Idealism, Materialism, and Biology in the Analysis of Cultural Evolution s4

Idealism, Materialism, and Biology in the Analysis of Cultural Evolution s4

<p> GUEST EDITOR'S PREFACE The title of this journal expresses its purpose to serve authors and readers who are interested in evolutionary changes and in his- torical analyses that are applied to social behavior. The seven artic- les in this special issue encompass an unusually broad scope of these topics. Most of the articles contain a very large number of cited publications, which are useful resources for readers. (1) Leonid Grinin, Alexander Markov, and Andrey Korotayev compare biological and social macroevolution, their general similarities and differences; they discuss a number of regularities that describe biological and social macroevolution, employing the concepts of social and biological aromorphoses. (2) Donald Kurtz explains how the interface of recently discov- ered genomic processes, the updated fossil record, insights into pri- mate evolution and behavior, and ideas regarding the cultural prac- tices of early hominin females, enabled hominins to evolve into Homo sapiens while the hominids evolved into the great apes. (3) Han Goo Lee discusses the concept of cultural genes that correspond in most respects to biological genes. From a viewpoint of cultural gene, civilization is a system of cultural genes, and the fusion of civilizations is recombination of cultural genes. The re- cent intensified fusion of civilizations leads to more variations of cultural genes, and the artificial variation of cultural genes is cha- racteristic of evolution of civilizations. (4) Akop Nazaretyan surveys the history of technological de- velopments, from the hominid ancestors of our species to contem- porary history. He demonstrates that each increase in destructive power has required improvement of social cooperation. (5) Richard Blanton and Lane Fargher describe how public goods, bureaucratization, and control over ruler had beneficial ef- fects on 30 pre-modern states. (6) Peter Turchin and Sergey Gavrilets examined the transition from small-scale, ‘simple’ societies to large-scale, hierarchically</p><p>Social Evolution & History, Vol. 8 No. 2, September 2009  2009 ‘Uchitel’ Publishing Housе 4 5 Social Evolution & History / March 2008</p><p> complex ones from the perspective of the multilevel selection theory. Hierarchical government is a crucial component of nations and empires. (7) Herbert Barry III focuses on variations in number of government levels above the community in a world sample of 186 diverse societies. Differences between pairs of societies, which are similar in most attributes, allow us to identify variables that are ap- parently functionally linked with more government levels. Preliminary versions of most of the articles were presented at the Fifth International Conference on Hierarchy and Power in the History of Civilizations, in Moscow, 23–26 June 2009. This spe- cial issue appears a short time after that conference because the au- thors cooperated with this journal's co-editor, Leonid Grinin, by rapid preparation of the final versions of the articles. </p><p>Herbert Barry III</p>

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    2 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us