State of Connecticut s20

State of Connecticut s20

<p> 1 1 2 1 STATE OF CONNECTICUT 2 3 SITING COUNCIL 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 CELLULAR SYMPOSIUM 16 17 RE: CTIA REPORT: IMPACT OF THE U.S. 18 19 WIRELESS TELECOM INDUSTRY ON THE U.S. ECONOMY 20 21 MARCH 2, 2006 22 23 (11:30 A.M.) 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 THE BUSHNELL PERFORMING ARTS CENTER 36 37 HARTFORD, CONNECTICUT</p><p>3 4 5 POST REPORTING SERVICE 6 HAMDEN, CT (800) 262-4102 1 2 2 RE: CTIA REPORT 3 MARCH 2, 2006 4 5 1 . . . proceedings of a Cellular Symposium </p><p>2 held by the State of Connecticut Siting Council at the </p><p>3 Bushnell Performing Arts Center on March 2, 2006.</p><p>4</p><p>5</p><p>6</p><p>7 MR. S. DEREK PHELPS: Our next speaker is </p><p>8 Mr. Roger Entner. Mr. Barrone, are we geared up and </p><p>9 ready?</p><p>10 Some time ago when I was putting together </p><p>11 this program, I was assembling it largely as a technical </p><p>12 workshop series of sessions that addressed the challenges </p><p>13 of propagation and as you just heard the challenges of </p><p>14 providing for coverage off of specific types of facilities</p><p>15 and, you know, the advantages and the disadvantages </p><p>16 associated. But before long, I began to realize that the </p><p>17 -- one component that I think maybe was in need of being </p><p>18 addressed today, especially from a policymaker’s </p><p>19 perspective, was the subject matter of what the industry </p><p>20 means today, what its potential impact may be in the </p><p>21 coming years, and certainly where it has come from in </p><p>6 7 8 POST REPORTING SERVICE 9 HAMDEN, CT (800) 262-4102 1 3 2 RE: CTIA REPORT 3 MARCH 2, 2006 4 5 1 terms of its impact on the economy. And so I’m pleased to</p><p>2 say that we were able to identify what I think is an </p><p>3 excellent speaker who’s come here today to address that </p><p>4 subject. He is here representing what we refer to as the </p><p>5 wireless association, the CTIA. And what he’s going to </p><p>6 discuss today is a synopsis of a recently published report</p><p>7 by the wireless association that measures the economic </p><p>8 impact of the wireless industry upon the nation and its </p><p>9 predictions for the next 10 years.</p><p>10 Ladies and gentlemen, would you please </p><p>11 join me in welcoming Roger Entner, Vice President, </p><p>12 Wireless Telecoms for Ovum on behalf of the wireless </p><p>13 association.</p><p>14 (Applause)</p><p>15 MR. ROGER ENTNER: Thank you very much. </p><p>16 And I’m also the guy who stands between you and lunch and </p><p>17 a much better looking speaker, Leslie Cauley, who will </p><p>18 follow me.</p><p>19 So here we did a report for CTIA that </p><p>20 actually for the first time quantified the impact that the</p><p>21 wireless industry has on the U.S. economy, because, you </p><p>6 7 8 POST REPORTING SERVICE 9 HAMDEN, CT (800) 262-4102 1 4 2 RE: CTIA REPORT 3 MARCH 2, 2006 4 5 1 know, you hear every day -- you know, even Allen Greenspan</p><p>2 saying, oh, the internet just did all these wonderful </p><p>3 things for the economy and all the boom in the 1990’s is </p><p>4 all due to the internet. But actually at the same time </p><p>5 another boom actually went on, and that’s wireless, and it</p><p>6 has also quite a significant impact.</p><p>7 So what we looked at here first is we </p><p>8 looked both at the supply and the demand side of the </p><p>9 wireless industry. And on the supply side we have that </p><p>10 through wireless usage, you know, you have an increase in </p><p>11 GVP employment, government revenues you know, all of your </p><p>12 tax -- well some more, some less -- wireless users. And </p><p>13 then on the demand side because it also enhances </p><p>14 productivity, there’s not only idle chatter going on, but </p><p>15 really a lot of business use. And then you have both </p><p>16 wireless voice and wireless data.</p><p>17 One of my predecessors speaking here </p><p>18 mentioned, you know, the increase in subscribers but also </p><p>19 in usage. You know, if we look at just from the beginning</p><p>20 of 2000, we had about a hundred million users, and now we </p><p>21 have more than two hundred million users. Minutes per use</p><p>6 7 8 POST REPORTING SERVICE 9 HAMDEN, CT (800) 262-4102 1 5 2 RE: CTIA REPORT 3 MARCH 2, 2006 4 5 1 that each of these individuals have used went up from </p><p>2 maybe 200 minutes a use to over 800. That’s, you know, </p><p>3 quite substantial. We are rivaling now what people are </p><p>4 using through their land line numbers. And on a land line</p><p>5 there are 2.3 people actually talking and on a wireless </p><p>6 phone one person is talking.</p><p>7 So we then went -- just to give you a </p><p>8 brief methodology -- I went through all 9,267 different </p><p>9 job classifications that the Bureau of Labor Statistics </p><p>10 segregates all into and defined what are the jobs that </p><p>11 will have a benefit from going wireless and what are not. </p><p>12 And we found that about 60 million people will actually </p><p>13 find a benefit from it. And then we did really a hard </p><p>14 analysis on the productivity savings. Not the </p><p>15 productivity enhancements, but really what time do they </p><p>16 use and how much labor will that cost less, because that </p><p>17 takes all ambiguity out there because the BLS also surveys</p><p>18 everybody and finds out that the proverbial plumber makes </p><p>19 this and the CEO makes that. And then you can estimate or</p><p>20 actually through case studies, you have businesses </p><p>21 reporting back -- you know, a nurse with a cell phone </p><p>6 7 8 POST REPORTING SERVICE 9 HAMDEN, CT (800) 262-4102 1 6 2 RE: CTIA REPORT 3 MARCH 2, 2006 4 5 1 actually saves four hours a week, and then you can say </p><p>2 okay four hours a week, the person makes X dollars, that’s</p><p>3 this productivity savings that they can use somewhere </p><p>4 else. So what we found here actually is over the next 10 </p><p>5 years there will be more than 617 billion dollars in </p><p>6 productivity savings.</p><p>7 On top of it there’s a consumer surplus of</p><p>8 750 billion. Consumer surplus in layman’s terms -- and </p><p>9 you know, I’m almost -- with my very capable predecessors,</p><p>10 I always felt like, you know, I’m blinded by science, so I</p><p>11 try not to do that too much. Consumer surplus is </p><p>12 basically the difference between what you’re actually </p><p>13 paying and what you would be willing to pay for the same </p><p>14 amount of usage. So we basically compared what Americans </p><p>15 are paying for this service and what equivalent they would</p><p>16 pay for it if they would live in Europe, which is as close</p><p>17 as we can get. So on average an American user spends </p><p>18 about $55.00 and talks about 800 minutes. If they would </p><p>19 live in Europe, they would have to pay $125.00 a month for</p><p>20 exact -- for getting exactly the same. So that translates</p><p>21 into 750 billion dollars.</p><p>6 7 8 POST REPORTING SERVICE 9 HAMDEN, CT (800) 262-4102 1 7 2 RE: CTIA REPORT 3 MARCH 2, 2006 4 5 1 On top of it, because the industry is </p><p>2 growing and then, you know, all the engineers are building</p><p>3 houses and so construction workers. They pay taxes, so </p><p>4 more government officials, and so on and so forth. So the</p><p>5 impact of the industry, you know, that turns into about </p><p>6 another 450 billion dollars, you know. To put this in </p><p>7 context, the Bush tax cut over 10 years was 670 billion </p><p>8 dollars, so that’s roughly the same impact. And it’s, you</p><p>9 know, more than twice as big as the repel of the state tax</p><p>10 over the same time period.</p><p>11 So here we looked at the productivity </p><p>12 benefits when we go through it. And you know, in -- in </p><p>13 2004 it was only, only about eight billion dollars. </p><p>14 That’s roughly the size of the economy of Bahrain, one of </p><p>15 the oil sheikdoms in the Pacific -- not Pacific -- Persian</p><p>16 Gulf. By 2015 this will grow to more than 80 billion </p><p>17 dollars a year. You know, which is roughly as big as </p><p>18 Chile or the Philippines. So you have one industry in the</p><p>19 U.S. that is really the size of another economy. So -- </p><p>20 and as I mentioned before, it’s -- basically, we looked at</p><p>21 the savings that people do. So your proverbial tree </p><p>6 7 8 POST REPORTING SERVICE 9 HAMDEN, CT (800) 262-4102 1 8 2 RE: CTIA REPORT 3 MARCH 2, 2006 4 5 1 cutter makes $12.68 an hour. So we counted the -- however</p><p>2 many hours they saved a week by them calling in and </p><p>3 saying, hey, I cut Roger’s tree and now I’m going -- where</p><p>4 should I go next, and then they can direct them directly </p><p>5 and route them in the best way. And so we counted these </p><p>6 savings.</p><p>7 I think what’s also very important to </p><p>8 mention is, you know, with the industry growing that big, </p><p>9 is that the industry -- 200 million users, 110 billion </p><p>10 dollar in revenue, so it’s also a huge economy, but </p><p>11 they’re just free cash flow positive. Free cash flow </p><p>12 positive means they’ve started paying back their debt they</p><p>13 accumulated over the last 20 years bringing us these </p><p>14 services. So the industry, while some people think and </p><p>15 actually treat it like the golden goose, is actually only </p><p>16 paying back the debt they accumulated over 20 years </p><p>17 building these networks. And I think that’s very </p><p>18 important to know as well.</p><p>19 So if we look at the future economic </p><p>20 benefits, you know, we put it in two -- the two major </p><p>21 components we found were actually more efficient </p><p>6 7 8 POST REPORTING SERVICE 9 HAMDEN, CT (800) 262-4102 1 9 2 RE: CTIA REPORT 3 MARCH 2, 2006 4 5 1 management and documentation and health care efficiency </p><p>2 benefits. It’s -- and those are by far the two biggest </p><p>3 contributors. When I started out the study, I didn’t </p><p>4 think it would -- that these two would be actually the </p><p>5 biggest one. And they contribute probably, you know, 75 </p><p>6 percent of that. Then it’s followed by field service, </p><p>7 automation, inventory, loss reduction, and field sales.</p><p>8 So -- by the way, if you have any </p><p>9 questions, just interrupt me. I’m easy. I don’t like </p><p>10 pontificating. I’m much more -- I’m much better, much </p><p>11 more fun when we’re interactive, so go ahead.</p><p>12 So -- as I mentioned, it’s a 110 billion </p><p>13 dollar industry, but the GVP impact is 92 billion dollars.</p><p>14 Where do the other 18 billion dollars end up? They </p><p>15 actually end up due to the handsets because they basically</p><p>16 get manufactured overseas. We don’t have anybody actually</p><p>17 making handsets here any more. So all the brain work </p><p>18 happens here with Motorola and a lot of the other firms, </p><p>19 but actually it’s manufactured then overseas. So every </p><p>20 day -- literally plane loads of handsets come into this </p><p>21 country. And -- you know, I’ll spare you the details.</p><p>6 7 8 POST REPORTING SERVICE 9 HAMDEN, CT (800) 262-4102 1 10 2 RE: CTIA REPORT 3 MARCH 2, 2006 4 5 1 Go ahead. So you know, coming back to the</p><p>2 consumer surplus, you know, it’s -- you know, at the end </p><p>3 of ’04 it was about 157 billion dollars. And all of it is</p><p>4 basically voice because that’s the most widely used </p><p>5 service. In ’04 we had -- you know, we had -- about one </p><p>6 or two percent of revenue from the carriers was wireless </p><p>7 data. Now it’s more than five percent. You know, $55.00 </p><p>8 as I mentioned before, ’04 -- and this is just for the </p><p>9 year ’04 -- it was, you know, a dollar or two. Now we’re </p><p>10 seeing four, five, six dollars even per user over -- spent</p><p>11 over the whole base. Somebody who is actually actively </p><p>12 using data is spending 10, 12, $15.00 a month. Quite -- </p><p>13 quite interesting. But at that time in 2004 we didn’t </p><p>14 have that. So by 2010 we expect that to grow to about 260</p><p>15 billion dollars with voice volumes to triple and prices to</p><p>16 half. And so it’s over 200 -- 300 billion by 2015, you </p><p>17 know.</p><p>18 By the way, another interesting factoid, </p><p>19 in 2001 the effective price per minute -- so basically </p><p>20 what you do is you divide what you pay per month by how </p><p>21 many minutes you use -- that was in 2000 about 22 cents </p><p>6 7 8 POST REPORTING SERVICE 9 HAMDEN, CT (800) 262-4102 1 11 2 RE: CTIA REPORT 3 MARCH 2, 2006 4 5 1 per minute. What do you think where are we today? </p><p>2 Anybody?</p><p>3 A VOICE: Five cents --</p><p>4 MR. ENTNER: Hmm?</p><p>5 A VOICE: Less than 10 cents?</p><p>6 MR. ENTNER: Yes. We’re now down to below</p><p>7 seven cents per minute. So that is actually -- now it’s </p><p>8 -- on an effective basis it’s cheaper to do a wireless </p><p>9 call than it is to do a land line call. So that’s how far</p><p>10 we have come in the industry.</p><p>11 So now we go into a little bit more </p><p>12 details in the supply side effect. I’ll spare you this. </p><p>13 (Laughter). So -- if you want to have a -- if you want to</p><p>14 have a copy -- e-mail -- or ask Derek if you wanted to </p><p>15 just give me a call or send me an e-mail, I’m happy to </p><p>16 send that to you. But basically this is about all the </p><p>17 different bits and pieces, who gets what money from </p><p>18 consumers. And the industry -- and in the end, the value </p><p>19 that the U.S. industry and the carriers are actually </p><p>20 creating is about 22 billion dollars.</p><p>21 Okay, go ahead. So coming back to the </p><p>6 7 8 POST REPORTING SERVICE 9 HAMDEN, CT (800) 262-4102 1 12 2 RE: CTIA REPORT 3 MARCH 2, 2006 4 5 1 industry and putting it in size of the impact it actually </p><p>2 has, it -- it -- in 2004 it was 20 percent smaller than </p><p>3 the computer industry; roughly the same with publishing; </p><p>4 it was actually more than twice as big as the movie </p><p>5 industry; almost as big as agriculture or automobiles; and</p><p>6 you know, more than twice as big as the oil industry, and </p><p>7 it got the worst rap and the less least pool of all the --</p><p>8 of all the industry out there. And it probably made a lot</p><p>9 more people happy than going to the pump.</p><p>10 Anyway -- go ahead. So here we look at </p><p>11 also the impact on jobs and the U.S. economy. So direct </p><p>12 employment is -- is a bit over half a million -- million </p><p>13 people. Then we have about another one and a half million</p><p>14 people in support services. So these are the people that </p><p>15 build the towers, that are servicing the towers, that are </p><p>16 providing content to -- that we watch on the television or</p><p>17 that make the software that makes the things run. </p><p>18 Indirect employment is now the people that feed all the </p><p>19 engineers who are hungry and do wonderful things. And </p><p>20 then the induced employment is what then feeds off of </p><p>21 against it, which winds up into 3.6 million people that </p><p>6 7 8 POST REPORTING SERVICE 9 HAMDEN, CT (800) 262-4102 1 13 2 RE: CTIA REPORT 3 MARCH 2, 2006 4 5 1 are directly and indirectly impacted actually by that. So</p><p>2 it’s -- if you translate it into Connecticut, so basically</p><p>3 every -- every wireless company employee basically </p><p>4 supports, you know, around seven other employees. So you </p><p>5 know, help the wireless companies bring jobs here, you get</p><p>6 seven jobs out of it.</p><p>7 Anyway, go ahead, the next one. Sixty-</p><p>8 three billion dollars in government revenue is generated </p><p>9 every year by the wireless industry -- or at least in </p><p>10 2004. With subscribers going up, this goes up as well. </p><p>11 14.6 billion in federal, state, and local sales tax, </p><p>12 transaction taxes, surcharges, you name it. Wireless in </p><p>13 terms of percentage taxation ran -- runs pretty close to </p><p>14 alcohol, gambling, and other sinful things. (Laughter). </p><p>15 Wireless users -- you know -- and the first wireless users</p><p>16 we had in the U.S. was in 1980, also paying for the 19-- </p><p>17 the 1898 foreign war tax where we’re still paying for the </p><p>18 expenditures for the war against Spain where we liberated </p><p>19 Cuba. So we’re still paying for that war. I don’t want </p><p>20 to know what happens with the Iraq war, that was a little </p><p>21 bit bigger in scope and longer, you know, when they put </p><p>6 7 8 POST REPORTING SERVICE 9 HAMDEN, CT (800) 262-4102 1 14 2 RE: CTIA REPORT 3 MARCH 2, 2006 4 5 1 taxes on it.</p><p>2 So about a billion dollars then in sales </p><p>3 tax is on handset purchases; 9 billion both from employer </p><p>4 and employee paid social security; 26 and a half billion </p><p>5 from workers dependent on the industry; and about 2.6 </p><p>6 billion dollars for USF. The wireless industry is already</p><p>7 paying more than 30 percent of the USF fund. So it’s -- </p><p>8 go ahead, sir.</p><p>9 (QUESTION FROM THE FLOOR)</p><p>10 MR. ENTNER: In 2004 there were no </p><p>11 spectrum auctions, so we didn’t put it in there. You </p><p>12 know, a small auction runs about a billion dollars. A big</p><p>13 auction like -- Auction 35, actually never happened, was </p><p>14 16 billion. There’s another auction coming up in June and</p><p>15 the federal government hopes to get at least two billion </p><p>16 dollars out of it. But you know, two billion -- you know,</p><p>17 a billion, two billion dollars in a -- you get -- the </p><p>18 government gets more in handset sales taxes than on some </p><p>19 auction. So it -- while it’s a really big -- well, you </p><p>20 know, a billion here, a billion there -- you talk about </p><p>21 real money and I would take it in a heartbeat -- but in </p><p>6 7 8 POST REPORTING SERVICE 9 HAMDEN, CT (800) 262-4102 1 15 2 RE: CTIA REPORT 3 MARCH 2, 2006 4 5 1 the big scope of things, it’s not that much actually.</p><p>2 Go ahead. Okay, and that concludes my </p><p>3 comments. So if you have any questions, I’m very happy to</p><p>4 answer you.</p><p>5 (Applause)</p><p>6 MR. ENTNER: Yes, ma’am?</p><p>7 (QUESTION FROM THE COUNCIL)</p><p>8 MR. ENTNER: Yes.</p><p>9 MR. PHELPS: Restate it please.</p><p>10 MR. ENTNER: If the numbers included also </p><p>11 real estate taxes on the sites. Yes, it does. Yes, sir?</p><p>12 (QUESTION FROM THE FLOOR)</p><p>13 MR. ENTNER: Okay, go ahead, go back.</p><p>14 (QUESTION FROM THE FLOOR)</p><p>15 MR. ENTNER: Yes, because it’s 22 and a </p><p>16 half billion dollars in value added, which the industry </p><p>17 used to pay the debts it has accumulated over 20 years of </p><p>18 loss making.</p><p>19 MR. PHELPS: Alright, one more time </p><p>20 restate the question.</p><p>21 MR. ENTNER: If -- if -- (laughter) -- </p><p>6 7 8 POST REPORTING SERVICE 9 HAMDEN, CT (800) 262-4102 1 16 2 RE: CTIA REPORT 3 MARCH 2, 2006 4 5 1 okay, sorry. If the numbers that are going into the </p><p>2 wireless carriers are bigger than the numbers that are </p><p>3 flowing out? And yes. And it’s exactly by the 22 and a </p><p>4 half billion that’s in the middle of it. And that’s used </p><p>5 to pay all the kind people that borrow -- or that lend </p><p>6 money to the wireless industry over the last 20 years. </p><p>7 Yes sir?</p><p>8 (QUESTION FROM THE FLOOR)</p><p>9 MR. ENTNER: If you want to have that </p><p>10 study done again, send an e-mail to Steve Lodgent </p><p>11 (phonetic) at CTIA -- (laughter) -- and I’m happy to </p><p>12 oblige. So we’re currently talking --</p><p>13 MR. PHELPS: I’m going to ask you --</p><p>14 MR. ENTNER: So the question was if we’re </p><p>15 doing this again? And -- and how it looks like when </p><p>16 things are changing? And I said -- this was a 2004 </p><p>17 snapshot and please e-mail Steve Lodgent, who is the CEO </p><p>18 of CTIA, if you want to have this done for 2005.</p><p>19 So -- if -- if we look at carrier -- or </p><p>20 going through significant changes, Cingular, for example, </p><p>21 built a completely new UMTS network, and from a </p><p>6 7 8 POST REPORTING SERVICE 9 HAMDEN, CT (800) 262-4102 1 17 2 RE: CTIA REPORT 3 MARCH 2, 2006 4 5 1 traditional three, four-billion dollar, actually spent </p><p>2 seven billion dollars. A boat load of money, no doubt </p><p>3 about it. It drowns a little bit in the massiveness of </p><p>4 everything else. So the -- you know, we have to remember </p><p>5 that the industry collectively spends 25 billion dollars. </p><p>6 So a quarter of their revenue every year they build -- </p><p>7 they spend on building and expanding their network either </p><p>8 by expanding coverage, improving -- improving capacity, or</p><p>9 providing new services on it; now if you not only want to </p><p>10 talk but you want to watch a movie or a clip on your </p><p>11 handset, you can do that to. Yes, sir?</p><p>12 (QUESTION FROM THE COUNCIL)</p><p>13 MR. ENTNER: Yes. If broadband wireless </p><p>14 was included in this -- in this study? What we’ve done </p><p>15 here is we really tried to be as conservative as humanly </p><p>16 possible. So what we did is we -- with our projections is</p><p>17 we said okay we’ll freeze the productivity gains that </p><p>18 people saw in 2004 and do not assume that they got smarter</p><p>19 and figured out better ways how to do it, but simply that </p><p>20 -- and simply go from, you know, five to ten million </p><p>21 people that are using it to about 50 million people. So </p><p>6 7 8 POST REPORTING SERVICE 9 HAMDEN, CT (800) 262-4102 1 18 2 RE: CTIA REPORT 3 MARCH 2, 2006 4 5 1 we -- we incorporated more people doing the same thing </p><p>2 they did in 2004 by -- what I didn’t want to do is put a </p><p>3 lot of personal, you know, beliefs and projections in it, </p><p>4 but be as conservative as -- you know, some of the other </p><p>5 studies I saw, you know, put like things -- every e-mail </p><p>6 an average person get is $5.00 and every e-mail a CEO gets</p><p>7 is $50.00. How they came up with that number, I don’t </p><p>8 know. If I get another ad for Viagra, sorry, it’s not </p><p>9 worth $5.00 to me -- (laughter) -- and it doesn’t enhance </p><p>10 my productivity either. (Laughter). So -- (laughter) -- </p><p>11 maybe -- maybe Mr. Doles, but that’s another topic.</p><p>12 Anyway, so we really tried to be really </p><p>13 very conservative here, so that’s why we didn’t include </p><p>14 that.</p><p>15 MR. PHELPS: One more question please.</p><p>16 MR. ENTNER: One more question -- or if </p><p>17 you’re hungry, I’ll let you go. Thank you.</p><p>18 (Applause)</p><p>19 MR. PHELPS: Ladies and gentlemen, that </p><p>20 concludes our morning sessions. For those of you who </p><p>21 registered, which I think includes most of you, we have a </p><p>6 7 8 POST REPORTING SERVICE 9 HAMDEN, CT (800) 262-4102 1 19 2 RE: CTIA REPORT 3 MARCH 2, 2006 4 5 1 luncheon that will be served featuring our keynote speaker</p><p>2 Leslie Cauley. That’s in the great room that’s just about</p><p>3 a hundred steps to the east of this building. I look </p><p>4 forward to seeing you over there and thank you for being </p><p>5 such a good audience this morning.</p><p>6</p><p>7 (Presentation concluded)</p><p>6 7 8 POST REPORTING SERVICE 9 HAMDEN, CT (800) 262-4102</p>

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    19 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us