Electronic Suplementary Material

-SUPPLEMENTAL DATA FILE-A quantile analysis of plateau and driving pressures: Effects on mortality in patients with the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome receiving lung protective ventilation Running title: Plateau & driving pressures in ARDS outcomeJesús Villar, MD, PhD, FCCM1,2; Carmen Martín-Rodríguez, MD3; Ana M. Domínguez- Berrot, MD4; Lorena Fernández, MD5; Carlos Ferrando, MD, PhD6; Juan A. Soler, MD, PhD7; Ana M. Díaz-Lamas, MD8; Elena González-Higueras, MD, PhD9; Leonor Nogales, MD10; Alfonso Ambrós, MD, PhD3; Demetrio Carriedo, MD, PhD4; Mónica Hernández, MD11; Domingo Martínez, MD12; Jesús Blanco, MD, PhD5; Javier Belda, MD, PhD6; Dácil Parrilla, MD13; Fernando Suárez-Sipmann, MD, PhD1,14; Concepción Tarancón, MD15; Juan M. Mora-Ordoñez, MD16; Lluís Blanch, MD, PhD1,17; Lina Pérez-Méndez, MD, PhD1,18; Rosa L. Fernández, MSc1,2; Robert M. Kacmarek, PhD, RTT19,20; for the Spanish Initiative for Epidemiology, Stratification and Therapies of ARDS (SIESTA) Network*From (1) CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain; (2) Research Unit, Hospital Universitario Dr. Negrin, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain; (3) Intensive Care Unit, Hospital General de Ciudad Real, Ciudad Real, Spain; (4) Intensive Care Unit, Complejo Asistencial Universitario de León, León, Spain; (5) Intensive Care Unit, Hospital Universitario Río Hortega, Valladolid, Spain; (6) Department of Anesthesiology, Hospital Clínico Universitario, Valencia, Spain; (7) Intensive Care Unit, Hospital Universitario Morales Meseguer, Murcia, Spain; (8) Intensive Care Unit, Hospital Universitario A Coruña, Coruña, Spain; (9) Intensive Care Unit, Hospital Virgen de La Luz, Cuenca, Spain; (10) Intensive Care Unit, Hospital Clínico Universitario, Valladolid, Spain; (11) Intensive Care Unit, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain; (12) Intensive Care Unit, Hospital Universitario Virgen de Arrixaca, Murcia, Spain; (13) Intensive Care Unit, Hospital Universitario N.S. de Candelaria, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain; (14) Department of Surgical Sciences, Anesthesiology & Critical Care, Hedenstierna Laboratory, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden; (15) Intensive Care Unit, Hospital Virgen de la Concha, Zamora, Spain; (16) Intensive Care Unit, Hospital Universitario Carlos Haya, Málaga, Spain; (17) Critical Care Center, Corporació Sanitaria Parc Taulí, Sabadell, Spain; (18) Research Unit, Hospital Universitario NS de Candelaria, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain; (19) Department of Respiratory Care, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA (20) Department of Anesthesia, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. * Additional investigators from the SIESTA Network are listed in the Appendix.1 Corresponding author: Dr. Jesús Villar, Multidisciplinary Organ Disfunction Evaluation Research Network, Hospital Universitario Dr. Negrin, Barranco de la Ballena s/n, 4th floor, South wing. 35019 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. SPAIN. Phone: (+34) 928449413; e-mail: [email protected]2 SUPPLEMENTARY RESULTSTABLE S1. Distribution of 478 ARDS patients by tertiles of tidal volume (VT) at 24 h after ARDS onset and the associated hospital mortality. VT is expressed in ml/kg predicted body weight. ≤6.5 ml/kg >6.5 – <7.5 ml/kg ≥7.5 ml/kg P No. of patients 123 178 177 Deaths, n (%) 60 (48.7%) 68 (38.2%) 74 (41.8%) 0.186PEEP, cmH2O 11 ± 3 11 ± 2 11 ± 2 1 Plateau pressure, 28 ± 5 27 ± 5 27 ± 5 0.162 cmH2O Driving Pressure, 16 ± 5 16 ± 5 16 ± 5 1 cmH2OTABLE S2. Distribution of 478 patients by tertiles of applied positive end-expiratory pressure(PEEP) at 24 h after ARDS onset and their associated hospital mortality. PEEP levels are expressed in cmH2O. PBW: predicted body weight; VT: tidal volume.PEEP<10 PEEP=10 PEEP 11-15 PEEP>15 p-value No. patients 27 285 142 24 Deaths, n (%) 11 (40.7) 104 (36.5) 75 (52.8) 12 (50) 0.012PaO2/FiO2, mmHg 170±68 181±80 132±59 133±59 <0.0001 VT, ml/kg PBW 7.1±1.0 7.1±1.0 6.9±1.0 6.8±1.0 0.1603 TABLE S3. Quantiles of plateau and driving pressures in 478 patients with ARDS of the derivation cohort and their associated hospital mortality*. Relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of each quantile is calculated in relation to the overall 42.2% hospital mortality as the reference (assumed to be 1). CI: confidence interval; DP: driving pressure; N: number of cases; Pplat: plateau pressure; RR: relative risk.Pplat N Mortality RR (95% CI) DP N Mortality RR (95% CI) cmH2O % cmH2O % 16 13 23.1 0.55 (0.21-1.48) 6 15 26.7 0.63 (0.27-1.47) 18 14 28.6 0.68 (0.30-1.55) 8 19 26.3 0.62 (0.29-1.33) 20 22 22.7 0.54 (0.25-1.17) 9 12 25.0 0.59 (0.22-1.58) 21 13 23.1 0.55 (0.21-1.48) 10 19 21.1 0.50 (0.21-1.20) 22 13 23.1 0.55 (0.21-1.48) 11 18 16.7 0.40 (0.14-1.11) 23 21 23.8 0.56 (0.26-1.21) 12 14 28.6 0.68 (0.29-1.55) 24 25 28.0 0.66 (0.35-1.25) 13 13 30.8 0.73 (0.32-1.65) 25 34 29.4 0.70 (0.41-1.18) 14 46 32.6 0.77 (0.50-1.18) 26 29 27.6 0.65 (0.36-1.18) 15 47 34.0 0.81 (0.53-1.21) 27 22 18.2 0.43 (0.18-1.05) 16 39 35.9 0.85 (0.55-1.30) 28 50 24.0 0.57 (0.34-0.94) 17 25 36-0 0.85 (0.50-1.45) 29 28 42.8 1.01 (0.65-1.57) 18 48 37.5 0.88 (0.61-1.29) 30 66 60.6 1.44 (1-15-1.79) 19 28 53.6 1.27 (0.88-1.82) 31 18 66.7 1.58 (1.12-2.22) 20 53 62.3 1.47 (1.17-1-89) 32 34 70.6 1.67 (1.31-2.13) 21 17 70.6 1.67 (1.21-2.31) 33 14 71.4 1.69 (1.19-2.39) 22 17 64.7 1.53 (1.06-2.21) 34 11 72.7 1.72 (1.18-2.51) 23 10 70.0 1.66 (1.09-2.51) 36 23 91.3 2.16 (1.83-2.55) 26 19 89.5 2.12 (1.76-2.55)(*) For the purpose of reporting mortality associated with each quantile of plateau and driving pressure, only those quantiles with ≥10 patients were considered. 4 TABLE S4. Cross-tabulated interaction between the values of plateau pressure and driving pressure in the derivation cohort of 478 patients with ARDS. CI: confidence of intervals, DP: driving pressure, N: number of cases, Pplat: plateau pressure, RR: relative risk.Combination of N Hospit Mortality RR (CI 95%) p-value parameters al (%)Deaths Pplat <30 and DP <19 284 72 25.3 1 Pplat <30 and DP ≥19 20 10 50.0 1.97 (1.22- P for trend 3.19) Pplat ≥30 and DP <19 46 32 69.5 2.74 (2.08- <0.0000003.62) 1 Pplat ≥30 and DP ≥19 128 88 68.8 2.71 (2.15-3.42) 478 202 42.2DP <19 and Pplat <30 284 72 25.3 1 DP <19 and Pplat ≥30 46 32 69.5 2.74 (2.08- <0.0001 3.62) DP ≥19 and Pplat <30 20 10 50.0 1.97 (1.22-3.19) 0.127 DP ≥19 and Pplat ≥30 128 88 68.8 2.71 (2.15-3.42)5 TABLE S5. Quantiles of plateau and driving pressures in 300 patients with ARDS of the validation cohort and their associated hospital mortality*. Relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of each quantile is calculated in relation to the overall 42.3% hospital mortality as the reference (assumed to be 1). CI: confidence interval; DP: driving pressure; N: number of cases; Pplat: plateau pressure; RR: relative risk.Pplat N Mortality RR (95% CI) DP N Mortality RR (95% CI) cmH2O % cmH2O % 18 10 30.0 0.71 (0.27-1.84) 8 11 27.2 0.64 (0.24-1.71) 20 12 33.3 0.79 (0.35-1.77) 9 13 30.7 0.73 (0.32-1.66) 22 16 25.0 0.59 (0.25-1.39) 10 23 17.4 0.41 (0.17-1.01) 23 16 31.2 0.74 (0.35-1.54) 11 12 33.3 0.79 (0.35-1.77) 24 24 33.3 0.79 (0.35-1.77) 12 19 31.5 0.74 (0.38-1.46) 25 26 23.0 0.54 (0.27-1.11) 13 33 30.3 0.72 (0.42-1.22) 26 17 11.7 0.28 (0.08-1.03) 14 31 35.5 0.84 (0.51-1.37) 27 20 35.0 0.83 (0.45-1.52) 15 27 37.0 0.87 (0.53-1.46) 28 33 33.3 0.79 (0.48-1.30) 16 15 40.0 0.94 (0.50-1.78) 29 17 41.1 0.97 (0.54-1.74) 17 15 40.0 0.94 (0.50-1.78) 30 24 54.2 1.28 (0.87-1.89) 18 26 42.3 1.0 (0.63-1.59) 31 15 66.7 1.58 (1.08-2.31) 19 14 64.3 1.52 (1.01-2.29) 32 18 83.3 1.97 (1.54-2.52) 20 15 66.7 1.58 (1.08-2.31) 33 12 91.6 2.16 (1.74-2.69) 21 11 81.8 1.93 (1.42-2.63) 34 11 100 2.36 (2.07-2.70) 22 10 70.0 1.65 (1.08-2.53) 23 11 100 2.36 (2.07-2.70)(*) For the purpose of reporting mortality associated with each quantile of plateau (Pplat) and driving (DP) pressure, only those quantiles with ≥10 patients were considered. 6 TABLE S6. Cross-tabulated interaction between the values of plateau pressure and driving pressure in the validation cohort of 300 patients with ARDS. CI: confidence of intervals, DP: driving pressure, N: number of cases, Pplat: plateu pressure, RR: relative risk.Combination of N Hospit Mortality RR (CI 95%) p-value parameters al (%)Deaths Pplat <30 and DP <19 199 56 28.1 1 Pplat <30 and DP ≥19 11 5 45.4 1.61 (0.81- P for trend 3.20) Pplat ≥30 and DP <19 33 20 60.6 2.15 (1.51- <0.0000003.07) 1 Pplat ≥30 and DP ≥19 57 46 80.7 2.87 (2.22-3.70) 300 127 42.3DP <19 and Pplat <30 199 56 28.1 1 DP <19 and Pplat ≥30 33 20 60.6 2.15 (1.51- <0.001 3.07) DP ≥19 and Pplat <30 11 5 45.4 1.61 (0.81-3.20) 0.022 DP ≥19 and Pplat ≥30 57 46 80.7 2.87 (2.22-3.70)7 FIGURE S1. Receiving operating curves for plateau pressure (Pplat) and driving pressure (DP) in 778 patients with moderate/severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. Area under the curve was 0.724 (95%CI: 0.686-0.761) for plateau pressure, and 0.704 (95%CI: 0.667-0.741) for driving pressure (p<0.000001).) on cti fra ve ve siti po ue ue(trTY TYVI ITI PplatNS DPSE Reference line1-SPECIFICITY (true negative fraction)8

Electronic Suplementary Material

Details

Download

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

Support