<p> 1 1 2 1 STATE OF CONNECTICUT 2 3 SITING COUNCIL 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 CELLULAR SYMPOSIUM 16 17 RE: CTIA REPORT: IMPACT OF THE U.S. 18 19 WIRELESS TELECOM INDUSTRY ON THE U.S. ECONOMY 20 21 MARCH 2, 2006 22 23 (11:30 A.M.) 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 THE BUSHNELL PERFORMING ARTS CENTER 36 37 HARTFORD, CONNECTICUT</p><p>3 4 5 POST REPORTING SERVICE 6 HAMDEN, CT (800) 262-4102 1 2 2 RE: CTIA REPORT 3 MARCH 2, 2006 4 5 1 . . . proceedings of a Cellular Symposium </p><p>2 held by the State of Connecticut Siting Council at the </p><p>3 Bushnell Performing Arts Center on March 2, 2006.</p><p>4</p><p>5</p><p>6</p><p>7 MR. S. DEREK PHELPS: Our next speaker is </p><p>8 Mr. Roger Entner. Mr. Barrone, are we geared up and </p><p>9 ready?</p><p>10 Some time ago when I was putting together </p><p>11 this program, I was assembling it largely as a technical </p><p>12 workshop series of sessions that addressed the challenges </p><p>13 of propagation and as you just heard the challenges of </p><p>14 providing for coverage off of specific types of facilities</p><p>15 and, you know, the advantages and the disadvantages </p><p>16 associated. But before long, I began to realize that the </p><p>17 -- one component that I think maybe was in need of being </p><p>18 addressed today, especially from a policymaker’s </p><p>19 perspective, was the subject matter of what the industry </p><p>20 means today, what its potential impact may be in the </p><p>21 coming years, and certainly where it has come from in </p><p>6 7 8 POST REPORTING SERVICE 9 HAMDEN, CT (800) 262-4102 1 3 2 RE: CTIA REPORT 3 MARCH 2, 2006 4 5 1 terms of its impact on the economy. And so I’m pleased to</p><p>2 say that we were able to identify what I think is an </p><p>3 excellent speaker who’s come here today to address that </p><p>4 subject. He is here representing what we refer to as the </p><p>5 wireless association, the CTIA. And what he’s going to </p><p>6 discuss today is a synopsis of a recently published report</p><p>7 by the wireless association that measures the economic </p><p>8 impact of the wireless industry upon the nation and its </p><p>9 predictions for the next 10 years.</p><p>10 Ladies and gentlemen, would you please </p><p>11 join me in welcoming Roger Entner, Vice President, </p><p>12 Wireless Telecoms for Ovum on behalf of the wireless </p><p>13 association.</p><p>14 (Applause)</p><p>15 MR. ROGER ENTNER: Thank you very much. </p><p>16 And I’m also the guy who stands between you and lunch and </p><p>17 a much better looking speaker, Leslie Cauley, who will </p><p>18 follow me.</p><p>19 So here we did a report for CTIA that </p><p>20 actually for the first time quantified the impact that the</p><p>21 wireless industry has on the U.S. economy, because, you </p><p>6 7 8 POST REPORTING SERVICE 9 HAMDEN, CT (800) 262-4102 1 4 2 RE: CTIA REPORT 3 MARCH 2, 2006 4 5 1 know, you hear every day -- you know, even Allen Greenspan</p><p>2 saying, oh, the internet just did all these wonderful </p><p>3 things for the economy and all the boom in the 1990’s is </p><p>4 all due to the internet. But actually at the same time </p><p>5 another boom actually went on, and that’s wireless, and it</p><p>6 has also quite a significant impact.</p><p>7 So what we looked at here first is we </p><p>8 looked both at the supply and the demand side of the </p><p>9 wireless industry. And on the supply side we have that </p><p>10 through wireless usage, you know, you have an increase in </p><p>11 GVP employment, government revenues you know, all of your </p><p>12 tax -- well some more, some less -- wireless users. And </p><p>13 then on the demand side because it also enhances </p><p>14 productivity, there’s not only idle chatter going on, but </p><p>15 really a lot of business use. And then you have both </p><p>16 wireless voice and wireless data.</p><p>17 One of my predecessors speaking here </p><p>18 mentioned, you know, the increase in subscribers but also </p><p>19 in usage. You know, if we look at just from the beginning</p><p>20 of 2000, we had about a hundred million users, and now we </p><p>21 have more than two hundred million users. Minutes per use</p><p>6 7 8 POST REPORTING SERVICE 9 HAMDEN, CT (800) 262-4102 1 5 2 RE: CTIA REPORT 3 MARCH 2, 2006 4 5 1 that each of these individuals have used went up from </p><p>2 maybe 200 minutes a use to over 800. That’s, you know, </p><p>3 quite substantial. We are rivaling now what people are </p><p>4 using through their land line numbers. And on a land line</p><p>5 there are 2.3 people actually talking and on a wireless </p><p>6 phone one person is talking.</p><p>7 So we then went -- just to give you a </p><p>8 brief methodology -- I went through all 9,267 different </p><p>9 job classifications that the Bureau of Labor Statistics </p><p>10 segregates all into and defined what are the jobs that </p><p>11 will have a benefit from going wireless and what are not. </p><p>12 And we found that about 60 million people will actually </p><p>13 find a benefit from it. And then we did really a hard </p><p>14 analysis on the productivity savings. Not the </p><p>15 productivity enhancements, but really what time do they </p><p>16 use and how much labor will that cost less, because that </p><p>17 takes all ambiguity out there because the BLS also surveys</p><p>18 everybody and finds out that the proverbial plumber makes </p><p>19 this and the CEO makes that. And then you can estimate or</p><p>20 actually through case studies, you have businesses </p><p>21 reporting back -- you know, a nurse with a cell phone </p><p>6 7 8 POST REPORTING SERVICE 9 HAMDEN, CT (800) 262-4102 1 6 2 RE: CTIA REPORT 3 MARCH 2, 2006 4 5 1 actually saves four hours a week, and then you can say </p><p>2 okay four hours a week, the person makes X dollars, that’s</p><p>3 this productivity savings that they can use somewhere </p><p>4 else. So what we found here actually is over the next 10 </p><p>5 years there will be more than 617 billion dollars in </p><p>6 productivity savings.</p><p>7 On top of it there’s a consumer surplus of</p><p>8 750 billion. Consumer surplus in layman’s terms -- and </p><p>9 you know, I’m almost -- with my very capable predecessors,</p><p>10 I always felt like, you know, I’m blinded by science, so I</p><p>11 try not to do that too much. Consumer surplus is </p><p>12 basically the difference between what you’re actually </p><p>13 paying and what you would be willing to pay for the same </p><p>14 amount of usage. So we basically compared what Americans </p><p>15 are paying for this service and what equivalent they would</p><p>16 pay for it if they would live in Europe, which is as close</p><p>17 as we can get. So on average an American user spends </p><p>18 about $55.00 and talks about 800 minutes. If they would </p><p>19 live in Europe, they would have to pay $125.00 a month for</p><p>20 exact -- for getting exactly the same. So that translates</p><p>21 into 750 billion dollars.</p><p>6 7 8 POST REPORTING SERVICE 9 HAMDEN, CT (800) 262-4102 1 7 2 RE: CTIA REPORT 3 MARCH 2, 2006 4 5 1 On top of it, because the industry is </p><p>2 growing and then, you know, all the engineers are building</p><p>3 houses and so construction workers. They pay taxes, so </p><p>4 more government officials, and so on and so forth. So the</p><p>5 impact of the industry, you know, that turns into about </p><p>6 another 450 billion dollars, you know. To put this in </p><p>7 context, the Bush tax cut over 10 years was 670 billion </p><p>8 dollars, so that’s roughly the same impact. And it’s, you</p><p>9 know, more than twice as big as the repel of the state tax</p><p>10 over the same time period.</p><p>11 So here we looked at the productivity </p><p>12 benefits when we go through it. And you know, in -- in </p><p>13 2004 it was only, only about eight billion dollars. </p><p>14 That’s roughly the size of the economy of Bahrain, one of </p><p>15 the oil sheikdoms in the Pacific -- not Pacific -- Persian</p><p>16 Gulf. By 2015 this will grow to more than 80 billion </p><p>17 dollars a year. You know, which is roughly as big as </p><p>18 Chile or the Philippines. So you have one industry in the</p><p>19 U.S. that is really the size of another economy. So -- </p><p>20 and as I mentioned before, it’s -- basically, we looked at</p><p>21 the savings that people do. So your proverbial tree </p><p>6 7 8 POST REPORTING SERVICE 9 HAMDEN, CT (800) 262-4102 1 8 2 RE: CTIA REPORT 3 MARCH 2, 2006 4 5 1 cutter makes $12.68 an hour. So we counted the -- however</p><p>2 many hours they saved a week by them calling in and </p><p>3 saying, hey, I cut Roger’s tree and now I’m going -- where</p><p>4 should I go next, and then they can direct them directly </p><p>5 and route them in the best way. And so we counted these </p><p>6 savings.</p><p>7 I think what’s also very important to </p><p>8 mention is, you know, with the industry growing that big, </p><p>9 is that the industry -- 200 million users, 110 billion </p><p>10 dollar in revenue, so it’s also a huge economy, but </p><p>11 they’re just free cash flow positive. Free cash flow </p><p>12 positive means they’ve started paying back their debt they</p><p>13 accumulated over the last 20 years bringing us these </p><p>14 services. So the industry, while some people think and </p><p>15 actually treat it like the golden goose, is actually only </p><p>16 paying back the debt they accumulated over 20 years </p><p>17 building these networks. And I think that’s very </p><p>18 important to know as well.</p><p>19 So if we look at the future economic </p><p>20 benefits, you know, we put it in two -- the two major </p><p>21 components we found were actually more efficient </p><p>6 7 8 POST REPORTING SERVICE 9 HAMDEN, CT (800) 262-4102 1 9 2 RE: CTIA REPORT 3 MARCH 2, 2006 4 5 1 management and documentation and health care efficiency </p><p>2 benefits. It’s -- and those are by far the two biggest </p><p>3 contributors. When I started out the study, I didn’t </p><p>4 think it would -- that these two would be actually the </p><p>5 biggest one. And they contribute probably, you know, 75 </p><p>6 percent of that. Then it’s followed by field service, </p><p>7 automation, inventory, loss reduction, and field sales.</p><p>8 So -- by the way, if you have any </p><p>9 questions, just interrupt me. I’m easy. I don’t like </p><p>10 pontificating. I’m much more -- I’m much better, much </p><p>11 more fun when we’re interactive, so go ahead.</p><p>12 So -- as I mentioned, it’s a 110 billion </p><p>13 dollar industry, but the GVP impact is 92 billion dollars.</p><p>14 Where do the other 18 billion dollars end up? They </p><p>15 actually end up due to the handsets because they basically</p><p>16 get manufactured overseas. We don’t have anybody actually</p><p>17 making handsets here any more. So all the brain work </p><p>18 happens here with Motorola and a lot of the other firms, </p><p>19 but actually it’s manufactured then overseas. So every </p><p>20 day -- literally plane loads of handsets come into this </p><p>21 country. And -- you know, I’ll spare you the details.</p><p>6 7 8 POST REPORTING SERVICE 9 HAMDEN, CT (800) 262-4102 1 10 2 RE: CTIA REPORT 3 MARCH 2, 2006 4 5 1 Go ahead. So you know, coming back to the</p><p>2 consumer surplus, you know, it’s -- you know, at the end </p><p>3 of ’04 it was about 157 billion dollars. And all of it is</p><p>4 basically voice because that’s the most widely used </p><p>5 service. In ’04 we had -- you know, we had -- about one </p><p>6 or two percent of revenue from the carriers was wireless </p><p>7 data. Now it’s more than five percent. You know, $55.00 </p><p>8 as I mentioned before, ’04 -- and this is just for the </p><p>9 year ’04 -- it was, you know, a dollar or two. Now we’re </p><p>10 seeing four, five, six dollars even per user over -- spent</p><p>11 over the whole base. Somebody who is actually actively </p><p>12 using data is spending 10, 12, $15.00 a month. Quite -- </p><p>13 quite interesting. But at that time in 2004 we didn’t </p><p>14 have that. So by 2010 we expect that to grow to about 260</p><p>15 billion dollars with voice volumes to triple and prices to</p><p>16 half. And so it’s over 200 -- 300 billion by 2015, you </p><p>17 know.</p><p>18 By the way, another interesting factoid, </p><p>19 in 2001 the effective price per minute -- so basically </p><p>20 what you do is you divide what you pay per month by how </p><p>21 many minutes you use -- that was in 2000 about 22 cents </p><p>6 7 8 POST REPORTING SERVICE 9 HAMDEN, CT (800) 262-4102 1 11 2 RE: CTIA REPORT 3 MARCH 2, 2006 4 5 1 per minute. What do you think where are we today? </p><p>2 Anybody?</p><p>3 A VOICE: Five cents --</p><p>4 MR. ENTNER: Hmm?</p><p>5 A VOICE: Less than 10 cents?</p><p>6 MR. ENTNER: Yes. We’re now down to below</p><p>7 seven cents per minute. So that is actually -- now it’s </p><p>8 -- on an effective basis it’s cheaper to do a wireless </p><p>9 call than it is to do a land line call. So that’s how far</p><p>10 we have come in the industry.</p><p>11 So now we go into a little bit more </p><p>12 details in the supply side effect. I’ll spare you this. </p><p>13 (Laughter). So -- if you want to have a -- if you want to</p><p>14 have a copy -- e-mail -- or ask Derek if you wanted to </p><p>15 just give me a call or send me an e-mail, I’m happy to </p><p>16 send that to you. But basically this is about all the </p><p>17 different bits and pieces, who gets what money from </p><p>18 consumers. And the industry -- and in the end, the value </p><p>19 that the U.S. industry and the carriers are actually </p><p>20 creating is about 22 billion dollars.</p><p>21 Okay, go ahead. So coming back to the </p><p>6 7 8 POST REPORTING SERVICE 9 HAMDEN, CT (800) 262-4102 1 12 2 RE: CTIA REPORT 3 MARCH 2, 2006 4 5 1 industry and putting it in size of the impact it actually </p><p>2 has, it -- it -- in 2004 it was 20 percent smaller than </p><p>3 the computer industry; roughly the same with publishing; </p><p>4 it was actually more than twice as big as the movie </p><p>5 industry; almost as big as agriculture or automobiles; and</p><p>6 you know, more than twice as big as the oil industry, and </p><p>7 it got the worst rap and the less least pool of all the --</p><p>8 of all the industry out there. And it probably made a lot</p><p>9 more people happy than going to the pump.</p><p>10 Anyway -- go ahead. So here we look at </p><p>11 also the impact on jobs and the U.S. economy. So direct </p><p>12 employment is -- is a bit over half a million -- million </p><p>13 people. Then we have about another one and a half million</p><p>14 people in support services. So these are the people that </p><p>15 build the towers, that are servicing the towers, that are </p><p>16 providing content to -- that we watch on the television or</p><p>17 that make the software that makes the things run. </p><p>18 Indirect employment is now the people that feed all the </p><p>19 engineers who are hungry and do wonderful things. And </p><p>20 then the induced employment is what then feeds off of </p><p>21 against it, which winds up into 3.6 million people that </p><p>6 7 8 POST REPORTING SERVICE 9 HAMDEN, CT (800) 262-4102 1 13 2 RE: CTIA REPORT 3 MARCH 2, 2006 4 5 1 are directly and indirectly impacted actually by that. So</p><p>2 it’s -- if you translate it into Connecticut, so basically</p><p>3 every -- every wireless company employee basically </p><p>4 supports, you know, around seven other employees. So you </p><p>5 know, help the wireless companies bring jobs here, you get</p><p>6 seven jobs out of it.</p><p>7 Anyway, go ahead, the next one. Sixty-</p><p>8 three billion dollars in government revenue is generated </p><p>9 every year by the wireless industry -- or at least in </p><p>10 2004. With subscribers going up, this goes up as well. </p><p>11 14.6 billion in federal, state, and local sales tax, </p><p>12 transaction taxes, surcharges, you name it. Wireless in </p><p>13 terms of percentage taxation ran -- runs pretty close to </p><p>14 alcohol, gambling, and other sinful things. (Laughter). </p><p>15 Wireless users -- you know -- and the first wireless users</p><p>16 we had in the U.S. was in 1980, also paying for the 19-- </p><p>17 the 1898 foreign war tax where we’re still paying for the </p><p>18 expenditures for the war against Spain where we liberated </p><p>19 Cuba. So we’re still paying for that war. I don’t want </p><p>20 to know what happens with the Iraq war, that was a little </p><p>21 bit bigger in scope and longer, you know, when they put </p><p>6 7 8 POST REPORTING SERVICE 9 HAMDEN, CT (800) 262-4102 1 14 2 RE: CTIA REPORT 3 MARCH 2, 2006 4 5 1 taxes on it.</p><p>2 So about a billion dollars then in sales </p><p>3 tax is on handset purchases; 9 billion both from employer </p><p>4 and employee paid social security; 26 and a half billion </p><p>5 from workers dependent on the industry; and about 2.6 </p><p>6 billion dollars for USF. The wireless industry is already</p><p>7 paying more than 30 percent of the USF fund. So it’s -- </p><p>8 go ahead, sir.</p><p>9 (QUESTION FROM THE FLOOR)</p><p>10 MR. ENTNER: In 2004 there were no </p><p>11 spectrum auctions, so we didn’t put it in there. You </p><p>12 know, a small auction runs about a billion dollars. A big</p><p>13 auction like -- Auction 35, actually never happened, was </p><p>14 16 billion. There’s another auction coming up in June and</p><p>15 the federal government hopes to get at least two billion </p><p>16 dollars out of it. But you know, two billion -- you know,</p><p>17 a billion, two billion dollars in a -- you get -- the </p><p>18 government gets more in handset sales taxes than on some </p><p>19 auction. So it -- while it’s a really big -- well, you </p><p>20 know, a billion here, a billion there -- you talk about </p><p>21 real money and I would take it in a heartbeat -- but in </p><p>6 7 8 POST REPORTING SERVICE 9 HAMDEN, CT (800) 262-4102 1 15 2 RE: CTIA REPORT 3 MARCH 2, 2006 4 5 1 the big scope of things, it’s not that much actually.</p><p>2 Go ahead. Okay, and that concludes my </p><p>3 comments. So if you have any questions, I’m very happy to</p><p>4 answer you.</p><p>5 (Applause)</p><p>6 MR. ENTNER: Yes, ma’am?</p><p>7 (QUESTION FROM THE COUNCIL)</p><p>8 MR. ENTNER: Yes.</p><p>9 MR. PHELPS: Restate it please.</p><p>10 MR. ENTNER: If the numbers included also </p><p>11 real estate taxes on the sites. Yes, it does. Yes, sir?</p><p>12 (QUESTION FROM THE FLOOR)</p><p>13 MR. ENTNER: Okay, go ahead, go back.</p><p>14 (QUESTION FROM THE FLOOR)</p><p>15 MR. ENTNER: Yes, because it’s 22 and a </p><p>16 half billion dollars in value added, which the industry </p><p>17 used to pay the debts it has accumulated over 20 years of </p><p>18 loss making.</p><p>19 MR. PHELPS: Alright, one more time </p><p>20 restate the question.</p><p>21 MR. ENTNER: If -- if -- (laughter) -- </p><p>6 7 8 POST REPORTING SERVICE 9 HAMDEN, CT (800) 262-4102 1 16 2 RE: CTIA REPORT 3 MARCH 2, 2006 4 5 1 okay, sorry. If the numbers that are going into the </p><p>2 wireless carriers are bigger than the numbers that are </p><p>3 flowing out? And yes. And it’s exactly by the 22 and a </p><p>4 half billion that’s in the middle of it. And that’s used </p><p>5 to pay all the kind people that borrow -- or that lend </p><p>6 money to the wireless industry over the last 20 years. </p><p>7 Yes sir?</p><p>8 (QUESTION FROM THE FLOOR)</p><p>9 MR. ENTNER: If you want to have that </p><p>10 study done again, send an e-mail to Steve Lodgent </p><p>11 (phonetic) at CTIA -- (laughter) -- and I’m happy to </p><p>12 oblige. So we’re currently talking --</p><p>13 MR. PHELPS: I’m going to ask you --</p><p>14 MR. ENTNER: So the question was if we’re </p><p>15 doing this again? And -- and how it looks like when </p><p>16 things are changing? And I said -- this was a 2004 </p><p>17 snapshot and please e-mail Steve Lodgent, who is the CEO </p><p>18 of CTIA, if you want to have this done for 2005.</p><p>19 So -- if -- if we look at carrier -- or </p><p>20 going through significant changes, Cingular, for example, </p><p>21 built a completely new UMTS network, and from a </p><p>6 7 8 POST REPORTING SERVICE 9 HAMDEN, CT (800) 262-4102 1 17 2 RE: CTIA REPORT 3 MARCH 2, 2006 4 5 1 traditional three, four-billion dollar, actually spent </p><p>2 seven billion dollars. A boat load of money, no doubt </p><p>3 about it. It drowns a little bit in the massiveness of </p><p>4 everything else. So the -- you know, we have to remember </p><p>5 that the industry collectively spends 25 billion dollars. </p><p>6 So a quarter of their revenue every year they build -- </p><p>7 they spend on building and expanding their network either </p><p>8 by expanding coverage, improving -- improving capacity, or</p><p>9 providing new services on it; now if you not only want to </p><p>10 talk but you want to watch a movie or a clip on your </p><p>11 handset, you can do that to. Yes, sir?</p><p>12 (QUESTION FROM THE COUNCIL)</p><p>13 MR. ENTNER: Yes. If broadband wireless </p><p>14 was included in this -- in this study? What we’ve done </p><p>15 here is we really tried to be as conservative as humanly </p><p>16 possible. So what we did is we -- with our projections is</p><p>17 we said okay we’ll freeze the productivity gains that </p><p>18 people saw in 2004 and do not assume that they got smarter</p><p>19 and figured out better ways how to do it, but simply that </p><p>20 -- and simply go from, you know, five to ten million </p><p>21 people that are using it to about 50 million people. So </p><p>6 7 8 POST REPORTING SERVICE 9 HAMDEN, CT (800) 262-4102 1 18 2 RE: CTIA REPORT 3 MARCH 2, 2006 4 5 1 we -- we incorporated more people doing the same thing </p><p>2 they did in 2004 by -- what I didn’t want to do is put a </p><p>3 lot of personal, you know, beliefs and projections in it, </p><p>4 but be as conservative as -- you know, some of the other </p><p>5 studies I saw, you know, put like things -- every e-mail </p><p>6 an average person get is $5.00 and every e-mail a CEO gets</p><p>7 is $50.00. How they came up with that number, I don’t </p><p>8 know. If I get another ad for Viagra, sorry, it’s not </p><p>9 worth $5.00 to me -- (laughter) -- and it doesn’t enhance </p><p>10 my productivity either. (Laughter). So -- (laughter) -- </p><p>11 maybe -- maybe Mr. Doles, but that’s another topic.</p><p>12 Anyway, so we really tried to be really </p><p>13 very conservative here, so that’s why we didn’t include </p><p>14 that.</p><p>15 MR. PHELPS: One more question please.</p><p>16 MR. ENTNER: One more question -- or if </p><p>17 you’re hungry, I’ll let you go. Thank you.</p><p>18 (Applause)</p><p>19 MR. PHELPS: Ladies and gentlemen, that </p><p>20 concludes our morning sessions. For those of you who </p><p>21 registered, which I think includes most of you, we have a </p><p>6 7 8 POST REPORTING SERVICE 9 HAMDEN, CT (800) 262-4102 1 19 2 RE: CTIA REPORT 3 MARCH 2, 2006 4 5 1 luncheon that will be served featuring our keynote speaker</p><p>2 Leslie Cauley. That’s in the great room that’s just about</p><p>3 a hundred steps to the east of this building. I look </p><p>4 forward to seeing you over there and thank you for being </p><p>5 such a good audience this morning.</p><p>6</p><p>7 (Presentation concluded)</p><p>6 7 8 POST REPORTING SERVICE 9 HAMDEN, CT (800) 262-4102</p>
Details
-
File Typepdf
-
Upload Time-
-
Content LanguagesEnglish
-
Upload UserAnonymous/Not logged-in
-
File Pages19 Page
-
File Size-