Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris

1 Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris 2 c/o Forwarding Agent at: 3 350 – 30th Street, #444 4 Oakland 94609 5 CALIFORNIA, USA 6 7 All Rights Reserved 8 Without Prejudice 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 17 18 19 George W. Bush, ) Case No. 00-836 20 ) 21 Plaintiff, ) 22 ) 23 v. ) 24 ) 25 Palm Beach Canvassing Board, ) 26 ) 27 Defendant. ) 28 ______) 29 ) 30 People of the United States ) APPLICATION FOR LEAVE 31 of America ex relatione ) TO INTERVENE BY RIGHT: 32 Paul Andrew Mitchell, ) 33 ) Supremacy Clause; 34 Petitioners. ) 28 U.S.C. 2403. 35 ______) 3637 COME NOW the People of the United States of America (“Petitioners”),38 ex relatione Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S., Sui Juris, a Citizen of39 California State, expressly not a citizen of the United States40 (hereinafter “federal citizen” [sic]), Federal Witness and Victim (see41 18 U.S.C. 1512, 1513), Private Attorney General, and Damaged Party42 (hereinafter “Relator”), formally to apply to this honorable Court43 for: (1) leave to intervene by Right in the instant case, and (2) all44 other relief which this Court deems just and proper, under the45 circumstances.1 Application for Leave to Intervene by Right: Page 1 of 8 1 OFFER OF PROOF2 Petitioners hereby make Their formal offer to prove that:3 (1) the voter registration practices in many, if not all,4 of the 50 States united, exhibit prohibited discrimination against the5 unique class of American People known as Citizens of ONE OF the United6 States of America (aka State Citizens) who are not also federal7 citizens, by “Right of Election”; see Internet URL:8 http://www.supremelaw.com/cc/sanmarco/complain.htm#one-of9 (2) those Americans who are qualified to make federal10 Laws, are not now eligible to vote or to serve on11 juries, State or federal; and,12 (3) those Americans who are eligible to vote and serve on13 State or federal juries, are not now qualified to make federal Laws.14 This twisted situation violates the fundamental Principle of15 Equal Protection of the Law.16 See Qualifications Clauses, in chief, at Article I, Section 2,17 Clause 2 (“1:2:2”), and Article I, Section 3, Clause 3 (“1:3:3”) in18 the Constitution for the United States of America, as lawfully amended19 (hereinafter “U.S. Constitution”). These Clauses have never been20 amended. See also Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 (“2:1:5”) as21 applied to Plaintiff in the instant case.22 23 INCORPORATION OF EXHIBITS24 In the interests of economy and convenience to all, Petitioners25 hereby formally incorporate the following Internet documents by26 reference, as if set forth fully herein:27 Gilbertson’s OPENING BRIEF and related supplements, to wit:28 [Please continue next page.]1 Application for Leave to Intervene by Right: Page 2 of 8 1 http://www.supremelaw.com/cc/gilberts/opening.htm 2 http://www.supremelaw.com/cc/gilberts/replysup.htm 3 http://www.supremelaw.com/cc/gilberts/supple1.htm 4 http://www.supremelaw.com/cc/gilberts/intentm3.filed.htm 5 http://www.supremelaw.com/fedzone10/docs/index.htm6 Petitioners respectfully direct the undivided attention of this7 honorable Court to the pertinent discussion of the Guarantee Clause in8 Gilbertson’s OPENING BRIEF supra.9 10 PRIMARY CAUSE OF ACTION11 Petitioners argue that the Guarantee Clause, and the fundamental12 Principle of Equal Protection, are both systematically violated when13 State Citizens (like Relator) are prevented from electing Their14 Representatives in Congress solely because those Citizens lawfully15 decline to accept, or to exercise, a foreign municipal franchise16 domiciled in the District of Columbia. See Murphy v. Ramsey, 114 U.S.17 15 (1885).18 Strictly speaking, citizenship is a term of municipal law. See19 Roa v. Collector [cite omitted], among others.20 21 NOTICE OF INTENT22 Assuming that the instant APPLICATION is granted timely,23 Petitioners provide formal NOTICE to all interested Parties of Their24 specific intent to apply also for leave to institute Quo Warranto25 proceedings against the voter registration practices in all Union26 States which continue to discriminate against those State Citizens27 (like Relator) who are not also federal citizens, by “Right of28 Election” [sic]. See Maine Supreme Court [cite omitted].29 Relator is a notorious victim of such demonstrably unlawful30 discrimination. See Equal Protection provisions in the Universal1 Application for Leave to Intervene by Right: Page 3 of 8 1 Declaration of Human Rights, and in the International Covenant on2 Civil and Political Rights, both rendered supreme Law by the Supremacy3 Clause in the U.S. Constitution.4 5 NOTICE OF FRAUD6 There are two (2) classes of citizenship under American Laws7 never repealed:8 (1) Citizen of the United States (aka State Citizen)9 (2) citizen of the United States (aka federal citizen)10 Confer at “Federal citizenship” in Black’s Law Dictionary, Sixth11 Edition. See also Pannill v. Roanoke [cite omitted], a case which is12 both definitive and dispositive: federal citizens were not even13 contemplated when the U.S. Constitution was first adopted.14 Prior to 1866, there was only one class of State Citizens.15 After 1866, there were two classes of citizens -– State and16 federal.17 The customary legal nomenclature for both classes produces a18 homonym, i.e. both terms sound exactly the same when uttered verbally,19 causing ambiguity.20 Webster’s New Collegiate Dictionary defines “ambiguous” to mean21 “capable of being understood in two or more possible senses.”22 Congress could, and should, have utilized the unique term23 “federal citizen” instead of the term “citizen of the United States”24 in order to avoid the obvious (and deliberate) ambiguity.25 That ambiguity resulted from changing the UPPER-CASE “C” in26 “Citizen” as found in the Qualifications Clauses, to the lower-case27 “c” in “citizen” as found in the 1866 Civil Rights Act -– a municipal28 statute. See Roa v. Collector supra.1 Application for Leave to Intervene by Right: Page 4 of 8 1 Adding to the ambiguity, the term “United States” has three (3)2 separate legal meanings, all different from each other. Confer at3 “United States” in Black’s supra.4 The term “United States” in the Qualifications Clauses means5 “States united”. See People v. De La Guerra [cite omitted], as cited6 in Gilbertson’s OPENING BRIEF supra.7 The term “United States” as found in the term “citizen of the8 United States” means the federal zone in the 1866 Civil Rights Act and9 in all subsequent legislation declaratory of that pre-existing Law.10 “Congress … cannot by legislation alter the [U.S.] Constitution,11 from which alone it derives its power to legislate, and within whose12 limitations alone that power can be lawfully exercised.” Eisner v.13 Macomber, 252 U.S. 189.14 Therefore, the proper construction and common understanding of15 the Qualifications Clauses have never, ever been altered by any16 federal statutes. See Ex parte Knowles [cite omitted].17 Did Plaintiff lawfully register to vote, if He is qualified by18 Law to serve in the office of President?19 20 REMEDY REQUESTED21 All premises having been duly considered, Petitioners22 respectfully request: (1) leave of this honorable Supreme Court to23 intervene by Right in the instant case; and, (2) all other relief24 which this Court deems just and proper, under the circumstances.252627281 Application for Leave to Intervene by Right: Page 5 of 8 1 VERIFICATION2 Relator hereby verifies, under penalty of perjury, under the laws of3 the United States of America, without the “United States” (federal4 government), that the above statement of facts and laws is true and5 correct, according to the best of My current information, knowledge,6 and belief, so help me God, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1746(1) (the7 “outside” option).89 Dated: November 28, 2000 A.D.1011 Signed: /s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell 12 ______13 Printed: Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S., Sui Juris14151617181920212223242526271 Application for Leave to Intervene by Right: Page 6 of 8 1 PROOF OF SERVICE2 I, Paul Andrew Mitchell, Relator, do declare that on this date,3 November 28, 2000 A.D., I served the attached APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO4 INTERVENE BY RIGHT on each Party to the above proceeding, and on every5 other person required to be served, by depositing an envelope6 containing said APPLICATION in the United States mail properly7 addressed to each of them, and with first-class postage prepaid, and8 also by facsimile transmission to those Party(s) whose fax number(s)9 are shown below:10 11 George W. Bush, Plaintiff 12 c/o Office of the Governor 13 State Capitol 14 Austin, Texas 15 16 Fax: (512) 463-1849 17 Tel: (512) 463-2000 18 19 20 Palm Beach Canvassing Board 21 Attention: County Attorney 22 301 N. Olive Avenue 23 West Palm Beach 33401 24 FLORIDA, USA 25 26 Tel: (561) 355-2225 27 28 29 Office of the Vice President 30 c/o The White House 31 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue 32 Washington, D.C. 33 34 35 Courtesy Copies: 36 37 Judge Alex Kozinski (supervising) 38 Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals 39 125 S. Grand Avenue, Suite 200 40 Pasadena, California 41 42 Solicitor General 43 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Room 5614 44 Washington 20530-0001 45 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, USA1 Application for Leave to Intervene by Right: Page 7 of 8 1 Katherine Harris 2 Secretary of State 3 Florida Department of State 4 PL-02, State Capitol 5 Tallahassee 32399-0250 6 FLORIDA, USA 7 8 Tel: (850) 414-5500 9 10 11 Speaker 12 House of Representatives 13 State Capitol 14 Tallahassee, Florida 15 1617 Dated: November 28, 2000 A.D.1819 Signed: /s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell 20 ______21 Printed: Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S., Sui Juris22232425262728293031323334351 Application for Leave to Intervene by Right: Page 8 of 8

Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris

Details

Download

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

Support