Volume 11, Number 1 TWinterHE M 2005AYBURY FAMILY 321 THE MAYBURY FAMILY MAYBERRY ۰MABERRY ۰MAYBERY ۰MABRY ۰MABREY ۰MABERY 2. Francis Maybury who went to Virginia about New discoveries about our 1679 Maybury ancestors in England 3. Thomas Maybury who went to Pennsylvania about 1716 4. John Maybery who went to Australia in 1853 Editor’s note: Our newsletter began ten years ago as The Mabry Family and had the descendants of Francis Thus we have not just one but four lines to help us Maybury of Virginia as its major focus. One of our in- look for our common ancestor in England. We believe terests has always been to find the birthplace of Francis that we have already established the line of John May- Maybury in England. But we have not been able to find bery back to a specific Maybury family in Shropshire that information using conventional research methods. in the early 1600s. We may also be very close to estab- Thus we expanded the scope of our work to include the lishing the line of Thomas Maybury who emigrated to lines of other early Maybury emigrants from England. Pennsylvania about 1716. At the same time we began the Maybury DNA Project to add scientific evidence to our research. In the past We are currently trying to find descendants of three few months this new approach has begun to yield re- additional emigrants from England in order to sample sults and we are pleased to present below a summary the DNA of those lines: of what we have found so far. 1. William Mayberry who left County Antrim, Ire- To recognize the wider scope of our research we have land for Massachusetts about 1730 decided to change the name of our newsletter. Begin- 2. William and George Mayberry who went from ning with this issue, The Maybury Family will honor Ireland to America about 1760-70 our family name as it was most often spelled in the time 3. James Washington Mayberry who left England of Francis Maybury and by several other early emi- for the United States about 1805 grants from England. It is also the most common spell- These lines will be helpful as we continue to look for ing still in use in England today. our common ancestor. One of our most significant - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - discoveries is the fact that six of the above seven Maybury emigrants shared a common occupation! DNA EVIDENCE POINTS TO A COMMON ANCESTOR That will be discussed below. We have now tested the DNA of twenty-five Maybury SIGNIFICANT HELP FROM OUR ENGLISH COUSINS descendants. The tests prove that twenty-three of them have a common ancestor in England. The other two In recent months our search for the origins of the descend from an unrelated line which originated in Maybury family in England has made important pro- Germany. The twenty-three who share a common an- gress with the help of several cousins who live in Eng- cestor represent the lines of four different Maybury land and Australia. We are especially grateful to the emigrants who left England between 1670 and 1853: following who are making significant contributions to our expanding knowledge of the family: 1. William Maybury who went to County Kerry, Ireland about 1670 (Continued on page 322) THE MAYBURY FAMILY 322 (Continued from page 321) In the period from 1650-1700 there was a continuing strong presence of the Mayburys in Shropshire and a Bill and Doris Maybury of Herefordshire have movement of a few families into nearby Monmouth- done extensive work on the Mayburys who left shire, Herefordshire, Worcestershire and Lancashire. England about 1670 to settle in County Kerry, Ire- Very small family groups continued between 1650-1700 land. Several from this County Kerry family later in Staffordshire, emigrated to Australia and to the United States. Warwickshire and John and Joyce Maybery have researched one Dorset. Only about a Maybury line that went to Wales about 1715, trac- dozen records are ing it back to Shropshire. found in other scat- John and Lettice Tanner of Berkshire have fine- tered counties dur- tuned the line of the Mayburys who went to Wales ing this period. The and have also compiled a very impressive collec- map on the right tion of Maybury records from parish registers and shows the four other sources all over England. These records in- counties where most clude: baptisms, marriages, burials, wills, admini- of the Mayburys strations, etc. lived: Shropshire, Worcestershire, FAMILY RECORDS IN ENGLISH PARISH REGISTERS Herefordshire and Monmouthshire. Parish registers were first introduced in England in 1538 to record baptisms, marriages and burials. Unfor- In the fifty years between 1700-1750 it is clear that the tunately, most of the early parish records were written Maybury family remained most numerous in Shrop- on loose sheets of paper and very few have survived. In shire, Monmouthshire, Worcestershire and Hereford- 1597 Queen Elizabeth I reformed the system by requir- shire. It was also growing in Gloucestershire and in ing that: parish records be kept in parchment books; Glamorganshire in Wales. The number of Mayburys in that records going back to the beginning of her reign other English counties was clearly declining. (1558) be transcribed onto parchment; and that copies of parish records be sent to local Bishops. Even so very WERE THE MAYBURYS ALWAYS IN ENGLAND few records prior to 1600 have survived. We have OR DID THEY COME FROM THE CONTINENT? found only about a dozen Maybury records before 1600. At this point we enter into the realm of “informed After 1600, however, the number of records is signifi- speculation” based on the fact that the total number of cant enough to give us a fairly accurate idea of the num- Mayburys in England’s parish registers is very small. ber of Maybury families and where they lived. Over the Indeed, for a period which spans about six generations past several years, John and Lettice Tanner have found (1600-1750), we have found less than 600 Maybury re- Maybury records in 23 different counties in England, cords in all of England. Because this total includes bap- Wales and the City of London. tisms, marriages and burials over a period of 150 years it seems reasonable to conclude that the Mayburys may It may be significant that the few Maybury records be- not have lived in England very long prior to this period. fore 1600 are either in the southeastern counties of Sur- Even allowing for plagues, famine and other factors rey and Sussex, or further north in Derbyshire and which decrease populations, the small number of Shropshire. Then, in the period between 1600-1650 the Mayburys present during the 17th century could be an largest number of Mayburys was in the west midlands indication that the family came to England from else- county of Shropshire, with a handful of scattered re- where during the preceding century. While this is only cords in adjacent Staffordshire and Worcestershire. The a theory, support for it is suggested by something else parish records also indicate what would appear to be a we have found in the parish registers. single family in Dorset on England’s south coast. (Continued on page 323) THE MAYBURY FAMILY 323 (Continued from page 322) Herefordshire, Worcestershire, and to Breconshire and Carmarthenshire in Wales, where they continued to MANY MAYBURYS WERE SKILLED IRONWORKERS follow their trade. The English parish records sometimes identified adults LATER MAYBURY IRONWORKERS AS EMIGRANTS by their occupation or social status such as: yeoman, labourer, victualler, spinster, farmer, servant, maid ser- Not only did these Maybury iron workers carry their vant, widow, pauper, etc. Looking at the Maybury re- trade to other nearby counties in the west midlands of cords, one cannot help but notice the large number of England, and in Wales, but some of them also took their men who were involved in the iron industry. Beginning trade with them when they emigrated to Ireland, Amer- as early as 1603 and continuing for generations, they are ica and Australia: identified in the records as: “hammerman”, “finer”, William Maybury "forgeman" was part of the “forgeman”, “hammerer”, “fineryman” “of the forge”, group of English iron workers transplanted to etc. Some early records, written in Latin, include the County Kerry in Ireland about 1670. Some of his term “fabricatoris”. descendants later emigrated to America, taking their iron trade with them. Thomas Maybury “ironmaster” emigrated to Penn- sylvania by 1716 where he was the first of a four generation dynasty of ironmasters who built fur- naces and forges in Pennsylvania, Virginia, Mary- land and New Jersey. William and George Mayberry emigrated, possibly from Ireland, to Pennsylvania. William, who served as an “artificer” in the American Revolution, later described himself as “a refiner of iron”. His brother, George was later an "ironmaster" in Vir- ginia's Shenandoah Valley. While iron was being produced in England long before James Washington Mayberry emigrated about the 16th century, articles about its development show 1805 from near Birmingham to America where later that the industry began to flourish in the 16th century census records describe him as a "blacksmith" and a when the technology of the blast furnace was imported "manufacturer". from places like Belgium and France. Scholars of the John Maybery, who emigrated from Monmouth- English iron industry make it very clear that forgemen shire in Wales to Australia in 1853, was an iron- and others with experience in the new technology were worker who had worked as an "angle-iron smith" brought to Sussex, Shropshire and other parts of Eng- on the construction of the "Great Britain", which land in the 16th century.