Supplemental Charge to Offenses Set Forth

Supplemental Charge to Offenses Set Forth

<p> Approved 2/13/17</p><p>SUPPLEMENTAL CHARGE TO OFFENSES SET FORTH IN N.J.S.A. 2C:35-5.3b and N.J.S.A. 2C:35-5.3c (SYNTHETIC CANNABINOID) (To be utilized in cases in which the quantity of the Synthetic Cannabinoid is an element of the offense)1 </p><p>If you have found the defendant guilty of [possession] [distribution] [dispensing] [manufacturing] [possession with intent to distribute, or dispense, or manufacture] of [choose appropriate CDS (synthetic cannabinoid)], you then must determine the quantity of [choose appropriate CDS (synthetic cannabinoid)] involved. It is the State’s burden to prove beyond a reasonable doubt the quantity of [choose appropriate CDS (synthetic cannabinoid)] that is involved. The State need not prove defendant’s knowledge of the quantity of the drugs, so long as it proves beyond a reasonable doubt that defendant knowingly possessed the controlled dangerous substance.2 Specifically, you must determine which one of the following quantities have been proven: 1. One (1) ounce or more of [choose appropriate CDS (synthetic cannabinoid)]; or 2. Less than one (1) ounce of [choose appropriate CDS (synthetic cannabinoid)]. </p><p>After determining which one of these quantities the State has proven beyond a reasonable doubt, you should mark the appropriate section of the verdict sheet which will be supplied to you.</p><p>1 This supplemental charge should only be given when the quantity makes the offense a second or third degree crime under N.J.S.A. 2C:35-5.3c.a. for offenses involving distribution, manufacturing, or possession with intent to distribute, of Synthetic Cannabinoid. The same applies when the charge is unlawful possession of Synthetic Cannabinoid (N.J.S.A. 2C:35-5.3c). If the quantity possessed is one ounce or more, it is a third degree offense (N.J.S.A. 2C:35-5.3c.) and both choices should be provided to the jury. In cases where only a fourth degree offense is charged (N.J.S.A. 2C:35-5.3c), the supplemental charge should not be used. 2 State v. Torres, 236 N.J. Super. 6 (App. Div. 1989).</p><p>Page 1 of 1</p>

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    1 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us