Literature Review Rubric (From Boote & Beile, and RER)

Literature Review Rubric (From Boote & Beile, and RER)

<p> Literature Review Rubric (from Boote & Beile, and RER) 1. 2. Quality of the Literature and Methods (12 points)</p><p> Is the review sufficiently inclusive in its coverage? (containing a strong, representative sample of all relevant literature?) (3)  Are the methods for searching and selecting articles to be reviewed explained and sufficiently justified? (3)  Does the review consider the quality of the evidence and the bias of the researchers (and the author himself/herself)? (3)  Does the review represent the best scholarship available on the topic? (3)</p><p>3. Quality of Analysis & Synthesis (17 points)</p><p> Does the review distinguish what has been done from what needs to be done? (3)  Does the review situate the problem or topic in the literature (either broadly, or deeply?) (3)  Does the review go beyond description to include analysis and critiques of theories, methods, and conclusions represented in the literature? (3)  Does the review provide enough information from the articles cited to judge the quality of the conclusions? (3)  Does the review provide a roadmap to the key issues, vocabulary, studies, people, and phenomena being researched? (2)  Does the review represent positions and work of previous authors fairly and respectfully? (3)</p><p>4. Significance & Impact (9 points) 5.  Does the review sufficiently rationalize the scholarly, practical, political, and/or social significance of the topic? (2)  Does the review synthesize and provide a new perspective or understanding? (3)  Does the review describe future research directions in sufficient detail to promote better scholarship? (2)  Does the review describe potential research-based solutions to educational problems or issues? (2)</p><p>6. Writing Quality (12 points)</p><p> Is the writing in the review concise? (3)  Does the writing follow APA guidelines, or the guidelines of another publication outlet (explain which style guide)? (3)  Does the argument of the review follow a logical sequence, building support for its conclusion? (3)  Is the writing grammatically correct? (3) </p>

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    2 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us