october 2003 recommended comp onents 10 03 THE 500 BEST AUDIO COMPONENTS COMPONENTS LISTED HERE HAVE BEEN FORMALLY REVIEWED IN STEREOPHILE AND HAVE BEEN FOUND TO BE AMONG THE BEST AVAILABLE IN EACH OF FOUR OR FIVE QUALITY CLASSES. WHETHER A COMPONENT IS LISTED IN CLASS A OR CLASS E, WE HIGHLY RECOMMEND ITS PURCHASE. ach listing — in alphabetical order within classes — is fol- We try to include in “Recommended Components” every prod- E lowed by a brief description of the product’s sonic uct that we have found to be truly excellent or that we feel characteristics and a code indicating the Stereophile Volume represents good value for money. Bear in mind that many differ- and Issue in which that product’s report appeared. Thus the ent tastes are represented. The listing is compiled after September 2003 issue is indicated as “Vol.26 No.9.” Please note consultation with Stereophile’s reviewing staff and editors, and that dedicated home-theater products are no longer included in takes into account continued experience of a product after the this listing but are part of Stereophile Guide to Home Theater’s formal review has been published. In particular, we take account “Recommended Components,” the most recent version of of unreliability and defects that show up after extended audi- which was published in that magazine’s March/April 2003 edition tioning. The fact that a product received a favorable review (Issue 63, Vol.9 No.3). cannot therefore be regarded as a guarantee that it will continue Some products listed have not yet been reported on; these are to appear in this listing. marked (NR), for “Not Reviewed.” We recommend that you The prices indicated are those current at the time the listing was read any product’s entire review before seriously contemplating compiled (August 2003). We cannot guarantee that any of these a purchase (products without reviews should therefore be treat- prices will be the same by the time this issue of Stereophile ed with more caution) — many salient characteristics, appears in print. peculiarities, and caveats appear in the reviews, but not here. Where we have found a product to perform much better To obtain back issues of the magazine, visit our website: than might be expected from its price, we have drawn atten- www.stereophile.com. We regret that we cannot supply photo- tion to it with a $$$ next to its listing. We also indicate, with copies or e-mail copies of individual reviews. Some reviews are a I, products that have been on this list in one incarnation or reprinted in our website “Archives” Section: these are marked another since the “Recommended Components” listing in “WWW.” More are added each week, so check the on-line list- Vol.23 No.10 (October 2000). Longevity in a hi-fi compo- ing. PDF files of past listings are also available for purchase. nent is rare enough that we think it worth noting (although Each $9.95 file includes a complete year’s worth of it can also indicate that the attention of design engineers has “Recommended Components.” moved elsewhere). In general, components do not remain listed for more than A note on editorial style is in order. When a passage is quoted three years unless at least one of the magazine’s writers and edi- from the original review, the past tense is used. But when the tors has had continued experience with them. Discontinuation comment is taken from a more recent private communication of a model also precludes its appearance. In addition, though from a reviewer, the present tense is used. For example: professional components — recorders, amplifiers, monitor “Sounded so good I had to cry,” said JA of the original version of speaker systems — can be obtained secondhand and can some- the Symphonic Bombast A-123 in his review. ST demurs, howev- times offer performance that would otherwise guarantee er, saying that the current Mk.VIa makes his reference speakers inclusion, we do not generally do so. Stereophile’s “sound like the woofers are disconnected!” “Recommended Components” listing is almost exclusively con- cerned with products currently available in the US through the We are not sympathetic toward letters complaining that the usual hi-fi retail outlets. Symphonic Bombast A-123 that we recommended heartily two years ago no longer makes it into “Recommended How recommendations are determined Components.” Where deletions are made, we endeavor to give The ratings given components included in this listing are based reasons (there are always reasons). But remember: Deletion of a entirely on performance — ie, accuracy of reproduction — and component from this list does not invalidate a buying decision are biased to an extent by our feeling that things added to you have made. reproduced sound (eg, flutter, distortion, colorations of various Individual reviewers mentioned by their initials are: John Atkinson, kinds) are of more concern to the musically oriented listener Paul Bolin, Lonnie Brownell, Martin Colloms, Brian Damkroger, than are things subtracted from the sound (eg, deep bass or ex- Robert Deutsch, Shannon Dickson, Art Dudley, Michael Fremer, treme treble). On the other hand, components markedly Corey Greenberg, Larry Greenhill, J. Gordon Holt, Lewis Lipnick, deficient in one or more respects are downrated to the extent John Marks, Paul Messenger, Thomas J. Norton, Wes Phillips, Bob that their deficiencies interfere with the full realization of the J. Reina, Kalman Rubinson, Markus Sauer, Jonathan Scull (J-10), program material. Chip Stern, Sam Tellig, and Barry Willis. October 2003 Recommended Components How to Use the Listings Carefully read our descriptions here, the original reviews, and Class A (heaven forbid) reviews in other magazines to put together a Best attainable sound for a component of its kind, without any short list of components to choose from. Evaluate your room, practical considerations; “the least musical compromise.” A Class your source material and front-end(s), your speakers, and your A system is one for which you don’t have to make a leap of faith tastes. With luck, you may come up with a selection to audition to believe that you’re hearing the real thing. With the recent at your favorite dealer(s). “Recommended Components” will not launches of Super Audio CD and 24/96 DAD, and the imminent tell you what to buy any more than Consumer Reports would pre- introduction of DVD-Audio, we have created a new Class, A+, for sume to tell you whom to marry! the best performance in those digital categories. Class A now represents the best that can be obtained from the conventional 16/44.1kHz CD medium. We also created a Class A+ category for turntables, to recognize the achivement of the Rockport Sirius. Class B The next best thing to the very best sound reproduction; Class B components generally cost less than those in Class A, but most Class B components are still quite expensive. Class C Somewhat lower-fi sound, but far more musically natural than average home-component high fidelity; products in this class are of high quality but still affordable. Class D Satisfying musical sound, but these components are either of sig- nificantly lower fidelity than the best available, or exhibit major compromises in performance — limited dynamic range, for example. Bear in mind that appearance in Class D still means that we recommend this product — it’s possible to put together a musically satisfying system exclusively from Class D components. Class E Applying only to loudspeakers, this “Entry Level” classification includes products that may have obvious defects, but are both inexpensive and much better than most products in their mid-fi price category. Class K “Keep your eye on this product.” Class K is for components that we have not reviewed (or have not finished testing), but that we have reason to believe may be excellent performers. We are not actually recommending these components, only suggesting you give them a listen. Though the report has yet to be published in certain cases, the reviewer and editor sometimes feel confident enough that the reviewer’s opinion is sufficiently well formed to include what otherwise would be an entry in one of the other classes, marked (NR). October 2003 Recommended Components low-flex plinth, its accurate, stable drive system, and, most of all, Turntables its sound or lack thereof, might just make it the finest turntable in the world.” Price does not include tonearm. Mikey preferred A+ the Graham 2.2 arm with the 30/2 in his system, rather than Rockport Technologies System III Sirius: $73,750 ✩ SME’s own Model IV.Vi. (Vol.26 No.3 WWW) What can you say about a $73,750 ’table and arm? The System III VPI TNT Mk.V: $6000 ✩ Sirius is all air-driven, exquisitely constructed, and 550 lbs in its Modular design allows owners of older models to upgrade easily stocking feet, with a “captured” linear-tracking, high-pressure, and inexpensively, or lets the impecunious begin with the TNT Jr. low-flow arm and bearing. It took all of 30 seconds for MF to real- and upgrade as finances allow. Slightly on the warm side of neu- ize that “it was in every way laughably better than anything else trality, asserted MF, but “big, full, weighty, and rich.” The I’d ever heard.” How so? “Its overall presentation was so much big- massive ’table’s speed stability and ultra-low noise floor “ ‘float- ger, more focused, solid, three-dimensional, sure-footed, dynamic, ed’ the sound so far beyond the reality of a stylus in a groove, it and seamless, that I lost my footing. Literally. I was floored!” It liberated it from the mechanical world to the living, breathing, rotates the LP with utter precision, “puts the stylus on a straight real musical world.” WP, a longtime Linnie, feels the current iter- and true path across the record surface, while allowing for precise ation finally swings realistically.