Performance Appraisal Administrative Professional Personnel

Performance Appraisal Administrative Professional Personnel

<p> UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT TYLER Performance Appraisal Administrative & Professional Personnel</p><p>PURPOSE The purpose of any performance appraisal program is development. The value of performance appraisal is in the process of communication between supervisor and employee and not merely in the completion of the form.</p><p>Specific objectives of UT Tyler’s Administrative Appraisal program are:  to increase professional development, skill level, and performance of each employee;  to strengthen working relationships between supervisor and employee;  to clarify job duties and responsibilities;  to measure performance based on objective, job related, measurable, and consistently applied criteria;  to give employee a feeling of satisfaction about effective phases of work;  to aid in promotion, retention and salary decisions.</p><p>PREPARATION For the reviewer of nonacademic personnel: Attend one of the Office of Human Resources’ presentations on evaluation techniques. Complete a tentative appraisal in advance of your conference with the employee. Provide the employee being reviewed with a blank appraisal form to complete as a self-evaluation. Together, a final appraisal can be developed at the conference. Specific documentation/comments on each of the appraisal sections is required. “Below Satisfactory Performance” ratings and “Consistently Unsatisfactory Performance” ratings must be accompanied by corrective action documentation along with a time frame for improved performance. An explanation that failure to improve performance could lead to disciplinary action, up to and including termination, should be discussed with the employee during the evaluation conference. All evaluations are to be reviewed by the U.T. Tyler EEO officer to ensure EEO compliance.</p><p>ADMINISTRATIVE PERSONNEL Administrators, other than chairpersons and deans, will be evaluated by their immediate supervisors.</p><p>DEPARTMENT CHAIRS Chairs will be evaluated annually by the dean. The dean shall solicit from the departmental faculty their assessments of the chair’s performance.</p><p>DEANS Deans will be evaluated annually by the Vice President for Academic Affairs. The Vice President shall solicit from the school faculty their assessments of the dean’s performance. UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT TYLER Performance Appraisal Administrative & Professional Personnel</p><p>EMPLOYEE</p><p>NAME: REVIEW DATE: POSITION</p><p>TITLE: ADMINISTRATI</p><p>VE UNIT NAME: I. PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL INSTRUCTIONS: Listed below are eight performance appraisal factors that are considered representative of most administrative and professional positions. A brief description is provided for each factor. In the space provided, the reviewer should place descriptive evaluative comments. Evaluations are to be based on criteria that are objective, job related, measurable, and consistently applied. </p><p>LEADERSHIP (motivation, counseling, and directing of staff) Comments: </p><p>DECISION MAKING (reaching firm, clearly defined decisions) Comments: </p><p>PLANNING (preparation of administrative unit programs, activities, and services) Comments: </p><p>STAFF MANAGEMENT (employee selection, retention, development and appraisal) Comments: </p><p>INTERNAL CONTROL AND FISCAL MANAGEMENT (including compliance with University rules, policies, and procedures) Comments: </p><p>HUMAN RELATIONS (interpersonal relations with internal & external constituents) Comments: </p><p>COMMUNICATION (oral and written) Comments: </p><p>PROFESSIONAL EXPERTISE (job knowledge) Comments: </p><p>II. PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SUMMARY Performance Strengths Areas for Improvement:   </p><p>  </p><p>  </p><p>  </p><p>III. OVERALL EVALUATION Below Commenda Satisfactor Superior Satisfactor Consistently ble y Performan y Unsatisfactory Performanc Performan ce Performan Performance e ce ce OVERALL EVALUATION: Consider the extent to which the employee’s job performance meets established organized standards IV. MUTUALLY UNDERSTOOD GOALS</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>EMPLOYEE COMMENTS</p><p>I acknowledge that I am aware of and agree to abide by the University of Texas at Tyler Standards of Conduct Guide and Conflict of Interest Policy which can be found on the UT Tyler Faculty Staff page under Manuals, Directories, and Links: http://www.uttyler.edu/facultystaff/. Any outside employment or compensation, including self-employment, and employment by another state agency have been approved by my supervisor using the appropriate form located on the UT Tyler website at: http://www2.uttyler.edu/ohr/forms_recruiting_resources.php.I have also disclosed any potential conflicts of interest, including, but not limited to, relationships with other employees, students, vendors, donors, business associates, etc. in the space provided below:</p><p>Dat e: Signature of Employee</p><p>Dat e: Signature of Supervisor</p><p>Signature of Evaluator’s Admin. Officer to Ensure EEO Compliance: ______Date: ______</p><p>Original to Human Resources. Copies to Employee and Departmental Files</p>

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    3 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us