Parent Material and Pedogenic Thresholds: Observations and a Simple Model

Parent Material and Pedogenic Thresholds: Observations and a Simple Model

Biogeochemistry (2016) 130:147–157 DOI 10.1007/s10533-016-0249-x Parent material and pedogenic thresholds: observations and a simple model Peter Vitousek . Jean L. Dixon . Oliver A. Chadwick Received: 24 May 2016 / Accepted: 21 September 2016 / Published online: 8 October 2016 Ó The Author(s) 2016. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com Abstract Pedogenic thresholds, where multiple soil minerals (40–60 %) remained through the highest- properties vary substantially and coherently in a rainfall sites ((Dixon et al. in J Geophys Res, doi: narrow portion of a broad environmental gradient, 10.1002/2016JF003864, 2016). We developed a sim- are well-described on basaltic soils in Hawaii. One ple model to explore potential mechanisms driving such threshold occurs along climate gradients where differences between basalt-derived and non-basalt primary minerals virtually disappear, base saturation soils. Incorporating a broader spectrum of mineral decreases sharply, and aluminum is mobilized within a weathering rates (including some primary minerals narrow range of increasing rainfall. A recent study that that are highly recalcitrant to weathering) into simu- evaluated thresholds along a climate gradient of non- lated non-basalt than simulated basalt-derived soils basalt-derived soils on the South Island of New (and accounting for the lower rates of evapotranspi- Zealand found that while base saturation declined ration in New Zealand) was sufficient to simulate steeply in a narrow range of rainfall on that gradient, observed differences between these substrates. Fur- the change was not coherent across soil properties; a ther, we used the simple model to evaluate the substantial fraction of the Ca present in primary consequences of rainfall variation in the short- (time step to time step) and long-term (a change in rainfall after 50,000 time steps). Results of these analyses Responsible Editor: Marc G. Kramer. demonstrated that year-to-year variation in rainfall could play an important role in controlling changes in Electronic supplementary material The online version of the position of the pedogenic threshold during soil this article (doi:10.1007/s10533-016-0249-x) contains supple- development. mentary material, which is available to authorized users. Keywords Hawaiian Islands Lithology Mineral P. Vitousek (&) Á Á Department of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, weathering New Zealand Pedogenic thresholds CA 94305, USA Á Á e-mail: [email protected] J. L. Dixon Introduction Department of Earth Sciences, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59715, USA Basalt-derived soils in the Hawaiian Islands do not change linearly in response to extrinsic differences in O. A. Chadwick Department of Geography, University of California, Santa environmental forcing such as rainfall; rather their Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA response is characterized by ‘‘pedogenic thresholds’’ 123 148 Biogeochemistry (2016) 130:147–157 that represent abrupt and/or non-linear (but pre- to anticipate that the threshold associated with mineral dictable) changes in soil properties and processes depletion in basalt-derived soils could differ funda- (Chadwick and Chorover 2001). For example; Chad- mentally from thresholds in non-basalt soils. Most wick et al. (2003) demonstrated that base (non- primary minerals present in basalt weather at similar hydrolyzing) cation saturation of soil exchange sites (and relatively rapid) rates, in comparison with the dropped from high values to 5 % or less (to 1 m depth) much wider range of primary minerals present in most across a narrow range of precipitation values (between other lithologies. 1700 and 1900 mm of rainfall on a climate gradient In this paper, we use a simple ‘‘toy’’ model and from 250 to 3000 mm/year, using rainfall from observations from basaltic soils in Hawaii (Chadwick Giambelluca et al. 2012). This change was caused by et al. 2003; Vitousek and Chadwick 2013) and non- depletion of primary minerals in higher rainfall sites, basalt soils in New Zealand (Dixon et al. 2016) to such that mineral weathering could not buffer atmo- evaluate the nature, dynamics, and underlying mech- spheric and biological acidity there. In support of this anisms driving the mineral depletion pedogenic explanation, Sr isotopes (87Sr/86Sr) also changed threshold on basalt-derived and one type of non-basalt abruptly at this threshold, from values characteristic soil. Further, we use the model to explore the of Hawaiian basalt in drier sites to those characteristic importance of rainfall variation in shaping changes of marine aerosol in wetter sites (Stewart et al. 2001; in the position of this pedogenic threshold. Chadwick et al. 2003). A similar pedogenic threshold has been observed along rainfall gradients on both younger (Lincoln et al. Methods 2014) and older (Vitousek and Chadwick 2013) substrates in Hawaii, although this threshold occurs Weathering model at differing average rainfall on the different-aged substrates. Additional thresholds associated with soil We developed a simple ‘‘toy’’ model (defined as a anaerobiosis (Chadwick and Chorover 2001; Miller simplified set of objects and equations that can be used et al. 2001; Thompson et al. 2011) and with biological to understand a mechanism) to explore the influence of uplift of plant macronutrients (Vitousek et al. 2004) parent material and of rainfall variability on weather- have been described as well. ing, leaching, and the dynamics of the mineral Pedogenic thresholds are well documented on depletion pedogenic threshold. The model is written basalt-derived soils, but there is evidence for their in Matlab (Mathworks Inc.), and is available in on-line importance on other substrates as well (Muhs 1984). supplementary material; it simulates the release of a For example, Dahlgren et al. (1997) analyzed soil soluble weathering product from primary minerals, its properties along a climate gradient in the Sierra concentration in soil, and its loss via leaching. Just one Nevada Range and identified a relatively narrow zone soil layer is considered; water enters via precipitation, where primary mineral weathering and clay mineral and is lost via evapotranspiration (considered to have a formation were enhanced greatly by a favorable maximum value per time step, progressively reduced combination of temperature and rainfall. Ewing et al. by water contents below the water holding capacity of (2006) documented a strong shift from accumulation the soil) and via leaching (calculated as all water that of atmospheric salts in the hyperarid core of the remains in the soil after evapotranspiration, in excess Atacama Desert to in situ mineral weathering and of a fixed water holding capacity). The soluble product pedogenic carbonate formation on the wetter, arid (conceptually, a soluble cation like calcium) is fringes of the desert. Additional thresholds have been released from minerals via weathering; it occurs in described along regional scale ecotones such as soluble form in the soil, and is leached from the soil in transitions from tundra to boreal forest (Ugolini and proportion its concentration and to the fraction of total Spaltenstein 1992). At a global scale, a water-balance soil water (after precipitation and evapotranspiration, driven threshold in soil pH has been documented using before leaching) that is leached from the soil. a 60,000 pedon database (Slessarev et al. in press). We assume that simulated parent materials are While climate-driven pedogenic thresholds occur made up of three classes of minerals that contain equal in soils developed in diverse substrates, there is reason amounts of the element of interest and that differ in 123 Biogeochemistry (2016) 130:147–157 149 how rapidly they weather (chemically). There are two mineral form’’ were depleted in simulated high- components to differences in weathering rates of rainfall sites by 100,000 time steps of simulation—a different minerals—solubility (the equilibrium con- pattern consistent with field observations on basalt centration of weathering products in solution) and soils (Chadwick et al. 2003). kinetics (differences in the rate at which minerals We then explored a range of coefficients and break down, at a given disequilibrium solution con- solubilities for the more recalcitrant minerals, and found centration of weathering products). We model both of that at values[*0.1 for the second mineral, simulated these components—and initially we treat them as pools of this mineral largely disappeared by 100,000 correlated, so that a sparingly soluble mineral will also time steps of simulation. For the third (most recalcitrant) have a slow kinetic component to its overall weath- mineral, there was little simulated weathering in ering rate. We calculate weathering of each class of 100,000 time steps at kinetic coefficients/solubilities minerals in each substrate as: \*0.05. Based on these observations, we chose to use kinetic coefficients/solubilities for non-basalt parent WeatherCax weathercoeffx soilwater=WHC ¼ Â ðÞmaterial that vary by 1:0.1:0.01; we describe the MaxCaconcx Caconc ; Â ðÞÀ implications of this choice in ‘‘Discussion’’ Section. where weatherCax is the release of soluble cation from We also use this toy model to evaluate the effects of mineral class x (of the three making up each substrate), rainfall variation on weathering, leaching, and the weathercoeffx is the kinetic coefficient for that class of dynamics of the mineral depletion pedogenic threshold. mineral in that parent material, soilwater/WHC

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    11 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us