Title III Directors Meeting - July 2007 (MS Word)

Title III Directors Meeting - July 2007 (MS Word)

<p>Slide 1 Title III Directors' Meeting</p><p>"Attachment Ts"</p><p>Findings, Conditions, and Corrective Actions on 2007 Title III Grant Awards</p><p>Slide 2 Title III Directors’ Meeting</p><p>Overview of Conditions Placed on FY 2007 Title III Formula Grant Awards </p><p>On July 1, 2007</p><p>28 States received Attachment Ts 8 States with conditions 19 States with special conditions 1 State/entity with a compliance agreement 0 States identified as high risk</p><p>Slide 3 Title III Directors’ Meeting</p><p>What do the categories mean and how did the Department decide which States received which conditions? </p><p>Slide 4 Title III Directors’ Meeting</p><p>What are the major findings?</p><p>Slide 5 Title III Directors’ Meeting</p><p>Overview of Key Compliance Issues</p><p>No AMAO determinations made by State AMAO determinations made incorrectly by State Failure to administer required assessments Lack of evidence of a process for aligning English language proficiency (ELP) standards and ELP assessments Lack of evidence of a process for aligning ELP standards to the achievement of content standards Failure to reserve funds for subgrants to LEAs with significant increases in immigrant students Failure to submit data on CSPR Slide 6 Title III Directors’ Meeting</p><p>Discussion</p><p>What are the barriers to compliance with these Title III requirements?</p><p>What are workable solutions for bringing States into compliance with Title III?</p><p>How can the Department work with States to correct areas of non-compliance? </p><p>Slide 7 Title III Directors’ Meeting</p><p>Finding</p><p>State did not make Title III annual measurable achievement objectives (AMAOs) or did not make accurate AMAOs--and therefore also did not make, or did not make accurate, notifications to LEAs and parents.</p><p>Sections 3122(a) and (b)</p><p>Slide 8 Title III Directors’ Meeting</p><p>Finding</p><p>State did not submit evidence on its process for aligning the State's English language proficiency (ELP) assessment to the State's ELP standards </p><p>AND/OR</p><p>State did not submit evidence on its process for aligning the State's English language proficiency (ELP) standards to the achievement of State academic content and student academic achievement standards.</p><p>Section 3113(b)(2) Slide 9 Title III Directors’ Meeting</p><p>Finding</p><p>State did not submit data to the Department on:</p><p>Achievement results for Title III served LEP students on ELP assessments Number, percent and achievement results for former LEP students Subgrantees not meeting AMAOs AMAO targets</p><p>Slide 10 Title III Directors’ Meeting</p><p>Corrective Action Plans </p><p>September 30 deadline Written submissions only Point of contact identified If State disputes finding, please submit as part of plan State describes planned corrective actions for Department review Department expects specific timelines and States should expect close monitoring of plans by Department </p>

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    3 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us