The Changing Face of Current Affairs Television Programmes in New Zealand 1984 – 2004

The Changing Face of Current Affairs Television Programmes in New Zealand 1984 – 2004

The Changing Face of Current Affairs Television Programmes in New Zealand 1984 – 2004 Sarah Jane Baker PhD 2012 School of Communication Studies Faculty of Design and Creative Technologies A thesis submitted to the Auckland University of Technology in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of a PhD. i TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................ vi ATTESTATION OF AUTHORSHIP ............................................................................... viii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ................................................................................................. xi ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................... xii CHAPTER ONE: NATIONAL AND INSTITUTIONAL CONTEXTS OF CURRENT AFFAIRS TELEVISION .................................................................................................. 1 British public service broadcasting ........................................................................... 2 The history and conception of ‘current affairs’ television programmes ................... 10 Current affairs programmes in Australia ................................................................ 13 Public affairs television in the United States .......................................................... 17 Current affairs programming in New Zealand ........................................................ 22 The 1990s and 2000s: Current affairs in crisis ....................................................... 31 CHAPTER TWO CONCEPTUALISING THE CHANGING GENRE OF CURRENT AFFAIRS TELEVISION ................................................................................................. 34 The political economy approach ............................................................................ 34 The critical political economy research tradition ..................................................... 41 The political economy approach and commodification/ commercialisation of Media ............................................................................................................................... 42 Deregulation ........................................................................................................... 47 Panorama/World in Action ..................................................................................... 54 Market driven journalism ........................................................................................ 60 Tabloidisation ......................................................................................................... 62 The rise of infotainment ......................................................................................... 65 A changing genre ................................................................................................... 70 Research on the news and current affairs genres in New Zealand ........................ 73 Charter principles versus commercial news and current affairs ............................. 80 after 1999 ............................................................................................................... 80 Summary ................................................................................................................ 84 CHAPTER THREE: SCOPE OF METHODOLOGY ...................................................... 87 Content analysis of news: Quantitative and qualitative approaches ...................... 87 ii The British template: Barnett & Seymour’s study (1999). ...................................... 90 New Zealand research ........................................................................................... 97 Comrie’s analysis of TVNZ news ........................................................................... 98 Comrie’s qualitative methodology .................................................................... 101 A summary of Comrie’s findings .......................................................................... 104 The study by Cook ............................................................................................... 105 The design of this content analysis study ............................................................ 106 The combination of approaches and the New Zealand current ............................ 113 affairs study .......................................................................................................... 113 Programme selection ........................................................................................... 114 Programme types ................................................................................................. 115 The sample and coding ........................................................................................ 116 Subject categories ............................................................................................... 116 Summary .............................................................................................................. 121 CHAPTER FOUR: QUANTITATIVE FINDINGS ........................................................ 122 Research Question One:...................................................................................... 122 Current affairs television 1984: Pre-deregulation, item lengths ..................... 123 Current affairs television 1984-1994: Before and after deregulation, ............ 125 a comparison of item lengths for Close Up and 20/20. .................................. 125 Current affairs television 1984-1994: Before and after deregulation, ............ 126 a comparison of item lengths for Sunday and 20/20. ..................................... 126 Current affairs programmes 1994: Following deregulation. ........................... 127 Current affairs television. From deregulation to the Charter. A ......................... 128 comparison of 1994 and 2004 current affairs programmes. .............................. 128 Current affairs television: Pre-Deregulation, de-regulation and the ................... 129 Charter: A comparison of 1984, 1994 and 2004 current affairs ......................... 129 programmes. ..................................................................................................... 129 Research question 2: ........................................................................................... 134 Current affairs television: Pre-Deregulation-deregulation, 1984- .................. 134 1994. Close Up and Sunday 1984 .................................................................. 134 A comparison of Close Up / Sunday 1984 and 20/20 1994 ........................... 135 A comparison of Close Up / Sunday 1984 and Holmes 1994 ........................... 137 Current affairs television: Deregulation-The Charter, 1994-2004. ................. 138 iii A comparison of 20/20 1994 and Sunday 2004. ............................................ 138 A comparison of Holmes 1994 and Holmes 2004. ......................................... 140 Research question three: ..................................................................................... 143 Close Up 1984 and Sunday 1984 ................................................................... 144 Close Up and Sunday 1984 compared to 20/20 in 1994 ............................... 144 Close Up and Sunday 1984 compared to Holmes 1994 ................................ 145 Current affairs television: Did entertainment-oriented subjectmatter increase; de-regulation- charter period, 1994 and 2004 ................................................ 146 Holmes 1994 compared to Holmes 2004 .......................................................... 147 Holmes 2004 compared to Sunday 2004. ......................................................... 147 Overall trends .................................................................................................... 148 Research question 4: ........................................................................................... 150 A comparison of Close Up and Sunday in 1984- pre-deregulation ............... 152 A comparison of Close Up/Sunday in 1984 and 20/20 in 1994 ..................... 153 A comparison of Close Up/Sunday in 1984 and Holmes in 1994 .................. 154 Source changes from deregulation to the Charter-1994-2004. ..................... 155 A comparison of 20/20 1994 and Sunday 2004. ............................................ 155 Holmes 1994 and Holmes 2004. ..................................................................... 156 Source Types for Holmes 1994 and Sunday 2004 ......................................... 157 Research question five: ....................................................................................... 158 A comparison of Close Up and Sunday in 1984. ............................................... 159 A comparison of Close Up and Sunday 1984 and 20/20 in 1994. ................. 160 A comparison of Close Up and Sunday 1984 and Holmes in 1994............... 161 A comparison of 20/20 in 1994 and Sunday in 2004. .................................... 162 A comparison of Holmes in 1994 and Holmes in 2004. ................................. 163 General trends in 1984, 1994 and 2004. ........................................................ 164 Summary.............................................................................................................. 164 CHAPTER FIVE: QUALITATIVE FINDINGS..............................................................

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    260 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us