Michel Et Al 2017 Stages of Sedimentary

Michel Et Al 2017 Stages of Sedimentary

Morpho-sedimentary and -dynamic characteristics of the Bay of Somme Michel C.a, Le Bot S.a, Druine F.a, Costa S.ac, Levoy F. b, Brunaud C.b and Lafite R.a [email protected] a : Normandie Univ, UNIROUEN, UNICAEN, CNRS, M2C, 76000 Rouen, France b : Normandie Univ, UNICAEN, UNIROUEN, CNRS, M2C, 14000 Caen, France c : Normandie Univ, UNICAEN, CNRS, LETG, 14000 Caen, France 1°0'W 0°0' 1°0'E 2°0'E 1°30'E 1°35'E 1°40'E 1°30'E 1°35'E 1°40'E N N SEDIMENT MAP N DYNAMIC MAP Rue Rue N N Sedimentological Dynamic zonation on the ' ' 6 6 zonation in 2013: 2011-2013 period: 1 Bay of 1 Pointe de Pointe de ° ° 0 Somme 0 St-Quentin S1 Muddy sand and sandy mud, St-Quentin D1 Stability 5 5 poorly sorted, with a strong D2 Eastern English Channel La Maye La Maye Picardy CaCO3 content D2 Strong dynamics due to migration of bedforms S2 Sand, moderately sorted to well sorted, with a low CaCO3 content D3 Strong dynamics due to D1 channel migration S3 Sand and slightly gravelly sand, Le Marais moderately sorted, with a very Le Marais 10 10 low CaCO3 content 10 N N D2 D2 ' ' Dynamic zonation N ' 4 4 CaCO3 content in 2013 (%) 0 1 1 S2 Lowest Astronomical Tide ° ° Bay of ° 0 0 0 Sedimentological zonation 5 5 Seine 5 Lowest Astronomical Tide Altimetric variation on the 10 40 20 30 02/06/2012-01/04/2013 Le Crotoy D2 Le Crotoy Mean grain size in 2013 D2 period (m) S3 (µm) 4.17 1.5 ± Le Hourdel 62 - 100 Le Hourdel English Channel 100 - 150 D3 Normandy 1.0 N N 1 150 - 200 ' ' S 2 2 1 1 200 - 250 ° ° 0.5 0 0 D1 5 5 La Mollière 250 - 300 La Mollière 10 10 300 - 350 0 Brighton N Brighton ' 350 - 400 D1 0 FRANCE ° Cap Hornu Cap Hornu -0.5 9 Atlantic 400 - 450 Cayeux- 4 Cayeux- Ocean 450 - 500 sur-Mer Saint-Valéry- La Somme sur-Mer Saint-Valéry- La Somme -1.0 sur-Somme 500 - 550 sur-Somme 0 50 100 Km 0 100 200 Km 0 1 2 Km 550 - 588 0 1 2 Km -1.5 -5.97 1°30'E 1°35'E 1°40'E 1°30'E 1°35'E 1°40'E MORPHOLOGY MAP INTERPRETATIVE MAP N N Rue N Morpho-sedimentary and Morphological zonation:* ' 6 -dynamic zonation on the 1 Pointe de Rue M1 Salt marshes ° 2011-2013 period with 0 St-Quentin 5 N information on filling stage: ' M2 Tidal channels 6 La Maye 1 Z1 Filled (nd) ° M3 Sedimentary bars 0 4 5 Pointe de Z M4 Hydraulic dunes Z2 Final stage of filling St-Quentin 1 (+0.088 ± 0.17m3/m2) Z 3 Z M5 Beach of high altitude M3 La Maye Z3 Final stage of filling Le Marais 3 2 * zones indicate the dominant morphological features observed Z 2 (+0.164 ± 0.17m /m ) on the 2011-2013 period (in case of change on the 2011-2013 3 2 period, salt marshes, tidal channels, sedimentary bars and then Z 5 Z4 Current filling (+0.065 ± 0.17m /m ) N Z 5 dunes have been favored). ' 4 Z5 Current filling 1 ° (+0.156 to +0.249 0.17m3/m2) M1 Morphological zonation 0 ± 5 5 3 2 M Lowest Astronomical Tide Z6 Current filling (+0.372 ± 0.17m /m ) Crests of intertidal bedforms interpreted Le Crotoy Z7 Current filling (nd) Z 8 from LiDAR data (01/04/2013) : Z 5 Z8 Erosion (-0.508 ± 0.17m3/m2) Le Marais Hydraulic dunes Le Hourdel Filling values according to Michel (2016) Z 7 Incertitude according to the formulae of Sedimentary bars Z 8 Z 6 M4 Brasington et al. (2003) N ' M4 Topography of 01/04/2013 N ' 4 Morpho-sedimentary and 2 1 (m NGF-IGN69) 1 ° -dynamic zonation ° 0 13.3 0 5 Z 1 Lowest Astronomical Tide 5 La Mollière 12.0 Brighton Proportions of sedimentary M4 10.0 Z 1 classes, average mean grain Cap Hornu size and carbonate content in 8.0 Cayeux- 2013 (individual samples in Z1 or mean sur-Mer Le Crotoy 6.0 Saint-Valéry- La Somme values per zone in Z2 to Z8) : M4 sur-Somme 4.0 0 1 2 Km Sedimentary classes proportions* 2.0 Sand Fine sand Mud Le Hourdel References : 0 Brasington, J., Langham, J., Rumsby, B. (2003) Methodological sensitivity of morphometric estimates of coarse fluvial sediment transport. M3 * Gravel is not represented as it represents Geomorphology, 53 (3-4), 299–316. never more than 0.76% -2.0 Michel, C. (2016) Morphodynamique et transferts sédimentaires au sein d’une baie mégatidale en comblement (Baie de Somme, Manche Est). M2 Mean grain size -3.6 Stratégie multi-échelles spatio-temporelles. Thèse de doctorat, Université de Rouen. 325 pp. + annexes 400 µm N ' 240 µm (maximum) 2 1 MAP INFORMATIONS ° Data: 0 0 5 M1 CaCO 3 content Reference system : - Sediment map: superficial sediment sampled in 2013 (Michel, 2016) La Mollière - Morphology and dynamic maps: 6 topographic LiDAR survey between 50% Spheroid: RGF93 2011 and 2013 : 31% (maximum) Brighton Projection: Lambert Conformal Conic (Lambert-93) - 17/02-08/03/2011 (RGE ALTI®, IGN) 0 - 28/09/2011 (CIRCLE, SNO DYNALIT, FR SCALE 3730) M1 Location map : Sediment dynamics Cap Hornu - 02/06/2012 (CIRCLE, Région Picardie, FEDER) (2011-2013) : Base map: BD ALTI® (IGN) Cayeux- - 18/11/2012 (CIRCLE, SNO DYNALIT, FR SCALE 3730) Stable areas Administrative boundaries: GEOFLA® Départements - 01/04/2013 (CIRCLE, Région Picardie, FEDER) sur-Mer Saint-Valéry- - 04/11/2013 (CIRCLE, SNO DYNALIT, FR SCALE 3730) Areas of low dynamics Sediment, morphology, dynamic and synthesis maps : sur-Somme La Somme For morphology and dynamic maps, there is no data recorded in water areas (e.g. Areas of strong dynamics Base map: RGE ALTI® version 2.0 (IGN) covered with sedimentary bars channels or hunting ponds located in salt marshes). Most of these zones appears (red) or hydraulic dunes (blue) Elevation scale (m) 0 1 2 Km in transparency on topography. Areas of strong dynamics -2.8 56 due to channel migration © Journal of Maps, 2017.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    1 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us