
April 2016 Metropolitan Region Scheme Amendment 1210/41 Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation Transcript of Hearings Volume 1 of 2 City of Fremantle, City of Nedlands, Town of Claremont, Town of Cottesloe, Town of Mosman Park and the Shire of Peppermint Grove Metropolitan Region Scheme Amendment 1210/41 Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation Transcript of Hearings Volume 1 of 2 City of Fremantle, City of Nedlands, Town of Claremont, Town of Cottesloe, Town of Mosman Park and the Shire of Peppermint Grove April 2016 Disclaimer This document has been published by the Western Australian Planning Commission. Any representation, statement, opinion or advice expressed or implied in this publication is made in good faith and on the basis that the government, its employees and agents are not liable for any damage or loss whatsoever which may occur as a result of action taken or not taken, as the case may be, in respect of any representation, statement, opinion or advice referred to herein. Professional advice should be obtained before applying the information contained in this document to particular circumstances. © State of Western Australia Internet: www.wa.gov.au Published by the Western Australian Planning Commission, 140 William Street, Perth WA 6000 Locked Bag 2506 Perth WA 6001 MRS Amendment 1210/41 Transcript of Hearings Volume 1 of 2 File 809-2-1-91 Pt 3 Published April 2016 Internet: www.planning.wa.gov.au Email: [email protected] Phone: (08) 655 19000 Fax: (08) 655 19001 National Relay Service: 13 36 77 Infoline: 1800 626 477 This document is available in alternative formats on application to Communications Services. Introduction to Metropolitan Region Scheme major amendments The Western Australian Planning Commission (WAPC) is responsible for keeping the Metropolitan Region Scheme (MRS) under review and initiating changes where they are seen as necessary. The MRS sets out the broad pattern of land use for the whole Perth metropolitan region. The MRS is constantly under review to best reflect regional planning and development needs. A proposal to change land use reservations and zones in the MRS is regulated by the Planning and Development Act 2005. That legislation provides for public submissions to be made on proposed amendments. For a substantial amendment, often referred to as a major amendment (made under section 41 of the Act), the WAPC considers all the submissions lodged, and publishes its recommendations in a report on submissions. This report is presented to the Minister for Planning and to the Governor for approval. Both Houses of Parliament must then scrutinise the amendment before it can take legal effect. In the process of making a substantial amendment to the MRS, information is published as a public record under the following titles: Amendment report This document is available from the start of the public advertising period of the proposed amendment. It sets out the purpose and scope of the proposal, explains why the amendment is considered necessary, and informs people how they can comment through the submission process. Environmental review report The Environmental Protection Authority must consider the environmental impact of an amendment to the MRS before it can be advertised. Should it require formal assessment, an environmental review is undertaken and made available for information and comment at the same time as the amendment report. Report on submissions The planning rationale, determination of submissions and the recommendations of the WAPC for final approval of the amendment, with or without modification, is documented in this report. Submissions This document contains a reproduction of all written submissions received by the WAPC on the proposed amendment. Transcript of hearings A person who has made a written submission may also choose to appear before a hearings committee to express their views. The hearings proceedings are recorded and transcribed, and the transcripts of all hearings are reproduced in this volume. Transcript of hearings Recording and Transcription This transcript is produced from live audio recordings. Whilst every care is taken in its preparation absolute accuracy cannot be guaranteed. No changes are made to grammar and syntax. Site inspection Day One Friday 20th September 2013 Minutes of the Committee hearing suDmissions on Metropolitan Region Scheme Amendment 1210/41 - Rationalisation of Stirling Highway DAY ONE - Friday, 7.0 September 2013 Site Inspection The composition of the hearing^ committee was endorsed by the Chairman of the Western Ausiralian Planning Commission on 13 August 2013, in accordance with the 27 October 2009 resolution of the Commission. Mayor Simon Withers was originally appointed to reoresent the interests of local government but withdrew for personal reasons prior to the commencement of the neanngs. CrCorinne MacRae was appointed to the hearings committee to fill the vacancy left by Mayor Withers on 13 August 2013. Chairperson Ms Megan Barde Member of the Statutory Planning Committee Members Cr Corinne MacRae Local Government Mr Kent McDowall Independent with Transport Expertise in attendance Mr John O'Hurley Department of Planning The members of the Hearings Committee met with Principal Planning Officer, Mr John O'Hurley at the corner of Bruce Street and Stirling Highway Nedlands at 9.30am for insoections of specific sites referred to in submissions requesting a panel hearing. The CommiTtee was briefed on submission themes and inspected properties between Nedlands and Claremont via foot and vehicle. The Committee concluded site inspections back at Bruce Street at 12.30pm. CHAIRPERSON: DATE: ^ Site inspection Day Two Wednesday 25th September 2013 Minutes of the Committee hearing submissions on Metropolitan Region Scheme Amendment 1210/41 - Rationalisation of Stirling Highway DAY fWO - Wednesday, 25 September 2013 Site Inspection The composition of the hearings committee was endorsed oy the Chairman of the Western Australian Planning Commission on 13 August 2013, in accordance with the 27 October 2009 resolution of the Commission. Chairperson Ms Megan Bade Member of the Statutory Planning Committee Members Cr Corinne MacRae Local Government Mr Kent McDowall Independent, with Transport Expertise In attendance Mr John O'Hurley Department of Planning The members of the Hearings Committee met with Principal Planning Officer Mr John O'Hurhy at the corner of Corry Lynn Road and Stirling Highway, Claremont at 9.30am for inspections of specific sites referred to in submissions requesting a panel hearing. The Committee was briefed on submission themes and inspected properties between Methodist Ladies' College and North Fremantle via foot and vehicle The Committee concluded site inspections back at Corry Lynn Road at 12.30pm. CHAIRPERSON. DATE; Transcripts of hearings Day One Friday 4th October 2013 Minutes or the Committee hearing submissions on Metropolitan kegion Scheme Amendment 1210/41 - Rationalisation of Stirling Highway DAY ONE - Friday, 4 October 2013, 140 William Street, Perth The composition ot the hearings committee was endorsed by the Chairman of the Western Australian Planning Commission on 13 August 2013, in accordance wich the 27 October 2009 resolution of the Commission. Chairperson Ms Megan Barde Member of the Statutory Planning Committee Members Cr Corinne MacRae Local Government Mr Kent McDowall Independent, with Transport Expertise In attendance Ms Heather Brooks Department of Planning Ms Marija Bubanic Department of Planning Mr Justin McKirdy Main Roads WA representative Mr John O'Hurley Department of Planning Mr Steven Radley Department or Planning Mr Andrew Trevor Department of Planning The presiding officer acknowledged the traditional owners and custodians of the land on which the meeting is taking place and welcomed those present. Presentations to the Committee commenced at 10.16am. The proceedings were recorded by 'Spark & Cannon Pty Ltd'. The following people made presentations: 1) Ms Serverine Blanchard for submission number 294. Ms Blanchard represented herself. 2) Mr Glenn Evans for submission number 474. Mr Evans represented himself. 3) Mr Andrew Telford for submission number 332. Mr Telford represented Cromag Pty Ltd. 4) Mr Bruce Haynes for submission number 71. Mr Haynes represented himself. 5) Mr Ste\/e Allerdmg (Allerding & Associates) and Mr Denis McLeod (Two Twenty Investments P/L 8 Dion Nominees P/L) for submission number 446. Mr Allerding and Mr McLeod represented Two Twenty Investments Pty Ltd & Dion Nominees Pty Ltd. 7) Ms Amanda Butterworth (Allerding & Associates) and John Kitchen (Harman Holdings Pty Ltd) for submission number 447. Ms Butterworth and Mr Kitchen represented Harman Nominees Pty Ltd. 8) Mr James Cheah Kit Seng for submission number 40. Mr Cheah Kit Seng represented the landowners. 9) Mr Ian Flack and Father Peter Boyland (Parish Priest) for submission numbers 135 and 384. Mr Flack and Father Boyland represented the Anglican Parish of Chrisi: Church. 10) Mr Paul Kidd for submission number 125. Mr Kidd represented Ms Robvn Kidd and himself. The following person cancelled their appointment with the Hearings Committee; • Mr David K Davidson ror submission number 141, representing himself. The following people did not attend their appointment with the Hearings Committee: • Mr Scot & Mrs Clare Griffin for submission number 458, representing themselves. Ms Bartle declared the hearings closed at 3 19pm. Chairperson: Date: \t \z \ , MS SERVERINE BLANCHARD representing herself
Details
-
File Typepdf
-
Upload Time-
-
Content LanguagesEnglish
-
Upload UserAnonymous/Not logged-in
-
File Pages276 Page
-
File Size-