Validation Team

Validation Team

<p> ANALYTICAL METHOD VALIDATION PROTOCOL</p><p>\ Company Name</p><p>PROTOCOLNO:- </p><p>Effective Date :</p><p>Revision No. : 00 COMPANY NAME & ADDRESS ANALYTICAL METHOD VALIDATION PROTCOL NO: EFFECTIVE DATE : Page No.:- 2 of 17</p><p>PRODUCT NAME : </p><p>Validation Team:</p><p>DEPARTMENT VALIDATION TEAM QUALITY ASSUARANCE QUALITY CONTROL</p><p>APPROVALS:</p><p>DEPARTMENT SIGN & DATE QUALITY ASSURANCE MANAGER QUALITY CONTROL MANAGER</p><p>REMARKS:</p><p>Prepared By: Checked By: Approved By: Date: Date: Date: COMPANY NAME & ADDRESS ANALYTICAL METHOD VALIDATION PROTCOL NO: EFFECTIVE DATE : Page No.:- 3 of 17</p><p>1.0 GENERAL: 1.1 INTRODUCTION: The Analytical method validation will be performed. The complete documentation for the validation comprises several independent documents, references to relevant documents will be given as part of this protocol, (see below). The results of the validation activities will be summarized in the validation report. ANALYTICAL METHOD VALIDATIONS:</p><p>The objective of validation of an analytical procedure is to demonstrate that it is suitable for its intended purpose.</p><p>Analytical methods used for the identification, ore assaying the purity and or the impurity profile For drug substances, packing components and drug products and will be validated for its parameters.</p><p>(I) Specificity:</p><p>Specificity is the ability to access unequivocally the analyte in the presence of components which may be expected to be present; typically these might include impurities, degradents, matrix, etc.</p><p>Lack of specificity of an individual procedure may be compensated by other supporting analytical procedure.</p><p>This definition has been following implications.</p><p>A) Identification: to ensure the identity of an analyte.</p><p>B) Purity Test: to ensure that all the analytical procedure performed allow an accurate statement of the content of impurities of an analyte i.e. related substances, heavy metals, residual solvents contents etc. C) Assay (Content or Potency): to provide an exact results which allows an accurate statement on the content or potency of the analyte in the sample. </p><p>(II) Accuracy:</p><p>The accuracy of an analytical procedure expresses the closeness of agreement between the value which is accepted either as a conventional true value or an accepted reference value and the value found.</p><p>This is sometimes termed as trueness. (III) Precision:</p><p>Prepared By: Checked By: Approved By: Date: Date: Date: COMPANY NAME & ADDRESS ANALYTICAL METHOD VALIDATION PROTCOL NO: EFFECTIVE DATE : Page No.:- 4 of 17</p><p>The precision of an analytical procedure expresses the closeness of agreement (degree of scatter) between a series of measurements obtained from multiple sampling of the same homogenous sample under the prescribed condition. Precision may be considered at three levels: Repeatability, intermediate precision, and reproducibility.</p><p>Precision should be investigated using homogenous authentic samples. However, if it is not possible to obtain a homogenous sample, it may be investigated using artificially prepared samples or a sample solution.</p><p>The precision of an analytical procedure is usually expressed as the variance, standard deviation or coefficient of variation of a series of measurements.</p><p>Repeatability: repeatability expresses the precision under the same operating conditions over a short interval of time, Repeatability is also termed intra-assay precision.</p><p>Intermediate precision: Intermediate precision expresses within-laboratories variations: different days, different analysts, different equipment, etc.</p><p>Reproducibility: Reproducibility expresses the precision between laboratories (collaborative studies, usually applied to standardization methodology.</p><p>(IV) Detection of Limit:</p><p>The detection limit of an individual analytical procedure is the lowest amount of analyte in a sample which can be detected but not necessarily quantitative as an exact value.</p><p>(V) Quantitation Limit:</p><p>The quantitation limit of an individual analytical procedure is the lowest amount of analyte in a sample which can be quantitatively determined with suitable precision and accuracy. The quantitation limit is a parameter of quantitative assay for levels of compounds in sample matrices, and is used particularly for the determination of impurities and/or degradation products.</p><p>(VI) Linearity The linearity of an analytical procedure is its ability (within a given range) to obtain test results which are directly proportional to the concentration (amount) of analyte in the sample.</p><p>(VII) Range The range of an analytical procedure is the interval between the upper and lower concentration (amounts) of analyte in the sample (including these concentrations) for which it has been demonstrated that the analytical procedure has a suitable level of precision , accuracy and linearity.</p><p>Prepared By: Checked By: Approved By: Date: Date: Date: COMPANY NAME & ADDRESS ANALYTICAL METHOD VALIDATION PROTCOL NO: EFFECTIVE DATE : Page No.:- 5 of 17</p><p>(VIII)Robustness The robustness of an analytical is a measure if its capacity to remain unaffected by small, but deliberate variations in method parameters and provides an indication of its reliability during normal usage. </p><p>1.2 List of Documents for Validation:  Validation protocol,  Details of sampling for the validation batches, test parameters with reference to test methods & Acceptance criteria. (acceptable Limit)  Methods for recording / evaluating results including statistical analysis.</p><p>Prepared By: Checked By: Approved By: Date: Date: Date: COMPANY NAME & ADDRESS ANALYTICAL METHOD VALIDATION PROTCOL NO: EFFECTIVE DATE : Page No.:- 6 of 17</p><p> Reference to relevant documents.</p><p>2.0 PERSSONEL RESPONSIBILITIES.</p><p>SR ACTIVITY RESPONSIBILITY REMARKS</p><p>1 Preparation of validation protocol 2 Approval of Validation protocol 3 Testing of validation samples & Preparation of validation report 4 Approval of validation report.</p><p>EQUIP LIST:</p><p>SR EQUIPMENT/ INSTRUMENT I.D.NO. STATUS REMARK NAME</p><p>GLASS WARE</p><p>SR GLASS WARE NAME NOMINAL STATUS REMARK CAPACITY</p><p>Prepared By: Checked By: Approved By: Date: Date: Date: COMPANY NAME & ADDRESS ANALYTICAL METHOD VALIDATION PROTCOL NO: EFFECTIVE DATE : Page No.:- 7 of 17</p><p>Prepared By: Checked By: Approved By: Date: Date: Date: COMPANY NAME & ADDRESS ANALYTICAL METHOD VALIDATION PROTCOL NO: EFFECTIVE DATE : Page No.:- 8 of 17</p><p>METHOD OF ANALYSIS: Method :- STP. No. :- Ref. :- Product Name :- Parameter Results Acceptance Criteria. RSD is Less than 1 % Precision 1. (Repeatability)</p><p>2.Reproducibility RSD is Less than 1 % Accuracy</p><p>2 Linearity R is NLT 0.98 Detection limit Method should be able to detect </p><p> minimum analyte concentration Method should be able to detect </p><p>Specificity impurity/ degradable product & </p><p> distinguish between std. </p><p>( Undegradable product) </p><p>Prepared By: Checked By: Approved By: Date: Date: Date: COMPANY NAME & ADDRESS ANALYTICAL METHOD VALIDATION PROTCOL NO: EFFECTIVE DATE : Page No.:- 9 of 17</p><p>Method :- STP. No. :- Ref. :- Product Name :- Label :- Precision ( Repeatability )</p><p>Taken 6 Sample individually and followed method Calculation :-</p><p>Sample Reading Assay in gm Assay in % Xi (Xi-X) (Xi-X)2</p><p>T1</p><p>T2</p><p>T3</p><p>T4</p><p>T5</p><p>T6 Σ Xi Σ (Xi-X)2 X =</p><p>S = Σ (Xi-X) 2 (n-1)</p><p>S = ______5</p><p>RSD = 100 S X</p><p>NOTE: Minimum six determination at 100 % of test concentration </p><p>Prepared By: Checked By: Approved By: Date: Date: Date: COMPANY NAME & ADDRESS ANALYTICAL METHOD VALIDATION PROTCOL NO: EFFECTIVE DATE : Page No.:- 10 of 17</p><p>Accuracy RECOVERY BY SPIKING STD. TO TEST PREPARATION </p><p>Taken Std.-Reference standard ______gm Std. Potency: - ______</p><p>Test Smp. T1______ml / gm T2______ml / gm T3______ml / gm</p><p>Recovery Smp. R______ml of test preparation ,______gm -______Std. Spiked, mixed.</p><p>(i.e. gm Std./ ml/ gm ) & followed method .</p><p>Reading Mean</p><p>Std. S</p><p>Test Smp. T1</p><p>Recovery Smp. R</p><p>Prepared By: Checked By: Approved By: Date: Date: Date: COMPANY NAME & ADDRESS ANALYTICAL METHOD VALIDATION PROTCOL NO: EFFECTIVE DATE : Page No.:- 11 of 17</p><p>Reading Mean</p><p>Std. S</p><p>Test Smp. T2</p><p>Recovery Smp. R</p><p>Reading Mean</p><p>Std. S</p><p>Test Smp. T3</p><p>Recovery Smp. R</p><p>Prepared By: Checked By: Approved By: Date: Date: Date: COMPANY NAME & ADDRESS ANALYTICAL METHOD VALIDATION PROTCOL NO: EFFECTIVE DATE : Page No.:- 12 of 17</p><p>Calculation :- </p><p>Calculate % recovery using following formula</p><p>% Recovery = gm in Recovery sample –gm in Test Sample X 100 gm Std. Spiked </p><p>Note: Three concentration and three replicates of each concentration.</p><p> e.g. 100 + 10 % i.e. 90 % , 100 % , 110 % </p><p>Linearity</p><p>Take Sample ______ml / gm. ______ml / gm.______ml / gm.______ml / gm. ______ml / gm. and followed method.</p><p>Calculation:</p><p> zSample Taken in ml Concentration in % % Recovered From 80 %</p><p>Prepared By: Checked By: Approved By: Date: Date: Date: COMPANY NAME & ADDRESS ANALYTICAL METHOD VALIDATION PROTCOL NO: EFFECTIVE DATE : Page No.:- 13 of 17</p><p>90 % 100 % 110 % 120 %</p><p>Note: Minimum of five concentrations * Assay of drug substance: - from 80 % to 120 % of the test concentration.</p><p>Linearity</p><p>%</p><p>150 118.04 % 100 98.87 108.46 78.21 88.54 50</p><p>0 0.0096 0.0108 0.012 0.0132 0.0144 y = 9.962x + 68.508 R2 = 0.9996 % of Conceration (Limit :- NLT 0.98)</p><p>Prepared By: Checked By: Approved By: Date: Date: Date: COMPANY NAME & ADDRESS ANALYTICAL METHOD VALIDATION PROTCOL NO: EFFECTIVE DATE : Page No.:- 14 of 17</p><p>Method :- STP. No. :- Ref. :- Product Name :- Label :- Precision ( Reproducibility )</p><p>Test by different analyst on different days. Sample A1:______Analyst 1 on:______</p><p>Sample A2:______Analyst 2 on:______</p><p>Sample A3:______Analyst 3 on:______</p><p>Calculation :-</p><p>Sample A1 </p><p>Sr Reading Assay in gm Assay in % Xi (Xi-X) (Xi-X)2 1 2 3 4 5 6 Σ Xi Σ (Xi-X)2 X =</p><p>Prepared By: Checked By: Approved By: Date: Date: Date: COMPANY NAME & ADDRESS ANALYTICAL METHOD VALIDATION PROTCOL NO: EFFECTIVE DATE : Page No.:- 15 of 17</p><p>Sample A2 </p><p>Sr Reading Assay in gm Assay in % Xi (Xi-X) (Xi-X)2 1 2 3 4 5 6 Σ Xi Σ (Xi-X)2 X =</p><p>Sample A3 </p><p>Sr Reading Assay in gm Assay in % Xi (Xi-X) (Xi-X)2 1 2 3 4 5 6 Σ Xi Σ (Xi-X)2 X =</p><p>S = Σ (Xi-X) 2 (n-1)</p><p>S = ______5</p><p>RSD = 100 S X</p><p>NOTE: Minimum six determination at 100 % of test concentration </p><p>Prepared By: Checked By: Approved By: Date: Date: Date: COMPANY NAME & ADDRESS ANALYTICAL METHOD VALIDATION PROTCOL NO: EFFECTIVE DATE : Page No.:- 16 of 17</p><p>Method :- STP. No. :- Ref. :- Product Name :- Label :- Specificity:</p><p>Include comparison of test results of samples containing impurities or degradation products ( 15,30,45, minutes of degradation product)</p><p>Factor for degradation;  Light  Heat  Humidity  Acid base Hydrolysate  Oxidation.</p><p>Sample A1: 15 minutes of degradation</p><p>Sample A2: 30 minutes of degradation</p><p>Sample A3: 45 minutes of degradation</p><p>Sample A4: Undegradable sample</p><p>Sample RESULTS A1 A2 A3 A4</p><p>NOTE: Recommended data : *In case of chromatographic procedure – chromatogram should be presented. * Peak purity test- Chromatographic peak should be presented. </p><p>Method :- STP. No. :-</p><p>Prepared By: Checked By: Approved By: Date: Date: Date: COMPANY NAME & ADDRESS ANALYTICAL METHOD VALIDATION PROTCOL NO: EFFECTIVE DATE : Page No.:- 17 of 17</p><p>Ref. :- Product Name :- Label :- Detection of limit:</p><p>Approach is used for detection limit: - Visual evaluation. </p><p>Take samples with known concentration of analyte and established the minimum level at which the analyte can be reliably detected.</p><p>Sample A1: ______</p><p>Sample A2: ______</p><p>Sample A3: ______</p><p>Sample A4: ______</p><p>Sample Known Concentration RESULTS A1 A2 A3 A4</p><p>NOTE: </p><p>Known concentration of analyte is decided from on the basis of required detection level i.e. above and below the required detection level. </p><p>Prepared By: Checked By: Approved By: Date: Date: Date: </p>

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    17 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us