STATE OF CALIFORNIA - NATURAL RESOURCES AGENCY EDMUND G. BROWN, JR., GOVERNOR CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION South Coast Area Office 200 Oceangate, Suite 1000 Long Beach, CA 90802-4302 (562) 590-5071 Th25d February 10, 2015 ADDENDUM TO: Coastal Commissioners and Interested Parties FROM: South Coast District Staff SUBJECT: Addendum to Item Th25d City of Long Beach LCP Amendment No. 1-13 (Mobility Element) for the Commission Meeting of Thursday, February 12, 2015 A. CHANGES TO STAFF REPORT Additional language is shown as bold underline and language to be deleted is shown as strikethrough. 1. On page 3 of the staff report, modify the explanation of the motions as follows, to correct the requirements for passage of the motions: Motion I: I move that the Commission certify Land Use Plan Amendment No. 1-13 as submitted by the City of Long Beach. Staff recommends a NO vote of the foregoing motion. Failure of this motion will result in denial of the LUP Amendment as submitted and adoption of the following resolution and findings. The motion passes only by an affirmative vote of a majority of the appointed membership of the Commission Commissioners present. Resolution I: The Commission hereby denies certification of Land Use Plan Amendment No. 1-13 as submitted by the City of Long Beach and adopts the findings set forth below on grounds that the amendment does not conform with the policies of Chapter 3 of the Coastal Act. Certification of the Land Use Plan Amendment would not comply with the California Environmental Quality Act because there are feasible alternatives or mitigation measures which could substantially lessen any significant adverse impact which the Land Use Plan Amendment may have on the environment. Addendum to City of Long Beach LCP Amendment No. 1-13 Page 2 of 2 Motion II: I move that the Commission certify Land Use Plan Amendment No. 1-13 for the City of Long Beach if it is modified as suggested in this staff report. Staff recommends a YES vote. Passage of this motion will result in the certification of the LUP Amendment with suggested modifications and adoption of the following resolution and findings. The motion to certify with suggested modifications passes only upon an affirmative vote of a majority of the appointed membership of the Commission Commissioners present. 2. On page 9 of the staff report, add Coastal Act Chapter 3 Policy 30252, as it also protects public access and recreation: Section 30223 of the Coastal Act. Upland areas necessary to support coastal recreational uses shall be reserved for such uses, where feasible. Section 30252 of the Coastal Act. The location and amount of new development should maintain and enhance public access to the coast by (1) facilitating the provision or extension of transit service, (2) providing commercial facilities within or adjoining residential development or in other areas that will minimize the use of coastal access roads, (3) providing nonautomobile circulation within the development, (4) providing adequate parking facilities or providing substitute means of serving the development with public transportation, (5) assuring the potential for public transit for high intensity uses such as high-rise office buildings, and by (6) assuring that the recreational needs of new residents will not overload nearby coastal recreation areas by correlating the amount of development with local park acquisition and development plans with the provision of onsite recreational facilities to serve the new development. Section 30253(d) of the Coastal Act. New development shall do all of the following:... (d) minimize energy consumption and vehicle miles traveled. STATE OF CALIFORNIA – NATURAL RESOURCES AGENCY EDMUND G. BROWN, JR., GOVERNOR CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION South Coast Area Office 200 Oceangate, Suite 1000 Long Beach, CA 90802-4302 (562) 590-5071 Th25d January 22, 2015 TO: Commissioners and Interested Persons FROM: John Ainsworth, Senior Deputy Director Charles Posner, LCP Supervisor Zach Rehm, Coastal Program Analyst SUBJECT: Major Amendment Request No. 1-13 (LCP-5-LOB-13-0229-1) to the City of Long Beach Certified Local Coastal Program. For public hearing and Commission action at the Commission’s February 12, 2015 meeting in Pismo Beach. SUMMARY OF LCP AMENDMENT REQUEST NO. 1-13 The Coastal Commission certified the City of Long Beach Local Coastal Program (LCP) on July 22, 1980. Amendment Request No. 1-13 amends the certified Land Use Plan (LUP) to include the Mobility Element as published in 2013. The certified Land Use Plan does not currently have an element related to transportation, although it does have general policies and guidance language related to transportation within the City. The amendment does not change any specific policies related to transportation. The City of Long Beach Planning Commission held a public hearing for the Mobility Element on July 18, 2013. The City Council held a public hearing for the Mobility Element and the LCP amendment on October 15, 2013. The LCP amendment was submitted for Coastal Commission certification with City Council Resolution No. RES-13-0092. Amendment Request No. 1-13 was deemed officially submitted for Commission certification on December 19, 2013. On February 20, 2014, the Commission extended for one year the time limit for its review of the LCP amendment request. The City’s submittal is consistent with the requirements of the Coastal Act and the regulations which govern such proposals (Sections 30501, 30510, 30514 and 30605 of the Coastal Act, and Sections 13551, 13552 and 13553 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations). SUMMARY OF STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff is recommending that the Commission certify the Mobility Element with suggested modifications, including the elimination of page 53 which contains incorrect information related to at least one preferential parking district and cannot be certified. Additionally, staff suggests modifications to some existing guidance language in the Land Use Plan to make it consistent with the Mobility Element and with the public access policies of the Coastal Act. The modifications would replace outdated language (written in 1980) identifying Long Beach as lacking non-motorized public access opportunities. The suggested modifications would identify Long Beach as a City embracing public transit, cycling, and walking, and would set new strategies for motorized vehicle access and parking. Commission staff worked with City staff on the suggested modifications and the City is in agreement. Staff is recommending that the Commission, after public hearing: 1. Deny the LUP amendment request as submitted; and, 2. Certify, only if modified, the LUP amendment request. City of Long Beach LCP Amendment Request No. 1-13 (LCP-5-LOB-13-0229-1) STANDARD OF REVIEW The standard of review for the proposed amendment to the Land Use Plan (LUP), pursuant to Section 30512 and 30514 of the Coastal Act, is that the proposed LUP amendment meets the requirements of, and is in conformance with the Chapter 3 policies of the Coastal Act. SUBSTANTIVE FILE DOCUMENTS 1. City of Long Beach certified Local Coastal Program (LCP), 7/22/1980. 2. Coastal Development Permit Appeal No. A-5-LOB-97-259 (City of Long Beach), 10/7/1997 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The LCP Amendment file is available for review at the South Coast District office located in the Molina Center, 200 Oceangate, Suite 1000, Long Beach, 90802. The staff report can be viewed on the Commission’s website: www.ca.coastal.ca.gov. The Mobility Element can be viewed on the City of Long Beach’s website: http://www.lbds.info/mobility_element/default.asp. For additional information, contact Zach Rehm in the South Coast District office at (562) 590-5071. 2 City of Long Beach LCP Amendment Request No. 1-13 (LCP-5-LOB-13-0229-1) I. MOTIONS AND RESOLUTIONS Motion I: I move that the Commission certify Land Use Plan Amendment No. 1-13 as submitted by the City of Long Beach. Staff recommends a NO vote of the foregoing motion. Failure of this motion will result in denial of the LUP Amendment as submitted and adoption of the following resolution and findings. The motion passes only by an affirmative vote of a majority of the Commissioners present. Resolution I: The Commission hereby denies certification of Land Use Plan Amendment No. 1-13 as submitted by the City of Long Beach and adopts the findings set forth below on grounds that the amendment does not conform with the policies of Chapter 3 of the Coastal Act. Certification of the Land Use Plan Amendment would not comply with the California Environmental Quality Act because there are feasible alternatives or mitigation measures which could substantially lessen any significant adverse impact which the Land Use Plan Amendment may have on the environment. Motion II: I move that the Commission certify Land Use Plan Amendment No. 1-13 for the City of Long Beach if it is modified as suggested in this staff report. Staff recommends a YES vote. Passage of this motion will result in the certification of the LUP Amendment with suggested modifications and adoption of the following resolution and findings. The motion to certify with suggested modifications passes only upon an affirmative vote of a majority of the Commissioners present. Resolution II: The Commission hereby certifies Land Use Plan Amendment No. 1-13 for the City of Long Beach if modified as suggested and adopts the findings set forth below on grounds that the Land Use Plan Amendment with the suggested modifications will meet the requirements of and be in conformity with the policies of Chapter 3 of the Coastal Act. Certification of the Land Use Plan Amendment if modified as suggested complies with the California Environmental Quality Act because either 1) feasible mitigation measures and/or alternatives have been incorporated to substantially lessen any significant adverse effects of the plan on the environment, or 2) there are no further feasible alternatives and mitigation measures that would substantially lessen any significant adverse impacts which the Land Use Plan Amendment may have on the environment.