It Is Always Been a Challenge to Characterize the Antibiotic Fermentation Process in Complex

It Is Always Been a Challenge to Characterize the Antibiotic Fermentation Process in Complex

<p>Online Resource 1</p><p>1 A process model for rifamycin B has been described in detail recently (Bapat et al.,</p><p>2006a). The model is based on cybernetic principles and assumes that in complex</p><p> medium the organism has access to up to three substrate combination: (i)</p><p>Combination I: uptake of AA [Equation (A.1a), (A.1b) for stoichiometry and</p><p> growth rate on this substrate], (ii) Combination II: simultaneous uptake of AA (S1)</p><p> and glucose (S2) [ Equation (A.2a), (A.2b)] and (iii) Combination III:</p><p> simultaneous uptake of glucose (S2) and AMS (S3) [Equation (A.3a), (A.3b)]. It is</p><p> assumed that the free AA is released by hydrolysis of proteins and peptides (S 4)</p><p>[Equation (A.4a), (A.4b)]. Equation (A.1a), (A.1b) – (A.4a), (A.4b) represents the</p><p> four main growth reactions with each equation consisting of the stoichiometry</p><p> followed by the kinetic model form. The uptake of substrate combination ‘i’ is</p><p> dependent on the level of the corresponding key enzyme (XEi), which may be</p><p> inducible. Thus, the organism invests resources to synthesize XEi based on the</p><p> growth achievable on the corresponding substrate combination. Although a unique</p><p> growth rate exists corresponding to each substrate combination, the overall</p><p> specific growth rate, μ, and specific production rate, qp, are the weighted sums of</p><p> the specific growth and production rates on the individual substrate combination.</p><p>The weights αi are estimated using the optimality criteria [Equation (A.8)] in</p><p> which the organism allows the uptake of all the substrate combinations as long as</p><p> the specific growth rate obtained by summing the rates on different substrate</p><p> combination is less than its intrinsic growth capacity denoted by μmax. The</p><p> complete model comprises of component mass balances represented by ordinary</p><p> differential equation (ODE’s) [Equation (A.9) – (A.16)] along with the optimality</p><p>2 criteria stated in Equation (A.8). The simulation exercise to predict growth,</p><p> product formation and substrate utilization was carried out by integrating the set</p><p> of simultaneous differential equations as an initial value problem. The model</p><p> parameters and bounds or nominal values of the process variables are listed in</p><p>Table I and II, respectively. </p><p>The key features of the model include:</p><p>. The nitrogen catabolite repression of rifamycin B formations [Equation (A.21),</p><p>(A.22)].</p><p>. The sequential utilization of substrates in a complex multi-substrate media</p><p>[Equation (A.8)].</p><p>. The model captures the fact that rifamycin B formation does not occur when AA</p><p> are taken up as sole source of carbon and nitrogen.</p><p>. The model considers inhibition of AA utilizing enzyme (XE1) by glucose (S2)</p><p> due to carbon catabolite repression [Equation (A.15)].</p><p>. The enzymes (XEi) are inducible and are assumed to undergo degradation via first</p><p> order kinetics [Equation (A.15) and (A.16)]. </p><p>For greater details about the model, the interested reader may refer to (Bapat et al.,</p><p>2006a). The model equations are summarized below.</p><p>Amino acid uptake:</p><p>Equation “a” is used to represent stoichiometry and Equation b is used to represent the kinetic form.</p><p>3 X  Y1,3CO 2 - Y1,1 S1  Y1,4O2  Y1,5 H 2O 0 (A.1a)</p><p> max  X  * μ  α μ  E1  r (A.2b) 1 1 1  X  1  E1 ,Re f </p><p>Simultaneous uptake of AA and glucose:</p><p>X  Y2,3CO 2 - Y2,1 S1  Y2,2 S2  Y2,4O2  Y2,5H 2O 0 (A.2a)</p><p> max  X  * μ  α μ  E 2  r (A.2b) 2 2 2  X  2  E 2 ,Re f </p><p>Simultaneous uptake of AMS and glucose: </p><p>X  Y3,3CO 2 - Y3,3 S3  Y3,2 S2  Y3,4O2  Y3,5H 2O 0 (A.3a)</p><p> max  X  * μ  α μ  E3  r (A.3b) 3 3 3  X  3  E3 ,Re f </p><p>Conversion of insoluble nitrogen to AA:</p><p>S1  S4 0 (A.4a)</p><p> X E  r   4  r* k X (A.4b) diss.  X  4 4  E4 , Re f </p><p>Rifamycin B production:</p><p>P  Y5,3CO 2 - Y5,1 S1  Y5,2 S2  Y5,4O2  Y5,5 H 2O 0 (A.5a)</p><p> max  X  qp  α qp  E 2  r* (A.5b) 2 2 2  X  2,P  E 2 ,Re f </p><p>P  Y6,3CO 2 - Y6,3 S3  Y6,2 S2  Y6,4O 2  Y6,5H 2O 0 (A.6a)</p><p>4 max  X  qp  α qp  E 3  r* (A.6b) 3 3 3  X  3,P  E3 ,Re f </p><p>Enzyme synthesis:</p><p>X  X 0 Ei (A.7a) r  K r* Ei Ei i ; For i = 1, 2, 3 (A.7b)</p><p>Optimality criteria:</p><p> max(μ),</p><p>,0  αi  1, (A.8) s.t. and μ  μmax</p><p>3 Where μ  αiμi i1</p><p>Mass Balance Equations</p><p>Biomass: dX   .X ; (A.9) dt</p><p>Amino acids: d( S ) 骣 S 1 =F C -轾 ym a + y m + y q a X + k E 琪 4 (A.10) S1 FS 2 臌( 1,1 1) 1( 2,1 2 5,1 P ,2) 2 4 ( prot ) dt桫 kS 4+ S 4</p><p>Glucose: dS  2  F C  y   y q   y   y q  X (A.11) dt S 2 FS 2 2,2 2 5,2 P,2 2 3,2 3 6,2 P,3 3</p><p>Ammonium Sulfate: dS  3  F C  y   y q  X (A.12) dt S 3 FS 3 3,3 3 6,3 P,3 3</p><p>5 Insoluble nitrogen: dS   S  4  F C  y   y   y q  X  k E  4  (A.13) S 4 FS 4 1,1 1 2,1 2 5,1 P,2 4 prot   dt  kS 4  S4  dP 3  qP .X ; Where q P  αi q P i (A.14) dt i1</p><p>Enzymes:</p><p>X E d 1 X X E E 1,Ref max S1   1 (A.15) = (μ  k )  μ  k  dt i deg,i S 2  deg,i  X S  Ks  S  1 E 2 1,1 1 1,Ref KI1,1</p><p>X E d i X X E E i,Ref max *   i (i = 2, 3) (A.16) = (μ  k ) r  μ  k  dt i deg,i i  deg,i  X E i, Ref</p><p>* Where, ri indicate the effect of substrate limitation on growth and product formation and are given by,</p><p>Growth on amino acids,</p><p>* S1 r1  2 S1 (A.17) Ks1,1  S1  K I1,1</p><p>Growth on substrate combination, 2 (Fig. 3)</p><p>* S1 S2 r2  2 2 S1 S2 (A.18) Ks 2,1  S1  Ks 2,2  S2  K I 2,1 K I 2,2</p><p>Production on substrate combination, 3 (Fig. 3)</p><p>6 * S3 S2 r3  2 2 S3 S2 (A.19) Ks3,3  S3  Ks3,2  S2  K I3,3 K I 3,2</p><p>* S4 r4  (A.20) ks 4,1  S4</p><p>Production on substrate combination, 2 </p><p>* S1 S2 r2,P  2 2 S1 S2 (A.21) Kp5,1  S1  Kp  S  K 5,2 2 PI 5,1 K PI 5,2</p><p>Production on substrate combination, 3 </p><p>* S3 S2 r3,P  2 2 S3 S2 (A.22) Kp6,1  S3  Kp  S  K 6,2 2 PI 6,1 K PI 6,2</p><p>Some of the terms and parameters used in the equations have been explained below for clarity:- </p><p>αk : Control parameter that determines the metabolic flux through </p><p> branch k CFsi : Concentration of substrate combination i in the respective feed </p><p> stream Fsi Fsi : Feed flow rate of substrate combination i -1 Kdeg,i : Degradation constant for the enzyme Ei, h</p><p>Ksi, j and Kpi, j : Substrate half saturation constant for substrate j in the model for </p><p> reaction i, g L-1 -1 qp2 : Specific product formation rate on amino acid and glucose, h -1 qp3 : Specific product formation rate on AMS and glucose, h ri : Reaction rate for substrate combination i</p><p>7 max -1 1 : Specific growth rate on S1, h max -1 2 : Specific growth rate on S2 and S1, h max -1 3 : Specific growth rate on S2 and S3, h XEi : Concentration of the enzyme responsible for uptake of substrate </p><p> combination i. -1 Y i, j : Stoichiometric coefficient of substrate j in reaction i, g g .</p><p>8</p>

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    8 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us