Substitution – As less of one input is used, increasing amounts of another input must be used to produce the same level of output. </p><p>- The more of one input you use, the less productive it is relative to the other input.</p><p>- Yields typical “bowed-in” isoquants.</p><p>Examples of Isoquants - Next page Linear Isoquants</p><p>Capital and Labor are perfect substitutes</p><p>K Increasing Output</p><p>Q Q Q 1 2 3 L Leontieff Isoquants</p><p>Capital and labor are perfect complements, i.e. capital and labor are used in fixed proportions</p><p>Q K 3 Q 2 Q 1 Increasing Output</p><p>L Benchmark Case</p><p>K Inputs are not perfectly substitutable Q3 Increasing Q2 Output</p><p>Diminishing marginal rate Q1 of technical substitution</p><p>Most production processes have isoquants with this shape</p><p>L Isocost Line </p><p>- A line that represents the combinations of inputs (K,L) that cost the producer the same amount of money.</p><p>- For given input prices, isocosts farther from the origin are associated with higher costs.</p><p>- Equation similar to budget line:</p><p> wLrK C</p><p>- Slope of the isocost line is the ratio of the input prices.</p><p>- To see this, rewrite equation as:</p><p>C w K L r r </p><p>- Changes in input prices rotate the isocost line (see diagram) Cost Minimization</p><p>For typically-shaped isoquants, marginal product per dollar spent should be equal for all inputs</p><p>MP MP L K w r</p><p>Expressed differently</p><p>MP w MRTS L MP r K Graphically, the cost-minimizing input combination occurs at a point of tangency between the isocost line and an isoquant.</p><p>K</p><p>Point of Cost Minimization Slope of Isocost = Slope of Isoquant</p><p>Q</p><p>L Optimal Input Substitution </p><p>To minimize the cost the producing a given level of output, the firm should use less of an input whose relative price has risen (see diagram).</p><p>Nothing akin to an income effect here; just a substitution effect.</p><p> Long-run input demand curves are downward sloping.</p><p>IV) Applications</p><p>A) Fringe Benefit Costs and Labor Substitution.</p><p>- Federal tax laws prevents firms from offering different benefit packages to high and low income workers.</p><p>- Goal is to ensure that low-income workers receive adequate benefits.</p><p>- Unintended consequences? - Consider a firm that employs computer programmers and secretaries.</p><p>- Suppose programmers earn $60,000 per year while secretaries earn $20,000 per year.</p><p>- Suppose that prior to the law, both types of workers have a health plan that costs 10% of their salary</p><p> The programmers’ plan costs $6000 and the secretaries’ plan costs $2000.</p><p> Relative price of a secretary to a programmer is 22,000/66,000 = .333</p><p>- Now suppose the tax law requires that both types of workers receive the same health plan.</p><p>- Suppose the firm chooses a plan costing $4000.</p><p>Q: What is the new relative price?</p><p>A: Now, the relative price of a secretary is 24,000/64,000 = .375 - To minimize costs, firms will substitute away from secretaries (by hiring temps, contracting work out, or making secretaries part-time workers, etc.)</p><p>Q: Does this really happen? </p><p>A: See article by Scott, Berger, and Black, “Effects of the Tax Treatment of Fringe Benefits on Labor Market Segmentation.”</p><p>B) Union support for minimum wage legislation.</p><p>Q: Why do unions lobby for increases in the minimum wage when virtually all of their members already earn above the minimum wage?</p>
Details
-
File Typepdf
-
Upload Time-
-
Content LanguagesEnglish
-
Upload UserAnonymous/Not logged-in
-
File Pages25 Page
-
File Size-